« Open Mike: Aliens (OT) | Main | Camera Density »

Tuesday, 13 June 2023

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

I didn't get to comment on the previous post, so here goes... My favorite opinion on the subject is (to paraphrase Calvin [& Hobbes? —Ed.])...that the sign that intelligent life exists is that they haven't tried to contact us.

I’ve seen that aircraft at the WPAF Museum and my little kids (at the time) exclaimed “That’s a UFO!!!”
Occam’s Razor ain’t what it used to be ... https://bigthink.com/life/california-zebras-hearst-castle/#:~:text=Thanks%20to%20some%20unexpected%20similarities,zebra%20herd%20outside%20of%20Africa.
I have run into way too many folks in the medical system that would do better at diagnosis if they didn’t always assume that lower percentage chances of disease presentation were always zero. Apparently they all got the Occam’s Razor talk as residents.
Intelligent alien life surely exists somewhere in our vast universe. The distance/time differential makes it extremely unlikely we’ll ever talk to them in real time. Will we find evidence of their existence? I’m sure we will eventually.
🖖 EdK

You and I are on the same page regarding UFOs. I totally agree.

Like other conspiracy theories, this is a silly thing. Flat earth, JFK, etc…. All these theories are the pursuits of minds with a lot of time on their hands (excuse the mixed metaphors).

But, this one at least can have the charm and delight of childhood imagination. Aliens from other parts of our solar system/galaxy/universe come in a myriad of shapes, sizes, colors, intentions, and results on us.

Well, why not? They can be malevolent, benign, evil, helpful, hellbent on our utter destruction, offering a helpful hand to our woebegone world, utterly indifferent to our struggles, and many other shades of… us.

Like our gods, we draw from what we know best: us. And we use that knowledge of us (flawed as it is) to create kind, or mean, creatures from other worlds. I can’t blame us - what else are we going to use?

Just like those of the past can’t imagine the future, we humans are poorly equipped to imagine any kind of being other than us, here and now.

But, as I said, as far as tinfoil hat fantasies, this one is pretty innocent, and has created some enjoyable flights of fantasy in literature, film, TV, and storytelling. So, if it floats your boat, go for it.

That’s my belief.

"When you hear hoofbeats, though, it's probably a horse."

Unless you're in the Serengeti?

Looking at that machine makes me think you should write a post on drones!

I know no one will be convinced by anything I have to say, granted- but I really wish that they would listen to and read the reports of countless military and commercial pilots, police and military officers, astronauts and government officials worldwide- before off handedly dismissing any and all reports and witnesses as conspiracy theories and whackos. That does not serve their particular argument well. Again, these are the most trained of observers, some whom can recognize just about any aircraft flying in our skies today. And yes, 95% of all UFO sightings are ultimately explainable by non extraordinary means- but at least give military and commercial pilots the benefit of the doubt to distinguish a true arial anomaly from... the planet Venus! That's just common sense. A noted Japanese pilot (along with his copilot and engineer) flying a 747 cargo plane (JAL 1628) stated that were 3 UFO's, one the size of 2 aircraft carriers shadowing his every move; these are the kind of reports that cannot, should not be casually dismissed. Those who do the research know that is but one of numerous, credible reports from the most reliable of observers.

Still, some people insist on their childish fantasy that if UFO's are "real" (as in extraterrestrial, or interdimensional)- why don't they land on the White House lawn? These very same people are no doubt ignorant of the fact that multiple UFO's buzzed the Capitol building on two consecutive Saturdays in July of 1952 as reported in The Times Herald. A commercial airliner spotted them, they were observed on both military and commercial radar, interceptors were deployed the second time when up to twelve flew past and at least one those interceptors spotted them while futilely pursuing.

Our very best scientists can't even tell us what over 95% of our own universe is made of- and yet, and yet, we continue to make the most definitive statements about said universe that we know next to nothing about with the utmost of confidence! Oh yes, aliens certainly may exist, but there too far away, way too far away, don't ya know? Well, yeah, if you're prone to believing commonly spewed... conspiracy theory- no one can even come close to 'proving' that particular, oft repeated little maxim that so many take to heart as very sage wisdom. Well, yeah if one thinks that an advanced species is going to embark on an antiquated linear trajectory using the most inept and primitive form of transportation- rocketry.

Yes, UFO world is full of kooks and zanies of all descriptions, no doubt- and our government depends on them to keep our eye off the ball, one couldn't ask for a better cushion of plausible deniability! Once past the smoke and mirrors, you get to some very credible people, and then you may start to ask the most important questions: why are these entities here, and how is our government interacting with them?

Right now, David Grusch, a former 14 year, US Intelligence official who led analysis of unexplained anomalous phenomena in the DOD (and whose 2022 performance eval reported him as "an officer with the strongest possible moral compass") has stated (at considerable personal risk) that we are in possession of alien craft and pilots, and has turned over illegally withheld documentation to Congress. Jonathan Grey, a current US intelligence official at the National Air and Space Intelligence Center backs him up and Karl E Nell, a retired army colonel, states that he is “beyond reproach”. We'd do well to listen to what this man says- or simply dismiss him as yet another in a long line of... UFO Whackos!

[You keep putting that word in my mouth. I didn't call anyone a whacko. --Mike]

Recommend ScFi.
Snow Crash - Neal Stephson- 1992 490pages. A predicted look at the present.

Anything by William Gibson. The Sprawl Triology was a good read. Gibsons books are written as part of a series.

c.d.embrey

'However, Occam's Razor applies. Occam's Razor is basically as follows: "when you hear hoofbeats, don't think zebras."'

This is a misuse/misunderstanding/oversimplification of Occam's Razor. From E. Britannica:

It is about evaluating theories of causality.
'Occam’s razor, also spelled Ockham’s razor, also called law of economy or law of parsimony, principle stated by the Scholastic philosopher William of Ockham (1285–1347/49) that pluralitas non est ponenda sine necessitate, “plurality should not be posited without necessity.” The principle gives precedence to simplicity: of two competing theories, the simpler explanation of an entity is to be preferred. The principle is also expressed as “Entities are not to be multiplied beyond necessity.”'

Or, more straightforwardly,
"In philosophy, Occam's razor is the problem-solving principle that recommends searching for explanations constructed with the smallest possible set of elements. It is also known as the principle of parsimony or the law of parsimony.
- Wikipedia"

Your example posits a theory, "Hoofbeats alone are sufficient to indicate that horses are coming."

In E. Africa, that is not a useful, accurate theory. In the American South and West, it may mean mules. It is thus overly parsimonious, insufficient to the purpose.

Yes, I know, a common and useful trope in casual thought, but not a useful example of Occam's Razor.

Interestingly, to folks like me, Occam's Razor is only useful in a singly determined universe. In an over determined universe, it fails.

In an under determined universe, it also is of no use. For example, in his book A Different Universe (Reinventing Physics From the Bottom Down), Nobel winning physicist Robert B. Laughlin concludes that reductionism is dead, that important properties of matter above the atomic level are emergent; that they cannot be derived from quantum mechanics, and simply exist, without cause.

I'm far from capable of arguing this position. But, if he is right, then we live in an under determined universe and Occam's Razor is of limited use.

Oh philosophy, oh physics . . .

Kind of both off and on topic:
Years ago (like, the 1950s and 60s) I read every bit of sci-fi that Robert A. Heinlein had written. Some of his novels were in what he or his publisher called the "future history" series. It's astonishing how many things he wove into the fabric of his stories while not focusing on them, just treating them as matter-of-fact, have come to pass. Recent AI and facial recognition come to mind. Manufactured "meat."
His own racist and radical political views also came through, though by the time I hit my 40s, I had lived long enough, read enough, experienced enough, that I easily could recognize them. Still, well-written books.

Did not, by any means, intend or try to put that on... you- simply not in your nature! It's just one of the more oft used pejorative terms used whenever said topic is up for 'discussion.' I tend to use it for all the irony it entails when associated with those who for all other practical purposes would be regarded as veritable pillars of society and well beyond reproach.

[No worries, Stan. I know you're one of the good guys. --Mike]

I've liked this very short story from the time I first encountered it.

http://www.terrybisson.com/theyre-made-out-of-meat-2/

How WOULD an AI interact with us?

The X-Files episode Jim Arthur references was titled: Jose Chung's From Outer Space. It had a Rashomon story structure, and the original planned casting for Jesse Ventura's Man in Black cohort was indeed going to be Johnny Cash, who had to bow out due to scheduling (the song Ring of Fire is heard in the background early in the episode). Alex Trebek was cast as an in-joke because David Duchovny had recently been on a celebrity themed episode of Jeopardy.

Patrick

Hi.

I was very surprised by this post.

Not because of the post's content, but because it was suddenly there - it's the last one. I'm 'up to date,' having just played catch-up over the last wee while with all of 2023's posts to date.

But of course, that means I'm also not up to date. With the last week's worth of work...

Oh well.

Cheers,
Dean

Surely WE are the aliens: someone arrived, spliced their DNA with earth creatures, and buzzed off again.

We're what's left behind.

The comments to this entry are closed.

Portals




Stats


Blog powered by Typepad
Member since 06/2007