The British magazine Black & White Photography, for which I wrote some 80 columns back in the 'aughts, has published an issue with an iPhone photo on the cover. The photo was taken by Tim Clinch, who posted it on Instagram with his comments.
Mike G told us about it, in a comment for the "Smallening and Lightening" post: "Pro photographer Tim Clinch, who writes a monthly column about smartphone photography for Black & White Photography magazine, recently did a shoot in Mexico and used only iPhones. I think he took his Fuji gear as backup. He also scored a magazine cover, which I believe is the first time the magazine used a smartphone shot for a cover."
More of that handwriting on the wall I was talking about two days ago, in the "Scary Future" post?
For counterpoint on that, consider part of a comment that came in from cgrab yesterday morning: "Cell phones, as strange as this sounds, might be more at risk from the next step in technological development: 'Siri/Cortana/Bixby/whatever, virtualize environment from implant readings and transmit to x.'"
Anything's possible!
Here's the B&WP subscription page, if you're interested in subscribing.
Mike
(Thanks to Mike G and cgrab)
Original contents copyright 2017 by Michael C. Johnston and/or the bylined author. All Rights Reserved. Links in this post may be to our affiliates; sales through affiliate links may benefit this site.
TOP/Yale Spring Photo Book Offer
(Ends June 30th or when supplies run out)
(To see all the comments, click on the "Comments" link below.)
Featured Comments from:
mike plews: "I carry an iPhone at work [Mike is a TV news cameraman —Ed.] and one of its functions is to take quick shots at news stories to send back to the TV station where I work as place holders on the web until a more complete story can be produced.
"At first I didn't think much of the camera but that is no longer the case. If you take if for what it is and work around its limitations, iPhone cameras are actually rather nice devices. Poor low light performance and limited resolution are offset by terrific mixed light performance and almost uncanny auto exposure. A fixed lens can be kind of liberating. It never bothered me when I was shooting a Rollei so why should a phone be different? In the end the iPhone has replaced my Canon S95 as the camera I carry all the time. Unlike the Canon I actually do carry the iPhone everywhere. When my phone filled up I got into the habit of dumping its contents onto a folder on my computer. I also use it to save gas receipts so I didn't want to lose anything. A few months ago I took a minute to look through the 2,000 or so images that had accumulated there and was pleasantly surprised at how much I liked some of them. The little camera is making me a better photographer through daily practice. That's cool."
The success of camera phones is driven to some extent by image quality and to a larger extent by what we can do with pictures once taken. Where would social media be without pictures and videos? Where would cell phone cameras be without social media?
Remember when family get-togethers included photo albums, slide shows and shuffling through envelopes of prints? Today my family sits in front of a very large 4k TV (is that even the right term anymore? TV?) and looks at pictures and videos stored in something called The Cloud.
The future of hardware for serious photographers (amateur and pro) will be determined not by image quality but by what we can easily do with the images once captured.
Posted by: Speed | Wednesday, 14 June 2017 at 09:56 AM
Well... there are those highlights in the white wooly thing. #blown
;-)
Posted by: Ed Hawco | Wednesday, 14 June 2017 at 10:24 AM
Personally I'm not going to lose much sleep with the scary camera future. I just suppose I am lucky my deepest love is with images and I couldn't care less if it was shot with a mobile or an 8x10 view camera. If I could afford it I would shoot always BW film, but I can't so I use whatever I can and I get over it.
Funny, it seems my type have always been in the minority, while the crowd is obsessed with gear worries. Just count how many commentators posted a message on the recent Eugene Smith and Stanley Greene essay compared to the other day Scary Future post.
Posted by: Paul | Wednesday, 14 June 2017 at 12:26 PM
Yes, the iPhone and other smart phones are quite capable these days. You can do very reasonable prints from their files. These two I made with the iPhone 6s
https://www.flickr.com/photos/42632173@N08/27591180403/in/dateposted-public/
https://www.flickr.com/photos/42632173@N08/27547598963/in/dateposted-public/
Posted by: Marcelo Guarini | Wednesday, 14 June 2017 at 01:50 PM
The mobile phone shots in the Red Bull photo contest from last year are rather impressive images, among a host of others -
https://www.theatlantic.com/photo/2017/06/winners-of-the-red-bull-illume-photo-contest-2016/530331/
Posted by: Nigel | Wednesday, 14 June 2017 at 06:30 PM
Raw DNG capture in Lightroom Mobile with my iPhone 6s is a whole new world, after the iOS Camera app. I still use the built-in app for sweep panoramas, though.
Posted by: Brian | Thursday, 15 June 2017 at 11:05 AM
At first I didn't think much of cameras but that is no longer the case.
If you take them for what they are and work around their limitations, cameras are actually rather nice devices.
(Friend of Mike. Bismarck High School, class of 1967. Reunion in August. Will skip this one too.)
Barnack units continue rusting.
Posted by: Dave Sailer | Thursday, 15 June 2017 at 01:55 PM
Look, long lenses and everything..
https://www.amazon.com/Optical-Telescope-Camera-Tripod-iPhone/dp/B00JPWUFHM
Posted by: brad | Thursday, 15 June 2017 at 10:24 PM
One day in class we lit an old Kodak. Dynamic tonality between a black bellows, buffed metal, and leather. We moved continuous lights and fill cards around til we were happy. 5 shooters were working this with dslrs. When they were done I pulled out my iPhone, framed and snapped. Looked perfect.
Everyone was a bit abashed but I encouraged them that all of our work brought ratios to where any camera would get a good image. We crafted the light and made it work; that's just basic photography. What happened is that they shifted from simply adapting by camera adjustments to shaping light. It took a while for that to sink n.
Posted by: Michael Mejia | Friday, 16 June 2017 at 12:29 AM
Might be more correct to say that Ben Lowy's 2012 Time magazine cover shot of hurricane Sandy hitting Coney Island was a Hipstamatic picture. But it was shot with an iPhone.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2230308/Photographers-amazing-shot-raging-ocean-Hurricane-Sandy-captured-iPhone-lands-cover-Time.html
Posted by: Dan Westergren | Friday, 16 June 2017 at 09:50 AM
I see that a major fashion magazine, Elle, has recently used an iPhone 7 Plus for the cover image of its Australian edition.
Personally, I've been using my iPhone for photography for a couple of years. (There are plenty of examples on my site.) In fact, I've just spent the past week using my 7P almost exclusively in San Francisco and in the LA / Beverly Hills area. The more I use it the more I'm impressed by it.
Posted by: Ken Tanaka | Friday, 16 June 2017 at 11:19 AM