[Ed. note: This article was rather slovenly, as I wrote it more or less off the top of my head. It contains some outdated information, and doesn't reflect the current state of affairs very well. I'll leave it up as background, and so as not to orphan your comments, but the newer post "ProGrade and Angelbird" is a better attempt.]
Do you know the English young adult novels about the Borrowers? It's a charming series of books for tweens and young teens about a race of miniature people who live in the unseen spaces in houses and account for all the little things that mysteriously go missing. Written by Mary Norton, who was my grandmother's contemporary, the original title has been around for longer than I've been alive.
Well, around here the only things the Borrowers seem to snitch are pens and memory cards. I continually load pens into the house and the house absorbs them. It gradually becomes more and more frustrating trying to find one, until I give in and buy another box. It really is a mystery how they all evaporate.
Same for SD cards. In my recent office relocation I was only able to lay my hands on six of them, which is remarkable considering how many there should be. The six I rescued are a motley of different types and sizes, although most of them are by SanDisk because that's the brand I usually buy. I recognize some of them as remnants of past "buys." Some of them are quite old. You can find lots of "repeated opinion" out there about the lifespan of cards—most places say they'll last ten years, which sounds to me like a number that came out of a monkey's butt. I'm not aware of any hard real data except for data on write-read cycles, which are unlikely to ever be exceeded, by me anyway. And I'm not sure how useful hard data on longevity would be in any case, because in my experience digital storage can either last a long time and be very dependable or it can conk out after a short time and take valuable data out with it. And there doesn't seem to be any rhyme or reason to which is which. The two hard drives that failed the soonest for me were supposedly the most dependable drives from the most reliable vendor. On the other hand, I don't think I've ever had a memory card fail, and that goes back to Smart Media cards and Sony Memory Sticks.
Of course, it could be that the Borrowers get them before they have a chance to wear out on me. (The Borrowers must have a reseller business on eBay or something.)
By the way, I buy SanDisk cards because Eli Harari, Sanjay Mehrotra, and Jack Yuan revolutionized flash memory in 1988 when the company was called SunDisk. Just before the company went public in '95, they changed the name to SanDisk to avoid confusion with (and probably a bitter legal tussle with) Sun Microsystems. SanDisk is the OG. [UPDATE: But see Stephen S.'s Featured Comment, below. —Ed.]
At least I still use SD cards exclusively, so I don't have to learn all about the XQD/CFExpress tangle, although I'd do so if I needed to of course. XQD has been around for a dozen years now, can you believe that? Time flies like an arrow, and fruit flies like bananas. Speaking of Dad jokes, here's a nice one:
What has four letters, sometimes has nine, and never has five
See if you can figure that one out. Took me a while, I have to admit. Anyway, I hope to get a new computer this year (mine is six years old, which I guess is my current refresh cycle—although I'm going to wait for the Apple M3 Mac Minis to either appear or not appear this coming Summer, When I do I'll probably get a Satechi hub for it too. There are some things I just want, and a front-facing SD card slot is just one of those things. You know those things that shouldn't matter and yet do?
My use-case makes optimizing card selection complicated, but also probably means that my choice is non-critical. I'm a light shooter and download my files promptly, so I don't need a lot of capacity on any given card. I don't need it to work well with video since I don't shoot video. And although my camera supports UHS-II it's supposedly not any faster with it except when ingesting to the computer (I think that's right anyway)—and I almost can't imagine a case where I might need the card to upload faster than a UHS-I card already does. So my buying-decision progression goes pretty smoothly: SanDisk because of "following myself," which is what Dan Ariely calls consumer loyalty (that is, I buy a Honda rather than a Toyota because I've bought Hondas in the past—I follow my own lead); U3 because that's enough write speed; UHS I instead of II because they're $11.70 per card instead of $40 per card and I'm cheap; and four of them because the little card holder that I carry in my fp bag has three compartments (one card in the camera, three spares). Then I just need to use a permanent marker to write the year on the cards so future me can identify when I bought them.
The six cards I have are limping along pretty good, but just looking at them together makes me realize I should sweep away the old and bring in the new. One is a UHS-II card I got when they first came out c. 2014; one is from a c. 2009 buy and one of the contacts keeps bending, which means I'm kinda playing with fire by continuing to use it; one is an off brand; one is a physically worn 128GB card that showed up through some unknown avenue or other—I didn't buy it; it probably came in a camera I rented or was loaned—meaning I have no idea how old it is or how many write-read cycles are on it; and so forth. One more little thing to remember is that a TOP reader was told by a SanDisk engineer that a third of all the SanDisk cards out there are counterfeits. B&H Photo sells nothing but authentic manufacturer-manufactured cards. I buy my cards from B&H and that's that. So my choice is the 32 GB SanDisk Extreme Pro U3 UHS-I from B&H Photo. YMMLWV! ("Your mileage likely will vary.")
I've said this before, but I should point out that a 32GB card for $11.69 is 36 and a half cents per gigabyte, and the first 1-GB CF card I bought cost $150.00 used. $150 to 36¢ is the arc I wish more things I have to buy would follow!
Well, actually I guess I'll buy five. They come in packs of five. That's three or four for me, and one or two for the Borrowers. :-)
Mike
Original contents copyright 2024 by Michael C. Johnston and/or the bylined author. All Rights Reserved. Links in this post may be to our affiliates; sales through affiliate links may benefit this site. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. (To see all the comments, click on the "Comments" link below or on the title of this post.)
Featured Comments from:
AN: "I think the Borrowers have been depositing your lost memory cards on my desk at work. For the last few weeks, old memory cards that do not belong to me have appeared at irregular intervals, for unknown reasons. My co-workers claim no knowledge of the source. A few interesting ones have popped up: a 4GB Seagate microdrive, a 2MB Casio CompactFlash card, and one of those 'Shoot & Store' series cards (from when SanDisk was trying to market SD cards as a single-use thing that you would save forever like a negative). No sign of your pens, though."
JOHN B GILLOOLY: "Along with my very low serial number Nikon D1 [introduced 1999 —Ed.], I purchased two 64MB cards for $349 each. A year or two later, after a failure of the incredibly fragile 1GB IBM Microdrive, I sucked it up and bought a 1GB CFII solid state for the whopping price of $1,199. That's a 1GB card! Probably 2002–2003. And in terms of speed, maybe 2x—for whatever that is worth."
Ed. note: These next two comments came in one right after the other:
MikeR: "Ya know how paper clips seem to disappear? They migrate to your closet, the paper clip larvae taking on the adult form of coat hangers."
hugh crawford: "You may want to read 'Or All The Seas With Oysters.'"
Stephen S.: "If your newest card is from 2014, that means you've never owned a SanDisk card made after they were bought by Western Digital. Things have gone downhill, everything from memory cards thicker than the standard that won't fit in some devices, to portable SSDs that lose all of their data and Western Digital spending months lying about the existence of the fault while clearing out existing stock at steep discounts, before finally admitting there was indeed a known problem. It has been sad to see the brand's reputation plummet under new ownership."
David Dyer-Bennet: "UHS II allows less compression when shooting 4k video in my camera (or you can just get uncompressed video with no overlay out the HDMI port and use an external recorder and real hard drives; you'd have to do that if you were doing anything serious). So yeah, important largely for video."
Luke: "At Imaging-Resource, we had a lot of cards from a lot of sources that were reformatted and used in hundreds of cameras. I think I threw out one bad one in seven years.
"And, I agree with Mr. Wood: get A good pen you like."
Graeme Scott: "I still use the Canon 20D I bought in 2005 as a camera for quick reference shots (8 MP is plenty for this ). The two Jessops-branded Compact Flash cards I got with it are still working fine.
"I don't lose pens, I just use them so infrequently that I find they've dried out when I try to write a greetings card. Pencils are definitely the way to go."
Mike replies: CF cards were the best. Robust, not too small, really held up. I wish they were still the standard.
And, have you ever read The Pencil by Henry Petroski? Amazing book.
Roger Bradbury: "It's socks and pens I lose in the house, but out in the shed it's the special bolts I lose; the ones I can't just replace with an ordinary one. They drop to the floor while I'm working on something and I search for them immediately. I've cleared out every corner of the shed, but none have reappeared. I've bought replacements, the piece of magic that usually guarantees the old one suddenly materialises in clear view on the workbench. Nothing works. My conclusion? It's the scrap metal mice."
Tom Burke: "Pens: since I started storing my Bic pens in just one place, I have actually had the experience of exhausting a ball-point pen! Never happened to me before in my life. And when it happened, I knew where I had a replacement.
"SD cards: Some years ago I read that cards that were continually removed from the camera, inserted into a reader, and then replaced into the camera were more likely to fail than those that just stayed in the camera. So I stopped using SD card slots/readers and instead connect the camera to the computer (via a USB-C cable in my latest camera) and use Canon's EOS Utility to read the files and transfer them to the computer. I'll generally wait until the card is more than half-full before formatting it, too—the EOS Utility remembers which files it has already transferred to the computer and on a future occasion gives me the option to transfer 'new files.' I never delete files on the card in-camera (easier to do it later on the computer) and I always format the card in the camera. No card failures since adopting these practices! —But I have no evidence that they have any actual effect on card longevity/resilience. They make me happy, however."
Bill Tyler: "When I first started using computers, memory cost about $1 per byte. At that rate, your 32 GB card would be...."
What I do now is treat them as write-once. After they are full, they get taped into a file folder for archiving. It's a very cheap form of backup, considering SD card prices now.
Posted by: James | Wednesday, 01 May 2024 at 01:21 PM
Ball point pens, tops to said pens, and odd socks from the dryer. I have a theory (not proven) that the rings of Saturn consist of these items, despite current scientific thought. How they get there, I don't know.
Posted by: MARILYN NANCE | Wednesday, 01 May 2024 at 01:48 PM
Add the SD cards, they disappear on me too!
Posted by: MARILYN NANCE | Wednesday, 01 May 2024 at 01:50 PM
Do you leave photos on the cards after downloading them to your computer? I ask because you have a lot of cards and buy them in lots of 4-5. I have one or two cards for each of my cameras. I download the images promptly to a drive that is backed up to a NAS which is also backed up to a NAS at my son's house halfway across the country, then I format the card and put it back in the camera immediately because I have had at one instance of trying to shoot only discover that the card was at home. Like you, I have never had a card go bad. Some of mine are at least 20 years old. I had one HDD hard drive fail (I dropped it) but now I tend to use only SSD drives. They are less delicate (no moving parts) and they are faster.
Posted by: James Bullard | Wednesday, 01 May 2024 at 02:24 PM
Maybe all your pens have migrated to my house. It seems everywhere I look, there are pens. Every time one fails to write, I instantly throw it away. And yet there are more pens.
I don't have a long timeline on SD cards. Many are on the order of 6 years old. I think all are Lexar. Many 32 GB, several 64 GB, and one 128 GB. 17 in all, 2 in cameras, and the rest in handy little holders designed for them. I've only had 1 card fail. Why so many? There was a 2 month long trip to New Zealand. I wanted to come home with all images on a hard drive, AND on SD cards, and I didn't want to reuse any of them. I did a bit of math to figure I'd probably need at least a dozen cards. Then I looked at the price of them in NZ (2x at least) and bought more here. I also sometimes set up a camera for night skies, hoping for aurora borealis, and let it run till the battery dies.
As a bonus, my theory on electronic stuff is that it will fail fairly quickly, easily within the warranty period, or else will last long beyond any possible extended warranty, assuming a modicum of care.
Posted by: Keith Cartmell | Wednesday, 01 May 2024 at 03:16 PM
Regarding memory cards, I have a dozen "card wallets" all stored in a drawer. Each wallet is labeled for a specific camera and each card slot is labeled with the subject and date, until I'm 100% sure that I have multiple back ups for the data, then the cards are formatted and labeled as such, again for that particular camera.
Card wallets are a simple way to keep those items organized and located in a known place. There are a ton of options on Amazon for them, from small to large storage capacity.
Posted by: Albert Smith | Wednesday, 01 May 2024 at 03:47 PM
I would not buy the Satechi hub you linked to. It has got only one USB-C port, the rest is USB 3.0. -- I bought a small hub with four USB-C ports because all my external SSD had come with both USB-C and USB 3.0 cables. I am glad I switched to USB-C, no more needing to make sure the cable is inserted the right way. -- Think ahead, you will be using your new Mac five years from now . . .
Posted by: Christer Almqvist | Wednesday, 01 May 2024 at 03:52 PM
A little while ago I bought one of those cameras that you don't have to aim -- it takes 360 degree pictures. And videos. Fun.
Not fun: It uses memory cards about the size of the potato chip crumbs one finds at the bottom of the bag. So small that if you drop one on a windy day, all your images will be floating around like so much tiny detritus from the garden.
Anticipating this, the camera company included an iPhone-size carrier that holds 20 memory cards and adapters (one adapter for each memory card -- you don't want to mess with mating tiny cards with slightly less tiny adapters anywhere other than over a clean and uncluttered desk). The carrier's color is somwhere between bright red and international orange so difficult to not see.
I was never very good at quickly loading 35mm film but compared to fiddling with these tiny retainers of digital photography, I was a star.
At least we don't have to deal with them inside a black bag or dark broom closet.
Posted by: Speed | Wednesday, 01 May 2024 at 04:54 PM
My borrowers don't seem at all interested in cards or pens, as I seem to have embarrassing accumulations of both. That includes a bunch of 1GB SD cards, most of which contain archived audio files ("archived" meaning little more than that I tossed them in a drawer when I was done with them). Heck, I even have an xD card or two somewhere.
Posted by: robert e | Wednesday, 01 May 2024 at 05:13 PM
I used to be a SanDisk guy. That is, until Western Digital bought the company and some of its bigger SSDs began to fail. The firm did not handle those issues well. I have no idea whether the reliability problems extend to memory cards.
I now stick with ProGrade and Delkin UHS-II, which are very reliable. I also find they run the coolest of any cards I have tried. For the one or two cameras that I have that still specify UHS-I, I use Samsung PRO Ultimate and PRO Plus cards.
Posted by: Steve Biro | Wednesday, 01 May 2024 at 06:20 PM
what = 4
sometimes = 9
never = 5
I lose pencils.
I only use a pen to write on the kitchen calendar. The pen stays by the calendar until the cat goes on a nip-nip-fueled rampage and turns it into a hockey puck on the counter. Surprisingly, he's been considerate enough to leave it on the counter when he crashes from all the excitement. But the pencils disappear, and I pay big bucks for them bc I am fussy about my pencils.
As a college math major, I received a gift of an expensive mechanical pencil beautifully weighted with the 0.7mm pencil lead I prefer, only to lose it. :(
Yeah, I'm a nerd. Photographers are cool nerds.
I return the card to the camera after uploading. I have a case with backups, but I have never used them. I do not want to jinx myself, but I've never had to deal with lost or damaged cards, just a mysterious case of disappearing pencils.
I'm pointing the paw of blame squarely at my feline roommates. Who knows, maybe those borrowers from the book have some hockey-playing cats on their hands, too.
Posted by: darlene | Wednesday, 01 May 2024 at 06:39 PM
Maybe I am odd, but I rarely buy cards. Mine seem to last a good long time.
As far as things disappearing:
https://notalwaysright.com/time-to-go-back-to-kindergarten/327908/
Posted by: KeithB | Wednesday, 01 May 2024 at 06:45 PM
Pens. The S is the problem.
Get one good pen.
Mentally less drag to track a single object.
And if it's expensive, you won't lose it.
And... a thing of beauty is a joy forever.
Posted by: Kye Wood | Wednesday, 01 May 2024 at 07:05 PM
I blame Butters.
Posted by: Jnny | Wednesday, 01 May 2024 at 10:41 PM
Lamy fountain pens are a nice alternative to the usual roller pens so common. And very affordable as well.
[I can't use fountain pens. Lefty.
I actually used them for several years in high school, because on the weekends I worked at a pharmacy where we sold them and I couldn't resist buying a few because they were so neat. I was partial to Parkers, which were made down the road in Janesville, Wisconsin. But finally I realized I was contorting my hand in order to write without dragging my hand through the fresh ink, and did the sensible thing and gave them up. Still kinda like them even though I can't use them. --Mike]
Posted by: K4kafka | Wednesday, 01 May 2024 at 10:57 PM
RE Jnny's post. "I blame Butters."
SOLID GOLD.
Posted by: Kye Wood | Thursday, 02 May 2024 at 01:17 AM
The failure of computer related hardware almost immediately or after sveral years of use is well known and is called the bath tub effect as when the failures of a large number of a particular piece of equipment is graphed over time the shape of the frequency distribution takes the profile of a bath tub, steep descent from a large number of near immediate failures, wide valley of reliability and then a slow increase in failures caused by wear and tear. More detail here: https://www.datacenterfrontier.com/voices-of-the-industry/article/11429014/the-bathtub-curve-and-data-center-equipment-reliability
Along with pens paperclips socks and SD cards that inexplicably vanish you can add teaspoons. And this is not just anecdotal but has been thoroughly researched by a group of experimenters in Australia. You can read all the details here :https://www.bmj.com/content/331/7531/1498?fbclid=IwAR0O4yl92RlSz73XSRg11I2r9aMqsq50a4lphTvC4UflKzhlStnCr65rUEs&int_source=trendmd&int_medium=cpc&int_campaign=usage-042019
There results are that large numbers of spoons need to be purchased on a continuous basis to maintain a viable number of useful spoons in the lab tearooms. I would suggest that this policy would only need to be maintained for a few months before the facility would reach a point of 'spoon saturation' such that a spoon would be at hand as soon as you realised it was needed.
Posted by: Roger Bartlett | Thursday, 02 May 2024 at 03:25 AM
I find these handy for storing and carrying SD cards
SDcardholder com.
I flip mine around once they are used.
Posted by: John Abee | Thursday, 02 May 2024 at 05:01 AM
I only have 4 cards, and the only one that never strays is my faithful 256mb Lexar. When I buy the farm, she’ll probably be lying next to me.
Posted by: Sean | Thursday, 02 May 2024 at 06:21 AM
If you find an old tiny Swiss Army knife, might be mine because I can't find it here anymore.
Posted by: Robert Roaldi | Thursday, 02 May 2024 at 07:42 AM
Re Cards.... I lived in fear of duplicate images ... arising from mishandling of cards in the field and related workflows ....
Card to disk, backup to second external disk, format the card.
I have now changed my workflow fundamentally for multi day trips, as cards have such high capacities.
1. Shoot images....
2. Back at base (home, hotel) I synchronise my card to a trip folder on a Samsung T7 (Blue Colour).
2. Synch this folder to a second T7 (Red)
3. Put the card back in the camera ... and continue. At the end of the trip I can ingest to my main system from one of the fast SSD drives and can format the card when my images get backed up to my main backup system.
This would not work for high volume wildlife / sports shooters using multiple cards in a session.
Posted by: Matt O'Brien | Thursday, 02 May 2024 at 10:42 AM
One of the Youtubers did a video a few months back on the importance of backups, and one of his teaching tools was a Ziploc bag full of failed SD cards. When he cracked one of them open (a fake SanDisk, if I recall), inside he found - a Micro SD card of the same capacity!
Posted by: Chuck Albertson | Thursday, 02 May 2024 at 11:02 AM
The Borrower is likely singing, Thanks for the Memory".
Posted by: Herman Krieger | Thursday, 02 May 2024 at 12:22 PM
One 256GB Sandisk card in each camera.
No carrying cards or losing them.
Copy to the hard disk, replace in the camera.
Usually format them at the start of each month.
Posted by: Hugh | Thursday, 02 May 2024 at 01:51 PM
"And although my camera supports UHS-II it's supposedly not any faster with it except when ingesting to the computer (I think that's right anyway)—and I almost can't imagine a case where I might need the card to upload faster than a UHS-I card already does."
True for your use, I imagine. But not so generically. Example from some of my SD cards:
Lexar UHS II 1667x cards Max Read Speed: 250 MB/s
Lexar UHS II 2000x cards Max Read Speed: 300 MB/s
Read speeds are generally whats printed on the label. So not much difference, no?
Well, yeah, big difference, if you look at write speed:
Lexar UHS II 1667x cards Max Write Speed: 120 MB/s
Lexar UHS II 2000x cards Max Write Speed: 260 MB/s
I have no idea how fast your camera is able to write. And you shoot slow. When focus stacking, and using burst modes, such as OM ProCapture modes, write speed does make a difference.
As to read speed, it makes a difference to me when I have hundreds of shots from a day in the field. But it simply comes with fast write speed, anyway.
Posted by: Moose | Thursday, 02 May 2024 at 02:10 PM
My house seems to have pen borrowing Borrowers as well. They also take screwdrivers and tape measures, but seem to leave the SD cards alone. Like others I keep coming across old small ones I barely remember buying. I just bought a few new ones since the new camera wants faster ones with a V speed rating. It's amazing how cheap even a 512GB card has gotten, though after reading the comments above I now regret buying a SanDisk.
I have repurposed some of the old SD cards to backup the camera settings. That way I can reformat the main cards and ensure I don't lose the settings.
Posted by: Larry Gebhardt | Thursday, 02 May 2024 at 06:28 PM
Flash memory like SD cards are not designed for archival storage.
https://whatsabyte.com/are-sd-cards-good-for-long-term-storage/
Posted by: jh | Friday, 03 May 2024 at 02:26 AM
1. I use a La Cie hard drive as the primary storage source for my photography (14 tb) which is exactly the same colour as an iMac mini and sits next to it. It's quiet, has not yet missed a beat, and has a powered USB A port, an SD port AND a CF port on the front for the odd occasion when I talk my now aging D3 out to play. Very convenient.
2. I'm generally opposed to disposable devices for environmental reasons, but sometimes the convenience is just too great to pass up. See if you can get yourself some Pilot Varsity or "V" fountain pens - they can sometimes be hard to find but are often on Amazon etc. They are reasonably cheap disposable fountain pens but are great to write with - better than several expensive pens I've acquired over the years, never leak (even on aircraft), and whose nibs for reasons I don't quite understand, work perfectly well with left-handed writers (with apologies for the very poor attempted pun). And if you ruin a nib with your writing angle (or dropping the pen on it, etc.), or it gets borrowed, just grab a new pen and keep going... I prefer the fine nibs.
Posted by: Bear. | Friday, 03 May 2024 at 03:56 AM
As was mentioned by at least two commenters, I have had TWO Western Digital HDDs roll over and die. No satisfaction from WD on the follow-up with them. No more DD for me, also no more HDDs just SSDs. Another frustrating failure of media devices has been "thumb drives". I have had several that appear to be read-once and never again, or simply do not work right out of the package. Cheap, low capacity memory cards are a solution, except when you want to give them to someone and they do not have the correct or any read capability.
As I continue to age, now 77, I find myself "losing" things at a much higher frequency. Pens, pencils, pocket knives, and keys. Pens and pencils are not as upsetting as I try to use low cost ones so the pain is lessened. However, in the case of knives and keys, it can be a $$$$. Have you ever needed to replace a car remote? OUCH!
One final note, In the film days, you could rely on the negative or slide as a back-up if stored properly. Of course now, I am trying to cull the herd as they say and dispose of the voluminous accumulation of the old media. Why? Not sure, my clients and children don't want any of them.
AH, progress, I think that is what they call it.
Posted by: Michael | Friday, 03 May 2024 at 09:00 AM
The flash memory in memory cards won't wear out from age alone -- only from heavy read/write use. It's unlikely you will wear out a card in a camera.
The "ten year" estimate you've heard is probably memory retention, not degradation. Flash memory retains data by trapping electrons in a transistor, essentially like a capacitor. Over time, the transistors lose electrons for various reasons. If they lose too many, that memory cell becomes unreadable.
I have asked Sandisk engineers about retention, but there are too many variables to give a firm estimate. The major factor is transistor size -- newer, smaller transistors trap fewer electrons and therefore retain their data for less time. Broadly speaking, the higher a memory card's capacity, the lower its retention.
Ten years is probably a reasonable estimate. Personally, I think five years is safer. I've had USB thumb drives fail after five years. I wouldn't trust any flash memory (including SSDs) for archival storage.
Posted by: Tom Halfhill | Friday, 03 May 2024 at 03:53 PM
Many new cards come with access to free recovery software. If you have some old cards turn up it’s always interesting to see what’s still lurking on the cards having been previously deleted….
Posted by: Dan Deakin | Sunday, 05 May 2024 at 04:52 AM