(I'm finally caught up with the comment moderation—84 comments on the "Settings" post, 205 comments on the "Camera Bags" post, and 102 comments on the "Portrait Lens" post.
Sorry to be so late getting them all up, but that was exhausting!
Nevertheless, thanks to all who contributed. Some really great comments on all the posts. Please do scroll down one last time and look at least at the "Featured Comments" on all those posts. —Ed.)
Having been somewhat more completely educated now, please allow me to modify...
MIKE'S SEAT-O'-THE-PANTS BASIC GUIDE to
CURRENT CAMERA BAG BRANDS
Good Utilitarian High Value brands: AmazonBasics, Manfrotto
Sensible Well-Established Mainstream brands: Tamrac, Lowepro, Tenba
Wotancraft Trooper size comparison
Cool, Hip and/or Retro-ish brands: Crumpler, Domke, Peak Design, Ona
Stylish Women's-Fashion brands: Jill-E, Jo Totes, Lily Deanne by Think Tank, Kelly Moore (lest you be in any doubt of the target market, Kelly Moore has a camera bag called the "Sues Vegan Organizer")
High-Status Luxury Veblen-Good brands: Billingham, Artisan & Artist, Fogg, Oberwerth (and on the topic of target margeting, Oberwerth, which Google Translate says means "upper worth" in German [not quite accurate, our German readers tell me], has an $800 bag not-so-subtly called the "Wetzlar"—which Leica will be happy to sell to you with its own branding for $200 more! Oberwerth also has a strap—just a camera strap—that costs $226, which is more than Tamrac's highest-priced shoulder bag. But then, that's the definition of a Veblen Good.)
Best Bags for Working PJ, Artist, and Professional Photographers: Think Tank, Porta Brace (better as portable packing cases than carry bags, methinks), Wotancraft
Honorable Mentions
Cheapest decent bag: AmazonBasics Large DSLR Gadget Bag, $22.65
Longest-lasting bags: Billingham (I've had my Billingham 335 shoulder bag since Reagan was President and it still looks good and works fine. Our readers seem to like the Hadley particularly)
Best camera straps: UpStrap (it's also Jay Maisel's favorite brand)
Best airline-friendly rolling case: Think Tank Photo Airport International V3.0 Carry On
Best feature (that I know of, anyway): Quick-access zipper on Tenba DNA Messenger bags. I love that
Highest-rated bag on Amazon: Domke F-2
Waterproof, shockproof hard cases: Pelican (waterproof polypropylene copolymer hard cases—LensRentals ships its rental cameras in a soft case inside a Pelican case inside a cardboard box)
Best-looking bag: Ooh, I ain't goin' there. Probably a Fogg? You'll pay for that, though. Plus, the only cameras pretty enough to go in a Fogg bag shoot film. As we used to say on CompuServe, <grin, duck, & run>
[Drum roll, please] Best camera bag brand overall: Think Tank Photo (by popular acclaim!)
How'd I do? Is that better? I got rid of the "-ster" on "hip-" that was causing so much consternation. And yer welcome. See what I do for you?
:-)
Mike
(Thanks to the 205 commenters on the previous camera bag post)
Original contents copyright 2018 by Michael C. Johnston and/or the bylined author. All Rights Reserved. Links in this post may be to our affiliates; sales through affiliate links may benefit this site.
(To see all the comments, click on the "Comments" link below.)
Featured Comments from:
Stanleyk: "Can't argue with the F-2. I have one that's at least 15 years old and going strong. It's been through multiple cameras. Currently I changed out the inserts and use it for a GFX 50R + 63mm + 45mm and a Mamiya C330 + 80mm + 65mm. I bet I still have and use this bag ten years from now."
Kenneth Tanaka: "Hey, that's a very good, well-sorted list, Mike! Adding to the best non-photo bag bags list, my own most frequently used 'goldilocks' bag is the PacSafe Metrosafe LS250. Terrific for general travel and for carrying small, mirrorless kit. I've been using these for a several years and they're excellent! Think Tank is my favorite brand of photo bag, followed closely by Lowe Pro. (No, I'm not self-conscious about the branding. It's often facing toward my body, anyway.)"
Geoff Goldberg: "Have had a lot of these bags, and still find the F-Stop the best of them all. Others have their virtues, but their larger backpacks are designed and made very nicely."
David Paterson: "Mike—enough with the bags already. But really.
"Please."
Mike replies: Well...y'see...I felt my list really should be improved...before I left the topic behind y'know...didn't want to let the flawed list stand...thought I could do better after having done more research...y'see....
Oh well. Okay.
In addition to the top zipper, I really like the silent velcro on the Tenba.
I used that messenger bag for a while doing landscape pics but found the weight when loaded too heavy. I went to a backpack style bag. But I liked the Tenba messenger so much, I took the insert out and used it as my work briefcase.
As an aside, I found out the hard (i.e. expensive) way, that when buying a backpack camera bag for using in the woods, always get a bag that open against you back. Not on the outside away from your back.
Posted by: Leon Droby | Friday, 18 January 2019 at 01:02 PM
Don't forget your landscapists! I use F-Stop Gear backpacks even if I'm not hiking because it's a great way to carry lots of heavy gear without hurting your body too much since they use hiking backpack design principles to distribute the weight.
My typical load in their Lotus backpack and large pro ICU typically has gripped Nikon D850 and D500 bodies, a Sigma 50-100/1.8 zoom (which is as large as a full-frame 70-200/2.8 lens), and 28/1.4E, 58/1.4G, and 105/1.4E Nikkors with room leftover for a Nikon Z body and its FTZ adapter, or a couple more primes. With their smaller Guru backpack and small pro ICU, I can carry 1 gripped DSLR, 3 large f/1.4 Zeiss primes, and an Einstein strobe head with its external battery pack.
Their design and functionality is generally very good as is their durability. The logos aren't too visible either.
Recently I was shooting in a venue that didn't allow backpacks, so I had to move my equipment into a reusable shopping bag to carry in a relatively lightweight video setup: a Nikon Z6, shoulder mount, video mic, 24-70S zoom, a C/Y Zeiss 85/2.8 MMJ, and a few batteries. I suppose that's an option too!
Posted by: Andre Y | Friday, 18 January 2019 at 01:10 PM
A "goldilocks" bag is in the eyes of the beholder.
A little while back, Kirk Tuck spoke favorably of a Home Depot tool bag.
Posted by: MikeR | Friday, 18 January 2019 at 01:17 PM
I might be the least hip person ever, but I do love the one-handed magnetic clasp on my Think Tank bag.
Posted by: RubyT | Friday, 18 January 2019 at 01:18 PM
I have a couple of Domke bags (F-5xa and F6) that that still look new after years of use and will likely outlast me. The Lowepro ProTactic that I use for everyday carry is easier on the shoulders, so the Domke bags stay at home most of the time...
I applaud you for trying to put together a list for camera bags. Not only are there a seemingly endless number of them on the market, categorizing them is highly subjective based upon each persons personal styling preferences, perceived needs, budget/income, and desire to portray their own idealized/imagined status in the photography community.
Posted by: Aaron | Friday, 18 January 2019 at 01:42 PM
It might be interesting to sometime (possibly not now, but in the future, if you're burned out on the topic) discuss camera bag *theory* as opposed to the desirability of specific bags. To ask how people actually use the bags, and what they want in one. There are so many bag designs that almost anyone can find one that is perfect or nearly perfect for their uses, but there are also designs that simply make you scratch your head and ask, "Why?"
So what are the design elements that are desirable and which are head-scratchers? In a way, the bags are like cameras themselves -- there seem to be several non-negotiable features (for most people) but you have a heck of a time finding all of them in one camera or bag. Like IBIS, or a quick-access flap. Shouldn't they ALL have those things, whatever those things may be?
One example: should a camera bag actually look like a camera bag? They don't necessarily have to, or if they do, they can be made very unobtrusive. Shouldn't all *serious* camera bags be like that?
Posted by: John Camp | Friday, 18 January 2019 at 01:59 PM
The Think Tank Airport International V3 is 4.4kg empty. That won’t allow you to carry much gear on international carriers where the carry-on limit is usually 7 kg...
Posted by: Kevin Sutton | Friday, 18 January 2019 at 02:48 PM
Some years ago in the UK there was a brand called Camera Care Systems. Sadly they closed when the owner retired.They had an idea that was so good that I can't understand why no one else uses it. Their shoulder bags had the usual flap held down by two leather straps of Billingham type. When this was opened it folded over the back of the bag and revealed the zip of a Gladstone bag style hinged cover. When unzipped you could close and open the bag in seconds. It was stiff enough to stay closed without using the zip.
Posted by: Bob Johnston | Friday, 18 January 2019 at 04:19 PM
Just thought I'd offer a nod to Wandrd's Prvke bags (though their 'we're-too-hip-to-use-all-the-vowels-we-should' naming policy irks me). I got mine just about two years ago and absolutely love it.
Posted by: JamesG | Friday, 18 January 2019 at 04:23 PM
I don’t have the experience that you have, but I’m with you re. Thinktank bags. I’ve had a few, but my current one is an Urban Disguise Classic 35. It turns out that it takes my 5DIV, 24-105 f4, 16-35 f4, 70-200 f4, 13” MacBook Pro, iPad, connectors, spare battery and headphones for a (tiny) smidge under 7kgs. Which is handy, as that’s Emirates Airlines’ cabin baggage weight limit, and they’re who I use for my trips to Asia.
A win!
Posted by: Tom Burke | Friday, 18 January 2019 at 04:46 PM
The all-black Foggs, especially a smallish bag like the ‘b-laika’, look fairly discreet, and with no screaming labels...
https://www.camleyphotographic.com/shop/fogg-leather-bag-b-laika-in-black-fblbb-condition-4e-7004/
And after 20 years....film and digital... :) mine looks well used but still robust. The cost significantly less, though, back then.
Posted by: Jeff | Friday, 18 January 2019 at 05:14 PM
I bought my large Billingham in the 1970s and it is still going strong,transporting a lot of gear for all sorts of events.
I would certainly not describe Billingham as a Veblen good.
Posted by: Trevor Johnson | Friday, 18 January 2019 at 05:37 PM
Fogg looks good with the Fuji X100 or X-Pro in it. Just as good as it does with a Leica M4 or newer.
Posted by: Daniel | Friday, 18 January 2019 at 05:56 PM
The classic/archetypical Pelican cases are actually not roto-molded. Their roto-molded line comes from their acquisition of Hardigg, which are generally very rectangular cases with removable lids.
Posted by: Robbie | Friday, 18 January 2019 at 06:17 PM
By the way, I did not comment on this issue earlier but I have used an upstrap but found that when stored in a bag with Nikon cameras, some sort of reaction occurs where the rubber becomes sticky on lens barrels etc. When I stopped using the strap, the problem resolved. Might be something in that sticky pad they have. Not a very scientific test but was wondering if anyone else has noticed this? Often an observation like this can lead to a testable hypothesis and maybe one of your readers has been more diligent than I have and sorted this out.
Posted by: Bill La Via | Friday, 18 January 2019 at 06:46 PM
This is funny. I didn’t read the bags post until a few days later. I felt like you were a little dismissive of Lowepro, and not giving ThinkTank their just due. But I wasn’t going to comment because it was late and I thought this had moved on.
Then I saw this and you read my mind. I agree that ThinkTank makes great products. I have several, and just really think they have it figured out.
Posted by: Ross A | Friday, 18 January 2019 at 09:45 PM
Just so you know, the Pelican cases used to transport gear are indeed injection molded. Their rotomolded products are more like industrial containers. Just as Robbie said, I just say his comment.
[Fixed now. Thanks to you and Robbie. --Mike]
Posted by: Marc Gibeault | Friday, 18 January 2019 at 11:12 PM
Ooh yeah, Billingham Hadley.
I have a small and a large, both of which have been used regularly for the past 12 years or so. They have actually become more useful as my cameras have decreased in size. The large Hadley comfortably holds a Sony A7 III body and three Sony F4 zooms (12-24, 24-105, and 70-200). Not exactly lightweight, but still shoulder-strappable and way, way lighter than the two Hasselblad 500C bodies and 3~4 lenses I used to carry around in a LowePro backpack. Now that was HEAVY! The small Hadley is perfect for an APS-C kit, specifically my a6500 and 2~3 lenses.
Given that both bags are sill in great shape, and that I can't see any reason to replace them, I'd have to say they were a good investment. Good value for the money, even. People like 'em for a reason.
The poor ol' LowePro backpack that had to support the heavy stuff back in the day was a darn good bag too. I still have it, but almost never use it anymore. A memento of the good ol' days, as we like to remember them.
Camera bags are the universe's way of reminding us that perfection will always be just out of reach.
Posted by: Kent | Saturday, 19 January 2019 at 02:18 AM
I wonder if there are people out there, I mean genuine working pro photographers, who carry their cameras on a factory standard strap? Or should there be the ultimate list of hipster camera straps to accompany the ultimate list of hipster camera bags?
Posted by: marcin wuu | Saturday, 19 January 2019 at 04:34 AM
Yes -- camera bag theory!
Transport bags vs. working bags (and how many of us try to make one bag perform both functions; but for example I don't need a working bag in a studio).
How horrible top zippers are (too narrow an opening). The importance of the top flap, and storage in the flap. How the idea of attaching a tripod to a bag is so obvious, and apparently so useless (I've set up for it twice, most of my bags are clearly equipped for it, but I've never found it useful). The lack of places to store discharged batteries. The need to accommodate your good body with the 70-200/2.8 mounted for quick access.
Posted by: David Dyer-Bennet | Saturday, 19 January 2019 at 10:24 AM
The Oberwerth brand is named after the Oberwerth district of the city of Koblenz in Germany as this is where the owners of the company live.
Posted by: Carsten Bockermann | Sunday, 20 January 2019 at 12:02 PM
In using any camera bag, said device is assumed for cameras less than a negative size of 4" x 5" !
That noted when I was much younger (50 years earlier)
cameras were built different; of metal and non-"plastic"
materials. Said hardware was heavy in weight. Now add the additional weight of a Billingham all
leather carry case and you've got a serious weight problem. My age has increased, however find here in Canada a whole lot of product cases are simply not available; probably would be well over 30%. higher in price over the pricing in the USA.
Best carry bag? Used camera bags are like used automobiles; too many to count, lots of variety, and available for cheap expenditures. Thrift shops are
the best place to start looking; am I cheap,
let's say just say practical, eh?
Posted by: Bryce Lee | Sunday, 20 January 2019 at 06:57 PM
I think it goes without saying -- for many photographers with a range of gear and pursuits -- that one camera bag is never enough. Over the last 30 years I have accumulated several camera bags and I keep them all (in one place). A little while ago I dusted off a camera bag I hadn't used for 25 years!
Posted by: Sven W | Monday, 21 January 2019 at 05:49 AM
I find the whole "Stylish Women's-Fashion" category to be pretty offensive. To me, it looks like a cynical and highly sexist exercise in marginalization on the part of bag manufacturers. Sure, there might be a marginal market for it, but historically speaking photography is, arguably, the most gender neutral of art-related activities. The list of notable photographers who were women is a long one and goes back to photography's very beginning. I'm pretty sure these women never suffered for the lack of a bag that matched their shoes, or that looked like a large purse. I think the executives pushing this stuff, almost certainly men, should be forced to dress in drag and schlep around camera gear in these ridiculous bags they're selling.
There. I feel better now.
Posted by: Doug Thacker | Monday, 21 January 2019 at 06:24 AM
I’m a big fan of Think Tank, and use a ‘Hubba Hubba Hiney’ shoulder bag/waist pack which is the perfect size for a m43 camera and a handful of lenses.
Doesn’t have a top flap, but generally tends to be a lens and sunglasses case store, while the camera is in hand.
Also as it’s modular, it can strap onto Think Tank’s belt system.
Incredibly useful when hiking or walking, as it can strap onto the waist or chest belts for backpacks, for a practical way of carrying your camera gear.
Durability and build quality is exemplary, as reported by all other users.
Posted by: Cliff Lee | Tuesday, 22 January 2019 at 01:33 AM