The last post made me curious, and I don't think I've asked this question for a while.
What's the oldest digital camera you shoot with regularly? (Don't neglect to give the year it came out if you can.)
Good topic for a Summer weekend. Bonus question: what's the weirdest, most unusual, or most offbeat camera you own and sometimes even use? (Here's how to add a picture to a comment in case you want to. Make sure the picture isn't more than 470 pixels wide.)
For me, my oldest camera in use is my 2014 Fuji X-T1 (2014 was a very good year for TOP and for me). The answer to the second question is surely my Exakta 66.
Mike
P.S. The post title comes from this, as the Deadheads and bluegrass fans amongst ye knew instantly.
Original contents copyright 2019 by Michael C. Johnston and/or the bylined author. All Rights Reserved. Links in this post may be to our affiliates; sales through affiliate links may benefit this site.
Amazon.com • Amazon UK • Amazon Canada
Amazon Germany • B&H Photo • Adorama
(To see all the comments, click on the "Comments" link below.)
Featured Comments from:
Emil: "I’ve only owned and used one camera since it was released 2011: Fujifilm X100 with its 23mm lens. We make a great team together!"
Dave Levingston: "I have most of the digital cameras I've bought, all the way back to a Sony Mavika that wrote the files to floppy disks, but I pretty much never use any but the most current, which these days are a pair of Panasonic GX8s.
"I have several 'weird' cameras, including a custom-made Fuji Instax Mini camera with a very nice, sharp view camera lens on the front. But the most weird is my 'Speed Holga' which I put together after an argument with a dedicated Holga photographer who was insisting that only a Holga camera could produce the Holga style in photos. I maintained that any crappy camera could take Holga-like photos. I told her I could tape a magnifying glass to the front of a camera and make photos that resembled Holga photos. She was certain that was impossible. So I did it.
"As you can see, no expense was incurred in the building of this camera and lens combo.
"I've taken a number of photos with this setup. The rear shutter of the Speed Graphic makes it easy to use. I used Polaroid and Fuji peel-apart instant film, though sheet film or roll film in a holder would work, but without the quick feedback on exposure, since the 'aperture' is a total unknown.
"Here's one photo done with it. This was grossly overexposed, might have been the first shot I took with it, but that overexposure turned out to be a pretty happy accident."
Andrew Lamb: "I use an EOS 5D II and Nikon D3S regularly for pro work. For personal pics I regularly use a 6x6 Super Ikonta, from 1938, my all-time favourite camera."
Jim R (partial comment): "Jerry Garcia started his musical career playing blue grass in 'jug bands' before making it big with The Grateful Dead, the grandfather of today’s 'jam bands.' I stopped paying attention to the more recent incarnations of The Grateful Dead once Jerry died in 1995. The music just stopped then. I did really like the ties based on his art though. The 'Old and In the Way' stuff is fabulous; thanks for the reminder!"
The oldest one I shoot with regularly is my 645Z, which I got just over 5 years ago.
Posted by: tex andrews | Sunday, 11 August 2019 at 11:21 AM
Regularly? I shoot a 1Ds Mark II and a 5D Mark II a lot.
Although I don't shoot with it a *lot*, I bust out an old Nikon D1x a few times a year, just because I like it.
Posted by: Tam | Sunday, 11 August 2019 at 11:49 AM
Weirdest camera would be a "Hasselblad" Lunar that I bought in EXC condition from KEH for only ten percent of the original asking price.
Since I use full-frame Sony bodies for work, it tags along in the bag sometimes as a crop-sensor backup body.
Posted by: Tam | Sunday, 11 August 2019 at 11:53 AM
My main camera is an Olympus EM5, but I regularly shoot with a Pentax K10D (released in 2008) and a Super Takumar 50mm 1,4.
Two years ago my cousin gave me his old Olympus E510 (eich he bought new in 2007. I immediately fell in love with it. It is, by far, the most comfortable camera I’ve hold, I wish I’ve known that when it was still on the market.
Posted by: Gaspar Heurtley | Sunday, 11 August 2019 at 12:06 PM
Oldest and oddest (and no longer with me) was a Conley 5x7 camera. The Conley was manufactured in Rochester...Minnesota and sold through Sears and Roebuck. The camera was of uncertain age and unknown pedigree and it served me well for the few years it was part of my photographic life.
Posted by: Joe D Lipka | Sunday, 11 August 2019 at 01:31 PM
Well it's still the Olympus E-1 for me. It doesn't get used as much as it did, but I do still take it out. I love the images from that old Kodak sensor and the whole experience of using the camera itself. The lovely Zuiko lenses help, and a more recently purchased Leica 14-150 IS zoom picked up for a fraction of its original price has added a new lease of life to the camera.
And to prove I still use it, here's one from earlier this year:
Posted by: Jon Schick | Sunday, 11 August 2019 at 01:32 PM
The oldest digital camera I shoot with fairly regularly is the Leica M9 released in September 2009. I purchased it last year (with new sensor). It certainly falls under the heading of "classic digital" with its now unique CCD sensor. It's my first Leica. Extrapolating, I think I'll be able to afford an M10 in about 5 or 6 years. The most offbeat is my Crown Graphic which, when I take it out of the house, always draws bemused attention.
Posted by: David Comdico | Sunday, 11 August 2019 at 01:57 PM
The oldest digital camera I regularly use is a Nikon D7000, which was introduced in 2010. (I received mine as a gift in late 2011.) The most unusual camera I sometimes use (rarely use is more accurate) is a Mamiya C330f with a late model (multicoated) 80mm f/2.8 lens. The last rolls of film used with it were B&W films from Fuji and Kodak. What I would really like to do some time is use a 4x5 wooden camera that I designed and built around 1990/91. Some day!
Posted by: Craig Yuill | Sunday, 11 August 2019 at 02:23 PM
Oldest digital camera I use would be a Pentax K-5, which came out in 2010. I use it when the weight of the K-1 would be a bother.
Not my oldest digital camera, which is an Olympus D-100 from 2001. 1.3 megapixels (VGA) with so-so color, and almost no compatibility with any reasonable batteries. One review noted peak current draw was 1.2 amps! Used SmartMedia cards (so obsolete).
For a while the oldest "quality" digital camera was a Canon G6. But our iPhone 7's make that pretty much obsolete.
Most odd-ball film camera I've used would be a Foth-Derby. 127 film, half-frame (30x40mm), and a focal plane shutter that kicks like a mule.
Although I suppose that Kodak Pamoram No. 1 and No. 3A also count as odd-ball. Have used both several times.
I did just test-drive an Ica Atom #51, having finally accumulated four plate holders for it. Used 0.040 styrene as a "plate" behind the film, since the plate holders are for glass plates. Took three sheets of 4x5 film until I cut one into rectangular (not trapezoidal) sheets of film that fit in the plate holders. Film is washing now. Looks like it came out well. But it's not that "odd", other than being about the smallest size (4.5 x 6 cm) of plate camera ever made.
Posted by: John Shriver | Sunday, 11 August 2019 at 03:23 PM
I didn't do digital until much later, but in 2007 I bought an Olympus E-1 for my wife. That was when Olympus had just introduced the follow-up model E-3, and the E-1 could be had for a couple of hundred pounds new. We still have the camera, and out of respect I take it out for a fun drive every once in a while. A beautifully crafted camera, and if you stay with base ISO, then the 5MP files from the CCD are very good. The camera was introduced in 2003, now we have 2019, that's 16 years of active service, not bad at all for digital. My own main camera now is the Fuji XPro2, which was introduced in 2016. I won't force the issue just to win records, but I wouldn't mind keeping the Xpro2 for at least ten to twelve years.
Film? Back in the early 2000s I had a phase where I was going all classic and worked with Barnack Leicas. I still have a small set of these elegant early Leicas: a Leica II (1932) with the Elmar f/3.5, a finderless Leica If (1952) with the Summaron 28mm f/5.6 and the external 28mm viewfinder, and the last of the screw-mounts, a Leica IIIg (1956) with the wonderful Elmar f/2.8. I loved the simplicity and functionality of these cameras. I don't really use them any more, but Barnack's dual-window design that uses separate finders for viewfinder and rangefinder has prepared me well for my current XPro2, where I use the lower-righthand corner of the OVF for the tiny focus-peaking LCD, in much the same way as my eye was switching between the two finders of the IIIg.
Posted by: Martin D | Sunday, 11 August 2019 at 05:21 PM
My oldest is the Panasonic GF1 with the 20mm lens I bought from you.
The oddest is the Welta Welty with a Schneider 5cm f2.0 for $15 picked up this year at the Pasadena Flea Market.
Posted by: Kenneth Wajda | Sunday, 11 August 2019 at 06:29 PM
Oldest in regular use: Ricoh GRII, from 2015. Bought mine in 2016. Still cuts the rug very finely IMO.
Weirdest: Pentax K-01, 2012, Bumble Bee edition. Bought in 2013 when they were being sold off cheaply for lack of sales. It was/is a great performer but the styling was too much for most people. If Pentax would have gone with a more conventional styling route like Fuji did, they could have had a winner. I think they made two other constraints that boxed them in: (1) using the flange distance for the K-mount lenses. Makes sense on paper but they could have started a new lens line and offered an adapter for the K-mount. (2) Constrained themselves into using their standard battery. Again, makes sense on paper, but a smaller battery and smaller flange depth would have made for a much slimmer body.
Posted by: Alex Hawley | Sunday, 11 August 2019 at 08:33 PM
Leica M8. It’s a good form factor but batteries are becoming and issue.
Posted by: Adam Bridge | Sunday, 11 August 2019 at 08:40 PM
Oldest digicam I use regularly: 2010 Canon S95. It's my primary camera.
Oddest film camera I use: 1914 Kodak No. 2 Brownie, Model D. It's just a blast.
Posted by: Jim Grey | Sunday, 11 August 2019 at 08:45 PM
Wait! I forgot my Pentax K10D is even older, 2006. Just shot it all weekend.
Posted by: Jim Grey | Sunday, 11 August 2019 at 08:48 PM
My oldest digital cameras are a Nikon D700 from about 2009 and a Canon G12 in a plastic underwater housing from 2010. The G12 still gets used regularly when I need lots of battery and don’t have access to power for charging. The most shots I’ve got from the single huge battery was over 1200.
Oddball camera is a Nikonos III underwater camera bought about 1975. It still works and takes great underwater macro shots using an extension tube with framing prongs. It is so easy to get good pictures that are in focus with that setup.
Posted by: Tony Ayling | Sunday, 11 August 2019 at 10:11 PM
Canon 20D from 2004 or 2005. Paid a friend $35 for it. Took a photo of an owl in low light at a whopping 800 ISO. A whole stop below max ISO. It was a little noisy, but I was pleasantly surprised at the quality.
Posted by: Michael Shwarts | Sunday, 11 August 2019 at 10:19 PM
My oldest digital camera used regularly is my Canon 1DS Mark II purchased brand new in 2004. Still beautifully noise free images up to iso 640.
My oldest film camera I use regularly is a Nikon Fe2.
Posted by: Paul | Monday, 12 August 2019 at 12:21 PM
The oldest digital camera I have is an Olympus E1, a 4/3 camera, but the oldest I'm using now is the Olympus OMD EM5.
Posted by: Marcelo Guarini | Monday, 12 August 2019 at 03:02 PM
Digital - Nikon D700, introduced July 2008. Bought the first one (refurbished) in February 2011, and have used a pair of them as my main event cameras since 2013. Still tempted by little used ones that come up for sale. Some can now be had for under £350.
Film - Zeiss Ikon Super Ikonta IV, that my parents bought around about 1955. A medium format (6x6) folder that'll fit in a big pocket. It's five years older than me, and can take lovely photos. Attracts attention, and smiles of surprise when in use. Mostly used for B&W, but I like this colour shot: https://www.blipfoto.com/entry/2032487129640077863
Posted by: Dave Stewart | Monday, 12 August 2019 at 05:33 PM
Sony RX100 III, 2014, still an excellent camera used nearly every day.
Posted by: Shaun | Tuesday, 13 August 2019 at 12:01 PM
Oldest Digital: Nikon D750, purchased shortly after it came out in 2014. It replaced a D700 which had taken a dunk in a river and didn't live to tell the tale.
Weirdest: the Texas Leica, er Fuji GW690 II. Costs $2/shot, but those big negatives are just wild to look at.
Posted by: Matt | Tuesday, 13 August 2019 at 01:55 PM
I'm hoping your well above average, expert in strange fields commenters could please discuss this (From John Krill - above)
"I don't use old electronic cameras. The oler they are the greater the chance of failure. Don't fool yourself ALL electronics fail.
That is why camera companies don't use the word electronics at all. They fail. They call them digital for that very reason.
After three years you're pushing your luck."
I have a bunch of old electronic cameras, some from the nineties and none have failed so far but I haven't used any one for more than maybe 25,000 exposures. I'd love to learn the truth or not behind this.
Gabe
Posted by: Gabe | Tuesday, 13 August 2019 at 10:48 PM
A colleague with a weakness for surplus optics sales had a monster aerial camera lens (10" focal length, f/1.34!)

and challenged me to use it to get a picture of one of the great comets. Lacking the original tracking film holder, I improvised a clamp for a 4x5" polaroid film holder and obtained some Type 57 instant film (3000 ASA). I also put together a crude tracking platform to keep it roughly centered on the comet. We got one decent image of Comet Hale-Bopp with a 15 second exposure (much sharper than it appears here):
We expected that the main problem in getting a sharp image would be the razor-thin plane of focus, but a more severe problem turned out to be film flatness since the film faced down and tended to sag a bit.
Posted by: John C | Wednesday, 14 August 2019 at 03:35 PM