I saw a marvelous photograph just now. It's a dark, heavily overcast morning in Penn Yan. While not actually foggy, the air is laden with moisture and visibility at not-very-great distances is limited—the far shore of our narrow lake is muted in the gray air, pastel, pearlescent, its details indistinct.
Where Route 58 turns on to Liberty Street, coming North and West, there is a sweeping left-hand turn that doesn't quite make a right angle (the proper adjective is "obtuse," but "obtuse angle" is an obtuse phrase for people who don't remember high school geometry). As I drove East and South toward home this morning after an errand, I saw coming around that corner, first, a Mennonite horse and buggy—the horse a dark, sleek young bay, stepping at a brisk trot, the cab of the black buggy shrouded in shadow; and, following it around the corner, slowly, a hulking semi trailer-truck, all white, almost spectral in the half-daylight. It would have made a gorgeous photograph...
...For about half a second. Visually it coalesced, hung there poised for a fleeting moment in my sight, and then fell apart again.
I mused to myself that to have gotten that shot, I would have had to be on foot, walking, camera in hand. And I would have to have been on the lookout; because I am often lost in thought, I'm not always alert. It struck me that even if I had been situated ideally to encounter that wonderful momentary scene, I still would have needed some luck, not to mention good chops, to get the shot. Maybe better chops than I have any more, at my age.
I'll think about that picture-I-missed for a few days, holding it in my mind. Gradually it will fade, as most of the pictures-I-couldn't-take do. (Although a few I can remember for decades.) I don't know about you, but as I go about almost every day, I see far more photographs than it's possible to even try to take.
Mike
Original contents copyright 2017 by Michael C. Johnston and/or the bylined author. All Rights Reserved. Links in this post may be to our affiliates; sales through affiliate links may benefit this site.
B&H Photo • Amazon US • Amazon UK
Amazon Germany • Amazon Canada • Adorama
(To see all the comments, click on the "Comments" link below.)
Featured Comments from:
Ken James (partial comment): "Walking around seeing pictures seems to be one of the side effects of being a photographer methinks."
richardplondon: "I recall someone (Henri Lartigue?) writing that as a child—before he had his first camera—he already longed to 'fix' or 'freeze' momentary sights and impressions as if captured by a camera in that moment. He would do this by blinking twice, quickly. Whatever flashed on his vision, isolated in time and in circumstance between those two black blinks, became an inarguable visual 'quantum.' Of course, this pretend-photo could not then be reliably remembered, let alone later re-manifested. Hence the camera.
"Yet, for example, the Impressionist painter Marquet was known for having precisely such a facility. He'd go for a walk, and when he got home, paint some scene he'd encountered—in lively and highly characteristic detail that was impressive to his fellow artists who'd accompanied him on that same walk."
Stan B.: "The ones that got away, the ones you almost got, the ones if only if...yeah, they add up after a while. The truth is, these magical visual moments of happenstance and grandeur occur in every city, town and path in between, all around the world, every hour of the day. They coalesce, shine and dissipate at a second's notice with your presence or not, with your recognition or despite it. And it's a wonder we ever get to pay any one of them any justice at all...."
Keith (partial comment): "I'm not sure which is worse, to see a shot you can't get for whatever reason, or being in just the right time and place for the shot but screwing up somehow."
Lindsay Bach: "I call shots like the one you saw 'retinagraphs.' My retinagraphs, etched in memory, are some of the most indelible images I know. Though they can be shared with no one, they are treasures nonetheless."
The key for me is that you saw the image and your mind says to you there it is, a moment in time that will make a good or great photograph. What I take away from your post is that so many people go through life not ever seeing those moments in time, they just are not wired the same way photographers are. I'm sure many of your readers have had similar experiences, I know I have.
Posted by: Peter Komar | Tuesday, 14 November 2017 at 12:01 PM
Yes indeed.
That does sound like a good one.
I had one a couple of days ago: It was late evening, I was walking home. A guy came walking, screaming continually and angrily at his German Shepherd, which was off the leash and continually eluding him.
The dog had a huge branch in its mouth, and as it paused right in front of me, backlit by a streetlamp, it looked a lot like a buck with big antlers.
But sadly, although I actually had my phone in my hand, the dog moved on a second before I could get the camera up.
Posted by: Eolake | Tuesday, 14 November 2017 at 12:08 PM
Sounds like an unlikely enough combination that going out to stalk a re-occurrence would be frustrating! I could almost see trying for the combination of two of the three main elements, but all three drives the odds a lot lower.
I only have one real success in going back after an escaped photo, and that one was nearly entirely based on fixed elements (it was inside, but still needed the weather to cooperate as well; but just clear sky with a few interesting clouds, which isn't that rare in summer here.
Posted by: David Dyer-Bennet | Tuesday, 14 November 2017 at 12:23 PM
For a while I tried to always have a camera on me, and it used to bother me that I missed a photograph. I'm not bothered anymore. I still really enjoy seeing something and thinking "that would make an awesome picture...". But now I focus on just enjoying the thing. When I'm photographing, I'm much more deliberate, and I tend to wait for times when I can actually work a scene, build a group of images, or build on an existing group. Partly this reflects me getting pickier about my own work, and partly it's a function of the sea of images we're swimming in today.
Posted by: Rob de Loe | Tuesday, 14 November 2017 at 12:55 PM
Careful Mike. Gorgeous is the word applied to females of a certain persuasion as well as dogs and similar critters...
Photos, not always...
Posted by: Bryce Lee | Tuesday, 14 November 2017 at 01:12 PM
Thanks for the nice story Mike. I know that feeling well...
Posted by: Wolfgang Lonien | Tuesday, 14 November 2017 at 01:21 PM
Mike, Nice piece. Of course it happens to all of us. We all have lives to live, groceries to buy, Dry Cleaning to pick up so it is a fact of life that even the best photographers, can't be photographers ALL the time.
But we can appreciate what we see in the spirit of Dorothea Lange's
"A Camera is an instrument that teaches people how to see without a camera" And while those 'mind pictures' do fade, they never fade completely. They pop up and inform other pictures we make, months or years later. They are never 'wasted'
Certainly there are some that were so good that we lament not being able to "Be there and Be ready' . But I would venture to say that the scene you described probably recreates itself several times a year.
This is were going back to location to 'mine it' over and over can pay off .
Will the picture be Exactly the same as the one in your head, -probably not, it may be better, or it may be worse, or just different in a good way, but you CAN pursue it if you choose to.....or not.
Good luck
Posted by: Michael Perini | Tuesday, 14 November 2017 at 01:37 PM
My friend just got me this book. "Photographs Not Taken" which is a collection of essays about just this subject.
https://www.amazon.com/Photographs-Not-Taken-Will-Steacy/dp/0983231613/
You just reminded me that I need to read it.
Posted by: Eli Burakian | Tuesday, 14 November 2017 at 01:49 PM
Mike,
Like you I have some missed images that stick in my mind for a long time and some that fade away sooner. On the other hand knowing that these images are out there gives me hope that even if I miss most of them that there will be more coming along in the future that I will have a chance of getting.
Also, having the lens cap off and the lens shade on is helpful :-).
Fred
Posted by: Fred | Tuesday, 14 November 2017 at 01:50 PM
If you wanted it, you'd go back there every day when the weather was right. It doesn't happen every time, but there's a fellow with a horse through there pretty often, maybe he's even on a schedule. And behind him, most of the time, there's a vehicle. Sometimes it's white.
A surprising percentage of those Once In A Lifetime Grab Shots are actually one of several taken of an event that happened over and over. This could be yours!
Posted by: Andrew Molitor | Tuesday, 14 November 2017 at 01:57 PM
You are NOT old. Like you I have several that I can remember that are decades old. Two of the best I did not get because I simply was too lazy, or as I prefer, disinclined. That makes it even worse. By the time I decided to act they were gone. Walking around seeing pictures seems to be one of the side effects of being a photographer me thinks.
Posted by: Ken James | Tuesday, 14 November 2017 at 02:04 PM
Well, Mike, isn't it enough that your photographic practice has made you a "nocticer"--that you are alert to how the pieces of the world sometimes come together visually in a way that moves the heart? Sometimes I feel that I am being greedy wanting to fix every beauty on film or in pixels. You say the image will fade in your mind, but that does not lessen the beauty you experienced in the moment—were more likely to experience because you are a photographer..
Posted by: Bill Poole | Tuesday, 14 November 2017 at 02:50 PM
This is the essence of being a photographer.
Posted by: Dillan | Tuesday, 14 November 2017 at 02:53 PM
Ah, the one that got away. It is during those moments that I wish I was a painter instead of a Photographer. You could shoot the corner where this happened, make some notes about ambient light and color, take or find appropriate photos of a horse & buggy and another of a semi, assemble them all and recreate the scene on canvas. Of course, that takes a lot of skill of a different kind but at least the moment would not be lost.
Posted by: Jims-ramblings.blogspot.com | Tuesday, 14 November 2017 at 03:14 PM
Had one of those moments the other day - missed a great environmental portrait (was driving, needed to be on foot). Moments like that are when I wish I could paint.
Posted by: Mike | Tuesday, 14 November 2017 at 03:29 PM
An 8K dashcam will give you 36MP stills.
Posted by: Clayton | Tuesday, 14 November 2017 at 03:39 PM
You reminded me of this site -
http://www.unphotographable.com/archives.html
Posted by: Yoram | Tuesday, 14 November 2017 at 03:39 PM
You've just described the real street photography genre (as opposed to any photograph taken on the street). Somehow the best street photographers have this propensity to capture a lot of these fleeting moments. It's not easy to do, and it's not just luck as they seem to do it over and over again. It's a combination of skill, eye, preparation, mindset, and trying.
Posted by: Dori | Tuesday, 14 November 2017 at 04:31 PM
For years now, every so often I see the sunlight reflect off the New York City high-rises at the Golden Hour as I ride in a commuter bus on the other side of the Hudson River.
I have marveled at how perfect a photo the scene would make and have vowed to capture it. I have even made it my business to have a camera with me on my commute
But it haven't managed to do it yet. Not only are the windows of the bus always filthy, they are usually further obscured by semi-transparent advertising shrink-wrap on the outside of the bus. Getting out anywhere in that area is not an option.
And so the dream continues.
Posted by: Steve Biro | Tuesday, 14 November 2017 at 05:07 PM
"I'll think about that picture-I-missed for a few days,..." But you didn't miss the image. You just can't share it.
Posted by: Ken Tanaka | Tuesday, 14 November 2017 at 05:09 PM
The featured comments pretty much say it all for me, but add to that the slowness of age, and those times when you think your ready, but find out differently when you see your results!
Posted by: Fred Haynes | Tuesday, 14 November 2017 at 05:30 PM
Don't forget those which just couldn't be taken. Like the wonderful series of street and vehicle lights fading into the mist which I spotted driving at speed in the fast lane of the M40 (the motorway between London and Birmingham)....
Posted by: Andrew Johnston | Tuesday, 14 November 2017 at 05:39 PM
So, if you were Jeff Wall, you would rent a horse and carriage, a large truck, some actors, a lighting crew with equipment, a master photographer and a large format camera. Then, you'd arrange with the county to block off the road, painstakingly re-create the light artificially and arrange the actors and props until you had the photo that you're carrying in your head. All that stands between you and that photograph is a hundred thousand bucks give or take :-)
Posted by: huw Morgan | Tuesday, 14 November 2017 at 05:42 PM
With the passing of the years, all the things that got away from us (the girl that got away, the moonshot stock that got away...) start to pile up in the attic of our minds.
I used to, but no longer, fret over a lost shot. Been to a few transcendent musical performances, and had a few memorable meals, which I had no means of capturing, either. We should let go. Seems to me serendipitous moments in one's life should be fleeting. Trying to make/keep a poor copy kinda ruins them.
Posted by: Al C. | Tuesday, 14 November 2017 at 06:15 PM
Familiar experience for a photographer. When, camera-less, I spot a worthy scene, I just think, "click!" (And smile.)
Posted by: MikeR | Tuesday, 14 November 2017 at 07:07 PM
I've always been intrigued by the fact that many quite ordinary scenes can make extraordinary photographs when framed 'just so', and many extraordinary scenes look ordinary as photographs.
Seeing a photograph is not the same as looking at a scene. Sometimes, it's nice to just look, and leave the camera by your side.
Posted by: Steve Jacob | Wednesday, 15 November 2017 at 07:28 AM
Two weeks ago my wife and I were in NYC. Every time we went out I took my camera and did shoot a lot. Early one evening I headed out to go to the International Center for Photography. For some stupid reason I chose not take my camera with me. Well as I approached the subway stop I looked up and there was a partial Moon right next to the lit tower on the Empire State building. As I thought about taking what would have been a beautiful shot I realized that my camera was blocks away back in the hotel room. At this point I said some bad words to myself.
BTW the ICP has a great show going on right now called GENERATION WEALTH by Lauren Greenfield . If you are in NYC it is well worth viewing. https://www.icp.org/exhibitions/generation-wealth-by-lauren-greenfield
On the other hand I keep a notebook next to my living room chair and draw sketches of photos that I would like to take someday.
Posted by: Zack S | Wednesday, 15 November 2017 at 09:37 AM
A conceptual photograph. Is it any less a work of photographic art because no shutter was tripped?
I'm being cute, don't want to start a debate on this. I'm already getting a headache. :)
Posted by: Robert Roaldi | Wednesday, 15 November 2017 at 11:12 AM
Wow, I didn't even think of trying to restage the foggy road shot movie-style. I should have! Not that I could do it, any more than Mike probably could really, but I should have thought of it.
Posted by: David Dyer-Bennet | Wednesday, 15 November 2017 at 12:02 PM
The joy of seeing ...
Posted by: YTC | Wednesday, 15 November 2017 at 01:33 PM
"I would have to have been on the lookout; because I am often lost in thought, I'm not always alert."
"I don't know about you, but as I go about almost every day, I see far more photographs than it's possible to even try to take."
Put together, those statements seem self-contradictory, but I understand. \;^)>
What I've found is that I tend not to get lost in thought when walking - if I have a camera with me. (Otherwise . . .) Especially if it's a "real" camera and in hand or around my neck. Cell phones don't work, and a camera in a bag or pouch are less effective. I "SEE" more with camera in hand.
OTOH, seen with camera in hand, ready to take advantage, most of those ". . . far more photographs than it's possible to even try to take." reveal their flaws as actual photographs.
In the face of actual picture taking, the fantasies collapse, and the number of actual shots available is manageable.
Posted by: Moose | Wednesday, 15 November 2017 at 02:48 PM
Those spectral images fascinate me too. I can recall several such 'wonderful momentary scenes' from many years ago when I didn't have a camera with me -in one case a shaft of intense golden sunlight poured through a gap in the roof of the old Manchester Victoria station (before redevelopment) spectacularly illuminating the massed ranks of evening commuters. In another unforgettable case it felt unsafe to take the photo. Some weeks later I found out that the group of rather dramatic looking young men hanging around their car by a remote rural reservoir had committed a horrific murder the previous evening. Thankfully I trusted my instincts and played safe.
Street photography, more than any other genre, seems to entail struggling with the inevitabilty of missing many, if not most, potential pictures for a variety of reasons, including our own limitations and/or ethical judgements. Fortunately though there are also photos that surprise us by working much better than we had expected.
In my case one of the benefits of developing a photographic 'eye' has been that I've noticed several species of wild flowers and fungi that turned out not to have been recorded in our area before.
Posted by: Brian Taylor | Wednesday, 15 November 2017 at 03:29 PM
As a film photographer, occasionally a film gets screwed up or lost... it's ALWAYS the one with the best photos on it!
Posted by: Chris | Wednesday, 15 November 2017 at 04:07 PM
I have a great portfolio of Ones That Got Away sitting in my biological hard drive. It's way better than my actual portfolio sitting on my computer.
Posted by: Lynn | Wednesday, 15 November 2017 at 04:58 PM