Commenting on the Not-OT post, Robert Roaldi writes, "All these books are great, I suppose, but what if you really hate doing marketing and sales?" (I had passed along JH's recommendation of The 22 Immutable Laws of Marketing by Al Ries and Jack Trout and added How to Succeed in Commercial Photography by Selina Maitreya, and Stephen S. added Photography: Focus on Profit by Tom Zimberoff and Best Business Practices for Photographers by John Harrington.)
In answer, I'd say, well, you probably shouldn't be a professional photographer. Unless possibly you're a Mom 'n' Pop operation and your spouse or partner enjoys marketing and sales. Or you can afford to hire a rep.
Marketing and sales is one of a few things necessary to be a successful professional photographer:
- A level of constant and consistent personal energy and appetite for hard work that is well above average.
- Approximately the sociability, gregariousness, extroversion, and people skills of politician who has to campaign to be elected.
- A knack for problem-solving.
- Enough entrepreneurial spirit that you could run a dry cleaners, a gas station, or a fast-food franchise. Or two or three of one or the other.
- A chameleonlike ability to adapt your visual style according to the circumstances, and a cheerful willingness to let clients dictate your subject matter.
- A relatively high level of technical knowledge but with no particular attachment to specific skills, equipment, or techniques.
- Excellent organizing ability.
- A high comfort level with deadlines, strain, and pressure.
Oh, and...
- An interest and enthusiasm for marketing and sales.
In other words, nothing to it!* Simple, right?
Mike
*I have chronic, low-level intermittent unipolar depression, which tends to make my energy come and go, and, moreover, be deeply undependable; I'm introverted and shy and sometimes socially awkward; I enjoy open-endedness, adventitiousness, and serendipity; I'm an "Idealist" type and have little interest in monetary success for its own sake, so entrepreneurship often feels beside the point; what most appeals to me would be to develop a consistent, authentic personal visual style and stick to it; my tech interest is mainly result-based and need-to-know; I am inefficient and have a poor (though not the worst possible) level of organizing ability; I hate pressure and have almost a psychological block against meeting deadlines (really, if you want me to not do something, give me a deadline for it)—I can't even keep a calendar; and I have an abstract interest in marketing because I enjoy the inventiveness of it intellectually, but I'm not motivated by the challenge of closing sales.
Except for that the bit about marketing, it's possible that I might be reasonably close to the opposite of the personality type most suited to be a professional photographer. Although, mostly, I get along with those folks just fine.
Anybody can succeed—at something or other—but it's always essential to "know thyself."
Original contents copyright 2018 by Michael C. Johnston and/or the bylined author. All Rights Reserved. Links in this post may be to our affiliates; sales through affiliate links may benefit this site.
B&H Photo • Amazon US • Amazon UK
Amazon Germany • Amazon Canada • Adorama
(To see all the comments, click on the "Comments" link below.)
Featured Comments from:
Rob de Loe: "Right then, I'll be stroking 'professional photographer' off the list!"
Mike replies: I don't discourage people from turning pro, but I do tend to discourage people from turning pro if they don't have the proper aptitudes for it. But then, I believe that knowing what you're good at and whether a profession matches up well with your abilities is important for anyone contemplating any career.
Jim Richardson: "When predicting success of a photographer going pro it’s generally good to bet on superior marketing combined with adequate creative skills. Especially if you are trying to predict long-term success. But both sides of the business can be learned, so to me doggedness is the prime ingredient. The underlying saving grace is that many editors and art directors cannot tell bluster from talent. (Goes double in the art world.) So if you are going to be good at only one thing, be good at BS."
Mike replies: Re doggedness, I have this taped to my computer: "A man may write at any time if he will set himself doggedly to it." Boswell, quoting Dr. Johnson. Re BS, no comment. :-)
Stephen Scharf: "In addition to being able to be an effective and efficient marketer, your point #1: 'A level of constant and consistent personal energy and appetite for hard work that is well above average' is really key to success. Many of the professional photographers I know who are successful and make a decent living as professionals work their frickin' tails off, frequently putting in 16-hour days, 5–7 days a week. And after years of doing this, many end up unhappy and burned out. One of the leading motorcycle racing editorial photographers I know, Brian J. Nelson, works incredibly hard covering all the motorcycle road racing test sessions, team shoots, practice sessions, and races throughout the year. He's typically only home for about 30 days out of the year, the rest of the time he's criss-crossing the U.S., and living and working out of his Mercedes Sprinter van. Another, Darren Miles, who lives in South Florida, has large portion of his business doing real estate photography. Darren photographed ~1,000 homes in the last year(!). These guys' capacity for hard work is off the charts."
Jeff Mellody: "I graduated with a degree in photography and I panicked at the time because I only had two business classes. After graduation I studied everything I could get my hands on about marketing. Photography is a totally different animal when done as a business. When the product is you, you have to sell yourself. It is a skill that can be learned if you put your heart into it. But it is crucial that it be mastered."
I did the freelance photog thing for about ten years. Your list is spot on.
There is an alternative for a handful of professional photographers: find one of the few remaining staff positions. I've been in one of those at a small university for 21+ years now. Of course that still requires most of the things on your list -- maybe even all of them. I'm not so worried about "sales" anymore, but I do take some care to keep up with the marketing and branding of my work, to maintain my employer's conviction that it's a good idea to keep me around. :)
The cool thing about this staff gig is that I've been able to build long term relationships with my subjects and my many clients (designers, writers, editors) on campus. I know who is doing what research, which professors and administrators are easiest to photograph, and where to find great light and a good backdrop any time of the day. It's nice being part of the community that I am covering. In many ways it's very similar to my first staff newspaper job, at a very small town paper right out of college.
Posted by: Ken Bennett | Tuesday, 21 August 2018 at 02:05 PM
Fair enough, actually totally fair. I don't pretend to be a pro photographer. I've often said that if I'd had to rely on my networking and sales skills, I'd have starved.
Posted by: Robert Roaldi | Tuesday, 21 August 2018 at 02:12 PM
"Know thyself."
Mike, you have hit upon the very essence of marketing -- but rarely understood as such.
I started a small company and managed to take it to a public company. Yet, I never really understood marketing until I reached my mid-40s, years after I had retired. People tend to think of marketing as an outward facing function, commonly understood to encompass marketing communications in all its related bits, including branding, positioning, segmentation etc. What most miss is that an equally, if not more, important marketing function is inward facing: knowing the organization's true strengths (and weaknesses), its history, culture etc. It is the proper cultivation, utilization and communication of outward knowledge (of customer and market needs/trends etc.) and inward knowledge (core competence, capabilities, history etc.) which should drive product planning and business development.
Good businesses know "thyself". Those who don't, or forget who they are, tend to flounder, or fail.
Posted by: Al C. | Tuesday, 21 August 2018 at 02:14 PM
I sort of fell into a job with a big company, but somewhere along the way, realized that it's the best place for me. I'm not an entrepreneur, don't want to market myself, find work, research health insurance options, taxes, retirement savings or any of the rest. I just want to come in and do the work I'm paid to do. So I put up with the corporate BS because it's better (for someone with my temperament) than the alternative. It also seems logical and efficient: civilization advanced when we moved beyond subsistence living and were allowed to specialize. So it makes sense for me to spend my time on what I'm good at and let marketers do their thing, let HR and IT do their jobs and so on.
I give lots of credit to those with the passion and drive to run successful small businesses. I know I'm not cut out for it.
Posted by: Dennis | Tuesday, 21 August 2018 at 02:52 PM
Mike says: What If You Hate Marketing and Sales?
Me, I'm in favor of hiring others to do all the scutwork (a medical term, tasks that are tedious and monotonous or trivial and menial). If you don't like marketing, it is wise to hire an agent. Even though a 10%er will take a percentage of sales you will still make more money.
I'm colorblind and abhor retouching—why should I do it when hired-help can do a better job?.
Posted by: c.d.embrey | Tuesday, 21 August 2018 at 02:56 PM
There used to be a number of institutional, in house professional photographers. Not a ton, but some. There was a guy employed by the University of Minnesota Medical School in Duluth for years. He retired. Now I think they hire out. If you somehow managed to find a job like that, you would be a professional who would not be concerned with marketing.
Another option is to work for one of the big wedding photography businesses, the branded ones with a large staff. Then someone else handles marketing, and you handle shooting. Someone else might even handle the processing.
Posted by: John Krumm | Tuesday, 21 August 2018 at 03:10 PM
Really excellent post, and (at least in my experience, very good advice.
I was an avid photographer from age 15. I worked for the college paper covering sports and general news on deadline.
After college I enrolled in NYIP back when they had a campus. I took their Commercial Photography Program, then their Portrait photography Program and did well enough that they offered a Job teaching which I took while figuring out how to break into Professional photography.
My first job was as an assistant to a successful Commercial Photographer. I worked on set , in the darkroom, delivered proofs, ran to Duggal Color with chromes (2 1/4- 8x10) ran back & forth with 'clip tests' Kept track of where every piece of film was, wrote numbers on the frames with a radiograph & india ink.
What amazed me is that we worked hard Every day. If there was no paying job, we did testing with the same rigor as client work.
My studio had a REP. but I was amazed at just how hard my boss worked to keep work flowing. From promotional pieces , hand delivered to AD's to exceeding every deadline, If the client wanted 4 looks we gave them five, Warm calling AD's he knew to say "Hello" to cold calling AD's he wanted to work for. (Though the cold calling had to stop for contractual reasons with representation.
Then he had to be a collection agent as we upfronted lots of costs which were reimbursable, along with our fee, but it could take time.
......"The Accounting department has a question about .........."
You have to love photography, be a really good technician, and be able to think on your feet to deliver what was asked.
We got lots of good business because we were good problem solvers. There were hundreds of guys in NY who could make the shots we made. I would say we were hired 80% of the time for our problem solving abilities, and 20% for our 'artistic abilities'
It may be different for people who shoot sports or news but your advice is spot on for generalist Studio / location photography
But truly, it is no different than any small business.
Running ANY business successfully, is very hard work. If you are looking for nights & weekends off, go work for a large company .
There is a Restaurant in Montauk that started 60 years ago as a one room Lobster shack and has evolved into 75 Ocean Front acres of restaurants and shops as well as a dock and wholesale and retail Fish markets. Started and run by one family all these years.
The Matriarch of the family once said "Running a Family business is Not hard work, it is Indentured Servitude. You have to love it with your whole being, or it can't work"
Posted by: Michael Perini | Tuesday, 21 August 2018 at 03:18 PM
I believe that you just described Kirk Tuck. His blog is a primer for how to succeed at hoot graph you.
Posted by: James Weekes | Tuesday, 21 August 2018 at 03:32 PM
Spell check just turned photography into word salad in my previous post. Sorry.
Posted by: James Weekes | Tuesday, 21 August 2018 at 03:35 PM
By those standards, I shouldn't have been a photographer at all.
I'd suggest that all of those sensible caveats aside, the single, greatest requirement is not on the list: the overwhelming desire that precludes any other option for your life. If you don't enjoy/suffer that, I'd suggest you think of doing anything else except photography.
If you are prepared to do absolutely any kind of work that you can get that involves a camera, don't have an overpowering drive in one direction, then I fail to see why you'd put yourself to the hassle, the constant state of insecurity, the massive shifts between great years and fallow.
Any advice I hear these days from people doing it at a high level is that the thing is in a constant state of flux, and that the way ahead is ever more with motion and not stills, though you do need both to stay afloat.
Of course, if you have the right connections, then you could always become an art photographer... you wouldn't necessarily need to be a great photographer to become rich.
Medicine and law are great careers.
:-)
Posted by: Rob Campbell | Tuesday, 21 August 2018 at 04:05 PM
Darn, your note about yourself does describe me pretty well. And still I would like nothing more then earn a living of photography, in some way or form. Always follow your dreams, they always say, but I agree you need to do that knowing your strengths and weaknesses. And I found there is nothing more dificult then that.
Posted by: Lars Jansen | Tuesday, 21 August 2018 at 04:26 PM
I flirted with the idea of going pro when I was made redundant about 20 years ago.
But if I turned it into a job, I knew that I would stop doing it for fun. In which case, what would I do in my spare time?
Posted by: Steve Jacob | Tuesday, 21 August 2018 at 06:02 PM
Thanks, Mike, for inspiring me to take another break from this book I'm doing on business to comment...
When I dropped out of grad school and looked at how to make a living, I considered continuing as a race mechanic but that had little earning potential in the late 60s before racing became more professional. So I used my physics degree to convince a very high tech company to hire me as.ta da..a salesman! Turned out that selling in a high tech environment was easy - solve a customer problem and you get an order. That attitude let me triple sales in my territory in no time.
Along the way, I took a bunch of courses on selling. I thought a lot about sales and developed a philosophy about it. Advertising and sales of consumer goods, the kinds of things that fill most advertising you see, is designed to create a desire. Successful advertising and sales of most everything else is oriented to fill a need.
A good sales person knows how to show the potential customer how they can provide a good solution to their problem - whether it's some high tech industrial product or photographs of a product, event or wedding. A portfolio of photos from a similar project establishes your ability to satisfy the customer.
My attitude changed as I gained experience and confidence. I knew I could provide a really good solution to the potential customer, and if I could not sell that, someone else would get the business and probably provide a lesser quality solution.
If somebody was going to get the order, I wanted it to be me! From that point on, my attitude changed. I was not reticent in telling the potential customer that I had a great solution and they would be satisfied.
I never sold on price.
Over time, I also learned when to walk away from a sale. Some orders you just don't want. The reasons vary - you don't have the best solution, the customer doesn't know what they want, or maybe the customer seems hard to satisfy. The most important thing to learn is when to not take business.
Aside: I only did one photography job for $ and learned that I am not of a mind-set that allows me to do creative work on demand. Same as a writer today - I do my thing only.
Posted by: JH | Tuesday, 21 August 2018 at 10:08 PM
Based on reading his blog almost as much as yours, I'd say you described Kirk Tuck
Posted by: Rusty | Tuesday, 21 August 2018 at 10:59 PM
Except for the “chronic, low-level intermittent unipolar depression” part.....me reading those lines you posting in the small print was like looking in a mirror. Metaphorically speaking.
Posted by: Tom Kaszuba | Wednesday, 22 August 2018 at 12:12 AM
If you hate marketing and sales, but your income depends on it, you'll learn to do marketing and sales. You'll probably still hate it though, which after a while will negatively effect any enjoyment you get from what you consider your main job.
I was once self-employed and surprised, shocked, saddened, enraged, frustrated, and driven mad to find out how much of my time was consumed by marketing and sales. Then, after all that work, I still had to do what I thought was my main job. What happened to all the freedom of self-employment and running my own business? I was, however, successful for the 3 years it lasted until I decided to go back to work for someone else. I considered my employment with them as actually just paying someone else to get customers for me. A trade off well worth it, I thought.
Nowadays, I am back to having some responsibility for sales, but in spite of being an introvert, it doesn't bother me like it once did. I mainly look at it as having a possible answer for a need (or problem) a client has. That sounds like just sale-speak, but it isn't. If I believe in a service, and I believe that we can help someone with it, I don't find it as stressful as I once did. I think the biggest difference is that I don't feel like I am selling myself like I did when I was my own sales rep.
Posted by: D. Hufford | Wednesday, 22 August 2018 at 12:51 AM
"But if I turned it into a job, I knew that I would stop doing it for fun. In which case, what would I do in my spare time?"
You'd have no spare time :P
Sean
Posted by: Sean | Wednesday, 22 August 2018 at 09:50 AM
"But if I turned it into a job, I knew that I would stop doing it for fun. In which case, what would I do in my spare time?" -Steve Jacob.
Don't worry, if you are doing professional photography correctly you will not have any spare time. Problem solved.
Posted by: kirk Tuck | Wednesday, 22 August 2018 at 04:20 PM