Photo by Dave Reichert
Happy Independence Day to all yous Murrkins who are celebrating. Don't mix booze and firecrackers, and keep your distance from those who do!
If you're looking for a good read that will immerse you in the subject, I can recommend Alan Taylor's masterful and engrossing American Revolutions: A Continental History 1750-1804, a followup to his wonderful American Colonies. A cut above. Americans need to know more American history.
Hope you all enjoy yourselves and have a lovely day.
Mike
(Thanks to Dave for permission to use his picture)
Original contents copyright 2017 by Michael C. Johnston and/or the bylined author. All Rights Reserved. Links in this post may be to our affiliates; sales through affiliate links may benefit this site.
TOP/Yale Spring Photo Book Offer
(Ends soon!)
(To see all the comments, click on the "Comments" link below.)
Featured Comments from:
Speed: "I hated history classes in school (U.S. grades one through twelve). We had to memorize names and dates and who did what—never why. In college, history was taught as a story that flowed, filled with interesting characters, heroes and villains. I've been hooked ever since."
Bill Bresler: "Great pic."
Ken Tanaka (partial comment): "My life-long belief in the value of historical knowledge is largely in ruins now in the third act of life. As I look back I see all the major events during my life—financial, cultural, political—taking place either uninformed by, or with complete disregard for, history. I am reluctantly convinced that it's a waste of time studying human history with any predictive expectations. It's still good entertainment but otherwise trivial."
Mike replies: "We learn from history that we do not learn from history." —Friedrich Hegel.
Here's what Dave's picture connotes to me: La Liberté éclairant le monde (Liberty Enlightening the World, better known as the Statue of Liberty) was a gift from the French when the United States was about a century old. It has a rich constellation of meanings. What became known as the American Revolutionary War could not possibly have been won without the help of the French, who were helping us in order to hurt England, under the same principle of "the enemy of my enemies is my friend" that has motivated a lot of political activity in world history; for instance, more recently it led us to surreptitiously aid the Afghans during the Russian occupation of Afghanistan. But the effort helped impoverish the French monarchy, weakening it and making it more vulnerable when the French emulated our rebellion with their own revolution, adopting similar enlightenment ideals.
Nowadays, of course, despite their historic friendship to us and the crucial participation in our freedom and independence, the French have, highly ironically, become an easy target for xenophobes and reactionary nationalists—largely because, unlike the English, Irish and Germans for example, there are only a small number of Americans with French heritage in this country; the major French ethnic enclave in North America is the Province of Quebec in Canada, itself formerly mostly British territory.
And then, of course, there's the meaning of the Statue of Liberty as the symbol of the freedom and promise of the United States for arriving immigrants, being literally one of the first sights of their new home seen by generations of Europeans arriving by boat. The contrast between the spirit of la liberté éclairant le monde with Trump's "wall," and by extension our politics and values traditionally with what our politics and values have been transmogrifying into since 1980, could not be more acute.
That's what it brings up in my head; others' mileage may vary. I concede that the picture is made or broken by the guy in the shades eating the ice cream cone, but, whatever it might mean to you, I don't see how this picture on this occasion could have very much resonance without knowing a little history.
Ken Tanaka responds: "By the way...I completely neglected to comment that I agree that Dave Reichert's image is wonderful. Many of the best images are seasoned with mystery, ambiguity, and references to memes and lore. This has it all. Yum!
"Also, that statue is something, ain't it? I doubt that even 1% of Americans can accurately recite its history (you're a 1-precenter, Mike) but that doesn't diminish its symbolic power a bit. There just aren't many symbols in the world as powerful as that statue.
"Finally, Brad's comment reminded me that 'history' is a tale, not a statue. Its telling is very analogous to making photographs. Historians choose the central subject, the focal length, their depth-of-field, and their selective focus just as any photographer. And with such choices they can...lie, just like any photographer, eh?"
Happy fourth to all my friends south of the border. I agree Americans on the whole would benefit from learning more history in general, not just American history. Actually we all could.
Posted by: Eric Rose | Tuesday, 04 July 2017 at 10:37 AM
@ Eric- Ain't that the truth...
Posted by: Stan B. | Tuesday, 04 July 2017 at 01:17 PM
I proudly listen to Stan Freberg's sublime United States of America (Part 1, The Early Years), every July 4th. I also try to watch the movie 1776. History learnin' is just easier with musical numbers.
As Thomas Jefferson said to Benjamin Franklin, soliciting his signature on his petition, "Come on, all we want to do is hold a few truths to be self-evident!"
Patrick
Posted by: Patrick Perez | Tuesday, 04 July 2017 at 02:17 PM
If history is the study of forces that have have shaped a society and continue to influence, it's no bad thing.
Sometimes dynamics change quickly and profoundly and make people figure that they can't be mastered or understood. Give that time.
Posted by: mark jennings | Tuesday, 04 July 2017 at 06:35 PM
@ Ken: It's certainly not about prediction- a fool's errand at best; it's about forming a basis of evaluation, and ultimately some foundation for understanding. Unfortunately, that doesn't necessarily mean the majority will take note, or take heed. War would have ended eons ago if humans could actually internalize what is to be learned from history.
Yes, a large swath of Americans now hold history (not to mention science and the arts) in utter contempt- and future generations may just want some modicum of insight into how and why we retreated into a celebrity dominated, alternative fact based reality. Pray it does them some good.
Posted by: Stan B. | Tuesday, 04 July 2017 at 07:07 PM
Hi Mike;
Re: Your comment about knowing History, US History in particular I guess..as it's 4/7.
Seems the "History" media can't be trusted to be factual about documented events in history? Don't those people have (knowledgeable) editors?
Washington did not fight at Gettysburg. Wrong war, wrong time.
From UK Daily Mail (couldn't find it in a US news paper):
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4663148/History-Channel-slammed-George-Washington-image.html
Posted by: brad | Tuesday, 04 July 2017 at 07:12 PM
As an engineering student, History was not at the top of my list-however, I can remember my history prof, one Otis Singletary, who gave such compelling lectures that he would often get applause from his big lecture hall full of sophmores-does that happen now? This was circa 1957.
Posted by: Herb Cunningham | Wednesday, 05 July 2017 at 10:05 AM
For another view of Amerian history, I would suggest, "American Nations", by Colin Woodard.
Posted by: Herman | Wednesday, 05 July 2017 at 10:13 AM
I think of history as a record of the crooked, bloody path of "civilization". That said, "civility" is a learned behavior and is really no longer being reinforced by our institutions or norms.
It's difficult to see a specific point in history that could be clearly defined as predictive for future generations unless you can reintroduce civility in thought and ideals. Good luck with that.
To my mind, the commonly referred Chinese curse of living in "Interesting times' has only had a few brief gaps that I can see. And sadly it's usually after long drawn out military conquests. The Pax Romana, The post WWII decade etc.. otherwise, hang on tight.
Posted by: Steve D | Wednesday, 05 July 2017 at 11:24 AM
Ken Tanaka's analogy between history and photography is apt, history is not the past.
‘History is not the past,’ says the writer Hilary Mantel in the first of her Reith Lectures on BBC Radio 4 . ‘It’s the method we’ve evolved of organising our ignorance of the past.’
(These lectures are available as podcasts so possibly available outside UK: http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b00729d9/episodes/downloads)
Posted by: Richard Parkin | Wednesday, 05 July 2017 at 02:50 PM
Lets not forget America in song ... Paul Simon's "America" (or the just as good but very different cover by Yes) and "America" from West Side Story (covered by The Nice).
While we're talking about how interesting and entertaining history can (and should) be ...
1776 is a musical with music and lyrics by Sherman Edwards and a book by Peter Stone. The story is based on the events surrounding the signing of the Declaration of Independence. It dramatizes the efforts of John Adams to persuade his colleagues to vote for American independence and to sign the document.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1776_(musical)
And then there's Hamilton.
Posted by: Speed | Wednesday, 05 July 2017 at 06:10 PM
Isn't that D.B Cooper on the right?
Posted by: Chuck Albertson | Wednesday, 05 July 2017 at 07:04 PM
Without history (at least recent), who could say if Trump was a President of the ages or not? Of course we need to pay some attention to what has gone before! We may not always learn history's lessons quickly, but without them, from where comes judgement?
Posted by: Jamie Pillers | Wednesday, 05 July 2017 at 10:30 PM
"there are only a small number of Americans with French heritage in this country; the major French ethnic enclave in North America is the Province of Quebec in Canada, itself formerly mostly British territory."
FYI
The French government program that provides French education to underprivileged francophone children around the world ,The Agency for French Education Abroad .has an outpost in New Orleans
http://www.aefe.fr/reseau-scolaire-mondial/rechercher-un-etablissement/etats-unis-la-nouvelle-orleans-lycee-francais-de
Posted by: hugh crawford | Wednesday, 05 July 2017 at 10:50 PM
When looking at Dave's picture, I can't bring myself to think about any of the long, recently-accelerating degradation this once-great country has suffered since 1980. It's too painful and I've virtually no power to reverse the trend.
Instead, I am transported to the ship on which my maternal grandfather reached New York harbor at the turn of the last century. I envision him getting his first glimpse of the statue and, probably, shedding tears over his good fortune. My paternal grandfather made the same journey at around the same time, but did not live long enough for me to know him, so imagining his reaction to the scene is not possible.
Motion pictures helped the downtrodden temporarily escape their circumstances during the Great Depression. Dave's picture afforded me a moment of similar liberation from this country's current governance nightmare. Thanks, Dave.
Posted by: Sal Santamaura | Wednesday, 05 July 2017 at 11:48 PM
Statues are important ways to shape and reinforce a people's mythical narratives about themselves. The study of history has a way of dislodging those narratives, so it's essential for a people to truly understand who they are.
Posted by: Clay Olmstead | Thursday, 06 July 2017 at 01:37 AM
If you don't know what to say, just throw a short, clever cynicism. A mob will think you're smart. Judging by some quotes here, it's plain that prominent people go there too.
Brooding about history made me remember that MLK, among others who actually helped change history, was a big student of it. What Ghandi had done and why he had done it, for example, was both instruction and inspiration for MLK. Inspiration is the highest form of learning.
Posted by: mark jennings | Thursday, 06 July 2017 at 09:15 AM
Mike,
Thank you sincerely for your response to Ken regarding La Liberté and the mini refresher course on a slice of French history. My Dad fought Nazis in France and Belgium, and he returned with a love of the French, which was infused into me when I started learning French, from a Parisienne, in grade five.
As you know, I am a huge Francophile and my love of France and the French has grown only stronger as a result of the last elections there. At some point I envision buying an airline ticket to France that is one way, no return.
Posted by: Earl Dunbar | Friday, 07 July 2017 at 11:26 AM
Asked about the purpose of teaching art history to undergrads, British art historian Kenneth Clark said, "So they might somewhat care."
Posted by: mark jennings | Friday, 07 July 2017 at 08:04 PM