The Online Photographer

Bruce Polin

Big congratulations to TOP reader Bruce Polin, whose work is being highlighted on the Lens blog of the New York Times.

Bruce Polin, Jay and Missy, Prospect Park, 2018

The work consists of traditional 8x10 film (FP4 and HP5) environmental portraits that are both meditative and collaborative. I really enjoyed the portfolio, which is called "What's the Opposite of a Cellphone Photo?"

Have a look at Bruce's work!

Mike
(Thanks to Bruce)

P.S. By the way, the mysterious "boxy, old-fashioned Japanese mechanism that shot on plates [sic] of film 8 inches by 10 inches" is a Toyo 810MII, and Bruce's whole rig, including the cart he wheels it all around on, does indeed weigh in excess of 100 lbs., as the article says.

Original contents copyright 2019 by Michael C. Johnston and/or the bylined author. All Rights Reserved. Links in this post may be to our affiliates; sales through affiliate links may benefit this site.

Want to help?

(To see all the comments, click on the "Comments" link below.)
Featured Comments from:

David Comdico: "Beautiful portraits. The intense regard of both the sitter and the photographer creates a forceful moment. What is often missing in photographs made today is this level of commitment, given how easy it is to make a (thoughtless) picture with our (smart) phones and cameras."

Bruce Alan Greene: "It seems to me here, that the great advantage of the large format, besides its awesome image quality, is...its very bulk and slow process. What better 'ice breaker' to connect with strangers in a park than a wagon full of old fashioned and fascinating photographic machinery! And I'm sure that many new friendships were made here as well. Bravo Bruce Polin!"

Two Catalogs

For those of you who are into film and darkroom, Freestyle's new catalog is out. It's very splashy.

For those of you who are into Micro 4/3, the new Micro Four Thirds Joint Lens Catalog is out. The catalog is limited to products offered by companies that formally participate in the 4/3 consortium. There are other lenses available from companies that don't participate but just copy the mount. Leica has more expensive lenses, Canon and Nikon have useful if somewhat scattershot lines, Sony furiously produces lenses with planning that appears to constantly change, Fuji's lineup is the most sensible and well-considered (and my personal favorite), but for variety and pure photogeek fun I don't think anything out there beats Micro 4/3.

Mike
(Thanks to Oren Grad)

Original contents copyright 2019 by Michael C. Johnston and/or the bylined author. All Rights Reserved. Links in this post may be to our affiliates; sales through affiliate links may benefit this site.

Want to help?

(To see all the comments, click on the "Comments" link below.)
Featured Comments from:

No featured comments yet—please check back soon!

Open Mike: Kirk Tuck Takes a Break

I would usually make jokes about "Open Mike" ("the often off-topic Editorial page of TOP") being a day late, but this is no time for cracking wise. Yesterday I didn't feel like writing this. I was feeling a curious species of grief. I got an email yesterday from my Texan colleague-in-arms and e-friend-I've-never-met, Kirk Tuck, who told me that he is hanging up his spurs for a while and stabling his blog, The Visual Science Lab. 

Kirk

No problem
He assured me that nothing's wrong. He hasn’t been injured, he's not sick, not broke, and he's not miffed or having a spat with anyone. (Kirk is an uncommonly good-natured guy, as you might guess). Still, the news is bittersweet.

He's leaving the site up and not officially calling it quits—he's leaving the door open for a return one day. That's the sweet part. The bitter part was Kirk's characteristic straight, unadorned honesty about what it's like to toil in a declining field. (That the field—writing about photography online—also happens to be my own doesn't help soothe the sting.) In the public announcement he made yesterday, he said things like: "Photography has changed profoundly since the inception of this blog in 2009," and "I sometimes feel as though I'm showcasing a style of lighting (and portrait engagement) that's become more of a temporal sign post of past practices than any good learning curriculum about current styles and trends," and "[I] can hardly shake the feeling that photography as we knew it and practiced it has changed so profoundly that the Visual Science Lab is now, more or less, irrelevant."

Sad to hear him say that.

Doesn't matter if any of us agree with that assessment (I don't, and maybe you don't either). It's the way Kirk feels. I get that, because I feel mournful over a lot of things these days. Not just things in my personal life, but the "drifting away" of things like prints as the end-product of photography; books on paper as the way to read long-form writing; principled, orderly government in my native country; and even...email. Commercialism has more or less ruined email as a means of convenient private communication among citizens, and our methods of staying in touch have begun to fragment into different walled-off corners of a Babel called "social media." I think that's a shame culturally and socially. An opportunity missed.

Imagine, mourning for email.

There's a (German) word for that
Maybe it's just the Weltschmerz* of a good guy getting on in years. And if so we might find that fact hard to stomach because, frankly, we just like Kirk, that's all. He can write about swimming or whatever else he cares about, like I can write about things like pool and stereos and George Kittredge and the meaning of words, in his usual voluble, articulate, friend-over-the-fence way, and we're pleased to spend time in his company. That doesn't seem to require "relevance" to continue. But on the other hand, all good things must come to an end; things rise, things fall. Where the truth of that is concerned, there's nothing new under the sun.

Kirk has other ways to make a living and lots of other things to do, at least. He is an accomplished and energetic professional with a mutifaceted business. He has five times the energy and business ability I do. If I were faced with the task of supporting myself with my photography, hoo law, in no time at all I'd be a shivering little girl in a ragged shawl selling pencils out of a tin cup in Dickensian London! They'd cart me off to the grim 'n' grimy workhouse instanter. Kirk also decided early on not to monetize his blog, and he notes that "last month was the first month that the blog logged a negative fifty six cents for affiliate earnings." I'm loathe to make this post about me (in my 12-step program we chide each other for egocentrism with the phrase "it's all about me/you," which can be topped with a question mark or an exclamation point, can fire in any direction, and can be a reminder, a note of caution, or a zinger), but TOP is being preserved—saved!—by the 682 "core readers" who are sending along a few bucks every month via Patreon. It's a neat solution, if you ask me...it's like switching to a subscription-only model but without closing the doors to the public. I still need about 200 more supporters, or 300 if Providence is kind. But currently one or two more trickle in every day, so by Summer maybe we'll have made that mark.

But I digress. (Can we be generous and say that digression is part of my charm?) Anyway, I've offered Kirk carte-blanche** to pen guest posts here on TOP any time he wants to, about any subject he's moved to unspool his thoughts about. We have a fair amount of overlap in our readerships, so I figured it could be a nice way for him to occasionally connect with part of his old audience. Don't know if he will take me up on that, but I shall renew the invitation from time to time. It's the most I can do, but it's also the least I can do.

New chapter
Bottom line: New chapter for our friend. Let's try not to be sad.

Wishing Kirk the best.

Mike
(Thanks to John Camp and several other readers)

*A German word with a fascinating history. Literally "world pain," it's defined as "a feeling of melancholy and world-weariness."

**Literally "blank document" in French, it means "to give full discretionary power."

Original contents copyright 2019 by Michael C. Johnston and/or the bylined author. All Rights Reserved. Links in this post may be to our affiliates; sales through affiliate links may benefit this site.

Here’s the situation

(To see all the comments, click on the "Comments" link below.)
Featured Comments from:

Martin D: "Weltschmerz is a fine and essentially critical word describing a slightly over-the-top mental state that is, I think, particular to German-language culture and quite different from the kind of sadness you are reporting on. Your sadness relates to a feeling where someone who has experienced a certain richness in some aspects of social life now sees this social richness diminishing. The loss is real; the diminished reality is felt against the contrast of a richer one that was part of the sad person's actual experience.

"Weltschmerz I think is different, the image to have before you is 'young man who regrets all the things he could have done.' A young person who feels a kind of pre-emptive feeling of nostalgia and loss. Having had a small number of deeply-felt actual experiences, and a large number of imagined ones, the young man regrets the way the world is going, having barely done any real living yet. I cannot prove it but I am quite sure that this is what we refer to when we talk of Weltschmerz. I will think some more on whether we have a German-culture term for the kind of real loss of environmental richness and authenticity that you describe; many of us no doubt feel similarly."

Paul Richardson: "On a related note, just yesterday I was perusing a list of recommended photography blogs that I was unfamiliar with, for the most part. The list, as far as I could tell, was about four years old. Anyway, I checked the sites out, and sad to say, almost all of them had been inactive for at least a couple of years, some longer. I think this speaks to how exhausting it must be to stay at it over time, no matter how passionate you are—and I’m assuming you’d have to be pretty passionate about your subject to start a blog in the first place. I tried blogging for a while about ten years ago, and after a few months I started feeling like I was talking to myself. I got discouraged and gave up. So I congratulate anyone who stays with it for years. I don’t know how you do it, but I’m glad that you do."

John: "I’ve not been reading Kirk’s blog for that long, but I do recall this is the second time since I started that he said he would stop blogging. I’ll expect him back soon, expect and hope, because he and you are my only daily blog reads."

Bruce: "I, too, lament Kirk's 'slowing down'...my top three 'favourites' on my feed are TOP, Kirk Tuck, and LuLa...(loved, then left, revisited, and it's sort of growing back). Beautiful writing from you both; I can't begin to admire the output of both of you both—and, yes, I make a very small contribution through Patreon to you, Mike. Kirk's contribution to the business of photography reinforced what a huge job it is to make a living in this fickle world. Without any obvious monetisation from his site. Who could have predicted this conversation even fifteen years ago, let alone thirty (only 1989!!) The speed of change is only mirrored by the slowdown of us 'oldies' (I'm 70, and still active in a fairly diverse area of corporate photography) trying to keep up with the world. Fortunately, I'm still relatively fit, but can't hold a candle to Kirk and his swimming! But I still get gigs as a wedding photographer, 'cos I can interact with people and make them laugh.... What else do you need???"

Paul: "I’m a regular VSL reader and will miss his posts. I don’t know how he’s managed running a photography business, family commitments, taking photos for fun, swimming and blogging. Just writing this makes me feel tired. I wish him all the best at what ever he chooses to do."

Dire Predictions

• I don't subscribe to the Nikkei (the Nihon Keizai Shinbun, the world's largest financial newspaper) and I don't speak or read Japanese, but according to the Google-translated intro to this interview with Canon President Fujio Mitarai, Canon fears that that market for digital cameras could shrink by "about half" in the next two years.

The estimate is a likely a worst-case scenario and the culprit is most likely the rapid improvement of smartphone cameras. The market in higher-end stand-alone ILC cameras will remain sizeable. However, the coming years may in some ways be just as volatile and uncertain for the industry as the early years of the digital transition.

This doesn't have to affect photographers, who will continue to be able to get what they need for their work. And it may just be that photography is changing into something different than we once conceived it to be, something we can't quite envisage yet. One thing's for sure though: the years of vigorous growth in the camera industry as we've known it appear to be ending.

• Meanwhile, according to an article in Witness ("a magazine for new thinking and new talent in visual journalism and storytelling" published by the World Press Photo Foundation) by Lewis Bush, photojournalism itself might be in jeopardy. He begins by assigning an approximate centenary (now) to photojournalism itself, and, wondering whether it will survive another century, poses what he considers three key questions: "who are we photographing, and why?", "how are we photographing these things, and why?", and "who are we photographing for?"

He ends on an up note, but it sounds a tad forced. There are many reasons why the relationship between democracy and the press is less stable now, and not all of them relate to the upheaval in technologies and established business models.

An interesting read for photographers and other citizens.

Mike
(Thanks to several readers)

Original contents copyright 2019 by Michael C. Johnston and/or the bylined author. All Rights Reserved. Links in this post may be to our affiliates; sales through affiliate links may benefit this site.

Harsh reality

(To see all the comments, click on the "Comments" link below.)
Featured Comments from:

D. Hufford: "May I be a selfish SOB and say 'who cares?' If the market for digital cameras falls by 50%, why should I care? I have the cameras I need and can get nearly any camera that I imagine that I would want. Should the market actually shrink by that much, I think I will be just fine. My problems with my photography have little to nothing to do with cameras or the market for them.

"Of course you already more or less wrote that. No doubt photography is changing into something new and different than it was. It has to. It cannot continue being more or less a rehash of past photography only with more megapixels and sharpness. Technology has advanced much further than photography."

Glenn Brown: "It is dire right now for me as a pro business photographer in Toronto. Firms have found someone in their staff that is 'good' at taking photos: and they now do the internal photos. I still am hired for the executives and that means about 30 people a year and not over 100 as before. Other run of the mill jobs for cheque presentations etc. do not exist. I used to earn $160 to $180k per year; now that is $80k. Luckily I will retire in May and always planned to have a few clients to 'keep my hand in' so I will be OK. I worry for young people just starting in the profession.

"P.S., Glad you settled into the tea world. My wife was pleased for you."

Thom Hogan: "I'll much more to say about this soon (I've already written one article on Mitarai-san's comment). It's not as dire as he made it sound, but it's real. The compact camera market continues to collapse, which is what really drives the numbers most. Interchangeable-lens cameras (ILC's) are on a long glide slope down. The two together make for a real problem if your business is based upon number of cameras of all types you sell, which is sort of where Canon Imaging was. Sony announced their numbers this week, too, and their unit volume is down significantly, and it's all again in compacts. Almost 20 million camera units were shipped in 2018. So 50% is 10m units. That very well could end up as 8m ILC and 2m compacts in a couple of years. Indeed, based upon the other things Canon said at their financials, I believe that to be Mitarai-san's thesis."

Benjamin Marks: "For those who ask, 'why should I care?' the answer is simple. Supply and demand. As the demand shrinks, the supply will too, and then prices will rise because the cost of making a new camera will have to be spread over a smaller number of units. Also, innovation will slow, because there will be fewer engineers working on advancing the tech, because the profits won't support a larger number of problem solvers, whose salaries also come from the sale of a smaller number of units. Finally, smaller brands, like Pentax, may not be able to compete and will go the way of Konica, Contax, and so on. In a general sense, we (photographers) have been very lucky over the last decade or so. Many choices, many price points, quite low price-per-shutter actuation compared to the days of film only. So maybe that will be changing."

Cameras Can Be Dangerous

There's a new peril that art museums, curators, and guard staff have to worry about now—people destroying art while attempting to take selfies of themselves with it.

...That being, of course, what art is there for.

We already know that people get run over by trains while making portraits and fall off cliffs while taking selfies. Not to mention the tragically dangerous and sometimes fatal things daredevils do in order to get themselves noticed on social media. But now people are inadvertently acting like tiny-brained Taliban in art galleries, toppling statues and, in one startling video at the link, tipping over a row of museum pedestals like dominoes.

The next trend? Selfie-safe art, maybe? Sort of an adult-toddler version of what parents do to protect literal toddlers from household mishaps, like putting padding on the sharp corners of coffee tables. Maybe there should be an app that automatically texts all phones within a 30-foot radius of unprotected art, warning that ART BREAKS! Or brakes, for those confused by vowel combinations.

(By the way, there are no more adults. That's the problem. They all died, and no one came along to replace them. That's my General Theory of the Contemporary World. I don't let myself off the hook, either.)

Cameras can be dangerous in the wrong hands. Just a public service reminder from your friends at TOP, in support of art.

—A Grumpy Old Beardy Guy

Original contents copyright 2018 by Michael C. Johnston and/or the bylined author. All Rights Reserved. Links in this post may be to our affiliates; sales through affiliate links may benefit this site.

B&H Photo • Amazon US • Amazon UK
Amazon Germany • Amazon Canada • Adorama

(To see all the comments, click on the "Comments" link below.)
Featured Comments from:

Benjamin Marks: "The Metropolitan Museum of Art will not let you in wearing a photo-backpack (wearing any backpack really). Your choices are to wear it on your front like a baby-Bjorn, check the bag, or return another day. Over-the-shoulder camera bags are OK, though. I assume that the rule went into effect after one or more near disasters."

Sal Santamaura: "Re 'there are no more adults'.... Yes there are. I am one. It's very lonely, and all the children mock adults' maturity. Oh, well, I yam what I yam.  :-)  "

Mike replies: I'm not certain adults use smileys. Or quote Popeye. Nyuk nuk-nuk-nuk.  :-)

Yonatan K: "Regarding your comment that all the adults have died, I have a different theory—conservation of intelligence. There is a constant amount of intelligence in the world, but the population is growing.

"Happy New Year!"

Richard Parkin: "Perfect! Take a selfie with (insert famous art object here) then destroy it and no one can copy you. Video the whole process and that will be a piece of performance art that galleries will bid for to replace the art you destroyed. A win all round, I think...."

Paul Mcevoy: "One of the most amazing things I ever saw was a tourist who kept backing up near a Warhol at MoMA until her butt actually touched it and you could see the fabric tighten a little bit. The guards almost tackled her. I find MoMA visitors dumber than the average visitor and the guards look extremely anxious at all times. Like that might not have been the only butt they pulled off that Warhol that day."

Mike replies: On the plus side, "pulling butts off Warhols" gets high marks as a job description for cocktail parties.

Ron Hampel: "This reminds me of a visit this past summer to the Belvedere museum in Vienna. A large group of patrons were gathered around GustavKlimt’s 'The Kiss.' Several among them were taking selfies; some doing so while acrobatically trying to mimic the couple’s pose in the painting. This display of self-absorption took place despite a large sign recommending people take selfies in front of the copy of the painting in the next room designed for this purpose. This caused so much traffic in front of the genuine painting so as to make it nearly impossible to see it and enjoy it. To say that this was aggravating is an understatement."

tex andrews: "I work in one of the museums in the linked article (and there was way more damage than was stated...). I actually feel like it's not just the selfie phenomenon. People just don't understand how to behave anymore. From people walking around in their pajamas, to laissez-faire parents, to cluelessness in museums, to loudness on public transport, and on and on. People no longer seem to understand that there's a difference between your own living room or bedroom, and space that is public and must be shared with everyone else. In the case of museums, if I were a museum director, I'd institute restrictions on entry and requirements to watch an orientation video that had stern warnings on how to behave. I'd also make those responsible for damage liable for the conservation costs—and let people know in advance just how high those costs might be."

Just Because Russell A. Kirsch Has Forgotten Who He Is, Doesn't Mean We Have To

Scanned photo of his young son Walden by Russell A. Kirsch,
considered by common consent the first digitally scanned image

Decline and death are an indivisible part of living. We're like flowers, which unfurl from a seed, grow, thrive, and bloom—then drop their petals, wither, perish and become one again with the soil in which they grew. In a way, finding it sad is...I don't know, indulgent? Some word like that. It's really only...natural. (The cycle of birth and death grows more profound to us as we age.)

This short article at Oregon Live about Russell A. Kirsch strikes me as sad even though maybe it's not. It's a brief glimpse into his life now, near the end of his decline.

Kirsch was one of the digital pioneers. He was the leader of the team at the National Institute of Standards and Technology that developed the first digital scanner in 1957. I've been reading Steven Pinker's Enlightenment Now recently, and finding it very thought-provoking (that term isn't just book-blurb boilerplate; it means what it says, i.e. a book that often sends you off on trails of thought of your own), and I can't help but view Russell Kirsch through the prism of the values the book defends.

Kirsch's has been a useful life, and by several accounts a happy one. His wife is still taking care of him. For the time it takes you to scan this one article, I thought you might want to acquaint with him, if you never have previously.

I look forward to the time when a standard scholarly work about the digital pioneers will illumine all of their biographies, after the fashion of Vasari, Plutarch, or Johnson. (Or Harold C. Schonberg, whose Lives of the Great Composers I enjoyed.) Hope I'm around to read it.

Mike
(Thanks to JG)

Original contents copyright 2018 by Michael C. Johnston and/or the bylined author. All Rights Reserved. Links in this post may be to our affiliates; sales through affiliate links may benefit this site.

B&H Photo • Amazon US • Amazon UK
Amazon Germany • Amazon Canada • Adorama

(To see all the comments, click on the "Comments" link below.)
Featured Comments from:

Jim Fix: "Thank you for that article. I met Russell at the start of my computer science teaching gig at Reed in Portland, must've been 2001 or so, probably before his condition had really taken root. I worked semi-regularly at the bakery they mention in that article, Ken's. One day there I was grading papers with 'automata diagrams' on them. There was this dapper, smiling fellow across the table from me, and he struck up a conversation about those diagrams. He was full of energy and curiosity, and natural charm, and he slowly revealed to me the details of his pioneering work, including the scanner prototype he had built, and the National Standards computer he had helped invent. Quite a resumé.

"He apparently was quite fond of images and art, definitely influenced by the life he had with his art historian wife. If I remember correctly, in retirement he was collaborating with her on ways that technology could be meaningfully used to analyze and preserve works of art, especially if it allowed others to share in his wonder about the artistic impulse. I think they had just returned from a visit to a major cave painting site in France, and he was full of ideas about that.

"I was grateful for the conversation, and my own luck, and was happy to learn that he had taken on teaching the same kind of automata material to his group of retired friends, ones that wanted to stay fascinated and engaged with the world around them, even the digital one. Despite his stature, his generosity during our chat left me feeling validated, and with an extra energy that I carried back to my own work.

"Funny how a shared love of a good cup of coffee and a Ken's 'morning bun' can lead to all sorts of other connection. You never know who your neighbor is and what they've been part of, and it's often good to put in a little work to find out.

"I am sorry to learn about his condition and its effect on his loving family. I got to witness a man who seemed filled to the brim with riches."

Mike replies: What a great memory. Thanks for sharing it, Jim.

Lowest Prices Ever

...Should there be eight exclamation points at the end of that title?

But my contacts at B&H Photo tell me these actually are the lowest prices on these items they've ever offered. (It's possible you might be able to find them advertised for even less, but then you wouldn't be dealing with B&H Photo. They clearly label anything that's gray market ("Imported"), they never bait-and-switch, they never sell open-box as new, their delivery is quick and efficient, and they offer generous, no-hassle returns. Dealing with B&H is as safe as mail-order gets.)

I think these deals are just for today? Not sure. On to the news:

Sony A9 body, ONE THOUSAND DOLLARS OFF (lowest price ever)

Canon 6D Mark II, $500 off and a grip for free (lowest price ever)

Canon EF 16–35mm ƒ/2.8 III wide angle zoom, $300 off. This deal ends at the end of the day (11:59 p.m. EST) on Wednesday.

Canon EOS 5D Mark IV, $500 off (lowest price ever)

Sony A7RIII, $400 off (lowest price ever)

Older Sony A7RII, only $1,598, (lowest price ever) (42 MP and IBIS...no, Mike. Down boy.)

Canon 24–70mm ƒ/2.8 II normal zoom (if you haven't seen Roger's teardown of this lens, check it out. He concluded, "Would I get one? Of course—I’m a resolution freak, a gear-head, and I don’t have a 24–70. I’ve just examined the highest resolving zoom lens I’ve ever tested and found it’s also built and designed superbly. I can’t walk away from that combination.")

Canon 100–400mm ƒ/4.5–5.6 IS II, $400 off

Canon EOS 5D Mark IV with 24–70mm ƒ/4, $650 off (lowest price ever. Also comes with an extra battery, the BG-E20 battery grip, a SanDisk 64 GB Extreme Pro memory card, and a shoulder bag, all thrown in to sweeten the deal.)

A few other things are on sale, but those are the big deals. Go nuts! (But careful, don't spend the rent money.)

Mike

Original contents copyright 2018 by Michael C. Johnston and/or the bylined author. All Rights Reserved. Links in this post may be to our affiliates; sales through affiliate links may benefit this site.

B&H Photo • Amazon US • Amazon UK
Amazon Germany • Amazon Canada • Adorama

(To see all the comments, click on the "Comments" link below.)
Featured Comments from:

Geoff Wittig: "If you've ever lusted after Canon's 16–35mm ƒ/2.8L III, just buy it. I can't praise it highly enough. I wasn't much of a wide angle user previously, tending to favor ~70–120 mm equivalent or so, but this lens has changed the way I see. Build quality is fabulous, handling is impeccable, and it's sharp edge to edge even wide open. Distortion is trivial, especially for this focal length range. It's much, much better than versions I and II."

Michael Perini: "I would second Geoff's comment about Canon's 16–35mm ƒ/2.8 III. I bought it and the new 24–70 ƒ/2.8—they are about as good as lenses get. Not only are they dead sharp, they both focus nearly instantly. But more than that, they create images that have a 'rightness' and depth about them. They are both better than most primes. I also own the 17mm T/S which I thought was in a league of its own—it now has company."

Oskar Ojala: "I paid nearly a grand more for my Sony A7RII when I bought it. Tells a lot about the camera market today. I still use it as my main camera, several times a week, and it was the mirrorless that made me completely give up on DSLRs. Yes, it has some quirks, but so do all cameras, and I get results consistently, so I'm not looking for a new camera right now (although the raw speed of the A9 is tempting...). And 42 megapixels might be too much, but it still looks stunning even if I need to crop."

Everything Went WHAT For a Minute?!

All right, all right, settle down, Doonesbury.

Slaggin' my beloved B&W!

Mike
(Thanks to Scott Kirkpatrick)

P.S. My iPhone now tells me how many minutes I used it the day before. Twenty-seven minutes yesterday, probably because I used the GPS to find my way from Geneva to Dundee....

Original contents copyright 2018 by Michael C. Johnston and/or the bylined author. All Rights Reserved. Links in this post may be to our affiliates; sales through affiliate links may benefit this site.

B&H Photo • Amazon US • Amazon UK
Amazon Germany • Amazon Canada • Adorama

(To see all the comments, click on the "Comments" link below.)
Featured Comments from:

SteveW: "No comment."

Essays Odd Wondrous and Strange

Universal Newsreel from 1933 showing Cecil H. Dill, a farmer from Traverse City, Michigan, demonstrating his ability to render popular melodies by pressing his hands together. After the performance, which seems to be of Yankee Doodle, Dill, while staring rather intensely into the camera, modestly tells how he discovered his unusual talent.

This is by way of noting that today is the last day to order The Public Domain Review: Selected Essays, Vol. V for the introductory price and with delivery before Christmas. I have no affiliation! PDR is one of the sites I visit occasionally because they post essays about photography like this one about the blinds and camouflages used by early nature photographers the Kearton brothers.

—Yr. Hmbl. Ed.,
Like Cecil H. Dill A Man of Peculiar Talents
(First para from PDR, mod. auct.)

Original contents copyright 2018 by Michael C. Johnston and/or the bylined author. All Rights Reserved. Links in this post may be to our affiliates; sales through affiliate links may benefit this site.

B&H Photo • Amazon US • Amazon UK
Amazon Germany • Amazon Canada • Adorama

(To see all the comments, click on the "Comments" link below.)
Featured Comments from:

FraserGJB: "Are you sure this isn't a short film David Lynch made in art school? Wonderfully weird."

Having a Bad Monday? (OT)

Cheer up! You could be this guy. (He's getting a ticket, too.)

Have an ordinary blah Monday!

Mike

Original contents copyright 2018 by Michael C. Johnston and/or the bylined author. All Rights Reserved. Links in this post may be to our affiliates; sales through affiliate links may benefit this site.

B&H Photo • Amazon US • Amazon UK
Amazon Germany • Amazon Canada • Adorama

(To see all the comments, click on the "Comments" link below.)
Featured Comments from:

Steve Weeks: "Having dealt with trucking on a somewhat limited basis during my working years, this person had not only a blah Monday, but also probably a life-changing Monday. It has been my experience that trucking companies and their insurers take a dim view when this happens. Most likely he will lose his job and not be employable in their trade in the future. The citation is just minor for the driver. Let's hope everyone reading just had a Blah Monday."

Chris S: "Puts my Monday morning blown tire into the proper perspective."

Using Photographs Differently

A "fan map" for Justin Timberlake shows strength in Utah and New
Jersey but a marked lack of interest in the Southern states

Many news websites have been experimenting with infographics lately, and a number of them have been really innovative...I remember a great chart at NYT.com showing just how few people had chosen our last two Presidential nominees (can't find it now—it might have been taken down), "fan maps" showing where music stars are popular like the one above, and the recent feature on land use in the USA from Bloomberg, which I found absolutely fascinating—for example, more land is devoted to cows than any other purpose in the US, whether to pasture them or grow food for them. I've revisited this article three times.

Some of the infographics use photographs. An example today at NYT.com is "Hurricane Michael: One Mile of Devastation in Florida," which tries to solve the "specificity" problem of photographs (they have trouble showing the extent of all-encompassing events such as hurricane devastation) by stringing frames together and combining the visuals with data. (Hint: to move sideways, scroll down.)

The ways in which information can be conveyed go far beyond words and single, static pictures. I'm sure a great deal of work goes into such features so that we can work less to extract the information. Credited in this case are Anjali Singhvi, Derek Watkins, K.K. Rebecca Lai, Troy Griggs and Karen Yourish.

Mike

Original contents copyright 2018 by Michael C. Johnston and/or the bylined author. All Rights Reserved. Links in this post may be to our affiliates; sales through affiliate links may benefit this site.

B&H Photo • Amazon US • Amazon UK
Amazon Germany • Amazon Canada • Adorama

(To see all the comments, click on the "Comments" link below.)
Featured Comments from:

John Nollendorfs: "You sure can see which buildings were built to hurricane code!"

People News II: Ming Thein

Ming Thein, from his website

Ming Thein, one of the very best photography bloggers on the Internet, has decided to bring his nearly three-year relationship with Hasselblad to a close. Noting that "it isn't worth my time or stress levels anymore," Ming announced that "I have elected not to renew my contract with Hasselblad/ DJI, which ended on 30 September 2018."

That's the short take; see his website for the longer version.

"I continue to remain in the Hasselblad family as an owner and user," he added, "as I believe the product still delivers the best image quality I’ve seen to date."

Mike
(Thanks to Oren Grad)

Original contents copyright 2018 by Michael C. Johnston and/or the bylined author. All Rights Reserved. Links in this post may be to our affiliates; sales through affiliate links may benefit this site.

B&H Photo • Amazon US • Amazon UK
Amazon Germany • Amazon Canada • Adorama

(To see all the comments, click on the "Comments" link below.)
Featured Comments from:

Michael Perini: "I have great respect for him, and I think he did some good for Hasselblad, but moving into a corporate culture as an advisor without direct authority is a very difficult position to be in. Plus he lost the person who recruited him. Never a good sign. I think he did the right thing, he was 'pushing water uphill.' Life is too short for that. I wish him the best. DJI will miss him more than they think."

Stephen Scharf: "One of the biggest challenges someone in Ming's role has is getting the execs who hired him to actually listen to, and act on, the input obtained from customers. I've taught and led a lot of 'Voice of the Customer' product development teams in my time. One challenge is getting those team members to keep their biases of what the product must do or be to themselves, and actually listen to what the customer says. Most times, what the product development team member thinks is important and what the customer actually thinks is important (and why) are 180° apart. Academic studies have confirmed this. Then, of course, the biggest risk are business executives, who always have their own biases, may not listen to the VOC and just do what they originally wanted to do anyway. This usually results in a catastrophe with respect to successful product development, because most executives make teams rush, don't provide them with the time to think things through thoroughly, and everyone gets caught out with surprises. Happens all the time.... I used to call this behavior 'executive arson.' Seen tens of millions of dollars wasted because of it, also."

Two Excellent Portfolios from The Atlantic

Two portfolios well worth looking at:

Photos of Abandoned Russia, mostly by Russian photographers.

and

Dramatic Photos of the California Wildfires.

More less as an aside, another thing I found at the Atlantic site that I loved is "Your Lying Mind: The Cognitive Biases Tricking Your Brain," which mentions an economist who uses constructed photographs to modify cognitive behavior:

"[Present bias] led a scholar named Hal Hershfield to play around with photographs. Hershfield is a marketing professor at UCLA whose research starts from the idea that people are 'estranged' from their future self. As a result, he explained in a 2011 paper, 'saving is like a choice between spending money today or giving it to a stranger years from now.' The paper described an attempt by Hershfield and several colleagues to modify that state of mind in their students. They had the students observe, for a minute or so, virtual-reality avatars showing what they would look like at age 70. Then they asked the students what they would do if they unexpectedly came into $1,000. The students who had looked their older self in the eye said they would put an average of $172 into a retirement account. That’s more than double the amount that would have been invested by members of the control group, who were willing to sock away an average of only $80."

Another bit that from the article that made me laugh: economists will routinely walk out of bad movies and stop eating bad meals in restaurants.

Why? Because they've internalized the sunk-cost fallacy. "Sunk-cost thinking," as you probably know, "tells us to stick with a bad investment because of the money we have already lost on it; to finish an unappetizing restaurant meal because, after all, we’re paying for it; to prosecute an unwinnable war because of the investment of blood and treasure." The article makes no bones about it: "In all cases, this way of thinking is rubbish."

The "Lying Mind" has little to do with photography (except that it tells you not to believe your eyes), but I couldn't help thinking of a cognitive bias called "base-rate neglect" when I was looking at the pictures of the California wildfires. Base-rate neglect is defined as people's "disinclination to believe statistical and other general evidence, basing their judgments instead on individual examples and vivid anecdotes." "Individual examples and vivid anecdotes" describes the reason why photographs so often bring distant events and dull statistics to life for us—they personalize abstractions and make news more real. Bet you can't look at the photograph of the beaming policeman and the orphaned fawn without feeling some sort of emotion.

But it occurred to me that base-rate neglect is exactly why honest journalism and objective editing is so crucial, and why it can't be replaced by random and relativistic crowd-sourcing, marketing, and propaganda: because when something is well-edited, we can more readily believe that the journalists are showing us "individual examples and vivid anecdotes" that accord accurately with their honest perception of "statistical and other general evidence." In other words, we trust that an edited set of photographs of the California wildfires give us a broader "picture" of the event that's in line with everything else the photographers and photo-editors know about the situation. They're anecdotal, all right, but they're accurate anecdotes.

Cynics will say that's just the ideal of journalism, not something journalism always actually achieves. Which is probably true. But since when it is no longer worth striving for ideals?

P.S. In the Wildfire portfolio, note especially photo #11. That's the overpass from which Ansel Adams took his famous picture "Clearing Winter Storm, 1935."

Mike
(Thanks to Jim Hayes and Scott Kirkpatrick)

Original contents copyright 2018 by Michael C. Johnston and/or the bylined author. All Rights Reserved. Links in this post may be to our affiliates; sales through affiliate links may benefit this site.

B&H Photo • Amazon US • Amazon UK
Amazon Germany • Amazon Canada • Adorama

(To see all the comments, click on the "Comments" link below.)
Featured Comments from:

Greg Mironchuk: "I know that this is a personal bias...but...I can't get past the observation that all the photos in the Abandoned Russia piece were sourced from Wikipedia and Shutterstock...either free, or 50 cents per photo. They must have invested a whole $12.00 on this, including a pro-rata on their Web Guy's time. As a person who spent most of his adult life being paid to make photos (and watching that all dry up, and go away), I can't help but feel hurt about this. Even if the genesis of the piece's fundamental idea was to use Russian photographers/photographs, they could have invested twenty minutes, and a few dollars, on Russian Pro Photographers, and Russian Professional stock photos...if, for nothing else, because we all ought to be watching each others' backs, in bad times...not exploiting anything that we can get away with not paying for. Shame on The Atlantic."

Mike replies: Reminds me of this cover. By the way, the Harlan Ellison [R.I.P.] video in that post still makes me laugh.

And if you go see that video on that post, be sure to see this followup. But be sure to watch the video first.

Chris Kern: "Photographers, of course, are notoriously subject to incremental lens bias, the persistent fallacious belief that adding just one more lens to their inventory will significantly improve their work."

Peter Wright: "Both of these excellent portfolios show pictures that are surrealist and apocalyptic. Both show subject matter that is in the process of change: one very rapid and one relatively slow, but neither set would be possible at some not-too-distant time in the future. They really show photography's strength and counteract the 'It's all been shot already' type of thinking. Thanks for drawing our attention."

Oskar Ojala: "Have to agree with Greg about the photos of the abandoned places in Russia. And the overall quality shows: the photos are not stylistically similar at all and practically no effort has been spent into tying these photos into some sort of narrative, explaining how they relate to history and geography. This would have been important due to the vast areas and multiple key events in history involved. Sadly, it's more reminiscent of one of those 'Top 21' lists on the Internet rather than a proper piece."

Bahi: "Last night, I heard two long audio interviews (part 1 and part 2) with Spencer Greenberg, touching on cognitive biases among other things. Mike, I know you're not a fan of long audio interviews but I found them interesting enough that I ended up visiting one of Greenberg's own sites, Clearer Thinking, which I think you'd like. It provides tests and articles to try to help us deal with our own misconceptions and biases. I tried some of the tests and found them useful and interesting."

Igor: "Ha! For abandoned as well as modern Russia you should go here. There are orders of magnitude more interesting photos with meaningful text on that site. The Atlantic pales in comparison."

Steve Rosenblum (partial comment): "Yes, the field documenting cognitive biases was pretty much started in the 1970s by Amos Tversky and Daniel Kahneman, and Kahneman later won the Nobel Prize in Economics for their work despite being a psychologist (Twersky had died earlier and Nobels only go to the living). Danny Kahneman's Thinking Fast and Slow is a fascinating account of their work if you want the technical detail, and Michael Lewis's book The Undoing Project explains the work within the context of their long friendship and working relationship. The tendency of our minds to play cognitive tricks on us should concern pretty much anyone involved in important decision making. I know that it gave me great pause during the years of my medical practice. There is no doubt that we doctors frequently make poor decisions due to these sorts of biases."

Flat Earth!

Some people are attracted to conspiracy theories. I, on the other hand, admit that I kinda like cranks. I'm pretty entranced by this whole recent flat-Earther thing, for instance. I can't help myself. I like those nuts.

For most of my life, "people who believe the Earth is flat" was pretty much a synonym for terms like ignoramus and dunderhead. Recently, however, thanks to our dubious friend the Internet, the belief that the Earth is flat has become a thing. So recently I got treated to something I'm glad I didn't have to miss: the sight of a man known as the "father of the flat-Earthers" being modest about his contributions to the growing movement. Here's the aww-shucks moment, on ABC Nightline.

Priceless. It's undignified, but that moment in the program made me giggle uncontrollably.

I might just gently point out that one facet of what we call "intelligence" is the ability to evaluate competing claims. I heard something the other day that I also thought was priceless: a guy was explaining that apple seeds have a special cancer-fighting ingredient, so you should chew them up (actually they have cyanide in them, from which you are normally protected because the seeds pass through your digestive tract intact, so you should not chew them up), but here's what he said: "Science and medicine are all against the idea, but I saw this video on YouTube...."

'Kay. Blind lady holding balance scales: Science and medicine on one side of the scale, this video I saw on YouTube on the other side. Who you gonna trust? Competing claims....

Proof
But here's something kinda great. If people believe the Earth is flat, and you believe the Earth is roughly spherical, well then you have to prove your point, right? So the Discovery Channel did just that:

Granted, this is something that shouldn't have to be proven. But when that helicopter disappears below the horizon I kinda got a lump in my throat. Because it was a beautiful thing.

Sometimes it's pretty elegant to have to prove even the established truth. So thanks for that, flat-Earth fans.

Mike

Original contents copyright 2018 by Michael C. Johnston and/or the bylined author. All Rights Reserved. Links in this post may be to our affiliates; sales through affiliate links may benefit this site.

B&H Photo • Amazon US • Amazon UK
Amazon Germany • Amazon Canada • Adorama

(To see all the comments, click on the "Comments" link below.)
Featured Comments from:

Andrew Molitor: "The ease of doing this kind of measurement, has convinced me that Columbus knew perfectly well how big around the world was (everyone else did, the legend is that Christopher thought it was a lot smaller). When a ship, like for instance one of his ships, sails any appreciable distance away, the hull drops below the horizon. Then the lower masts, and finally the masts. The mathematics required to turn that into a rough estimate of the diameter of the earth is trivial. Draw a couple pictures, and some triangles turn up, and then it's just trigonometry. Which, I admit, isn't trivial for everyone. But for a ship's captain in 1492, it should have been pretty easy. Columbus was sandbagging. He was pretty sure there was something out there, but he knew it wasn't The East. He made up his theory of the much smaller planet to get funding for his expedition."

Dog Photographers of the Year

Katarzyna Siminiak, Waiting Beauty (Thalia, Nova Scotia duck tolling retriever,
Poland). Katarzyna won second prize in the "Dog Portrait" category.

With the dog days of Summer coming up fast—it was so humid here yesterday the air was practically dripping—it's fitting that the prizes for Dog Photographer of the Year have been announced. Huffington Post has a nice and fairly extensive portfolio that is worth a visit if you like dogs.

Mike

Original contents copyright 2018 by Michael C. Johnston and/or the bylined author. All Rights Reserved. Links in this post may be to our affiliates; sales through affiliate links may benefit this site.

B&H Photo • Amazon US • Amazon UK
Amazon Germany • Amazon Canada • Adorama

(To see all the comments, click on the "Comments" link below.)
Featured Comments from:

YB Hudson III (partial comment): "Sorry, but I need a cat nap after viewing that portfolio."

Mike replies: That's a rather catty thing to say.

Taking a Picture a Day Is Good For Your Health...Really

Whoa. How about this? It's an article in the journal Health that "makes an in-depth examination of one digital daily practice, photo-a-day, using a practice theory framework to understand the affordances it offers for well-being. [...] We conclude that this practice has multi-faceted benefits for improving well-being."

Under the "Results" heading, the article states, "Many people who conduct the practice start out doing a defined 365 project—one photo per day for a year. Sometimes, the availability of materials (wanting to use a new digital camera) or a desire to gain new competencies (to learn to take better photographs) opened up this practice as a possibility. However, it was the meaning afforded to these practices and their linkage to other practices (leaving the house, mindfulness[,] and community interaction) that enabled the persistence of the practice and was seen to have an impact on well-being."

I might point out that another "digital daily practice" that might "provide an unexpected benefit of improving well-being" could be checking in with your favorite blog every day! (You'll have to be the judge of that. The study has not been done scientifically.)

Also on the subject of health in the space of 365 days, check out what happened when Dan Green followed the Federal dietary and exercise guidelines for a year. Interesting!

As you might know, health resolutions begin on May 1, not January 1. (In the Northern Hemisphere.) Who can get motivated in January??

Mike
(Thanks to Richard Newman)

Original contents copyright 2018 by Michael C. Johnston and/or the bylined author. All Rights Reserved. Links in this post may be to our affiliates; sales through affiliate links may benefit this site.

B&H Photo • Amazon US • Amazon UK
Amazon Germany • Amazon Canada • Adorama

(To see all the comments, click on the "Comments" link below.)
Featured Comments from:

Kenneth Tanaka: "Well, to be honest this wasn’t a very scientific 'study' even as ethnographic research. Buried under the fog of nonsense we find this: 'Participants were recruited via an open invitation shared on social media, including via the "friends of Blipfoto" Facebook page with over 6,000 followers. A total of 33 people responded via social media or email. Three potential participants were excluded because they were not currently engaged in the practice. All others were provided with further information about the research. The first eight respondents to provide written informed consent were selected as a convenience sample.' Eight people. You couldn’t use this as a master’s thesis at even a second-tier college. Eight people who are already engaged in the activity being studied. Not even a control group of another eight people. Still, I’m sure there’s much to advise doing anything one finds an enjoyable and creative social diversion each day. But beware the daily rain of Internet bull."

Mike replies: Well stated, but consider an anecdote Tom Fangel recently shared: "Niels Bohr had a visitor from a US university. They went to Bohr's summer cabin north of Copenhagen. As they approached the house the visitor noticed an old horseshoe nailed above the door frame. 'Do You really believe in this kind of superstition?' asked the visitor. 'No, of course not,' answered Bohr, 'But I have heard that it works even if you don't believe in it.'"

In other words, I think it's pretty clear this study is true even though there's no good evidence it's true.  :-D

Bahi: "This report describes my experience, though I don't aim for a photograph a day. When I read descriptions of the effects that meditation has on practitioners, I'm reminded of the effect that walking around my neighbourhood with a camera has on me. I usually have no goal or shot list. I'm often wearing headphones and listening to some kind of podcast. After a few minutes, I reach some kind of flow state and when I get back, not only are own problems less stressful and urgent but I'm actually more productive. (And I have photographs that I like but which would strike most viewers as very mundane.)

"The odd thing about this: if I'm at my desk, stuck on a problem, it's very difficult to persuade myself to get up, pick up the camera and go out. It somehow seems counter-intuitive. When I do it, though, there's a 100% success rate. I get more more done when I'm back and I feel better. Also, people I don't know come up and chat every so often, which is nice.

"I'm hoping you haven't crossed podcasting off your list, by the way. I'm hoping for your company on future photo walks!"

JohnMFlores: "If you add up all the healthy things that I (allegedly) do, I'm fifteen years old and will live until I'm 256."

Kristine Hinrichs: "Having completed almost seven years of Project 365 I can say I’m very happy. This has been a great bridge to retirement, made me more aware of my world, introduced me to new people, and greatly improved my photography. Over time it has become pretty easy to find something unusual and interesting to share every day. I am also very careful about my captions. Year 8 starts July 1."

David Sparks and the Black Skimmers

Photo by David Sparks

In support of the Sunday Support Group this week I thought I'd share a personal project by TOP reader David Sparks. Here's part of what he wrote:

I am an 80-year-old retired neuroscientist and a longtime lurker on TOP. My retirement hobby is nature photography, primarily bird photography. The stimulus for sending this note was your posts about the Sunday Support Group.

The project I just completed is a collection of photos of Black Skimmers, each of which is intended to illustrate historical quotes that describe the unique structure and behavior of this bird. The quotes are taken from writings of Charles Darwin, Rachel Carson, and from early articles in the archives of ornithology journals such as The Auk and The Condor. The quotes are prepotent. I selected the photos to illustrate the quotes. I thought the emphasis on the words would interest you with your love of writing. Quotes and photos were converted into a 44-page, 8x8-inch lay-flat book printed by Zno. Only a dozen copies were printed and given to family members and a few birding friends. Now I am working on two or three similar projects and trying to 'touch them every day.'

Here's a link to a site showing the cover and contents of the Black Skimmer project.

I wonder if the stuff I'm doing is of any interest to people who live in the real world of photography.

I enjoyed David's project, primarily for the reason intended—it let me "meet" a species I previously knew nothing about. But I think there are a couple of other reasons, just for me. I'm reminded of what I learned from Jiro Dreams of Sushi—"too much rice, and the rice wins; too much fish, and the fish wins." In other words, balance is key. In putting words with pictures over many years and observing many projects which do, I've learned that balance between the two is difficult to achieve. One or the other usually "wins." David's use of the quotes with pictures, for me, strikes a nice balance. The pictures amplify the quotes and the quotes amplify the pictures.

Finally, it's just nice to get such a clear window into something that someone else really cares about; I always enjoy that.

Mike

P.S. About Zno books: "In 2012 the photo book market was dominated by press-printed books. Professional photographers preferred a special kind of books called flush mount albums, also known as wedding albums, but they were expensive.

"Today we are the biggest flush-mount album maker in the world, and we make high quality albums with the lowest price and the fastest turn-around time. We make everything ourselves. Our mission is to make all things beautiful and make them insanely affordable.

"We've also grown to become a global company. Our product and design department is in San Francisco, California. Our manufacturing is in Shanghai, China. Our global delivery and warehouse is in Houston, Texas. We ship to all countries at low flat rate." (From the Zno website.)

Original contents copyright 2018 by Michael C. Johnston and/or the bylined author. All Rights Reserved. Links in this post may be to our affiliates; sales through affiliate links may benefit this site.

B&H Photo • Amazon US • Amazon UK
Amazon Germany • Amazon Canada • Adorama

(To see all the comments, click on the "Comments" link below.)
Featured Comments from:

Rob de Loe: "This really is a wonderful project. The photography is terrific, and the text matches beautifully. The link you provided actually allows the reader to read all the pages. It's well worth the time. It would make me enormously happy to be producing work like this when I am 80."

Dave Burns: "I just received my first Zno book a week ago with photographs from my workshop in Cuba with Peter Turnley. I was surprised at the high quality given the price but I would definitely order again. Recommended."

UPDATE: Reply from David Sparks: " Thank you for highlighting the Black Skimmer project on TOP. I thank the authors of the comments for their generous remarks too. A sentence or two about the motivation behind my current projects follows. The general goal of my bird photography is to try to capture, in an unobtrusive manner, the beauty and uniqueness of the birds, and some of the characteristic behaviors displayed in their natural habitat. The Black Skimmer project and the other projects I am working on now is an effort to preserve some of the successful images in a format that will be more accessible to family and friends when I am no longer around. Unless I do something to give prominence to selected photos they will just remain part of the bloated Lightroom catalogs where they now reside."

Mike replies: Thank you for letting me feature it. By the way, I might point out that having it featured on TOP also bears out the wisdom of your program for "giving prominence to selected photos." Good job on that!

Connectedness

You surf, sometimes you hit flotsam and jetsam.

This still survives on Pinterest (I generally loathe Pinterest, by the way)—

Look at that handsome youngster! The text is "Meet Butters a Petfinder adoptable Labrador Retriever dog | Waukesha, WI" (top left). The original Petfinder page has gone 404. (He's actually a pit mix, though I would bet he's half Lab at least.) Butters was a difficult adoption—he suffered from anxiety, especially separation anxiety; coprophagia; leash reactivity; and DHD (doggie hyperactivity disorder. I just made that up. But he had it). He couldn't be crated (he would have an involuntary poop and get it all over himself), and it took a year to housetrain him. I probably walked a thousand miles while I was helping him get over leash reactivity, two patient and often challenging miles a day. He almost took me to the limits of my patience and fortitude...

...Not quite, thank God. Now he's a lovely fellow with a gentle heart who has a few residual peccadilloes but nothing out of the ordinary. He leashes fine, no more coprophagia, he's potty trained at last, and he just looks sad and hangs his head when I leave the house, as opposed to what he used to do, which was to go crazy and have an unintended bowel movement. Things have greatly improved.  :-)

Clickbait
I ran across this: "10 Photos That Flipped People's Lives Upside Down." Kinda interesting, although also a little creepy. It's hard for me to observe pop culture today—it's impersonal and omnipotent, flighty, fickle and airheaded but also a remorseless, irresistable juggernaut capable of crushing people like insects.

It occurred to me the other day that the future is probably going to be a neverending series of platform migrations. I like email myself, and I still center my own communication activities on it, but I distinctly remember thinking, in the 1990s, that one day it was going to become useless because commercialism would swamp it. That day is almost here—right now, less than 5% of my email is relevant personal communication from people I'm at least marginally interested in hearing from. And that's just counting the "good" emails, not including all the stuff that's sloughed off into my spam folder by my spam filters. For several years now I've already been meeting people of my son's generation who don't use email at all, and recently I'm having the experience of sending people emails who later tell me they don't get them because they never check their email any more.

So we move on to various other platforms. Texting, Facebook, Twitter, Instagram. We're now defined in part not just by how much of our lives are online, but on the particular platforms we happen to favor. I actually sent an email not long ago and the recipient replied, "I don't read emails any more. Can you send that to me on Messenger?" Uh, really? No, I can't, because I don't do Messenger. Or "I don't Messenger," which might actually be proper English.

Young people already watch YouTube and Netflix more than broadcast television and cable. Many people, doubtless including the intrepid "Charlie from Top 10s" who posted the "10 Photos" video I linked to above, are entrepreneurs trying to meet the need by crowdsourcing (hey, remember that word?) content for YouTube, and profit from it. But YouTube is already less compelling to me than it used to be...I used to helplessly watch one video after another as linked videos appeared in an unbreaking stream, but now each one is punctuated by an ad. Even though I can skip most of the ads, or half of them anyway, the interruption reminds me that I should be doing other things, and that breaks the spell and I turn it off. Doubtless YouTube will outlive its own usefulness and currency someday in the not-so-distant future, as commercialism swamps it and, inevitably, clamps down on and crowds out anything original or creative or personal.

As with online photos, it bugs me that I could watch YouTube all day and still have no idea what's on it, because I would be seeing such an infinitesimally small portion of all it contains. That's an irrational feeling on my part, but I feel it anyway.

Photography online make me feel like the story of the Inuit Indian who won a trip to New York City. Asked during an interview what he thought of the experience, he said, "Too many faces! How do you remember them all?" Having grown up in a village of a hundred souls, his basic assumption was that he should memorize and remember every face he ever encountered. He always had. But faced with a mere day's worth of the numberless legions of NYC pedestrians, that portion of his settled worldview experienced circuit overload. I know it's irrational, but it bugs me that I could look at photography online all day and yet still see so little of it that it would statistically be extremely close to "none at all." It's not enough to be "connected"; I need some kind of shared culture, some kind of recognized culture, something I can keep up with and stay abreast of, to feel connected.

Mike

Original contents copyright 2018 by Michael C. Johnston and/or the bylined author. All Rights Reserved. Links in this post may be to our affiliates; sales through affiliate links may benefit this site.

B&H Photo • Amazon US • Amazon UK
Amazon Germany • Amazon Canada • Adorama

(To see all the comments, click on the "Comments" link below.)
Featured Comments from:

John Camp: "Your post is like a continuation of the last one; I almost commented on that one, but resisted, but I can't resist this time.

"At one time, long ago, most people lived in 'bubbles' that were actually physical. You married somebody who was born nearby because they were in your physical bubble, and you didn't usually move outside of that. With the arrival of mechanized transport, the bubbles of some people expanded, but most still hung close to home. At some point (I would say after World War II) the idea of physical bubbles began to break down, although many still continued to live in them. In my generation, in my hometown of Cedar Rapids, Iowa, most people still married people who were from Cedar Rapids, and often from the same high schools. But quite a few married outside the town, and often from distant places, because for the first time in history, large masses of people went to college, and began marrying not because of natal proximity, but because of some other selection process, like intellectual or financial compatibility.

"That's now been further shattered by instant communications where people form relationship groups with other people they've never physically met...and even meet for dating and marriage purposes online, and across very large distances, before they engage physically. As physical bubbles continue to lose relevance, it's now become necessary for people to form their own (conceptual) bubbles. Bubbles are a way of limiting social and intellectual contacts to a manageable state—if you try to keep up with everything, all the time, you will live in a constant frenzy. So you gotta have that bubble.

"TOP is one chunk of my personal bubble. Because it's part of my bubble, I've actually met you (Mike) physically, when you were in Wisconsin, and even wrote a book with another person, Ctein, who I met in the TOP bubble. While I have lots of interests, as most TOP members seem to, I actually resist adding many of those chunks to my bubble, because when you get too many chunks, you get frenzy.

"At one time, and not really all that long ago, a few adventurous people made great efforts to expand their bubbles—they'd move from Cedar Rapids to New York, or Paris, looking for something they couldn't find at home. Now, you have to make a great effort to restrict your bubble to achieve some kind of person peace and coherency, or you will go batshit crazy."

Rodolfo Canet: "Interesting to read Mr. Camp's comment ten days after my older son returned from Argentina, where he flew to finally meet face-to-face his online girlfriend. They've been 'engaged' for...eight years!!!"

Mike replies: According to eHarmony, 20% of Western couples now meet online, and 5% of new marriages began as online relationships. Older photographers might remember Maxim Muir, who was once a leading expert on photo chemicals, especially print developers. He met his wife online and they decided to marry before they had met in person. They've been very happy for many years, at least as of the last time I heard from Max.

Snapshots

This panther brooch (brooch, n., an ornament fastened to clothing with a hinged pin and catch) by Cartier is for sale at M.S. Rau Antiques for $38,500, coincidentally just about exactly the median household annual income in the village nearest where I live.

• The great British author Virginia Woolf was a photographer—here's an article featuring her snapshots of the Bloomsbury Group.

• The most popular book by our friend John Camp a.k.a. John Sandford is Storm Prey (2010) according to Goodreads. It's #20 in the Lucas Davenport Series. I just met a local guy who could hardly believe I know John—he fixed me with an intent stare and said, "he's one of my guys. I read ev-er-y-thing he writes."

• Canon has introduced a new mirrorless camera. The new M50 has a 24-MP sensor, an electronic viewfinder, and is the first camera in the Canon's M series to include 4K video. It costs $899 with its compact 15–45mm kit lens and is available in white. It is said to be targeted to beginners.

• This is a snapshot no lover of photography (well, none who knows who these guys are, anyway) will fail to appreciate—William Klein and Daido Moriyama snapping pictures of each other at Akio Nagasawa Gallery in Tokyo, on Instagram.

• If you ever in a past life enjoyed smoking those funny marryjehoochie cigarettes, Master KK's latest "Up the Box" (NSFW, n.b.) will make you laugh and groovealong. Includes some super-rare tracks. You might enjoy it even if you are not, um, high. (And please, I know I've opened the door, but let's not discuss illegal substances in the squeaky-clean TOP Comments section. Thenk-yew, the Ed.)

• Yesterday saw the introduction of the Sony A7III, the third iteration of the basic level of the highly popular A7 series. B&H Explora has posted the launch. Sony typically does not stint in letting its best technologies trickle down, and the A7III loads into the sub-$2k (barely) basic A7 camera many of the advances of the A9 and A7RIII. It is not yet available for pre-order.

Provenance unknown, from a show called Gathered: Snapshots from the Peter J. Cohen Gift and Works by Carmen Winant and Luke Stettner, an exhibition from late 2016 that celebrated the gift of more than 200 amateur photographs from the collection of Peter J. Cohen to the Columbus (Ohio) Museum of Art. Although the body had its identity elided, doubtless the missing head was clipped out in order to be treasured in a locket or honored in miniature frame, so no need to mourn the headlessness of the anonymous subject.

• Speaking of detachable heads, Frankenstein by Mary Shelley, one of the most remarkable masterpieces in Western literature, is celebrating (if that's the right word) its bicentennial this year. It was published on January 1, 1818. (The link is to the 1818 first edition text.) The book and myth is incredibly rich; it resonates with meanings that range from from slavery, to feminism, to the usurpation of God, to the heartlessness of science, to the emotion of revenge, to the experience of crushing loss and the longing for the dead to rise—Mary Shelley in her life was devastated by the loss of successive children, and she outlived most of her illustrious parents and her even more illustrious circle of friends that included her husband the poet Percy Bysshe Shelley and Lord Byron.

• The China Institute at 100 Washington Street in Manhattan will for most of this year be showing Art of the Mountain: Through the Chinese Photographer's Lens:

Art of the Mountain will consist of three sections: Revered Mountains of China will introduce the geography, history, legends, and culture that are associated with Chinese mountains and will include photographs by Hou Heliang, Kang Songbai and Kang Liang, Li Daguang, Lin Maozhao, Li Xueliang, Lu Hao, Zhang Anlu, Xiao Chao, Yan Shi, Wang Jing, Zhang Jiaxuan, Zhang Huajie, and Zheng Congli. Landscape Aesthetics in Photography will present Wang Wusheng’s photography of Mount Huangshan, also known as Yellow Mountain, to reflect the renowned Chinese landscape painting aesthetic and its influence. New Landscape Photography includes the works of Hong Lei, Lin Ran, Lu Yanpeng, Shao Wenhuan, Taca Sui, Xiao Xuan’an, Yan Changjiang, Yang Yongliang, Yao Lu, Zeng Han, Gao Hui, and Feng Yan, who express their thoughts on the role of mountains in society.

Mike
(Thanks to Ned Bunnell)

Original contents copyright 2018 by Michael C. Johnston and/or the bylined author. All Rights Reserved. Links in this post may be to our affiliates; sales through affiliate links may benefit this site.

B&H Photo • Amazon US • Amazon UK
Amazon Germany • Amazon Canada • Adorama

(To see all the comments, click on the "Comments" link below.)
Featured Comments from:

Steve Rosenblum: "I first read "Frankenstein" as part of an undergraduate literature course on science fiction taught by Prof. Eric Rabkin at the University of Michigan in 1971 or 1972. It was a rigorous, wonderful course and I think that Eric may still be teaching it. "Frankenstein" was the first reading for the course. I had low expectations of it, and was totally entrhalled by what a wonderful book it is, as well as the amazing story of Mary Shelley, its writing, and the interlocking lives of Mary, Lord Byron, and her husband the poet Shelley. It is nothing like the movie made in the 1930's. Speaking of movies, I also highly recommend "Young Frankenstein" to anyone who hasn't seen it. IMHO the funniest movie ever made."

John Camp: "And Mary Shelley's circle also included John Polidori, Byron's personal physician. She, Percy Shelley, Byron and Polidori one night agreed to write 'ghost stories.' Hers eventually evolved into Frankenstein. Polidori's, published a year after Frankenstein, was called 'The Vampyre,' and is generally acknowledged to be the first vampire story and the model for the character Dracula (the Dracula story itself was written 70 or 80 years later by another guy.) The stories by the two famous writers didn't amount to much."

Geoff Wittig: "The 'Art of the Mountain' show sounds fabulous. While my ignorance of Chinese art and photography are profound, my understanding is that photographs and especially paintings of the iconic Yellow Mountain region of China are perhaps analogues to heroic 'Western' art in American culture. To my eye, archetypal Western landscape paintings by Bierstadt and Moran are very similar in their heroic motif to Ansel Adams' equally dramatic photographs. Traditional Chinese painting by contrast tends to be more gestural, suggestive and subtle. So too are the Chinese mountain photographs I'm familiar with. Wang Wusheng's lovely 2005 photo book Celestial Realm: The Yellow Mountains of China is full of delicate, moody fog-draped images. And it's still available new. Just sayin'.

"On an unrelated matter, is it just me, or is Canon's M50 the ugliest mirrorless camera we've seen yet? Fujifilm's X-T2 is a lovely piece of photo jewelry; Panasonic and Olympus mirrorless cameras look purposeful. But Canon's M50 and M5 are photo-Edsels. Lumpy, inelegant and dull. Maybe it works great, but it's so homely I'd be embarrassed to pull it out to take a shot. 'Course, it could just be me."

cdembrey (partial comment): "For me the most interesting recent announcement was Canon's new flash. From my POV, seen one camera and you've seen them all—YMMV."

Ken Tanaka: "I was delighted to see one of Peter Cohen’s found photos in this story! A good friend of mine, Peter has amassed one of the largest and richest collections of anonymous and found photographs anywhere. That’s how he enjoys photography. And it turns out he’s not alone, as there’s a very lively community of similar collectors out there. In recent years Peter has opened his collection to museum curators (The Met, The Art Institute of Chicago, The Columbus Museum of Art, et al) who have created some very unique and memorable shows from the collection. In 2011, for example, Michal Raz-Russo here at the Art Institute of Chicago created a show titled 'The Three Graces' after she and Peter noticed that so many of the snaps contained three women. In 2015, Mia Fineman, an associate curator at The Met, published a cute book titled Snapshots of Dangerous Women with images also mined from Peter’s collection.

"Yet another example of how photography and photographs can be enjoyed and used toward creative objectives...without using a camera."

Apple Syracuse Photo Walks

This is a sign o' the times they are a-changin', if I can mashup a Prince song title with a Dylan song title. Apple Syracuse is hosting "Photo Walks"—mini-workshops meant to "Explore the world around you and level up your iPhone photography skills on an inspiring photo walk. We'll take you to new places, show you how to create stunning shots, experiment with the latest accessories, and share our best photography and editing tips." There's one called "Developing Your Style," and another is "Framing Architecture and Details." The rest include "Capturing Action and Video," "Manipulating Light and Shadow," and "Portraits and People."

All of them caution participants to "Wear comfortable shoes and bring only what you need—including a fully charged device"...which, come to think of it, is advice I should should tape to my computer, if not my forehead.

Are other Apple stores doing this?

Can't be bad for future photographers. Good on Apple Syracuse for reaching out.

Mike
(Thanks to Gordon Lewis)

Original contents copyright 2018 by Michael C. Johnston and/or the bylined author. All Rights Reserved. Links in this post may be to our affiliates; sales through affiliate links may benefit this site.

B&H Photo • Amazon US • Amazon UK
Amazon Germany • Amazon Canada • Adorama

(To see all the comments, click on the "Comments" link below.)
Featured Comments from:

KeithB: "They are doing it in Albuquerque."