TV cameraman (and, of course, TOP reader) Mike Plews wrote a nice comment to yesterday's post about approaching people in the street—he said that a tip he gives to "new kids" is to lose their sunglasses.
I second that. A few additional tips—keep your hands out of your pockets, keep the camera out in the open, and no hoodies! Light clothing helps too, in my opinion, unless you look like the business in dark clothing. Short sleeves in Summer—people won't think you "have something up your sleeve"! Anything that helps you look more like what you're presenting yourself to be can't hurt.
A photo vest helps...even if you don't have anything to load into the pockets and you don't actually need the vest. Remember, people are going to be sizing you up quickly. Photo vests remain useful in that they look faintly silly so they're seldom worn as fashion—who would wear something so dorky unless they needed it?—so to many people they still telegraph "photographer." And that helps you with your bonafides.
Consider this guy. Who could take that dude for anything but a photographer? And note, no sunglasses, and nothing on his head, and light clothing, and nothing up his sleeve. He's old, too, which helps—people are less threatened by oldsters. If you're younger, you'd best be charming.
You might consider Lee's getup to be a disguise. He's a real photographer who has disguised himself as a photographer. :-)
Of course, your attitude is the main thing. Peter's got mad skillz in that sense. Me, not so much.
If you're anxious, people are going to pick up on it right away. (Three guesses how I know.) As strangers appraise you, an anxious attitude is a turnoff. My advice is, be fully prepared for a "no" answer and have the ability to treat it like the proverbial "water off a duck's back." If you're all set and ready for rejection, then there's no need to be nervous.
Here are a few photo vests from Amazon, and here's one from B&H. Unfortunately you cannot purchase a good attitude. If you could, I'd recommend it. :-)
Mike
(Thanks to Mike P.)
Original contents copyright 2019 by Michael C. Johnston and/or the bylined author. All Rights Reserved. Links in this post may be to our affiliates; sales through affiliate links may benefit this site.
Amazon.com • Amazon UK • Amazon Canada
Amazon Germany • B&H Photo • Adorama
(To see all the comments, click on the "Comments" link below.)
Featured Comments from:
Josh Hawkins: "Relaxed, approachable smile. It’s been my go to for 20 years. If that doesn’t smooth everything over be prepared to have a nice friendly conversation about who you are, what you’re doing and why. And always stay nice and positive even if you’re not going to get a good photo."
Gordon Lewis: "As a veteran street shooter I can confirm that the less intimidating you look, the better. This of course can mean different things to different subjects, but generally speaking, any photographer with reasonable emotional intelligence has a sense of how intimidating they may seem to other people. I've never been a fan of photo vests and the like, but you'd be surprised how often I'm asked if I'm a pro photographer simply because of the way I carry and handle my equipment. I don't do this intentionally, it's just that most people can perceive that experts move differently from novices.
"The takeaway here is it helps to look like you're confident and know what you're doing. Final tip: Consider what type of person you're approaching for a photograph. I once approached an extremely dapper gent in Philadelphia and asked if I could photograph him. When he asked why, I replied, 'Now surely you didn't leave home today looking this fabulous without thinking that maybe, just maybe, you might turn a head or two.' He grinned and said 'Where do you want me to stand?' The point isn't to use flattery per se but rather to look for a seamless way to introduce the idea of taking a photograph. Frankly, considering you're probably standing in front of them with a camera on your neck or shoulder, they should hardly be surprised if you make a polite inquiry."
Dennis: "Some years ago, when my daughter was a younger child, a photographer took pictures of her on the boardwalk in New Jersey...at first, my parent's instincts jumped to attention, but he was a friendly older gentleman wearing a photographer's vest with a couple of cameras, and he approached us after taking a few shots and talked briefly to us—might have asked for some information, I can't remember. In hindsight, it may have been Bob Krist—I vaguely recall him looking somewhat like Bob does in pictures, and I bought a book of Krist's photos that features some taken on that same boardwalk around the same time period."
Martin D (partial comment): "Personally, I'd rather not be seen in one of those photo vests. I am already rather deficient in the fashion department, and I want my young daughters to accumulate the right sort of memories of their dad! I don't need such vests to look even more geeky. :-) "
Dogman: "When I shot film, I loved my vests. Especially when traveling—you could carry guide books, maps and brochures alongside rolls of film and extra lenses. But digital cameras and the iPhone kinda did in the need for a photo vest. But I'm not givin' up my cargo pants and Tilley hats...."
Tom: "This is all well and good, but what we really need to know from Peter is how he manages to get a woman he's just met to sit and have a cup of coffee with him."
Mike replies: Your comment made me laugh, because when we talked on the phone I told him that that had never happened with me in my entire life.
"Unfortunately, you cannot purchase a good attitude, If you could, I'd recommend it. Mike"
Drat.
With best regards.
Stephen
Posted by: Stephen S. Mack | Thursday, 11 July 2019 at 07:16 PM
I love that guy. One of my heroes.
Posted by: Carlos Quijano A. | Thursday, 11 July 2019 at 08:22 PM
There is no way I’m wearing a photo vest. lmao. I don’t have any problem getting people to let me take their photo. However, several have told me that if I was wearing a photo vest...uh uh no way. :-)
Sharon
Posted by: Sharon | Thursday, 11 July 2019 at 09:32 PM
Brandon Stanton's done well with wearing a hat, but often a backwards baseball cap -- which is definitely a photographer thing. But, he surely is a good talker and listener.
Of course, he's also widely recognized in New York City by now.
Posted by: John Shriver | Thursday, 11 July 2019 at 09:38 PM
If you really think a vest would be a good thing for a street photographer then you've never photographed on the streets in Austin. The millennials who see you would snicker all the way to the next kombucha bar.
But if you think it might work in the American midwest you could always drop by the local Walmart and get one of their greeter's vests....authentic!
A khaki photo vest just SCREAMS "uncle Bob from the camera club." YMMV.
Posted by: kirk Tuck | Thursday, 11 July 2019 at 09:42 PM
I am often on, or wheeling along, a bicycle, and I find this has a disarming effect. (This is based on experiences in India, Japan and western Europe; other places may be different.) As a bonus, the bike saddle makes a passable tripod in low light, and at times I have used my bike light as a weak substitute for a flash.
Posted by: Sroyon | Thursday, 11 July 2019 at 09:43 PM
Sorry, rather put away the camera than wear one of those vests- I still like to think I retain some (however) small vestige of dignity.
Seriously, what does worry me is that once asked (and the person consents), what can often follow is what I consider the number one portrait deal breaker- the inevitable smile! Although completely well intentioned, it is the ultimate mask, the complete character and emotional annihilator writ large. I'll usually oblige them their "happy" shot, and then ask for a more "serious" look. Once they crack a smile though, it's hard to get back on course to what one originally envisioned. Sometimes, I might even look like I don't quite know what the heck I'm doing with all those camera controls, just to see what kind of reaction(s) I get...
Posted by: Stan B. | Thursday, 11 July 2019 at 10:02 PM
I've found people are much more at ease if you use a camera that doesn't have a viewfinder. There's something about looking at the LCD on the back of the camera rather than having one eye closed and the other pressed up against a viewfinder that makes the photographer less intimidating. I bought a Pentax K-01 partly as a cheap backup (they go for a song on eBay) and partly as a possible collectable, but I've found it really useful for street photography.
Perhaps it's all psychological. But most of photography is psychological anyway.
Posted by: Mark Roberts | Thursday, 11 July 2019 at 10:29 PM
Personally, I'd rather not be seen in one of those photo vests. I am already rather deficient in the fashion department, and I want my young daughters to accumulate the right sort of memories of their dad! I don't need such vests to look even more geeky. :-)
Here are two good ways to hide. The first is what I normally do, the second I still have to try.
(1) Wear what a regular person walking the streets would be wearing. This will vary with the area where you operate, and it must be consistent with who you are. I recall the short stretch of film showing Cartier-Bresson in the street: eleganty dressed in a light suit and with proper shoes, taking pictures in the market place. He doesn't pretend to be a street trader, he just looks like the gentleman of leisure that he would be if he did not have his camera. Since this is authentic, he remains unnoticed.
I think this approach works equally well for the clandestine and the open styles of street photography. Whatever you style, you will look authentic and thus non-threatening.
(2) Here's a radical option from the other end of the spectrum. Put on one of those "hi vis" yellow jackets that are worn by construction workers. Perhaps also a construction helmet on your head. Plant your tripod in the middle of the road, with camera attached. The bigger the camera, the better. Take your pictures, not showing any regard for the people around you. Everyone thinks you are doing some surveying work for the city authorities and will see through you as if you are air. Obviously, this method works only if you prefer to take pictures unnoticed. I have heard people taking clandestine street shots with a large-format Linhof in this fashion. Personally, I never had the guts to try this myself, but some day I will.
Posted by: Martin D | Friday, 12 July 2019 at 06:50 AM
It’s not easy to be able to photograph people on the street these days. There’s a whole range of anxieties that come into play, with the subjects and the photographer. To be photographed by someone is different than one taking a selfie. To get the opportunity of closer shots, engaging the subject makes sense. This could be a conversation, or just plain “hi” and a smile. The type of camera seems to make a difference sometimes, as well as clothing that blends in with the surrounding population your shooting. Having the camera slung outside oneself seems better than pulling it out of a bag or coat. Shooting with a phone might evoke subsequently posting on social media, rather than just a person using the current “snapshot camera”. One has to gauge the shooting environment and adapt accordingly.
Posted by: Bob Gary | Friday, 12 July 2019 at 07:04 AM
Some years ago, when my daughter was a younger child, a photographer took pictures of her on the boardwalk in New Jersey ... at first, my parent's instincts jumped to attention, but he was a friendly, older gentleman wearing a photographer's vest with a couple cameras and he approached us after taking a few shots and talked briefly to us - might have asked for some information, I can't remember. In hindsight, it may have been Bob Krist - I vaguely recall him looking somewhat like Bob does in pictures, and I bought a book of Krist's photos that features some taken on that same boardwalk around the same time period.
Posted by: Dennis | Friday, 12 July 2019 at 07:28 AM
When I shot film, I loved my vests. Especially when traveling--you could carry guide books, maps and brochures alongside rolls of film and extra lenses. But digital cameras and the iPhone kinda did in the need for a photo vest.
But I'm not givin' up my cargo pants and Tilley hats....
Posted by: Dogman | Friday, 12 July 2019 at 07:58 AM
This is all well and good, but what we really need to know from Peter is how he manages to get a woman he's just met to sit and have a cup of coffee with him.
Posted by: Tom | Friday, 12 July 2019 at 08:21 AM
Mike, thinking that “disguises” is the key to taking people photos doesn’t address the real issue.
I remember taking three workshops with Charles Harbutt in the early 70’s. While this isn’t verbatim, his advice on street photography went like this. If you’re going to try to be HCB, you’ve got to become invisible...nobody should even notice your presence. He also jokingly said taking a picture of the back of someone’s head doesn’t tell a story...unless you’re LF. If you want to take street portraits, it should be no different than sitting down next to a stranger at an outside cafe table and striking up a conversation. If you normally can’t do this, then your photos aren’t going to be genuine.
It’s all about your attitude and mindset about how you normally interact with strangers. If you’re an introvert, you’ve got challenges. If you’re an extrovert, it’s far easier to know how to strike up a conversation with someone and make them feel comfortable in your presence.
My advice. Skip all the thoughts about gear and what you’re going to wear. That’s an excuse masking the real issue which is many of us don’t even make eye contact with someone walking by on the street these days. Work at making yourself feel more natural and comfortable with strangers. Think about how you’d like to be photographed by a stranger. Once you get past this hurdle, it’s becomes really enjoyable getting up close and personal.
Posted by: Ned Bunnell | Friday, 12 July 2019 at 10:05 AM
I have had the amazing opportunity to go to Nepal twice and India once in the last year and a half. Going back to Nepal this week! I carry a DSLR and several lenses in Think Tank pouches, you know I am a photographer.
My experience with local people, some speak english and many don't, is to Say Namaste and bow, point to my camera, point to them with a smile on my face and then mimic taking the photo without the camera in hand. I can't think of one person who refused the photo.
A farmer in India was questioning my motives but he asked his two young daughters to come out for the photo. The stood very formally, there is still a lot of English influence in India, for the first photo. I then pointed to the young girl and pointed to my heart to indicate that she was beautiful. The farmer relaxed and thats when the real photograph was taken. The farmer and I said hello every time I passed after that.
Many people view a camera as a barrier between the photographer and their subject, for me it is a door that allows me entry into someones life even if only for a moment.
Jim
Posted by: Jim Metzger | Friday, 12 July 2019 at 10:21 AM
"(2) Here's a radical option from the other end of the spectrum. Put on one of those "hi vis" yellow jackets that are worn by construction workers."
I can attest to the effectiveness of Martin D's suggestion above. Most of my pictures over the last eight months have been taken with such apparel, including my white hard hat and scruffy protective boots. This is because I am currently photographing the construction of our new (and quite large) church, now about 30% complete, and go on site regularly to take pictures for the parish web site. I say hello to the site manager on each visit and I'm just accepted as part of the scene. Only the new crew members don't know me, so I tell them what I'm dong and why, and ask what they are engaged in at the time. People generally are very happy to meet someone who is interested in what they are working on. I've found that no one objects to my photography, and after a while simply carry on with what they are doing, and I get some great pictures. The architect liked my pictures so much that he commissioned me to photograph other projects!
Really, I'm just following Mike's advice: "What CAN you photograph? Photograph that." I'm also following Peter Turnley's teaching on how to approach strangers: I did a course with him in NY a few years back - best workshop I've ever been on! And yes, I'm quite certain that with this gear on, and perhaps a wooden Berlbach tripod, I could take pictures in the middle of the street with no problems!
Posted by: Peter Wright | Friday, 12 July 2019 at 10:34 AM
The comment by Dennis reminded me of a situation where I photographed a funky wood door gracing the front of dry cleaning business. A man of Asian decent came out quite upset that I was photographing his business. "Why are you photographing my door?" I had to think quick.
"Because this is the best old door in town. Look at the boring glass door on the pub across the street? Why would I photograph that?" He then shook his head in approval of my photograph.
A save is a save.
Posted by: Mike Ferron | Friday, 12 July 2019 at 11:26 AM
I use photo vests for concentrated photography, weddings and roller derby matches and concert videography. Digital has modestly reduced what I need to carry, but I need more spare batteries (often of two or even three different types these days), and I still need my stock of spare memory cards, and a few of the emergency lenses. And Kleenex and lip balm and hand wipes and glass cleaner and lens tissue and a Rocket blower and pen and notebook and all the usual stuff.
Local photographer Stuart Klipper has reported good results with the high-vis vest plus hardhat approach (admittedly for photographing road construction, not more ordinary street photography).
Posted by: David Dyer-Bennet | Friday, 12 July 2019 at 01:09 PM
Photo vests are as bad a the "adventure traveler" vests that you see on tourists in places where they think they need to look adventurous. I recall a flight from Delhi to Kathmandu, and the casual tourists all wore adventure vests (and Tilley hats and shirts with a strap to hold the rolled-up sleeves in place). The real climbers or trekkers wore old shirts or whatnot. And the rugged adventure travelers had vastly more luggage than any of the mountaineers or trekkers.
Posted by: Kodachromeguy | Friday, 12 July 2019 at 06:48 PM
For portraits on the street I think a successful method is employed by (some of?) the people in the Flickr 100 Strangers group: https://www.flickr.com/photos/iainblake/40914619723/in/pool-100strangers/ . For example Iain Blake: https://www.flickr.com/photos/iainblake/albums/72157672572717512 who has fairly stock set of questions for the subjects, records their names and sometimes engages their or their friends’ help holding a flash or reflector. Most subjects are not giving cheesy grins ;-).
Posted by: Richard Parkin | Saturday, 13 July 2019 at 07:31 AM
Amble.
Posted by: John Camp | Saturday, 13 July 2019 at 11:44 AM
When I first saw the pictures of Vivian Maier I had two immediate thoughts: the Rolleiflex is a phenomenal camera, and only a woman could have gotten this close this often...
Posted by: Chris Y. | Sunday, 14 July 2019 at 06:42 AM
Some years ago I did a workshop with Costa Manos; we went to a county fair day of some sort. I have never seen anyone 'vanish in plain sight' as he did. He was somehow out in the open and clearly photographing; however, the people he was making images of, though he was only a step away from them, seemed either oblivious or completely accepting of his presence. One thing was that he did not futz about or seem bashful; he had a balance of confidence and kindness that I think put people at ease with what he was doing.
Posted by: Jason | Sunday, 14 July 2019 at 07:43 PM