Longtime TOP reader Stephen Voss, a photographer who lives and works in Washington DC, has been "documenting the upheaval and psychological tumult of the Trump Administration here in DC on both a local and federal level," as he says, and now has a major portfolio published at Politico.
Politico's introduction: "For anyone who lives in Washington, it was clear Donald Trump campaigned against the city in two ways. He ran against 'Washington,' the metaphorical seat of unchecked government power, and also against the actual city of Washington, a multicultural, Democratic stronghold that embraces immigration, marijuana and seemingly every other progressive policy Trump voters rejected. Since the inauguration, photographer Stephen Voss has been documenting the city’s uneasy relationship with its highest-profile new resident."
Outstanding documentary photojournalism, well worth taking a look from a photographic perspective regardless of your politics. Big congratulations to Stephen.
Mike
P.S. Here's Stephen's website.
Original contents copyright 2017 by Michael C. Johnston and/or the bylined author. All Rights Reserved. Links in this post may be to our affiliates; sales through affiliate links may benefit this site.
No tumult
Give Mike a “Like” or Buy yourself something nice
(To see all the comments, click on the "Comments" link below.)
Featured Comments from:
No featured comments yet—please check back soon!
No politics. And, nice snaps.
But, the thing that first struck me when seeing the photos on his site was.. Man, those pictures look digital!
Maybe it's his taste in post production adjustment?
Posted by: brad | Monday, 01 May 2017 at 02:07 PM
Some really arresting images there. I like the high contrast style and the voyeuristic approach of many of the shots. Some feel processed to 11 but overall a really nice set.
These are historic times so I've been in the streets since the weekend after Election Day, capturing the images and sounds of our time. In the big rallies, I am one of thousands of photogs. But in the smaller gatherings, noticeably in my home Congressional District, I am often the only one documenting the proceeding, fancifully thinking that 100 years from now some historian is going to value what I've done.
I am also gathering photos of "The Resistance" on Flickr and we have over 2,000 photos from 100 photographers from around the country and world.
https://www.flickr.com/groups/thenewresistance/
Of those, I've curated what I have found to be the most interesting and compelling images:
https://www.flickr.com/photos/johnmflores/galleries/72157681145221415/
As the saying goes, may you live in interesting times...
Posted by: JohnMFlores | Monday, 01 May 2017 at 09:49 PM
Agreed. Let's try to limit the political spin kids, whenever possible.
I know it's hard for some folks to adjust to a new day in America, but as Sonny & Cher once sang, " The beat goes on...
K4kafka
Posted by: K4kafka | Monday, 01 May 2017 at 10:12 PM
Brad, gotta second the emotion- great content and compositions, but the 'digital effect' sometimes lessened the experience for me. Couldn't help but think how much better still the outdoor shots would've looked with the extended tonal values (in the shadow areas) inherent with film. Then again, perhaps the indoor shots may not have looked quite as dramatic...
Posted by: Stan B. | Monday, 01 May 2017 at 11:13 PM
On the first day of the previous administration, I got a photo that seemed to sum up Washington's mood at the time. A smiling, uniformed, black DC cop was dancing in the street to music on the PA while we awaited Obama's inaugural parade.
Posted by: John McMillin | Monday, 01 May 2017 at 11:49 PM
Very nice work, Stephen.
As in generations past one needs to have a distinctive style to establish a visual identity. That's what many amateurs don't understand. You usually don't get hired to make works of art or the "best" portraits. You get hired to stop eyeballs, usually in ways constructive to the accompanying story. So I can clearly get a sense of when Stephen's portraits would work by looking at his samples. They draw a strong, consistent outline.
Posted by: Kenneth Tanaka | Tuesday, 02 May 2017 at 08:59 AM
While I found some images interesting, I was turned off by the processing. To me, the processing became the focus of the series, harsh, dark, overdone. Just my opinion of course.
Posted by: Jim Becia | Tuesday, 02 May 2017 at 09:46 AM
I appreciate the dark contrasts of Stephen's images.
Posted by: Darlene | Tuesday, 02 May 2017 at 12:25 PM
"... adjust to a new day in America...".
That's one way to put it.
Posted by: Dave Kee | Tuesday, 02 May 2017 at 03:49 PM
I quite enjoyed the photos and think the processing treatment was spot on for the mood he created. On the negative I thought the photo of M Rogers was a cheap shot.
Posted by: Eric Rose | Tuesday, 02 May 2017 at 04:54 PM
Kudos to Stephen V. The images are arresting, powerful, moving, thoughtful, sad, twisted...in short, great photographs.
Thank you for posting the link, Mike.
Posted by: Miguel Tejada-Flores | Tuesday, 02 May 2017 at 10:08 PM
I too found the processing distracting and a little overbearing.
Congratulations on the work being published Stephen!
Best Regards,
ACG
Posted by: Aaron C Greenman | Wednesday, 03 May 2017 at 03:49 AM
Wonderful images, but I really, really dislike the soot-and-chalk digital image style.
Posted by: Alan Carmody | Wednesday, 03 May 2017 at 06:05 AM
Thanks everyone for the thoughtful comments on the work. I think Ken Tanaka said it better than I could regarding the look and feel of these images. Just as we used to make film+processing choices to complement and enhance the photographs we were after, I spent a long time working through various post-production options before settling on this look to achieve the mood of what I was after.
Posted by: Stephen Voss | Wednesday, 03 May 2017 at 09:30 AM
I too really liked the processing and was wondering whether Mike chose Mr. Voss not only for the politics, but also the B&W tonality, which has been a recent topic.
Posted by: Jim Meeks | Wednesday, 03 May 2017 at 01:20 PM
I also started wondering whether Mr. Voss, since he is a TOP reader, might offer to talk about his influences, shooting style, gear, processing method and so on?
[I'll pass your request along. --Mike]
Posted by: Jim Meeks | Wednesday, 03 May 2017 at 01:39 PM
Reminds me of W. Eugene Smith both in the tonality and the point of view.
This image more aligned in subject than style.
Posted by: hugh crawford | Thursday, 04 May 2017 at 04:51 PM
Brad says
" Man, those pictures look digital!"
Hugh says
" Man, those pictures look Rodenal*! " with a dash of cyanide perhaps?
*Actually HP5 in d19 if it were me.
Posted by: hugh crawford | Thursday, 04 May 2017 at 05:08 PM