« David Turnley Christmas Print Offer | Main | Open Mike: Wasaaaaaaabi! (Wasabi) »

Tuesday, 12 December 2023

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Wow, the timing! I was just watching probably the 500th rerun of Seinfeld and this commercial came on. I have a digital DVR, so I could rewind and freeze frame to see the Spotmatic. An old screw mount SLR and printed photos, perfect. Maybe the trend followers will sell back the Fujifilm X100V cameras they bought up because they were told to and buy Pentaxs.

I'll trade my Spotmatic with the excellent 50mm f/1.4 straight up for one of those X100Vs.

That really makes me wonder about the Pentax film project.

https://www.ricoh-imaging.co.jp/english/pentax/filmproject/

Like that the included grandma's old truck in the driveway.

Imagine the flip side of that ad -- Pentax cameras old/film and new/digital with grandma and granddaughter photographing their old and new (EV maybe?) trucks. Alas, camera companies don't make TV ads anymore, right?

This video reminded me of something I saw earlier today about a photographer's "revolutionary" technique. You'll see what I mean. https://fstoppers.com/humor/photographer-revolutionizes-technique-holding-lens-wrong-way-sparks-outrage-and-652252

My first 35mm was a (Honeywell) Pentax H1a, very similar to the SL. Used a clip-on light meter. Top shutter speed 1/500 sec (SL was 1/1000, I think). It's probably why I love my K1000, K2 and ME so much. The fingers remember!

Loved that one - thanks for embedding it, Michael :)

No offence but I can’t get on board with this one. Sickly, sentimental marketing promoting self-indulgent US consumerism. Why does a single person and her dog need a bus all to themselves to get around in?

Most of the time when companies want to invoke the retro mood with cameras, they dust off the well used Leica. But this is a Japanese company and they have quite a bit of national pride. But, I suspect they did not want to look like they were playing favorites among the usual suspects. So Canon and Nikon were out, they were clever to pick a brand that is no longer independent. I bet the final choices were Minolta SRT-101, Olympus OM-1 and Pentax Spotmatic. Personally, I would have recommended the Canonet G-III QL1 even though it is a Canon product.

[The Spotmatic works much better than a Leica would IMO. It evokes bygone times much better, because they were legendary in their day but nobody uses one or wants one today. --Mike]

I was wondering when you were going to post this. :>)

I originally found this on Pentax Forums (https://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/173-general-photography/463050-has-anyone-else-seen-toyota-christmas-commercial-featuring-pentax-spotmatic.html)

I've already got an SL, so that's tempting, but if I get another film camera, it'll probably be a KX (with mirror lockup) or KM (without mirror lockup), just to have a K-mount camera. I pretty much use my SL for B&W and my K1 II for color.

I look forward to seeing your SL photos.

Ooh, I forgot to mention the windows. Is that red and white dishcloth hanging over the lamp supposed to be a darkroom filter?

At least the shutter sound seems accurate!

[The Spotmatic works much better than a Leica would IMO. It evokes bygone times much better, because they were legendary in their day but nobody uses one or wants one today. --Mike]

You mentioned you were going to post a picture of your quite rare SL to sell it here on TOP. Why bother as no one will buy it:)

Didn't work for me. Unless she was naturally very good, most of her images would have been - well, let's just say "not good".

If you detect a bit of disappointment, even a hint of bitterness, in the comment above you're not wrong. This last few days I sorted through several thousand slides from the many years when I was taking such images. The earliest were from the mid-70s, the most recent just under 20 years ago. Over 90% of them were awful. Either technically awful (not too many, and mostly found in the older sets) or utterly uninspired. Currently I've got just over 200 saved for further review, and I'm confident that in the end I'll get down to not much more than 100. Then I'll have them scanned and printed in a photo book.

The ease of digital photography has blinded many of us as to how hard photography used to be. Just getting the exposure right let alone achieving a correctly-exposed image that would be worth keeping was a challenge. I feel that anyone who picks up a film camera today - especially an old one, with none of today's 'making it easy' add-ons - is in for a shock.

Somehow I had managed to live this long without ever hearing about "tricolor" imaging. Where have I been?

I think it would be a bit funny to use a Leica or Pentax K-3 Monochrome to do this. Go to all the trouble to build/buy a B&W digicam, only to turn around and use it to mimic a Bayer sensor, albeit using every pixel for each colour. Sounds like a fun experiment though.

Rob Rosinsky and AN both mentioned they do tri-color photography. I've long thought that a tri-sensor camera with beam splitter(s) a la the Technicolor method could produce better color photographs, and be easier to implement from a technology standpoint than the Foveon approach. The cost of 3 1", 4/3, or APS sensors I should think would make the economics work out.

Don't some of the sensor shift cameras where the sensor is moved by a pixel 4 times to increase resolution also make possible same-resolution but 'purer' color files? That seems like it's solvable in software.

Patrick

In reply to Rob and AN, my partner Laura shot this wonderful tricolour image of her pal, Katariina, at uni.

I was always astonished Katariina was able to sit still enough.

Laura now works as an archivist, so her interest in fussy/unusual processes shouldn't have surprised me.

- https://www.instagram.com/p/BSwKU4LAvyy/

- https://ibb.co/Fq9Lgs3

For Pentax repair service, Eric Hendrickson, a former Pentax service manager, now working in Tennessee: http://pentaxs.com/index.html 

Click on his "About Me" tab to learn about his work experience.

The ad pushed many of my buttons, too, it seems, to the extent that I completely forgot what it was trying to sell. To be fair, any relationship with their products was purely gratuitous and coincidental. You can say the same about most Coca Cola ads, technically, but they somehow manage to do a better job of insinuating their product into the feels. Anyway, a nice reminder of what photography is for, for many.

I agree that a long-gone camera was a better choice than something that survived to become a luxury retro fetish; plus, even in their day, the Spotmatic came to be more associated with amateurs than pros, even if some of those amateurs were celebrities.

The story cleverly exploits both the generational aspect of analog photography (including its recent faddishness) and the considerable personal investment associated with a DIY analog printing project.

TL:DW

They pushed the wrong nostalgia buttons for me. When I'd had enough, I was amazed how much was still to go. I opted not to risk an emotional diabetic reaction.

I'll stick with the British TV show Sex Education. One of the young female protagonists is running around shooting everything, anything, everybody and anybody with an OM film camera*.

I don't fantasize about marrying her, but her two big slab front teeth are getting sexier . . .

* Given to her by a sly guy in a wheelchair who would like to . . .

I've done a little tri-color. Did it with a digital camera, just took 3 exposures close together and grabbed one channel from each.

This was the first time Prokudin-Gorski's work hit the Internet, and I wanted to see if some of his artifacts happened for the reasons I thought (they did).

Here's my 2001 photo of downtown Minneapolis, across Lake Calhoun I believe, assembled from color channels from 3 separate exposures.

[Very cool. Yup, that looks like a tricolor all right! I guess more people are trying these than I thought. Or maybe you're just another of the nine people. --Mike]

As far as 35mm SLRs go, I think the Spotmatics are some of the prettiest to look at and nice to shoot with.

Their M42 mount allows the use of countless other lenses many of which are legendary in performance. One example is the Jupiter-9, a CZJ copy of the Zeiss Sonnar 85mm/f2, already a legendary portrait lens in its own right.

Even so, the 50/1.4 Super-Takumar is so amazing in delivering bokeh that I often use it on my Canon EOS-RP (which is a cheap and good FF camera) with an adapter. Mirrorless cameras have opened up a whole new world to acquiring and shooting digitally with old world lenses.

Another one experimenting with trichromes, plus ICM with redscaled film! I had two Spotties back in the 70s, but swapped to K-mount Pentaxes, now use my ME, MX and LX all the time!

Several reactions to the Toyota ad.

1. The young woman reminds me a bit of the character Claire in the terrific television series SIX FEET UNDER who, during the course of the series, gains interest and skills in photography, and grows up to be a professional photographer. She looks like Claire a bit.

2. As a native of eastern Massachusetts who grew up on candlepin bowling, I've always referred to the bowling in the ad as "big-ball bowling, not real bowling."

3. The full, one-minute version of Amazon's current television ad--produced by a well-known agency co-founded by a high-school classmates--will, I think, "hit you in the feels" even more than the Toyota ad. (Or "spot," as the ad people say.) This version, which has the old women remembering their childhood runs on wooden toboggans, unfortunately isn't run on television.

Here's a link to the full thing:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jmF0bOCa_4Q

"nobody uses one or wants one today." Wait a minute. I took a walk through town yesterday morning with my Spotmatic F and the 50mm ƒ/1.4 SMC Takumar. It is compact, easy to use, and does not break. What is there not to love? And I would like to have a Leica fan demonstrate in a print or online where the Takumar lenses are inferior to the L lenses of that era.

[Been done--Herbert Keppler of Modern Photography and later Popular Photography famously compared the Super-Takumar 50mm with the contemporary Leica Summicron. Basically couldn't tell the difference but thought the Super-Takumar had a slight edge.

Another fun fact: for many years the Pentax 50mm f/1.4 Super and Super-Multi-Coated Takumars were loss leaders, sold for less than they cost to make. 80% certainty on that rumor, not total certainty. --Mike]

I still have my Spotmatics, in fact a few Pentax 35mm cameras from a black SV to a black ESII, with a number of Spotmatics in between. Including my first one, the SP500 that didn't have a 1/1000th of a second shutter speed. But of course it did, but the speed is unmarked, because it would have been too expensive to manufacture a different shutter. And I have a mint copy of "The Ultimate Asahi Pentax Screw Mount Guide, 1952-1977 2", which ironically, is worth more than any of my Spotmatics. I bought it for £12 from a collector who was selling all his 35mm Pentax gear, about 20 years ago.

And a note to Toyota (I have been buying four wheel drive Toyotas for over 20 years now). Please stop keep making them larger every time a new model comes out!

I'll check in as another worker in tricolor. I've experimented with different filters and processes; sometimes the result is interesting, though often just strange.

The basement darkroom is so wonderfully familiar. Another appeal to me are the Toyota trucks. I've owned four since 1985, still have two, one is a 1988 and still a daily driver with 253,000 miles.

The comments to this entry are closed.

Portals




Stats


Blog powered by Typepad
Member since 06/2007