[Ed. Note: "Open Mike" is the anything-goes, often off-topic editorial page of TOP, wherein we let Yr. Hmbl. Ed. off the leash and allow him to indulge in tracking behavior*. When all is well and the moon is in the Seventh House, "Open Mike" appears on Wednesdays.]
There's lots of putative information on the Web about nutrition, probably 90% of it misinformation. If you're curious, possibly the most reliable site, in my opinion, is NutritionFacts.org. Michael Greger, a rock star in the WFPB (whole-food plant-based) community, is not a typical "diet guru"—he started his organization with a grant, sustains it through donations, and doesn't accept advertisements or sponsorship. Everything on his website is free—you can't pay for any "tiers" or rewards or special attention—and he donates the proceeds of his books and speaking engagements to charity. This is in stark contrast to many other such figures, who are running little entrepreneurial businesses that are monetized in many different ways, from books, to overnight diet spas, to commercially-available salad dressings. Not that there's anything wrong with making a living.
And he sticks to evidence, mainly by collating and synthesizing the results of peer-reviewed scientific studies. As Dr. Greger puts it, "Every year, I read through every issue of every English-language nutrition journal in the world, so you don't have to."
He adds, "I don’t ever want you to ever do anything just because I or anyone else told you so. That’s the problem with the field of nutrition. Everyone seems to listen to their respective gurus, who can sometimes just make pronouncements from on high without explaining their reasoning. Can you imagine that flying in any other field of science?"
Because I drink a berries-and-greens smoothie every morning for breakfast, I recently watched all five of Dr. Greger's 2015 videos on green smoothies:
Liquid Calories: Do Smoothies Lead to Weight Gain?
Are Green Smoothies Good for You?
Are Green Smoothies Bad for You?
Green Smoothies: What Does the Science Say?
The Downside of Green Smoothies
(By the way, be careful of the end of that last one. Quite possibly the most disgusting thing I've ever heard in a nutrition or food video! Be ready to turn it off.)
Not surprisingly, the news is mostly very good. And I didn't see anything wrong with what I'm doing. The takeaways for me: 1.) It turns out that greens-and-berries smoothies are so rich that it's a good idea to sip them slowly rather than chug them down—they're easier for your body to metabolize that way; 2.) It's a good idea to add a small amount of fat, about the amount found in three walnuts or cashews; and 3.) Lemon juice and even a little lemon zest is a good addition. (I already knew that ground flax seeds go well in smoothies, something he also advocates. Mmm.)
The big one: 4.) Green smoothies are bad for your teeth enamel—almost as bad as that horrendous industrial concoction known as Diet Coke! So you should drink them with a straw (less contact with your teeth that way), and rinse out your mouth with plain water when you're done. (And by the way, never drink diet soda. Seriously.)
Since I am running a little entrepreneurial businesses that is monetized in many different ways, I'll add a link to these nifty borosilicate glass smoothie straws. They're very tough and won't break if you drop them, and, although I would wash them by hand, they're dishwasher safe.
Would you like a little rice with your deadly poison?
The other thing I've been researching recently is rice. Rice is a nearly perfect human food; as with potatoes, you can almost live on rice alone.
But that's uncontaminated rice. Unfortunately, most rice is contaminated.
As with most nutrition science, the rice problem is complicated and multivalent. Here's a short-short version: because arsenic was used for years as a pesticide, there's arsenic in the soil in many places in the world; rice is grown in water; arsenic is water-soluble; so arsenic gets into the rice. You can't escape this by buying organic in this case either, since organic standards don't take into account the quality of the existing soil. But it's highly variable—some rice is very high in arsenic and some rice isn't bad at all. At the same time, the problem is surely serious: some Americans who rely on rice as a daily staple food, when tested, show highly elevated levels of arsenic in their bodies, and even symptoms of arsenic poisoning.
(Red wine has lots of arsenic in it too, just so you know.)
Consumer Reports began testing rice for arsenic a number of years ago, and fully expected that, as a result of its exposé, the FDA would issue limits and labeling requirements as a result of its tests. But that would have been the old, strong, functional America. In the new, weak, dysfunctional America, the FDA has remained silent on the subject. Well, not entirely silent, but it hasn't yet set standards for maximum allowable arsenic levels or required sufficiently informative consumer labeling or warnings.
As a result, there's no real way to know if the rice you're eating is okay or...well, poisoning you.
So we have to fall back on a "best known practices" approach. It's advisable not to eat rice every day. U.S.-grown rice is highly variable as to arsenic content—we grow some of the safest rice and also some of the most toxic rice. Generally, rice grown in California is best, and rice grown in former cotton fields in the Old South, where arsenic was used for decades to kill the boll weevil, is the worst. Trouble is, most rice is not labeled as to where it was grown. With one exception, which I'll get to.
There's a new and better way to cook rice that removes a lot of the arsenic. Basically, you cook it like spaghetti rather than the traditional method of using just enough water and cooking it until all of the cooking water soaks in. (More on that in a minute, too.) In two or three quarts/liters of boiling water, throw in the rice; boil for 20 minutes (white rice) or 30 minutes (brown rice). Take the pot off the heat and turn off the stove, then pour the water and rice through a strainer. Without letting the rice drain completely—i.e., still dripping—toss it back in the still-hot pot and put it back on the stove (now turned off) for another 15–20 minutes. This final steaming "finishes" the rice.
This method can remove up to 60% of the arsenic in the rice.
Now here's where it gets a little complicated. Brown rice contains a bit more arsenic that white rice, all else being equal, and, even after the spaghetti-method cooking, will still contain a little more. But not that much more. The catch is that cooking white rice by the spaghetti method removes most of the desirable nutrients. The reason for the traditional just-enough-water method of cook is that white rice is "enriched"—that is, the vitamins and minerals removed in the refining process are sprayed back on to the endosperm after the rice has been "polished." Cooking white rice in lots of water removes that. (In addition, white rice is polished with copious amounts of talc, which has recently fallen under suspicion of containing a form of asbestos, a really virulent carcinogen.)
Brown rice ends up with a little more arsenic in it once it's been cooked, but it also retains more of the desirable nutrients you want to be eating the rice for in the first place.
So far, the only vendor I've been able to find that labels their rice as having been grown in California is Lundberg, the California-based, family owned rice grower that was the first company in the United Stated to offer certified organic rice. How much arsenic does it have? I don't know, although maybe Consumer Reports does. But for my money, Lundberg Family Farms Organic California Basmati Brown Rice cooked by the "spaghetti method" sounds like the safest bet for now, until the FDA steps up and addresses this issue.
I'm lovin' it
I'm sorry if this is bad news—I know people never like to get bad news. But hey, there are things you should know.
I never liked cooking, but I really do like eating for health. To me anyway, it seems like a much more sensible approach to eating**. It's a deep subject, which I like, and it's fascinating. And, strangely, I love the food, even more than the food I used to eat for taste and self-indulgence only.
Mike
*Dog training term, for when a dog is not made to heel but can follow his nose. I forgot to mention that brown rice cooking in a pot of water makes the whole kitchen smell heavenly.
**Best practical WFPB "diet" book (really just a healthy eating book, since he advises never allowing yourself to be hungry): The Starch Solution by John McDougall. I really want him to start a giant chain of fast-healthy-food restaurants called McDougall's! :-)
Here's Michael Greger's book, How Not to Die—but I'll warn ya, it's a tome. This guy has forgotten more about nutrition than most diet gurus ever knew.
Original contents copyright 2018 by Michael C. Johnston and/or the bylined author. All Rights Reserved. Links in this post may be to our affiliates; sales through affiliate links may benefit this site.
(To see all the comments, click on the "Comments" link below.)
Featured Comments from:
Paul Duncan: "My wife Lori reading How Not To Die by Michael Greger. We've appreciated Greger's evidence-based approach to food and nutrition for a few years now and it's worked very well for us. We heartily concur with your endorsement."
hugh crawford: "Some California rice is very low in arsenic but some is quite high in arsenic, selenium, and other metals. Heavy metal and salt concentration in the soil is an inevitable byproduct of irrigated agriculture, especially where the water comes from a "young" mountain range like the Sierra Nevada. This is why farmers really would prefer to over irrigate and let the waste water flow to the ocean rather than concentrate in the soil. The history of irrigated agriculture worldwide is pretty dismal. My family began farming in California over a century ago, and I grew up hearing all about this and the associated politics. Even before the current drought rice farming would be the occasion for some serious eye rolling. There are a lot of things in life that can kill you but with reasonable luck only one of them will."
Steve D: "Just a heads up. I work in Civil Engineering and have been involved in permitting (including soil and water sampling) for about 30 years now. The level to which arsenic is naturally occurring across the country would surprise the heck out of most folks. I point this out because you sort of, kind of imply (or maybe it's just me who read it that way) that the biggest culprit is a residual pesticide problem in the Southeast. While there is certainly evidence to support this in certain regions of the Southeast, the contribution is not to the degree you would think. Arsenic concentrations are sprinkled across North America like table salt on a counter top. Do a search on USGS Arsenic distribution maps for lots more information."
Rob Griffin: "So if this is the case, 'Rice is a nearly perfect human food; as with potatoes, you can almost live on rice alone,' could I just substitute potatoes (not fried of course) for rice, or do they have the same arsenic problem or another negative? Just wondering because I really like potatoes better than rice, even without gravy."
Mike replies: You should realize I just research things for my own information or for the purpose of writing about them—I'm not an expert or any kind of scientist. Really, my education doesn't go much beyond the 12th grade level. I was deprived of the opportunity to graduate from college and as a result became a relentless autodidact, but I don't have any academic degrees. I'm not qualified to comment on the contamination levels of any foods except to report what other people say.
That said, take the interesting case of an Australian man by the name of Andrew Taylor. Convinced he suffered from food addiction, Mr. Taylor ate potatoes for all of 2016. Only potatoes. Nothing else. This is not an advisable diet in the opinion of his doctor, and the consequences for Mr. Taylor were extreme:
...He lost 110 pounds, his depression improved to the extent that he stopped taking antidepressant meds, he reported sleeping much better, and chronic joint pain from old sports injuries went away.
"My health just continues to improve," he said at the end of his year. "I had high cholesterol but now it’s low, my blood pressure has dropped and my sugar level has dropped. Every time I get a new blood test, it just gets better."
Even more remarkably, he was never hungry, and he didn't get sick of potatoes—at the end of a year of eating potatoes and nothing but potatoes, he said he planned to continue eating mostly...potatoes.
[Source: news.com.au, self-described as "Australia's number one news site."]
For perspective, compare and contrast that to Morgan Spurlock, who, for his movie Supersize Me, ate nothing but McDonald's food for one month. Spurlock, who was 32 years old at the time, gained 24 lbs., increased his cholesterol to 230 mg/dL (6.0 mmol/L), and experienced mood swings, sexual dysfunction, and fat accumulation in his liver. It took him 14 months to recover from the ordeal. [Source: Wikipedia.]
Mike wrote, "In the new, weak, dysfunctional America, the FDA has remained silent on the subject."
Arsenic in Rice and Rice Products
https://www.fda.gov/Food/FoodborneIllnessContaminants/Metals/ucm319870.htm
FDA Statement on Testing and Analysis of Arsenic in Rice and Rice Products
https://www.fda.gov/Food/FoodborneIllnessContaminants/Metals/ucm367263.htm
Questions & Answers: Arsenic in Rice and Rice Products
https://www.fda.gov/Food/FoodborneIllnessContaminants/Metals/ucm319948.htm
(Includes directions for the "spaghetti" or "pasta" method of preparation)
Posted by: Speed | Wednesday, 09 January 2019 at 05:57 PM
You know how to ruin a person’s day, Mike. I was going to make my first batch of rice tonight in my new rice cooker. Now I feel like I’m preparing a vat of arsenic. I think I’ll drive to the local McDonalds instead, you know, as a healthy alternative; double cheeseburger and diet Coke.
Posted by: James Pilcher | Wednesday, 09 January 2019 at 07:07 PM
https://pduncan02.files.wordpress.com/2016/10/20161021-adkvisit-12_dxo.jpg -- my wife Lori reading How Not To Die by Michael Gregor. We've appreciated Gregor's evidence-based approach to food and nutrition for a few years now and it's worked very well for us. We heartily concur with your endorsement.
Posted by: Paul Duncan | Wednesday, 09 January 2019 at 07:43 PM
"How much arsenic does it have? I don't know ...." Lundberg does report on this:
https://www.lundberg.com/info/arsenic-in-food/arsenic-testing-results/
I have been boycotting cruelty for decades, by not using animal products. Everything is from factory farming/fishing now (including the stuff with the labels suggesting otherwise -- "free range"; "humane"; "organic"; etc. all come from factory farms now, in the USA).
Factory farming is a very recent and wildly radical departure from millennia of human practice and religious teachings. It is a moral catastrophe. The most basic decency requires boycotting factory farming/fishing. Start with chickens' corpses:
https://www.onestepforanimals.org/
Or start with Meatless/Meat-free Mondays:
https://www.meatfreemondays.com/
https://www.meatlessmonday.com/
And then take it from there. By the way, my doctor is stunned by how healthy I am for someone my age. He wishes all of his patients would do what I am doing. And I don't even do it for me. I do it for the innocent, defenseless victims of factory farming/fishing.
Best wishes.
Posted by: PacNW | Wednesday, 09 January 2019 at 07:55 PM
I am rather into food and health. Every morning I make Karin and I a smoothie featuring blueberries, strawberries, spinach, kale, banana and avocado and mixed with protein nut milk fortified with pea protein. Added to the mix is a vegan supplement powder and turmeric. I feel good about this.
Folks please stay away from wheat, sugar and anything processed. Go organic when ever possible. The prices have come down.
(btw cauliflower is amazing and versatile. It can imitate anything from mashed potatoes to rice. and a much healthier option.)
Posted by: Mike Ferron | Wednesday, 09 January 2019 at 08:05 PM
WOW That's a real bummer about rice. Especially since I eat brown rice every day as a special diet aid. Bummmmmmmer
[I love rice too. Bear in mind I'm just reporting, I'm not an expert. From what I know I'd suggest sticking with Lundberg rice if you can, and cooking with the "spaghetti" method. Here's the Lundberg page that PacNW provided:
https://www.lundberg.com/info/arsenic-in-food/arsenic-testing-results/
And here are Dr. Greger's videos on the subject:
https://nutritionfacts.org/?s=arsenic%20in%20rice
I have to say, though, that these are not encouraging.
--Mike]
Posted by: Louise Peacock | Wednesday, 09 January 2019 at 08:07 PM
excellent, keep talking. Like you, one of my favorite subjects. Will check out Michael Gregor. Thanks for this Mike, yes, I eat rice almost everyday. I hate change, but . . .
Posted by: Ken James | Wednesday, 09 January 2019 at 09:12 PM
Naturally, I went right to the end of that last video, thinking "how bad could any nutritional video topic be?" Alas, nihil novi sub sole, and I was already well aware of the phenomena. Personally, I find all smoothies to be disgusting, so I generally eat my greens raw.
Posted by: MarkB | Wednesday, 09 January 2019 at 09:12 PM
Hey Mike, rice is a carbohydrate that spikes insulin causing the body to store carbohydrates as fat while simultaneously shutting down growth hormone and fat burning enzymes--plus carbohydrates are unessential.
[Neither of these statements is true at all! You can't survive without carbohydrates. --Mike]
Posted by: Jeff1000 | Wednesday, 09 January 2019 at 09:16 PM
Rice has long been a staple of my diet and I'm now avoiding gluten as well, which increases my exposure to rice-based ingredients, so Arsenic has been on my mind lately.
According to Consumer Reports in late 2014, "White basmati rice from California, India, and Pakistan, and sushi rice from the U.S. on average has half of the inorganic-arsenic amount of most other types of rice." [emphasis mine]
https://www.consumerreports.org/cro/magazine/2015/01/how-much-arsenic-is-in-your-rice/index.htm
On the other hand, this data from the FDA seems to suggest that the safest rice is actually white Jasmine rice, with white medium- and short-grain rice a close second.
https://www.fda.gov/downloads/food/foodborneillnesscontaminants/metals/ucm352467.pdf
I assume that by "sushi rice" CR meant white medium-grain rice, in which case they concur with the FDA data. That's my favorite kind of rice, so take the observation with a grain of, er, salt.
But an even better bet seems to be pseudo-grains like millet, quinoa, amaranth and buckwheat, which, in addition to having less arsenic than rice, tend to have more nutrients and protein. I intend to try a bunch of them as rice substitutes.
There's a terrific sum-up of the arsenic and rice issue here: https://foodrevolution.org/blog/arsenic-in-rice/
[Millet is highly goitrogenic, and don't forget barley, which I've been eating a lot of lately. If I ever find a good barley recipe I'll let you know, though. --Mike]
Posted by: robert e | Wednesday, 09 January 2019 at 09:44 PM
You can try Massa Organics for great California brown rice.
http://www.massaorganics.com
And here are some barley recipes. I can't vouch for any of them, but a few seem worth trying out.
https://www.seriouseats.com/tags/barley
If I were looking to, I'd add it to a hearty vegetable/bean soup, or I'd mix it with little black lentils and season with fresh herbs and a simple red wine vinaigrette. Yum!
Posted by: Ben | Wednesday, 09 January 2019 at 11:14 PM
RICE: Why do most people regard rice as a healthy food? Because we carry chilhood memories of traditional asian people eating it. Asian people are/were lean because they eat small portions and expend lots of energy in their daily lives. We don't.
Rice is starch with almost no nutritional value. With the husk it's little more. Worse, the starch polymer chain molecule breaks down into glucose monomer units in about 90 minutes flat, and that massive sugar spike forces the body to release excessive insulin. Excesive insulin has been identified as a leading cause of the present epidemic of diabetes.
Moral: Avoid rice altogether unless you need it as a side for the occasional Indian dish. Yes, carbohydrate is essential, but we can get all the carbohydrate we need from green and coloured vegetables. That's the level of carbohydrate we need unless we're running marathons or farm-labouring.
SMOOTHIES: If we reduce the chewing we do, we deprive ourselves of the satiety effect of chewing, which provides part of the satisfaction of eating. Smoothies were invented by blender manufacturers! Why do it?
Posted by: Rod S. | Thursday, 10 January 2019 at 12:55 AM
i.s.t.r. that in days gone by rulers/despots regularly consumed small quantities of arsenic in order to build up immunity to it and lower the risk of beng poisonedby it
Paul Mc Cann
Posted by: Thomas Mc Cann | Thursday, 10 January 2019 at 02:11 AM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pEmn0Oqzrf8
Posted by: Dave_lumb | Thursday, 10 January 2019 at 02:56 AM
You say evidence based Mike.
Surely the most relevant evidence in the context of human nutrition is related to the design of the human gut system, rather than the efficacy of a particular recipe?
We have a gut that is longer than a carnivore, but shorter than a herbivore. We have one stomach.
This fact indicates that we need to process our intake somewhat but not as much as grass eaters. So forget wheat and rice, or anything that require more than one injection of enzymes and acids, like the other complex carbohydrates.
However, because we don't have a really short gut, where really strong acids are injected into a very small stomach and then the food is got rid of very quickly before it does any damage, we are not good with really bloody highly nutritious meat like offal, which is the first thing that a carnivore goes for after a kill. So that kind of stuff ferments in our medium length guts.
Going further up the food canal we reach the mouth, where we have a combination of grinding and tearing teeth, rather than a full set of permanently growing cutting teeth or similar grinding teeth. Our mouths produce an enzyme which instantly digests simple sugars.
We get our energy from simple sugars, and we get our large brains from easily digested fats.
Without going into volumes on this subject, that is about the size of it. We are designed to eat simple sugars and fats, and lots of them.
The vegan diet, in the context of the grassy plains would satisfy that, and it did for centuries.
As David Byrne said... We are living on nuts (fat) and berries (sugar).
However, we are the most successful animal on the planet, and we have adapted. We have modified our diets so that we can spend more of the day playing with cameras.
We can now eat fatty pork and cheesy comestibles to get the really concentrated fat, we can break open coconuts and process olives and palm nuts for further sources of fat.
We have bred citrus fruits and apples and pears so that they are no longer nasty little dry tree fruits geared only to the reproduction of the tree, but now so that they are really tasty.
The fact is that the genie is out of the bottle, and there is no such thing as perfect nutrition, there just isn't enough perfect food to go round.
Factory food and rice, wheat, potatoes, deep sea fish, and other foods are convenience foods produced by mill owner, to enrich himself. They are the source of all of our ills, since they store up trouble.
In order to increase their profits they have to continually enlarge their marketplace, increase the population and break down barriers. In short, they need globalism.
And they are going to continue to fool enough idiots into supporting them.
Personally, I would rather have 70 free years, than 120 years as a prisoner of big pharma, and big farmer.
Posted by: StephenJ | Thursday, 10 January 2019 at 03:52 AM
Hmmm, should I start a rice exported business from here? Since we do test our imported rice for heavy metals and arsenic. I sense a business opportunity. :P
[You should mention where "here" is, because no one can tell from...here. (Heh.) --Mike]
Posted by: YS | Thursday, 10 January 2019 at 03:59 AM
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-46654042?app=news.science_and_environment.story.46654042.page#share-tools Interesting piece on the BBC website concerning Vegan Milk, it takes 54 litres to produce 1 glass (200ml) of Rice Milk.
Posted by: George Swann | Thursday, 10 January 2019 at 04:09 AM
Sorry that should have read “54 litres of Water” to produce 1 200ml glass of Rice Milk.
Posted by: George Swann | Thursday, 10 January 2019 at 04:12 AM
The American Cancer Society on Arsenic …
Some foods naturally contain more arsenic than others. As mentioned above, rice and rice products are a particular concern because they are a major food source in many parts of the world and are included in the diets of many infants and children. The levels of arsenic in these products and their possible health effects are areas of active study. At this time, neither the FDA nor the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) recommend specific limits on how much rice or rice products should be eaten, but they do recommend that families eat a wide variety of foods for a well-balanced diet that includes grains other than rice, such as wheat, barley and oats. This can help limit any possible health effects from eating too much of any one type of food.
Concerns have also been raised about arsenic levels in some fruit juices (particularly apple juice). The FDA has tested the arsenic levels in many apple juice products and has stated that it is confident in the overall safety of apple juice for children and adults. The AAP does not have specific recommendations regarding arsenic in fruit juices, but it has stated that children don’t need to drink fruit juice to have a well-balanced, healthy diet. The AAP recommends limiting the intake of all sweet beverages, including juice, because of the risk for poor nutrition, obesity, and childhood cavities.
https://www.cancer.org/cancer/cancer-causes/arsenic.html
(part of a long piece)
I believe that "wide variety of foods" and "well balanced diet" are key. Don't dwell on any one thing.
Posted by: Speed | Thursday, 10 January 2019 at 07:05 AM
What would you says the nearest equivalent website for photographers? One that "started his organization with a grant, sustains it through donations, and doesn't accept advertisements or sponsorship. Everything on his website is free."
[Beats me. Do you know of one? --Mike]
Posted by: Arg | Thursday, 10 January 2019 at 07:12 AM
"If I ever find a good barley recipe..."
Well, beer (generally) and malt whisky are made from barley... ;-)
Posted by: Steve Higgins | Thursday, 10 January 2019 at 09:29 AM
Argue or discuss, the reality of it all is that nobody gets out alive.
We grow, reach a peak and then go downhill - what goes on during that time can make a difference in quality of life as we progress.
We could go back to farming methods without so many chemimicals, without genetic engineering and without the machinery spewing toxic fumes as they harvest and then watch more starve as production falls drastically.
Now I'll go have a Chili Cheeze dog with triple onions on it and a Pepsi Cola.
Posted by: William | Thursday, 10 January 2019 at 09:55 AM
Arsenic in red wine?
Hmm, for what did that used to be a treatment in years past?
(Just off the cuff by an Immunologist.)
Posted by: Rick in CO | Thursday, 10 January 2019 at 09:56 AM
It's weird to see you recommend a site that is almost exclusively videos...Yuck!
Posted by: Remi | Thursday, 10 January 2019 at 10:25 AM
Mike...thanks for TOP every morning, and for good writing. But for a real science-based take on Dr. Greger: https://sciencebasedmedicine.org/death-as-a-foodborne-illness-curable-by-veganism/
[That's very curious...why would you think that that's "a real science-based take"? Because the title of that blog says it is? As far as I can tell, the expertise of the author of that site is that she's a doctor. A doctor who is a retired Marine Corps colonel. Nothing wrong with that. But Michael Gregor is also a doctor, one who specializes in nutrition and is a recognized expert in nutrition. Furthermore, your author's schtick is to play devil's advocate...she even calls herself the "SkepDoc." And yet even so, she ends her critique (all based on watching ONE video) by substantially agreeing with him.
The instant I saw Greger's book title ("How Not to Die") I knew it was a mistake, because certain people are literal-minded and would object that we all die. Whereas the title merely refers to the efficacy of looking at common causes of death and searching for "best practices" to mitigate their severity. Wouldn't you rather die of old age in your nineties than cancer, hypertension or heart disease decades earlier? That's apparently too subtle for Dr. Hall, who also makes the blatant category mistake of calling Greger a "vegan," which he's not. He advocates WFPB, not veganism. Calling him a vegan, characterizing vegan views in general terms and from other sources, and then shooting them down is setting up a straw dog, which is a pretty weak gambit from a debating standpoint.
One quality of logical thinking that editors have to be good at is "evaluating competing claims." In this case, I don't think you've done due diligence yet. A retired Air Force physician who's an admitted generalist (see her bio) and who has watched ONE of Greger's videos is not in a position to issue a blanket condemnation. There might be valid critiques out there of Greger and his claims to being scientific, but this isn't one of them. --Mike]
Posted by: Joe H | Thursday, 10 January 2019 at 10:52 AM
I wonder about what this plastic rice that was imported from china to Nigeria does to one's health:
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-africa-38391998
Perhaps rice with arsenic is preferable in the end.
Posted by: Nigel | Thursday, 10 January 2019 at 11:04 AM
Re barley: try scotch broth soup. Should be able to get packets of broth mix pulses. Very high in barley
Posted by: Richard Tugwell | Thursday, 10 January 2019 at 12:14 PM
One of your more interesting (for me, anyway) OM/OT "free range" posts, and I appreciate the links.
I deliberately steer towards "organic" and non-GMO in my grocery purchases, the bulk of which I either grow myself or buy from a local farmer who I've know for a number of years. When asked why I do this, since regular supermarket groceries cost less and look okay, my response is, "If I wanted to eat RoundUp (glyphosate)I'd put a bottle of it on the kitchen table along with the salt and pepper grinders."
Wheat, (and wheat products), is problematic. In large scale wheat production, it is much more efficient for the farmer at harvest time if all of the wheat ripens at the same time, which it normally does not do. So, they "force" the still-green wheat to "harvestibility" by broadcast spraying the field with glyphosate, then allowing a week or so for the chemicals to work.
From where you live, take a trip up to Sodus Point one day in warmer weather. Along the way you will pass apple orchards where the apple "trees" are trained onto supports similar to grape vines. The ground at their bases, and between rows, is clear. Can you guess why?
(BTW, Sodus Point is an interesting place to visit of itself.)
Posted by: MikeR | Thursday, 10 January 2019 at 12:56 PM
Hey Mike, both statements are true. You only need carbohydrates in the form of say leafy green vegetables for their vitamins and minerals which you could supplement instead. Carbs ARE unessential. The body without carbs will switch to burning fat and converting the fat into ketones. Carbs are converted to sugar in which some are used for energy and the rest are stored as body fat. If you're consuming a good amount of carbs just look in the mirror: are you lean with lean muscle or flabby. Eliminating carbs and using fat and some protein for energy will transform your body into a lean, ripped machine.
[Hi Jeff, you've fallen for some unfortunately common misinformation. You can't gain weight eating more rice. If you yourself are overweight at all, try this experiment (because I don't want to advocate eating rice): without changing anything about your current diet--that is, without compensating by eating additional rich foods, but without attempting to curtail your normal eating either--add 14 slices of whole-grain bread to your diet each day for six weeks. Make sure it's real whole grain bread and has low sugar. Eaten plain. You will lose weight. Try it for yourself. --Mike]
Posted by: Jeff1000 | Thursday, 10 January 2019 at 02:32 PM
Off-topic posts like this surely aren't helping you retain your readership.
[Au contraire, mon frere. My most frequent request from readers is for more off-topic posts. I hear it more than anything else. --Mike]
Posted by: Don | Thursday, 10 January 2019 at 03:44 PM
This has turned into somewhat of a hobby of mine ever since hearing a Nina Teicholz interview on CBC radio about the time that "The Big Fat Surprise" came out.
Some things that might be relevant follow...
* "U.S. News is wrong about what constitutes the best diet", By Gary Taubes and Nina Teicholz Jan 28, 2018
At https://www.latimes.com/opinion/op-ed/la-oe-taubes-teicholz-us-news-best-diet-problems-20180128-story.html
* "Lesson for the Next Dietary Guidelines Committee: We Need A Diversity of Opinion"
"Given that the vast majority of committee members supported plant-based diets, one might not be surprised that they introduced 'Healthy Vegetarian' as one of three official USDA-HHS dietary patterns. (The others are 'Mediterranean' and 'US-Style'). Yet the committee could not identify any rigorous, i.e. 'Grade 1' strong evidence, to support this recommendation. Moreover, of the eight systematic reviews the DGAC conducted, examining whether fruits and vegetables could promote health benefits of any kind, only 'inconclusive' evidence could be found."
At https://www.nutritioncoalition.us/news/2018/10/17/lesson-for-the-next-dietary-guidelines-committee-we-need-a-diversity-of-opinion?rq=mediterranean
* "Women, Low-Fat Diets & Heart Disease" is a video interview with Nina Teicholz, author of "The Big Fat Surprise", the result of 10 years of intense research.
- On saturated fats: It's been demonstrated that the most effective way to increase your HDL is to eat more saturated fat. It's the only food known to increase your "good" cholesterol. If you keep carbs low and your saturated fats high, you're in good shape.
- On the "Mediterranean Diet": It was a commercial product developed by the European Olive Oil Commission to sell more olive oil to America. So they developed this brilliant plan of hosting the best-ever series of nutrition conferences all over the Mediterranean.
There's a reason we have a Mediterranean diet - that's because everybody wanted to go on vacation to the Mediterranean. There's a reason we don't have a Siberian diet. But there was never any science for it. Anyone who goes to the Mediterranean knows, they eat a lot of meat. Lamb, and beef, and pork, and - if you're in Greece, you know - vegetables are a nice side dish, but every meal has some meat in it.
Check it out at YouTube. "Women, Low-Fat Diets & Heart Disease w/ Nina Teicholz" at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EX41JlrIzws (runtime: 1:10:05)
* Zoë Harcombe Most perfect food: liver. Eat more cholesterol and live longer.
Video lecture at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wdznfiWvGq0 (runtime: 25:13)
* Death by Veganism
"...traditional vegetarian diets, as in India, invariably include dairy and eggs for complete protein, essential fats and vitamins. There are no vegan societies for a simple reason: a vegan diet is not adequate in the long run."
https://www.nytimes.com/2007/05/21/opinion/21planck.html
* "You can't survive without carbohydrates." False. See Rober Lustig: https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=Rob+Lustig
* Also Vilhjalmur Stefansson and Karsten Anderson proved nearly 100 years ago the truth of the no-carbohydrate diet with a medically-supervised year of living on only meat.
Good summary of Stefansson's findings in three parts:
https://web.archive.org/web/20180109155358/http://www.biblelife.org/stefansson1.htm">http://www.biblelife.org/stefansson1.htm">https://web.archive.org/web/20180109155358/http://www.biblelife.org/stefansson1.htm
https://web.archive.org/web/20180104021843/http://www.biblelife.org:80/stefansson2.htm">http://www.biblelife.org:80/stefansson2.htm">https://web.archive.org/web/20180104021843/http://www.biblelife.org:80/stefansson2.htm
https://web.archive.org/web/20171206075942/http://www.biblelife.org:80/stefansson3.htm">http://www.biblelife.org:80/stefansson3.htm">https://web.archive.org/web/20171206075942/http://www.biblelife.org:80/stefansson3.htm
Posted by: Dave Sailer | Thursday, 10 January 2019 at 03:57 PM
Sushi rice is short grain Japanese style rice that cooks up a bit sticky, thus nice to use in sushi.
Like this:
https://www.amazon.com/Tamaki-Gold-Signature-California-Koshihikari/dp/B003HGKO78/ref=sr_1_1_a_it?ie=UTF8&qid=1547154169&sr=8-1&keywords=tamaki+gold
I've used this for years because although it is on the expensive side when cooked in a good rice cooker it is the best rice on the planet.
Posted by: psu | Thursday, 10 January 2019 at 04:04 PM
Okay, I watched the first video you linked to on smoothies and it was pretty good. Nice summary. I'll mention it to my wife, who is a doctor and likes smoothies.
Posted by: John Krumm | Thursday, 10 January 2019 at 04:38 PM
Hey Mike, it's still always calories in versus calories burned, but I'm talking about body composition. If you're spiking insulin with a diet rich in carbs you will carry more fat versus lean muscle than if you kept insulin flatlined. Insulin prevents fat burning enzymes from working plus you lose out on your body producing growth hormone which has fat burning and anti-aging properties.
Regards!
Posted by: Jeff1000 | Thursday, 10 January 2019 at 06:46 PM
A few years ago, I happened upon the concept of "nutrient density." At its simplest, the idea is how much protein you get from foods for the calories eaten.
For example, 100 calories of romaine lettuce provides 10 gr of protein. Contrast that with 100 calories of a hamburger from the well-know golden catenary chain, which provides just 4 gr of protein.
I used nutritiondata.self.com for these figures, (which are, by the way, approximations).
Posted by: MikeR | Thursday, 10 January 2019 at 08:09 PM
In 1968 (before being shipped off to Vietnam) I went through U.S. Army Basic Training at Fort Knox, Kentucky. I got diet advice from an old Army veteran who knew something of wars and survival and I have followed that advice faithfully ever since:
I'll eat anything that's slower than I am.
Regards, Mike.
Jim
Posted by: Jim Hart | Friday, 11 January 2019 at 11:42 AM
"Millet is highly goitrogenic, and don't forget barley"
Thanks for the Millet warning. I'll mix it with other grains and/or prepare it with kombu.
@psu:
Americans use the term "sushi rice" to refer to just about any medium or short grained rice, though some are more discriminating. Even in Japan though, a number of varieties are used to make sushi, some associated with specific regions.
So in the context of a report warning about toxin levels in particular varieties and sources of rice, it's just too vague a term. It's possible that CR tested a sufficient variety to make a blanket statement, but I strongly doubt it.
Posted by: robert e | Monday, 14 January 2019 at 12:03 PM