Last Day! Tomorrow is the last day to submit pictures for the "Objects" Baker's Dozen. I've gotten more excellent photos of interesting objects than you can shake a selfie-stick at; it will be an editing challenge. Yours can still elbow its way into the lineup, however. I thought I had "the" car shot, for example, but then one came in that was even a little more of a must-include.
[UPDATE: I've received 137 submissions so far, so the set of 13 will be about one in ten. Thanks to everyone for sending along such thoughtful and skillfully-made photographs. As always, it's been a great pleasure to see all the work. You might think I do these "Baker's Dozens" for you, but I'm not so sure.]
The Big Storm came and went. We were only on the trailing end of it and out on the fringe, but still got eight inches down here. Together with the last snow, there's 15 inches of snow on my yard, inconvenient because it comes up over the top of my Bogg boots. (Great boots, by the way.) Love "the day after" winter storms! It's sunny and 10°F (–12°C). Butters is inconvenienced, however, because the snow swallows and hides balls, making fetch difficult to impossible.
[UPDATE: We are down two balls just this weekend! It got down below zero last night. I have to admit, I put on a coat for the short walk to the pool table shed, which is only about 60 feet from my back door! Did you know that humans are more sensitive to the temperature of solid surfaces nearby than to the temperature of the air? That's why it can seem "hot" indoors in summer and "cold" indoors in winter even when the air temperature is heated or cooled to the same 68°F/20°C. It's also why superinsulated houses are so comfortable.]
Ctein, Buddha, Japanese Tea Garden, San
Francisco, California, 2016 (digital infrared)
Print offer: Our Infrared Print Sale got off to a good start on Friday, and has picked up speed over the weekend. There's no need for pictures to be prints any more, but I love prints. If a picture's not a print then it's no-thing. Gotta be a thing to be traded and treasured.
Shipped: Speaking of prints, if you ordered one of my prints from the "Mike's Miniatures" sale, it has been shipped and is on its way. Please allow extra time for it to get to you: storms and worker shortages are lengthening ordinary delivery times.
Lenses: Can anyone answer a question for me? What's the best camera or brand of camera on which to use an adapted manual-focus lens? I mean in terms of ease and convenience of focusing and metering.
[UPDATE: I think I've discovered something even better. My objective in asking this question was that I'd like to experiment with manual focus—real manual focus, with a lens with a helical and an infinity stop, rather than the usual "focus by wire." I've discovered that Zeiss makes a 25mm Loxia lens in native Sony E mount. That's about 37.5mm equivalent on the APS-C A6600, right in the "sweet spot" of my personal focal-length preference. It's manual focus but also native to Sony E mount so that it transmits the aperture setting as well as EXIF info. So I've requested one of those from our friends at LensRentals. I haven't tried a manual focus lens on a digital camera since I used a Voigtlaender ƒ/0.95 lens on, I think, a Panasonic about ten or a dozen years or so ago.]
Instagram: Apropos of nothing, been trying to learn Instagram. Dragged kicking and screaming. I don't allow other people to use this snarky epithet here (or the term "karen," either, which is appallingly ill-mannered), but I'll use it on myself: boomer!
American Football: There's no football game today. I've always disliked the two-week hiatus between the Championship games and the Super Bowl. It just kills momentum and pours cold water on enthusiasm. It's like: football football football and then wait wait wait. It's annoying. It's a mistake. You know what it is? A preview of the offseason, that's what. Pretty soon there's going to be no more football and here's what it's going to feel like. (Hey, what's a post like this without a little ranting?)
Developing instructions: This is possibly the weirdest web page I've seen recently. As far as I can tell, it's an invitation for a wine party at which everyone will learn to develop film. ? See what you make of it.
Malkoviching: And finally, this is mildly amusing in a sort of horrifying way. Enjoy! If that's the word.
Book o' the Week:
Ernst Haas: New York in Color 1952–1962. "When Haas moved from Vienna to New York City in 1951, he left behind a war-torn continent and a career producing black-and-white images. For Haas, the new medium of color photography was the only way to capture a city pulsing with energy and humanity. These images demonstrate Haas's tremendous virtuosity and confidence with Kodachrome film and the technical challenges of color printing."
This book link is a portal to Amazon.
Original contents copyright 2020 by Michael C. Johnston and/or the bylined author. All Rights Reserved. Links in this post may be to our affiliates; sales through affiliate links may benefit this site. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
(To see all the comments, click on the "Comments" link below.)
Featured Comments from:
Hugh: "Best camera for an adapted manual focus lens? Got to be full frame really to make use of the lens. The Canon RF mount is wide enough to fit almost anything. The Canon RP works effortlessly with aperture priority auto exposure, easy magnification in the viewfinder, handles beautifully, and it’s cheap."
robert e: "Wine and developing? Why not? Hopefully, they stock aged developer broth as well as good wines. In my opinion wine pairs better with cyanotype processing, where if it's not to one's taste (or even if it is, I suppose) it can be used as a toner."
Dan Khong: "You asked: 'Can anyone answer a question for me? What's the best camera or brand of camera on which to use an adapted manual-focus lens? I mean in terms of ease and convenience of focusing and metering.' My answer: Canon RP. I have a lot of adapters and I use the focus peak (+/- magnifier sometimes) feature to get super sharp pictures."
AN: "Regarding that weird website: At a glance I thought it was a super strange combination too, but then I remembered this: https://paintingwithatwistfranchise.com/ In recent years, quite a lot of venues have popped up to host painting (and sometimes ceramics) as a party game, so it’s not much of a leap to think that people would try to extend that to other arts and crafts. I’m sure any minute now we will see Smoke and Sculpt, Inebriated Intaglio, Chug n’ Weld, and Psychotropic Makerspace."
Mike,
What about a Nikon Z50 or Z fc?
I use a Z6 with my ancient manual focus Nikkor's
and it works like a charm;-)
Posted by: JOHN BOUR | Saturday, 05 February 2022 at 03:45 PM
For the MF adapted lenses, I really love the way Panasonic does the magnifier : magnified in the center of the viewfinder, but you still can see the borders to assess your framing.
MF Assist / PiP in the menu, I think.
Astonishing that they're the only ones doing that (seen that on Magic Lantern too, but I don't know if they made it run on the Rs).
Posted by: NikoJorj | Saturday, 05 February 2022 at 04:53 PM
The Big Storm: When I was much younger I did a lot of cross-country skiing and I always wore gaiters when I ventured out. You should check them out for those times when the snow gets as high as a beagles eye.
Developing Instructions: This Old Tony put out a video yesterday on how to weld cast iron and the first 45 seconds of the video show him pretending to develop an SD card as if it were a print. He’s got an unusual sense of humor that I kinda like. It takes him a full 12 minutes to get around to the welding part.
Posted by: Jim Arthur | Saturday, 05 February 2022 at 05:31 PM
Please do post the comments or the results of the feedback about which cameras to best use an adapted lens. I am currently puzzling the same question for myself and I would love to hear the answers of your knowledgeable readers! I currently mount Mamiya RB and Olympus OM lenses on a Canon 5D ("classic") and, although the pictures sometimes turn out quite all right, from a ease of use perspective, it is not. the. answer.
Posted by: Phil | Saturday, 05 February 2022 at 05:38 PM
Related to the topic of adapted, manual lenses:
I can't give a body recommendation, but in my experience so far, it seems important that the filter pack over the sensor be as thin as possible so that the loss of image quality toward the edges and corners is as minimal as possible.
The filter pack on the Sony a7 series is quite thick and I have had significant problems with it on adapted wide-angle lenses, even at 35mm and 28mm.
As far as I know, on the digital M Leicas, the microlenses are tilted slightly inward on the sensor so that the edge rays don't bend in so much. Also, the filter package is relatively thin.
Posted by: Lothar Adler | Saturday, 05 February 2022 at 06:33 PM
cameras to best use an adapted lens. You have an a6600 - adapted lenses is its middle name.
Posted by: Steve Deutsch | Saturday, 05 February 2022 at 07:54 PM
MF adapted lenses:
According to the Phillip Reeve website, which I have been following for a couple of years, the answer is Sony Alpha full frame. The people there shot a lot, and quite well, so I am trusting their judgement.
Though so far, I have satisfied myself by adapting Pentax K mount lenses to a Pentax DSLR. Works quite well ;-)
https://phillipreeve.net/blog/
Posted by: Kevin | Saturday, 05 February 2022 at 08:43 PM
Adapting lenses - Nikon Z Mount probably best amongst FF mounts, almost everything can be adapted, at leats for manual focus (no idea about AF lenses). And Nikon has really simple software settings allowing one to tag and remember non-electronically attached lenses so that IBIS and aperture priority / manual metering works (which to me is the most important bit - as if it’s hard to use, I won’t do it). Just note that no mirrorless camera I know of supports auto-aperture stop down - so that you will almost always need to remember to add the additional step of opening to a wide aperture to focus then stopping down for exposure before activating the shutter. It isn’t much and if I’m regularly using a MF lens, its no big deal, but I’ve become so spoilt by auto-everything cameras that I expect I would find manually winding film forward annoying these days…
Posted by: Bear. | Saturday, 05 February 2022 at 09:21 PM
Mike,
In re; Lenses.
Pentax, of course. The screw-mount lenses without aperture "info" transfer can be used in stop-down metering mode with the M42-to-K adapter.
K-mounts of all vintages can be used without adapters.
Even the MEF's early autofocus lens that wasn't ready for prime time, the SMC Pentax-AF 35-70mm F2.8, can work with most newer Pentax cameras. (https://www.pentaxforums.com/compatibility/any/SMC+Pentax-AF+35-70mm+F2.8/)
Posted by: Dave | Saturday, 05 February 2022 at 09:35 PM
Finding using older manual focus Nikkor AI lenses on a D750 working well. Easier and much nicer than on the Canon 6D body I tried.
As the man says - Your Mileage May Vary.
Posted by: Daniel | Sunday, 06 February 2022 at 12:33 AM
Re. camera as a platform for adapted lenses.
I can't really speak with a lot of experience on my back, but it was a question I mulled over quite a bit when I upgraded from my ancient Panasonic GH1 early 2021.
Despite the small m43 sensor, the GH1 camera was incapable of providing acceptable results on any adapted rangefinder lens shorter than 35mm (which would be a 70mm equivalent on m43). Corner smearing being the primary problem.
Owning a lot of manual focus lenses in Leica, Nikon F and M42 mount which are dear to me, my replacement camera needed to work acceptably with these.
Looking at the 24MP'ish mirrorless landscape anno early 2021, Nikon z6ii and Leica SL2-S seemed to provide an edge for adapted lenses, especially when looking at results from adapted wide rangefinder lenses.
Availability, and not least price, swayed me towards the z6ii.
Now, a year later, I can only say I am pleased. Even my old Voigtlander 12mm/5.6 will give acceptable results - which I never expected possible on a digital sensor.
Focusing aid is the usual enlarged view and/or focus peaking which I think any mirrorless offers these days.
I also briefly considered the Nikon Z5 but didn't find many online examples with known (to me) rangefinder lenses, and I was unsure if the lack of BSI sensor in the Z5 would make it less favorable for my pourposes.
Posted by: Niels | Sunday, 06 February 2022 at 03:06 AM
Instagram. It's a terrible way of displaying quality photos to other people. But it is a good way of safely exchanging contact info with other photographers you meet along the way. You get a sense of what they're about, and they get the same about you. It can be an easy way of showing someone something related to the conversation you're having, using your phone, on a train or boat, in a foreign country. Generally you can follow the breadcrumbs to a portfolio, or blog, or facebook or email to stay in touch or find the photos they are really proud of. But as a unified, curated portfolio site? Bah. Yes, I'm on it, my name is the clue, not that I'm looking to increase my follower count. :-)
Posted by: Keith Cartmell | Sunday, 06 February 2022 at 10:22 AM
Oh, that photo of Erwitt by Soth! I've had a small copy of that over my computer desk for years. Another copy is on the wall in what was once my darkroom but now is just a closet adjacent to a bathroom. That picture has kept me on track over the years.
For an adaptable camera, it appears the Sony A models are the most popular for adapting lenses but I don't own one so that's just hearsay. I use adapted Voigtlanders and some of the Chinese manual focus lenses on my Fuji X-Pros and they seem to work perfectly. However, I never liked adapted lenses on my X-T1--the focus aids were not very good on that camera.
I also love using the classic Zeiss ZF.2 lenses on my Nikons as well as those lovely old manual focus Nikkors. It took a lot of practice to remember how to focus manually. Odd, that someone has to work at something that seemed easy and natural in their youth. Maybe not....
Posted by: Dogman | Sunday, 06 February 2022 at 10:31 AM
Instagram used to be a photo-centric app, but since at least 4 years ago, it became Facebook's insurgent fighter. Business reality was that the younger users in the Facebook universe were on Instagram, so the features to fight off the insurgents had to be there. Snapchat creates disappearing videos with "filters?" Instagram Stories. Tiktok? More Instagram Stories.
Even before that, Instgram had already turned from the photo sharing upstart that took all the visual interest away from Flickr into Facebook's cooler, younger sibling.
If you sense before was that Instagram was an ephemeral thing (for photographers at least), you were right before.
Posted by: James | Sunday, 06 February 2022 at 11:23 AM
On your adapted lens/camera question: I've used adapted lenses on Fuji Xs (long time ago), Leica M digitals with the stick-on viewfinder, and Nikon Z7s. I recall that focusing with the old Fujis was difficult due to camera shake, because as you zoom in on the live image it's like having a huge telephoto on the camera. Any camera motion is magnified enormously. The same was true with the Ms, with which I only used adapted lenses in a pinch (long lenses since the Ms top out at 135mm). With the Z7, it's a better experience because the camera has built-in image stabilization, and the focus peaking is good. A thing to keep in mind with the Z7 is setting the non-CPU lens info for the lens you're using (for non-Nikon users this translates to telling the camera the focal length and maximum aperture of the lens you're using). Otherwise, it seems image stabilization won't kick in. It takes a bit of getting used to but I think focusing an adapted lens is no more difficult than using an old manual focus SLR, and as long as you have focus peaking and in-camera image stabilization, the make of the camera won't make much difference (but the Panasonic feature mentioned above by NikoJorj sounds like an excellent idea). After years of autofocus camera use, it will feel slow -- two reasons for that are the stiffness of the helicoid in many old lenses, and the longer throw from close to far. Lens selection may mean more than camera selection here.
Posted by: Joseph Reid | Sunday, 06 February 2022 at 12:27 PM
There is a discussion over at Cameraderie https://cameraderie.org/threads/the-great-equalizer-a-camera-body-for-adapted-mf-lenses-only.51879/ on which body to use for adapten MF lenses. You might find it useful. I found m4/3 to do a good job but the crop factor is harsh on wide angle lenses, alas.
Meanwhile there is the utterly useless ProBowl on if you are really having American Football withdrawals today.
I am glad to hear that your A6600 is meeting your needs. I've been having a glorious time with my Leica M 240 and a just added a pair of early Nikkors - the HC 50/2 & the QC 135/3.5 to the kit giving me an EDC of 21/4, 35/1.7, 50/2, 90/4 & 135/3.5. That's as good as it gets for a rangefinder kit. Perhaps next year I'll add a superspeed 50/1.1 but not just yet. It's extremely rare for me to find a shot I can't make with the 50/2. Well, I do have a Nokton 50/1.5 which is pretty good too :)
Now if only my print of your halloween pic would get here!
Have a great day, Mike.
Posted by: William A Lewis | Sunday, 06 February 2022 at 12:34 PM
I never got the hang of Instagram and then they banned me for an unknown "violation of community standards". I posted 4 or 5 things several years ago and then pretty much ignored it because I could only post from my phone. A year or so ago I got an app on my desktop and tried using that but couldn't get into my account. after several tries, I gave up until recently and that's when I learned that had been "deactivated". They also made my banning irrevocable and don't reply to any of my inquiries so...
These large tech companies are hell to try to communicate with. They put up walls of FAQs that are supposed to resolve everything but, of course, don't, and attempts to reach a live body are rebuffed. I had a similar problem with Flickr many years ago. It is interesting that both revolved around my difficulties with accessing the accounts. It makes me wonder if my accounts were hacked.
Posted by: James Bullard | Sunday, 06 February 2022 at 01:52 PM
The Zeiss Loxia lenses are widely believed to be made by Cosina, who definitely made the Voigtländer lens you used ten years ago, so it's an appropriate continuation of your "manual focus lens on a digital camera" experience!
Posted by: Stephen S. | Sunday, 06 February 2022 at 02:42 PM
I don't know about the best, but I've enjoyed using old manual lenses with my Olympus cameras, first an OM-D E-M10 II and recently an OM-D E-M5 III. I reprogrammed two of the camera buttons to correspond to focus peaking on/off (exposure compensation button) and magnify on/off (movie button). Between the two of them I'm able to nail the focus most of the time. I've also found it as fast or faster than changing the auto focus to a specific point for selective focus.
Metering is easy, I just set the mode dial to A and adjust the aperture on the lens. The camera varies the ISO (up to a set limit) and shutter speed to get the correct exposure.
I mostly use a Vivitar 28mm f/2.5 Canon FD mount lens with a Mitakon Zhongyi Lens Turbo II adapter. The Lens Turbo provides a focal reduction of 0.726 and increases the amount of light hitting the sensor by one additional stop. Between the MFT crop and the Lens Turbo the 28mm becomes a 40mm-e.
The E-M5 III has a feature (not available on the E-M10 II) to save the information for manual lenses. This saves the focal length, maximum aperture and lens name in the EXIF data. Since there is no communication between the camera and the lens the aperture value is always listed as the maximum, which may be an issue for some. It doesn't bother me, though.
Posted by: James | Sunday, 06 February 2022 at 02:54 PM
Olympus has a manual to autofocus clutch on these lenses:
ED 12mm f2.0, 17mm f1.8, ED 7-14mm f2.8 PRO, ED 8mm Fisheye PRO, ED 12-40 f2.8 PRO, ED 12-100mm f4 PRO, ED 17mm f1.2 PRO, ED 25mm f1.2 PRO, ED 45 mm f1.2 PRO, ED 40-150mm f2.8 PRO and ED 300mm f4 PRO.
Posted by: s.wolters | Sunday, 06 February 2022 at 03:09 PM
Manual focusing vintage lenses adapted on my Canon RP (with the focus peaking feature) is often faster than AF.
Posted by: Dan Khong | Sunday, 06 February 2022 at 03:21 PM
The Leica SL cameras, the Sigma fp cameras and the Panasonic S1 series cameras all feature a quick punch in method to the center of the frame and available at various magnifications (controlled by the user). Using any of these cameras allows one to use any manual focus lens that will fit and get superb focusing.
With the SL cameras you will be doing your focusing on a nearly 6 mega-dot EVF. It's an accurate, comfortable and easy method for using MF lenses well.
As you are using an APS-C Sony you might also find the Leica CL capable of doing the same sort of MF focusing but in a smaller format camera.
[Yes the Sony has that too. It is indeed VERY accurate. The Sigma lens I'm using has very good-feeling manual focus-by-wire, too. --Mike]
Posted by: KT | Sunday, 06 February 2022 at 04:48 PM
". . . real manual focus, with a lens with a helical and an infinity stop,"
Beware that not all adapters are created equally, and accurately. Preparing for some astro shooting, I tested a couple of OM mount Oly lenses, tripod, far distant subject. The mount adapter was not the right length, short, so the lens focused past infinity before hitting the stop. That's a no-no, working in the dark. Trying a combo of an OM=>EOS and EOS to Sony E mount, infinity was perfect.
Measuring, I found the Beschoi OM to Sony-E adapter I got from Amazon was short by almost 1 mm.
If that's their strategy, to be sure of infinity focus, no matter what, it's not for me. I returned it for a Fotasy, same price, which is the correct length.
Posted by: Moose | Monday, 07 February 2022 at 04:00 AM
"I'd like to experiment with manual focus—real manual focus, with a lens with a helical and an infinity stop, rather than the usual "focus by wire.""
Wow, really? I have a large menagerie of MF lenses for my Alt-photography, in 7-8 different mounts. Some of these lenses were designed around 1960, and do things differently than even lenses from the mid-70s, let alone contemporary designs.
I also have quite a few LensBaby optics. Contemporary, completely manual helical focusing, designed to be intentionally bad in various, often interesting, ways.
With the focusing aids on digicams, esp. magnification, accurate manual focus is much easier than in the old days. I recall, un-fondly, peering into magnifying right angle finders trying for perfect focus.
Posted by: Moose | Monday, 07 February 2022 at 04:11 AM
Yep, mechanical focus is half of the solution.
The other half is a big, clear EVF, with either focus magnification or peaking. Peaking allows you to see the focus field moving forward and back very easily, which works well for certain types of photos. Focus mag works for critical focus on one object.
Posted by: Luke | Monday, 07 February 2022 at 07:32 AM
Electric car makers say heated seats and steering wheel are way more efficient than heating the air.
They work for me! A heated steering wheel used to seem like a silly luxury, but it warms up in seconds and makes you feel warm all over.
[It's one of the few luxuries I truly covet. --Mike]
Posted by: Luke | Monday, 07 February 2022 at 07:39 AM