I'm big on big plans. I'm an "Idealist" personality type—see the definition at Keirsey—and we tend to be big on head-in-the-clouds ideas.
But the Big Plan often leads to the Big Fizz. Things fizzle out. Meaning, my high-flying ambitions collapse like a bad soufflé in the face of the work needed to attain them. My big ideas shrink. Slink away to oblivion. The rubbish heap of my unrealistic ambitions is a high one.
But here's an interesting thing. I'm getting a bit older now, as longtime readers know. I was in my forties when I started this blog, and still passed for youngish. Now I'm settling comfortably into my sixties. (My birthday is on Thursday—it's the Macca one. And thank you, MikeR, for the funny card and the piece of your mind!) And when you start getting older, or so I read, one of the recommendations for keeping your mind healthy is to deliberately struggle with new things. Not to attain things, necessarily. Just to challenge yourself.
Struggle...for the sake of the struggle.
My big plans were usually based around results—around attainment. That was the big idea. I de-emphasized the journey, exalted the destination. But when you look into it, it turns out that to keep your brain flexible and lithe, responsive and athletic, one thing that's important is to struggle with new things. Learning a musical instrument is often mentioned as being beneficial, if you're not musical and don't already play. Learning a language, or, if you already know more than one, learning a new one, or a harder one. For instance, if you speak three Romance languages, trying Thai, or Navajo, or Tagalog.
Learn to dance. Not despite, but because, you've always had "two left feet." If you're a photographer and already good at looking, paint. My friend Nick, as photographer most of his life, is learning to be a potter and is doing great at it. If you grew up in the era when "rote memorization" was in disfavor as a pedagogic method for kids (it was very much in style for the Greatest Generation and earlier, distinctly out of style by the time the Baby Boomers came along), memorize some poems. If you're "innumerate" (a coined word applying the concept of illiteracy to numbers), take a math class. If you're "terrible with names," start trying to learn and remember the names of the people life throws in your path every day. (My mailman is Charles.)
You get the idea. It's not the attainment that matters. It's the struggle. I'm not into the theory, so I'm not going to talk about blazing new neural pathways or whatever. But this idea, of "struggling on purpose" as stretching exercises for your brain, is something I've been aware of for a few years and it's beginning to sink in.
If something is hard for you, don't worry about it—that's the point. Is learning Chinese online frustrating? Great! You're doing well then. Is memorizing sequences of movements on the dance floor something for which you have no aptitude? Well then, crank up the Victrola, grab your sweetie, and cut the rug...I don't know, are there ballroom dancing classes online? There must be.
It's an odd concept for me. We all gravitate to the things we already do well—we like to feel good about ourselves, and deliberately throwing up challenges that are "outside of our comfort zone" is against human nature. And I have some reservations about it, because I think it's very difficult to stick to something we have no natural aptitude for—aptitude is what leads to reward, and it's tough to stick to anything without reward.
But that's actually one of the advantages of the struggle-for-the-sake-of-the-struggle model...if you spent three weeks grappling with Mandarin on Duolingo and then just drifted away from it because you weren't getting anywhere or it was just too much of a slog, well, it's not a failure. You've done your brain some good.
Nice.
Old Photo Dawgs
Anyway...after I'm nothing if not game. After reading the last part of Dave's comment to the post on Friday (and Chris Hunt's seconding of Dave's comment), late last night I spent an hour at a touch-typing learning site online.
And...actually rather enjoyed it.
But I don't know. I really don't know. Can I learn to type? Can you really teach an old Photo-Dawg new tricks? I kind of doubt it. Those old neural pathways are really grooved. Learning to touch-type feels an awful lot like just another Big Plan to me. One inevitably bound for the Big Fizz.
Maybe, though, even if I can't learn to type, the time taken for the attempt won't have been wasted. It'll be a failure, but, like trying and failing to summit Everest, at least I'll be able to say I tried.
Here's a weird thing—this morning, back to my regular old four-finger typing method, I'm typing noticeably better. What's up with that?
Anyway, aiming to struggle with new and challenging things, even if you fail—that would be a "big plan," wouldn't it? An idealistic ambition? And I've always been good at those. :-)
Mike
P.S. Taking several online typing tests, which I just did, I time out at about 45 words per minute with 100% accuracy, which is better than the average of 36 WPM. But I'm at a disadvantage in that test because I have to look at what I'm supposed to type. That's not typical of the way I write. Most of the time I can type without looking at the keyboard, but I do have to check back and forth from time to time. I probably look at the keyboard one-third to half of the time I'm typing? Something like that. So copying slows me down a lot. I've always been aware of that. Based on those tests, I would guess that when I write "out of my head" rather than trying to copy something (like writing this, for instance), I'm probably around 60 WPM. Although stopping to correct frequent mistakes slows me down then too. Because my fingers fly around the keyboard, I frequently hit two keys and the wrong one registers and I have to go back. If my fingers moved less (or if I were more coordinated) I might be faster. (Today is a good typing day, BTW.)
I should set a timer for three minutes and just write something, then count the words and the errors. That would give a better idea of how fast I actually type when I write. But many times I just don't need to type faster because before I type I have to think about what I'm about to say.
ASW comments, "I wonder if some (lucky?) people find a typing style that matches the pace of their thinking. Most TOP readers would agree that your writing is clear, concise, and organized. Maybe your hunt-and-peck typing style matches the pace of your idea formulation, or even facilitates your writing process."
That might be the case. If my typing keeps up with my composing speed, then there's no problem, right? After all, I'm a writer, not a secretary or a data-entry person. The fastest typists I've known were a photographer in the '90s who worked at a family typesetting business, and my current doctor. He says he's never been timed but I would bet good money he's easily above 100 WPM, and if he timed out at 130 I wouldn't be at all surprised. He will type up an original half-page summary of a 20-minute appointment while he's talking to me, and it takes what seems ninety seconds. Other people I know who are patients of his also remark on it.
But I definitely notice that my typing skills are deteriorating. I first saw signs of it at age 45, and it's been getting very slightly worse since then. These days I have "good typing days" and "bad typing days." Sometimes I'm fast, sometimes things don't flow. When I have bad typing days I make loads of errors and it definitely slows down my work.
Book Product o' This Week:
Is it too late for this? 2021 is still young. There are two reasons to value these Michael Kenna calendars from Nazraeli Press: one is that his originals are 8x8", so these pictures are meant to work at wall-calendar sizes. The other is that Michael's calendars can actually increase in value! Dan Smith suggested this, and he reports that some older ones sell in the hundreds of dollars. "The printing is excellent," Dan wrote, "and the calendar is beautiful."
The above link takes you from TOP to Amazon. This week's pick is not available at Amazon Canada, but 2019 is. Hey, the pictures are still good. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Original contents copyright 2021 by Michael C. Johnston and/or the bylined author. All Rights Reserved. Links in this post may be to our affiliates; sales through affiliate links may benefit this site.
(To see all the comments, click on the "Comments" link below.)
Featured Comments from:
Bill Tyler: "Here's one data point, admittedly anecdotal, about re-learning typing technique. I learned touch typing in high school—the most useful single class I took in those four years. But in my 50s, I began having severe pain in my right thumb as a result of using it in the canonical way to hit the space bar, and developing arthritis. So I tried switching to my left thumb. It took about two weeks to make that natural. Then the same pain started developing in my left thumb, so I switched to using my right index finger on the space bar. That took another two weeks to feel natural. Several decades later, my right thumb is not fully normal, but for a long time it's been reasonably OK. I still use my right index finger for the space bar. So each time I switched my typing patterns, it took a couple of weeks for the new pattern to feel natural. Your mileage may vary, but it may be worth the attempt. At the very least, you'll be taking another journey."
Brian Stewart: "Excerpt from 'Ithaka' (1911), by Constantine P. Cavafy (I'm unsure of who did this particular translation):
'When you set out for Ithaka
ask that your way be long,
full of adventure, full of instruction.
'Have Ithaka always in your mind.
Your arrival there is what you are destined for.
But don't in the least hurry the journey.
Better it last for years,
so that when you reach the island you are old,
rich with all you have gained on the way,
not expecting Ithaka to give you wealth.
Ithaka gave you a splendid journey.
Without her you would not have set out.
She hasn't anything else to give you.'"
Paul in AZ: "Many, many years ago my high school had a required class in typing as part of their university entrance track. Seemed silly to me at the time. As I recall 60 words per minute was a passing grade. I actually got pretty good at touch typing. Needless to say that course in touch typing could be the most useful single course I took in high school."
David Dyer-Bennet: "In terms of matching speed of thought to speed of output (typing), my own experience, and watching and talking to many professional writers, what I see is that often you think quite a while—and then have a bunch of stuff to dump out to paper (you didn't write it all in your head, but you decided roughly how it was going to go, and then it gushes out). Fast typing makes that last step much less frustrating."
Dominic Tantram (partial comment): "Just a note, no doubt covered by others; but current neuroscience suggests you definitely can forge new tracks in a matter of months. Significant improvement in your typing should be possible. While your big goals set ambition, you also need milestones so you can see (and congratulate yourself on) progress."
Ilkka: "Don’t worry about it. You have been typing for some 40 years already [50 —Ed.]. You are doing fine. Content is more important than speed. Where’s the rush? Your advice for young people is good. But at our age? I wouldn’t worry about it."
Steve Rosenblum: "My mother (may she rest in peace) made me take a typing class in high school. I pushed back pretty hard on it but she was adamant. I said, 'Aw, Mom! Why should I take typing? Only girls take that class! [Note this was in 1967 and I was 15.] The ones who are planning to work as secretaries. What's the point?!' She wisely said, 'You're planning on going to college, right? You are going to have a lot of papers to write and turn in. Who do you think is going to type all those papers for you? I'm certainly not going to pay anyone to do it, so are you going to spend all your savings on having papers typed?' So, under protest, I took the class. There I was, the only boy in a class full of girls, and too young and dumb to see that as the great advantage it might have been! But, I took to typing like a duck to water and became pretty proficient.
"Little did I know that 20 years later there would be a PC with a keyboard attached on every desk. As others have said, it was likely the most useful course I took in high school from a practical skill standpoint. Thanks, Mom!"
Peter Jeffrey Croft: "I'm almost exactly 10 years ahead of you on life's path and you speak of things that are much on my mind.
"First, on big plans, it's exercise for the brain just as we need exercise for the body. Seems self-evident.
"Second, instead of saying, 'I wonder if I could do this,' say, 'I'm going to do this. What do I need to do to achieve it?' Positivity. In 1974 I had the chance to go to UK and Europe (I was 27). I started thinking, 'Oh, can I do this?' But I switched to, 'I'm going; so what do I need to do?' It worked.
"Third, I never got a university degree, only a technical college three-year diploma. I've always wanted to do a degree but I wanted to travel a lot. Since this pandemic stops us travelling, it looks like my time has come to go to university, at 74. Too old? I read today of an Italian guy who got his first degree at 83. There are many, many stories like this.
"Fourth, I'm a two-finger typist but my fingers seem to know where to go by themselves. Like the others, I've found that I type at about the same rate as I think, which probably doesn't say much. I've never measured my speed but I don't care, I compose as I go.
"Finally, when PCs were just being born in the late '80s, and I was a tech, I didn't care what faults developed, I saw it as a learning exercise. Every fault was my challenge to overcome. It worked—there isn't much I haven't seen and overcome in the past 40 years."
From what I read, it's good to stretch, to work beyond what you can do - but not *too* much further. So don't try to jump from being innumerate to working with the geometry of General Relativity. That's too large a push for most of us.
I would think that your pool table, Mike, would be ideal. It requires coordinated use of many mental faculties (very good for working the brain), you can stretch as much or as little as you want at any time, and you enjoy it. Perfect!
Posted by: Tom Passin | Sunday, 21 February 2021 at 10:23 AM
I can try to learn a new skill and at best become mediocre at it. Or I can try to improve my skill at something I already know and possibly become excellent.
Posted by: Speed | Sunday, 21 February 2021 at 10:24 AM
As I've gotten older (I'm now in my 70th orbit of the sun) I've come to accept a couple of statements that give me guidance.
First is I had no idea when my parents were alive I'd miss them so much now that they're (long) gone. There is no substitute for parental advice.
Second, if you had told me when I was younger that at nearly 70 I'd meet so many people who know everything, I would not have believed you. Yet today I am constantly astounded how many people I come in contact with that know everything.
Finally, during my corporate working life we used to have a saying… Dare to be Cautious. Now, I don't think that's the best approach. We need to push outwards a little, keep moving ahead. The more we move ahead, the harder it will be for that which is always just behind us, to catch up. As the old Whole Earth Catalog used to advise, Stay Hungry.
Posted by: GD Morris | Sunday, 21 February 2021 at 10:44 AM
Robert Heinlein (the SF author) in his later (and bigger-selling but rather less popular among the SF fans I hang out with) books frequently has his older characters in the established habit of learning new things (in his case, and no doubt partly because he didn't have to do it, just write about his characters doing it, at the level of auditing college classes).
Dancing, something I've never had any interest in, is maybe an especially good combination of physical activity and mental stretching; a precise template to keep track of and try to achieve, requiring physical work to do so. And you get to listen to music!
Posted by: David Dyer-Bennet | Sunday, 21 February 2021 at 10:54 AM
Try the Numberphile channel on youtube for some obscure math to challenge the shrinking brain.
Posted by: Robert Roaldi | Sunday, 21 February 2021 at 10:59 AM
Mike, I meant to comment on this the other day. I went to a State School in Ohio (Kent State University). We had a course in the business school that was a requirement called letters and reports. The course was about how to write memos and reports and such. This was the 1960s so that was a common form of communication in business. A requirement for the course was a typing course that each student needed to pass before they could take the course. Now after 50 years the course letters and reports is very dated and really not material anymore in the business world, but the typing sure came in handy over my entire career. I am glad I know how to type without looking at the keys. Small things in life are important. Who would have thought. Good luck with your learning experience. Eric
Posted by: Albert Erickson | Sunday, 21 February 2021 at 12:39 PM
If you learn to touch-type you'll be able to type faster, and consequently generate more output before the camera industry disappears completely and forever: 97% camera market drop, 2010 thru 2020. Infographic for those who have not seen it yet at https://lensvid.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/infographics-2020-scaled.jpg
Recommended tool: Happy Hacking keyboard. https://amzn.to/2NNjgDk Also available with black-on-black keycaps so's one can practice overcoming Huntin-Peckering Syndrome all the faster, while swearing too.
Don't know if they work with those goofy Apple computers though. Spensive too. I bought 3 in 1998-2000 when they were only $150 each. Still working fine, but good things aren't also forever. Time to buy a new one soon, price no object for excellence.
Posted by: The Other Dave (the creepy one) | Sunday, 21 February 2021 at 01:11 PM
I'm older than almost everyone here, and I've been through most of the routines people have argued that you need to stay healthy and sane, because I would like to stay healthy and sane. As I turn 77 in a couple of days, I have some recommendations.
-Don't be fat. That hurts, not so much in the length of your life, but in the restrictions it puts on you when you're still (relatively) young.
-All diets are fads. When it comes to maintaining your weight, or losing it, only two things count: how many calories you take in, and how many you burn. While all diets are fads, if you can find a fad that fits you, you'll lose weight and even keep it off. But there's little point in struggling with a diet you hate -- it won't work for you.
-Stay interested. Work if your work is interesting. Be social. Go out to dinner with friends. Games (with friends) are great.
-Walk, do yoga and swim if you have a place to swim. I've done all kinds of exercise regimes involving gyms and weights, and after decades of experience, I've found nothing better than walking, yoga and swimming. When you're in your sixties and beyond, nothing helps like a simple fifteen minutes of yoga stretches and balancing exercises when you get up in the morning. Weight work, in your sixties and seventies, unless you have an extraordinary body, will kill your shoulder and hip joints. Be very careful with it.
-Some of us have to sit, or stand still, for long periods because we work at computers. Face it: it's not good for you if you do it for too many hours a day. You really have to think about that. COMPUTERS ARE NOT GOOD FOR YOU.
-Find a daily routine that allows you to sleep at night. Good sleep makes a huge difference in quality of life. I personally still struggle with it.
-A bottom line (maybe not the only one): move. Simple as that: move.
Posted by: John Camp | Sunday, 21 February 2021 at 02:18 PM
I wonder if some (lucky?) people find a typing style that matches the pace of their thinking. Most TOP readers would agree that your writing is clear, concise, and organized. Maybe your hunt-and-peck typing style matches the pace of your idea formulation, or even facilitates your writing process.
Personally, I've always struggled to translate my thoughts to paper or screen. My brain runs faster than I can write with a pencil, but slower than I can type. So, good old-fashioned writing leaves me feeling like I am, at best, creating a rough draft outline (and missing the best bits), whereas staring at a blank screen on the computer leaves me feeling adrift, thoughtless, and spinning my mental gears to no purpose. Unfortunately, my work (wildlife and evolutionary biology) is predicated on reporting and publishing research on a regular basis, so... yeah, that doesn't always work out so well for me.
Posted by: ASW | Sunday, 21 February 2021 at 02:51 PM
I am 71 and my typing is definitely not what it was. I am wondering if voice typing might be the answer.
Posted by: Bob Johnston | Sunday, 21 February 2021 at 04:15 PM
Happy Birthday, Mike. You are almost 11 years younger than me (9 days less); I will soon be 3/4th of a century old.
I second comments from John Camp, summing it up as "all things in moderation," and add "rolling stones gather no moss."
You talked about keyboards and mice, but also important is a good monitor and proper eyeglasses for the monitor.
My frustration with the data inputting is spell checkers and autocorrection. Since my writing is technical with many unique terms, I dither between turning it off because its autocorrections are generally wrong and leaving it because it corrects my typing/spelling errors.
For those of us who work at keyboards and monitors, frequent breaks are important, and good to add in longer periods of exercise.
When we lived on the farm, it was easy to go roam out to the barn or the fields to break the routine. Now in the city, besides short breaks we take a late morning, late afternoon and late evening walk of 30+ minutes, with Tuesday/Thursday/Saturday afternoon hour+ hikes in the Mountains near here. The hikes are doubly good because it involves short scenic drives along the Pacific through Malibu.
You are in a good location to take a short break, grab a camera and dog and wander your property. On the farm, I always had two cameras ready - one with a macro lens and one with a very long telephoto for animals. Do you have a bird bath or watering hole? We loved our birds - identified 50+ species of them. And they are challenging to photograph.
Ciao.
Posted by: JimH | Sunday, 21 February 2021 at 04:51 PM
My wife was trained as a classical pianist and taught piano for several years. She said something to me once I consider simple but profound. She said, "anyone can play any piece if they play it SLOWLY enough". Really think about that and get it stuck in your head. People say they can't do something but if you can move your fingers, hand, mouth, or whatever, to perform the action, then you CAN do it. You just can't do it as quickly as a competent person...yet. Speed comes later with practice.
Posted by: Steven Palmer | Sunday, 21 February 2021 at 05:15 PM
I realize this is an older topic on mice/keyboards. And you may already know. You can get expansion USB connectors. I use them all of the time.
For wireless devices, I keep it on my desktop and close to the wireless device.
Anaker makes them, as do others. This search on Amazon will show you what I mean.
Anker USB C Hub, Aluminum USB C Adapter with 4 USB 3.0 Ports, for MacBook Pro 2018/2017, ChromeBook, XPS, Galaxy S9/S8, and More
Posted by: Steve Walker | Sunday, 21 February 2021 at 05:21 PM
...I'm a writer, not a secretary...
I took a typing class in high school. If memory serves, my speed at the end was around 60 words per minute.
That served me very well about 25 years ago in the corporate world, when everyone except executives got computers and were expected to be their own secretaries.
[I didn't mean to denigrate secretarial work...all I meant was that I seldom if ever have to re-type text that other people give me. --MJ]
Posted by: Sal Santamaura | Sunday, 21 February 2021 at 06:36 PM
I'm eightysomething. Ive never taken a typing class, but I've tested several times at 110/120 WPM during IT job interviews.
In the past I've used several secretarial services—both have been out-of-business for over 20 years. No need for the kids to learn conventional QWERTY typing now-a-days. Have you ever watched a middle school student text with their thumbs? I'm not half-bad myself. The message on my voice-mail says If you want a reply, please text me.
For me, reading the manual, is the best way to learn. Doesn't matter if it's a new camera, car, computer, driver-drill, firearm or computer program. LOL, I RTFM, YMMV.
BTW dictating to an iPhone works even better than to a computer. I can take long walks while writing, instead of destroying my health sitting at a desk.
BTW2 Sputnic 1 hadn't been launched when I was 14 y.o. Like it or not, time marches on.
Posted by: c.d.embrey | Sunday, 21 February 2021 at 07:42 PM
Thanks for the Keirsey link! I like that sort of thing. Meyer-Briggs with a twist!
I knew they nailed me when they stated in their description of me, Rationalist are "skeptical of all ideas, even their own." Yes, that's me . . . . but not always.
Posted by: Dillan | Sunday, 21 February 2021 at 08:47 PM
Imagine a language that does not bother withseparationbetweenwords, that has 40 different options for the English word “I“ and don’t use any of them.
The concept of tenses, gender and singular - plural does not exist. The language does not necessarily differentiate between boys and girls, but rather between older and younger, so older sister and younger brother exist, but not the words for brother or sister. Sibling is simply older-younger:-)
Combining two or three word expressions containing the word “heart” could give you more than a thousand regular expressions. That is how you build complexity into a language stripped of the grammatical tools that European languages depend on. A person with a cold heart is not temperamental (easy going), good heart is happy and heart good is a kind person. Animals would be grouped with tables, chairs and things with four legs, Kids belong to the same category as balls and round objects. So four chairs would be chairs four bodies, while four kids would be kids four balls.
The letters of a word does not appear in the order they are pronounced so me would be written “em” and still pronounced me, just because the e is always written before the letter it is pronounced after...
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abugida See this for more.
The alphabet contains 44 letters and all of them are consonants. They do have 15 vowels, they are just not a part of the alphabet. And from time to time they are not written, but implied. So “video” can be written VDO even in English and pronounced as vee-dee-o. In the same way tnn is pronounced tanon “highway”. “S” can change sound from s to t if it is at the end of a word... The alphabet is unique but have similar construction to non related languages.
Now if you need to check the phone book, you will realize that all people with the name Peter are grouped together and Mary would be listed with other Mary’s with the addition of a surname. The problem is that Peters mother became so happy to have a son that she gave him the nickname precious. So everyone knows him by that name. The surname is not used... Mary could be named the shrimp just to make sure that the evil spirits did not get to her. You would only know her as shrimp. So the phone book is a thought one.
Having learned the language including the five tones, I am still fascinated by this rich and old culture. The food, oh the food... The gentle people and their exotic customs.
I am talking about the language you mentioned, Mike, Thai.
Of course you can learn to type fast, just remember every key on the keyboard has two different letters assigned to them:-)
[That's fascinating! How wonderful to have a glimpse of Thai. Thank you kindly. --MJ]
Posted by: Jean | Sunday, 21 February 2021 at 09:04 PM
My strong is my left one. PITA mashing my nose against the back of the camera. Following a tip from yourself I persisted with the right eye and in a very short space of time re-learned.
John Camp
Not starting a competition but I hit 77 last December
Posted by: Thomas Mc Cann | Monday, 22 February 2021 at 03:38 AM
[I didn't mean to denigrate secretarial work...all I meant was that I seldom if ever have to re-type text that other people give me. --MJ]
Nor did I. My comment was intended to snidely point out the way corporations took advantage of technology by eliminating valuable secretaries, burdening other employees with the work secretaries used to do, then lowering all salaries while hoarding the greater financial rewards this "productivity improvement" gave them. :-)
Posted by: Sal Santamaura | Monday, 22 February 2021 at 10:30 AM
Why type at all? Use some speech recognition software that can keep up with your thinking. Of course there’ll be lots of glitches, but you can correct these as you revise what you’ve said (you do revise, yes?).
When I have a long piece to write, I jot down an outline with major headings, and then just go for it. The process takes much less time, and interferes much less with my creativity.
Posted by: Peter Clayton | Monday, 22 February 2021 at 03:25 PM
I always have a winter project that requires research and learning to keep the blues away. Two years ago, it was rebuilding a stereo system using interesting vintage stuff (to keep it cheap). This winter was to be the Winter of Axes--learning and researching their history and their makers, and then learning to really sharpen, rehaft, and restore old axes. But it has turned into the Winter of Estate Law. Not as fun, and quitting isn't allowed, but still requiring mental exercise.
I second the notion of learning skills slowly. I've been working on one of the Bach 'cello suites on tuba for about 15 years (I started playing the tuba 50 years ago). I'm finally up to speed. And I second the notion of maintaining fitness--I've been fat, and I've been fit. Being fit is better for my goal of dying young--as late as possible.
On the keyboard topic, I bought a keyboard with Cherry MX Blue key switches, which are clicky the way IBM Selectric keys were clicky. For me with essential tremor, they improve accuracy. I've slowed down to about 50 words a minute with no errors, but that's still faster than I think.
I learned touch typing in my first job, recognizing that we would all be using computers routinely starting around then (1980ish). My boss banished me to the conference room--he couldn't stand the sound of me typing manually to learn the technique. Perhaps it was the added colorful epithet every eight or ten clicks. But I learned. Now, I'm trying to teach my thumb to be more accurate on an iPhone. Fat chance (literally--my thumb covers half the keyboard). I'm probably better off with the axes, as long as I keep the Bandaids handy.
Posted by: Rick Denney | Monday, 22 February 2021 at 10:08 PM
Ok well, I’ll jump in and say I’m 70 and during the 2020 lockdown I discovered..... sewing machines! It was the masks... I got bothered that they weren’t available (at first) and started to make my own. I discovered the YouTube sewing community, quickly went from a new cheapie plastic singer to some all metal 80s ones, and then found a 1957 singer 401 all aluminum slant needle by the curb one day. Just bought a 70s Brother industrial single stitch for $300- it’s like the 401 and a Harley Davidson had a baby. Research them and look at the videos of people restoring them. They are early 20th century linkage technology, like typewriters, and like typewriters they changed everything. I’ve got them all at standing height, and they’ve got me up and moving around like the old darkroom did. Yeah, absolutely, discover a new thing!
Posted by: Chris Y. | Monday, 22 February 2021 at 10:21 PM
This just in...
"PRACTICAL TYPEWRITING: By The All-Finger Method, Which Leads To Operation By Touch. Arranged for Self-Instruction and School Use"
Third Edition
by Bates Torrey
(1894)
https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=loc.ark:/13960/t0vq3q16z&view=1up&seq=9
Posted by: Homer Office | Tuesday, 23 February 2021 at 12:35 PM
I’ve been playing guitar since I was thirteen, but like most guitar players of that era (the 60s) I never bothered to learn to read music. Why bother? The music we wanted to play only existed on records, and sheet music was all written for pianos anyway.
About ten years ago, after retiring, I decided to take jazz guitar lessons to actually learn why I was playing some things the way I was playing them, and how to play more sophisticated ones. My teacher asked how well I read music, to which I responded “not at all”. The truth is I was afraid to try and fail to learn to read. After a month or so of him nagging me every week, and struggling to work out the lessons he gave me - all of which required a minimum of sight reading skill - I sat down in the corner of the living room and learned to read in two days. Not well enough to play a complex piece straight from the score. But well enough to learn the exercises and lessons.
As for typing, I also was fortunate enough to take typing in middle school. Which served me well in college typing my papers on the portable typewriter I got for high school graduation. And then served me even better when I saved a fortune by typing (multiple drafts of) my doctoral dissertation. And even more when I started a career in IT, and have spent most of my life in front of keyboards.
Posted by: Scott Abbey | Tuesday, 23 February 2021 at 07:07 PM