I guess people want me to write about this story: "He spent his life building a $1 million stereo. The real cost was unfathomable," by Geoff Edgers, in The Washington Post. A lot of people have sent me the link. [UPDATE: Craig tells us that non-subscribers can read the article here. Craig also notes that "the better term for Mr. Fritz's condition, rather than 'monomaniacal,' would be 'stereomaniacal.' Any true audiophile would surely agree."]
I had already read it, having found it, ironically, while I was unsubscribing to the WaPo. I just don't read it enough. (I'm very unhappy with the state of access to information on the Web, by the way. Although that's another story. We—and by "we" I mean Western humanity—need a new, rethought model for how that should work, I'll say that. It's becoming a Tower of Babel.)
The story struck me as disturbing, and a little horrifying. I'm not qualified to diagnose what kind of madman Ken Fritz was, but it seems like a mere psychological determination would be too rationalist/materialist, too modern—he seems like something out of a Gothic horror novel from Victorian times, or perhaps even a type to stand with the classic protagonists of ancient Greek tragedies. (The giant stereo could have served up the Chorus.) The only word I can come up with is monomaniacal. Which doesn't seem to do Mr. Fritz justice. He put me in mind of a poor soul I saw on the A&E show Hoarders once who couldn't get rid of old objects because they reminded her of her children, when her hoarding of old objects was what was causing her estrangement from...her children. Hmm.
On the other hand, I might point out that you don't have to be obsessed with building the perfect stereo to treat your sons like shi*t. Lots of people do that who are perfectly happy with desktop speakers or listening to music on airpods. We all waste time; a lot of us have weird hobbies. I recall meeting two young men in an electronics store once who had each spent most of their lives mastering various video games and every possible thing appertaining thereunto. All they were qualified to do for a living was...sell video games. It was all they knew! When I worked at Model Railroader, I remember reading about a guy who spent his whole life making an extremely elaborate (and famous) model railroad layout which then had to be dismantled at his death—it couldn't be moved, and no one had the money, the patience, or the will to maintain it anyway. I don't actually see what's uniquely odd about wasting your time and money on a crazy handmade stereo. Is it really any better or worse than fielding a polo team or collecting old cars or climbing all the tallest mountains in the world, or any other expensive, shading-into-neurotic pastime?
Still, there's no denying that audiophilia and obsessive-compulsive disorder go together like cheese and crackers. I was involved in it only for a short time, but it was long enough to acquaint myself with a variety of crackpots, obsessives, and eccentrics. And they were on both sides of the spectrum, too—the people who insisted on strange, quasi-magical tweaks on the one hand, and the folks who insisted that all amplifiers had to sound the same and that lamp cord was just as good as speaker wire on the other. To me, the anti-magical stance was just as unscientific and irrational as the people who "heard the difference" between a Home Depot electrical outlet and one made for hospitals.
The haunted darkroom
Something similar, but at a much lower level, happened at the darkroom magazine. I accepted and published an article by a guy who had just finished building "the perfect darkroom," everything beautifully designed, researched, engineered, and hand-crafted. It was magnificent, although, having spent years toiling in darkrooms, it also struck me as too nice to be practical. Years later, I remembered the guy's name and called him to find out the fate of the glorious darkroom. He said that after finishing it, he almost never worked in it, and subsequently it was dismantled and put in storage at the time of a house move and he had never set it up again. He came to realize, belatedly, that it was the planning and building of it that had been the hobby for him, not what he could do with it once it was done. I had run into that phenomenon before.
When I read the article about the million-dollar stereo system I couldn't see the subject as sympathetic. I thought it shone a flashlight on a dark, ugly pathology. I can't see much beautiful or desirable in such a quest. Quest...hey, maybe that's the best analogy! The Man of La Mancha—Don Quixote. (Have you ever read it? I had to admit I gave up. I'm like that guy in that Onion video who reviewed only the first third of all the great classic novels.)
All I can say is, don't spend your life tilting at windmills. The perfect is the enemy of the good.
But boy, did that article ever creep me out.
Mike
Original contents copyright 2023 by Michael C. Johnston and/or the bylined author. All Rights Reserved. Links in this post may be to our affiliates; sales through affiliate links may benefit this site. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. (To see all the comments, click on the "Comments" link below or on the title of this post.)
Featured Comments from:
Severian: "I share Mike's reaction—this is ultimately a very sad story that is quite familiar. Brings to mind a certain captain and a whale. Lots of crew (family) are destroyed in the hunt and the whale outlives the captain. Sorry if I spoiled that book for any readers! Obsession about anything brings to mind the classic line from pharmacology: The dose makes the poison. It is so easy for intense hyper focus and true craftsmanship to slide into what I would define as mental illness. It is a caution to all of us 'of a certain age.' Our days will be up sooner than we care to face and we should take heed against investing too much (time, money, pride) in what will often be scrapped not too long after our funerals."
Peter Wright: "Fascinating article! Ancient wisdom in all religions has it that we shall have 'no god but god,' or words to that effect. Ken Fritz worshiped his stereo and paid a price, but many people fall into the same trap in different guises."
G Dan Mitchell: "I read your blog but rarely post comments. But I have a professional background in music and an aspect of audio. (I had a college faculty position teaching what we used to call 'electronic music.') One thing that almost no one notes about the super audiophile types is that they are predominantly not connected to the actual world of music, despite focusing obsessively on the purported 'perfect' modes of reproducing music. The complement to that observation is that the inverse is usually the case, too. I know a lot of musicians—people who make their livings by making music—and I cannot think of one who fits the audiophile profile. Whatever this audiophile thing is (and I have some ideas about that), it is only tangentially related to music itself."
Mike replies: You might not post comments much any more, but I note that you've been commenting since 2010, which is pretty impressive. Thanks for reading, and for the comments you do make.
Gary Merken: "Spending decades and a truckload (or two) of money on building the 'perfect' stereo system is one thing. Nothing intrinsically wrong with that. The horror, as you describe the story, comes from pressing his children into service pouring concrete and building walls, yet never (it seemed from the article) paying any time or attention to what interested them, what drove their passions. Hence at the end of his life, when he was too sick to even lift a record onto the enormous 'Frankentable,' one of his sons would not return his calls, the other didn't come around much, and only one of his children had much to do with him. To me, that was the saddest part."
I can't read the full article since it's paywalled (and WaPo doesn't seem to believe in letting people read a few free articles every month), but I get the idea. Naturally, the audiophila forums are full of people who think this sort of thing is just wonderful. For example, search for "ken fritz site:stevehoffman.tv" at Google.
However, I think the better term for Mr. Fritz's condition, rather than "monomaniacal", would be "stereomaniacal". Any true audiophile would surely agree.
Posted by: Craig | Monday, 15 January 2024 at 11:49 PM
For non-WaPo subscribers, the article can be read here: https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/he-spent-his-life-building-a-1-million-stereo-the-real-cost-was-unfathomable/ar-AA1mUqsx
Posted by: Craig | Monday, 15 January 2024 at 11:54 PM
From the story:
"At some point, Betsy flicked the power on the 35,000-watt amplifiers and put on a selection of Christmas songs."
Posted by: John Camp | Tuesday, 16 January 2024 at 12:14 AM
I red that article a couple of days ago, and who I mostly felt sad for was his family. Really a tragic tale. I’m probably a bit of an audiophile but would never spend that much time and money on my hobby. Same with my photography hobby.
Posted by: Steve B | Tuesday, 16 January 2024 at 12:32 AM
There is something strange about the world of audiophilia. I think it is related to the nature of sound perception. It is quite difficult to pin down sound quality by ear alone, aural memory fades in seconds and the power of suggestion plays a strong part. This means for audiophiles there is often a distrust of objective methods. They think they hear something the measurements don't show and they have faith in their perceptions so they end up distrusting objective measurements and fall prey to unscrupulous media, manufacturers and innocent, but confused fellow audiophiles more than willing to play on that distrust. The great irony is that for the most part, major equipment manufacturers rely on the very measurements that audiophiles so distrust to design the equipment they love. It all leads to a vicious circle that typically involves many years of great expense and rarely results in commensurate satisfaction. I was cured of my audiophile obsession by the simple act of volunteering with a high end audio manufacturer and learning first hand how it really works from the designer himself.
I studied Jane Austen's "Emma" aged 16-18 at 6th form as part of my A-Level English Literature course. When I say "studied" I mean I never read it. What average 17 year old boy would enjoy "Emma"! Now having retired, I set out to put right a number of unfinished tasks from my youth and read it right through. I still think it is unreadable crap with a vastly inflated reputation and my 17 year old younger self had it right. I think, perhaps, in retrospect, English Literature was not a wise choice of A-Level for me - although I did ok in the final exam, it was despite being unable to answer any questions on the set classic novel for some reason...
😄😄😄
Posted by: Dave Millier | Tuesday, 16 January 2024 at 05:39 AM
So much waste, but you can't reason with obsession. It's not even the "perfect" stereo. If he wanted better sound, he'd get a digital player with a $100 DAC that would significantly outperform his $50,000 custom record player.
Posted by: Dori | Tuesday, 16 January 2024 at 07:40 AM
I've always been leery of high-end audio. I still use a mid-level CD-player (three disc changer baby!) stereo with two 40w speakers and a 65w self-powered subwoofer that I bought (gasp) almost 30 years ago. It has been boxed up and moved around the country at least a dozen times and still works like new. To me, it sounds as good if not better than the fancy systems I've listened to over the years. I even had it hooked up to the TV for years where it did an admirable job of punching up our movie experience.
Actually (shamefully? embarrassingly?), the best audio experience of my life came in my 2007 Toyota Yaris hatchback. Four tiny paper-cone speakers being zapped with, at best, a few watts per channel and mounted in an extremely noisy and rattly car (aside: on the highway above 55 mph we didn't even try to listen to the radio because this car was so loud). A home-made mp3 CD was shuffling through Iron & Wine songs and one of them sounded so good that I had to pull over to listen to it again. I had no way to identify the track at the time and for whatever reason I've never been able to figure out which track it was, despite owning every Iron & Wine album and listening to them semi-regularly. Audio-amnesia? The curse of perfection?
Posted by: ASW | Tuesday, 16 January 2024 at 10:12 AM
Hand in hand with the Washington Post article is a video documentary on the man and his system:
One Man's Dream - Ken Fritz Documentary about the world's best stereo system
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4b2IOOhJmxw
Ken does some serious audio-name dropping in that documentary.
Posted by: kevin willoughby | Tuesday, 16 January 2024 at 10:25 AM
What a f*****g idiot.
Posted by: Graeme Scott | Tuesday, 16 January 2024 at 11:31 AM
Sounds like sound advice from Mike.
Posted by: Herman Krieger | Tuesday, 16 January 2024 at 11:46 AM
All it makes me think is that, as an atheist, I don't believe we have any ongoing consciousness or awareness after death, and for people like this, that's probably a blessing. Both because they won't know what happens to their "legacy" and because they won't have eternity to dwell on the personal cost of it.
Posted by: Ade | Tuesday, 16 January 2024 at 12:11 PM
The irony here is that your hearing progressively declines as you get older, so no matter what you do to improve your audiophile system you won't be able to hear the difference.
Posted by: Robert Hudyma | Tuesday, 16 January 2024 at 12:16 PM
I remember reading about him a few years ago at an audio site for enthusiasts. I have friends who are always tweaking and moving in new gear. By the way, a great way to buy audio gear is used. I'm a buy what I want and hold person, usually less than a year old gear from people moving on to the next thing. I go to Axpona some years just to see what's going on. The systems have gotten so expensive. After visiting multiple rooms, when I go home I find I am very happy with what I have.
I think some people just aren't self aware enough to ask the question, 'Just what the heck am I doing and why?' You sure can't take it all with you when you pass on, just leaving your obsessions for other people to deal with.
Posted by: Dan | Tuesday, 16 January 2024 at 12:19 PM
A quick search of ultra high end speaker cables on the web shows pricing in the $80,000.00 bracket so it is not hard to imagine how one could blow a million without too much trouble.
Posted by: Nick Reith | Tuesday, 16 January 2024 at 12:31 PM
You can't find the information you want anymore because the search engines have been co-opted by people who want to sell you something or push some agenda on you.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2020/10/19/google-search-results-monopoly/
Posted by: Mark P Morris | Tuesday, 16 January 2024 at 01:40 PM
The kids as slaves I very much related to. My dad did the same thing. He had a sort of pyramid scheme outlook on life (and when I think of that huge stereo, I think pyramid). Friends did not want to come over because he would always put them to work. We had a multi-colored "chore chart" with index cards organized into daily, weekly and monthly work for my brother and me. Way beyond take out the garbage and do the dishes... We also, more often than not, hated our dad. He worked from home during our teen years, and when we came in the house after school, he would usually have a pile of "things we had done wrong" on the kitchen table to discuss.
We were fortunate that my mom divorced him and we had a couple normal if not ideal years as teenagers before setting out on our own.
Posted by: John Krumm | Tuesday, 16 January 2024 at 01:58 PM
From a technical point of view, what confused me was that he did all this with vinyl as his source. Surely whatever he did was beyond the resolution of the media?
This isn't my area of expertise, but my understanding is that most of the vinyl vs. X arguments are with X being CDs. Nowadays I believe that audiophiles use very high resolution bitstreams via the internet (perhaps stored on hard drives), way beyond what CDs can provide.
Posted by: Marc Rochkind | Tuesday, 16 January 2024 at 02:47 PM
Is somehow reminding me of a house listing I saw while visiting San Diego. For sale for $32M on Coronado Island by a toy company executive. Apparently the guy did $20M of renovations to it which, at first must have been tasteful, but opulent, restoration of the original architecture. But then much much more seemed to be done, a lot underground, for bizarre entertainment rooms, surf-themed, toy-themed, Star Wars themed, …
“Rosebud.”
Posted by: xfmj | Tuesday, 16 January 2024 at 05:41 PM
$1 million, and it didn't even go to eleven.
Posted by: Sean | Tuesday, 16 January 2024 at 06:48 PM
LIfe’s all about the getting, not the having.
Posted by: Bear. | Tuesday, 16 January 2024 at 06:52 PM
"All I can say is, don't spend your life tilting at windmills."
Or reading all the way through articles like this. I clicked on it, saw the picture, read a few words — and left the rest unread.* It's so predictable, many of us could have finished it . . .
"The perfect is the enemy of the good."
Depends on the definition!
If The Perfect is realizing it's a time suck and quitting while ahead, it's better than the good of finishing.
Or, the reverse.
* It's been over 60 years, and I still remember clearly the day I realized I didn't have to finish a book, just because I'd gone to so much trouble to get it, it was a rare classic, yadda, yadda. I didn't have to finish it. It was awful, and yet a gift, as I've elected not to finish reading so many things since, like adding years to my life.
Posted by: Moose | Tuesday, 16 January 2024 at 07:22 PM
I'll second what commenter Graeme Scott above said. What an effing idiot.
This guy had one lucky break: to his death, he remained utterly oblivious to everything (and everyone) but his obsession. Because if he'd ever had a moment of introspective clarity at the end where he could assess his life, he would have hated himself.
Posted by: Ken | Tuesday, 16 January 2024 at 07:28 PM
We need the idea Ted Nelson originally came up with for his Project Xanadu (not exactly the web; but in the mid 1960s).
It was obvious to him then that there needed to be an economic model to make it practical. That model was micro-payments per word for quoting things. My server could publish whatever it wanted and I would be paid for people reading it, and it could quote anything else published out there and when people read my quote of that, the original author would be paid.
Posted by: David Dyer-Bennet | Tuesday, 16 January 2024 at 10:04 PM
Long time ago I worked in a Hi Fi store, just the manager and I. We had a very good customer who in the quest for a respectful bass response managed to wrestle a concrete sewer pipe into his listening room then drop a large woofer into it. A concrete footing together with steel columns was required under the house to support everything. Good talking point.
Posted by: Peter Tutt | Wednesday, 17 January 2024 at 01:45 AM
Your reference to the Man of the Mancha reminds me of "L'homme de la Mancha", a version in French by Jacques Brel. The song "L'inaccessible étoile" is unbelievable. The song title in English would The Unreachable Star.
Posted by: Stéphane Bosman | Wednesday, 17 January 2024 at 05:45 AM
For a million, I'd just hire a band.
Posted by: Robert Roaldi | Wednesday, 17 January 2024 at 07:12 AM
It's possible the fellow suffered from mental illness, and this was a form of self-medicating.
Posted by: Bob Rosinsky | Wednesday, 17 January 2024 at 12:01 PM
Actually this occurs in huge numbers in homes.
Ask an estate agent, there are a huge number of house (etc) buyers who will (irrespective of the age of the fittings) rip out kitchens and bathrooms (and other elements) when they buy a house.
Indeed many when finished will then soon sell and move on to another property. This even happens if they actually designed and built the house from scratch. They aim to have show houses and then get bored or dissatisfied with their own efforts.
Posted by: louis mccullagh | Wednesday, 17 January 2024 at 04:06 PM
Posts like this would be so much more engaging if you were to go to the Substack model, or Substack itself. You have an interesting post that generates an interesting set of comments. A discussion among the intelligent, perceptive followers you have cultivated can never get off the ground because you moderate and edit and review all the comments before they are posted. If you were to have done this on Substack, an interesting discussion would have taken place between your commentators.
It's not uncommon for a number of Substacks that an article or post generates hundreds of comments -- here after 20 or 30 it's a dead end and we move on.
[There's some reason Substack doesn't work for me, but I forget what it was. I did check into it at one point. --Mike]
Posted by: Andrew Kochanowski | Wednesday, 17 January 2024 at 05:13 PM
Having been diagnosed late in life with mental issues I find stories like Mr. Fritz' terribly sad. Not only for himself, but the way it affected his family and friends.
I mentioned Mr. Fritz to my father (who has only grudgingly accepted that my "quirks" are not normal, probably because he has many of them himself) in making a point that many people who seem to have had destructive issues but would only have been tolerated as "strange" in the past, but in modern times could have led much happier existences.
For me, it is not treatment or therapy that have benefitted me most, but understanding and forgiving myself and figuring out how to live without causing other people distress as a result of my issues.
Posted by: Nikhil Ramkarran | Thursday, 18 January 2024 at 06:30 AM