My pick for the Innovation of the Year in 2016 goes to Panasonic, for the GX8's viewfinder.
The quality of a car's steering (bear with me here) is the major determinant of the character of any particular car. (Best steering in my limited experience, going only by memory: 1975–85 Peugeot 604. Second best, my former 2001 NB Mazda Miata.) In a similar way, one of the biggest influences on a camera's character—its gestalt, the feel of the experience of using it—is its viewfinder.
I love camera viewfinders. There's not a big explanation or a tortured rationale following this; I just love camera viewfinders. They have always made a big difference to my buying decisions and always been a major determinant of how much I enjoy using various cameras.
I love to see, you see, and the VF is how you see with a camera. A VF can be anything from a crude and approximate pointing device to a beautiful way of engaging more intimately with the visual world.
I've used all sorts of viewfinders over many years, from a fine fresnel intensifier on a view camera groundglass, to the Albada viewfinder on various Pentax 645's, to a simple wire frame on a Graflex Crown Graphic press camera and various unadorned tunnel finders, to tiny simple prisms attached to antique folders, to the laterally reversed groundglass images on TLRs, to some lovely Leica and Zeiss clip-on OVFs for rangefinders (and rangefinder camera VFs too, naturally), to, of course, many different SLR finders on cameras big and small. So much so that I became something of a savant of various viewfinder properties for a while. Some of my favorites over the years include the Contax RTSIII, the Olympus OM-4T, and the original Sony A900...not to mention the neat swiveling viewing screens on the early Nikon Coolpix 950 and Sony F-707.
A few abbreviations:
VF = viewfinder
OVF = optical viewfinder
EVF = electronic viewfinder
Those refer to the eye-level or eyepiece finders. The little monitor on the back of your camera (as I once got in trouble for pointing out to David Pogue) is called the viewing screen.
It wasn't until the Fuji X-T1 that my allegiances finally tilted over to the eye-level EVF. Not that I think EVFs are better at everything in all cases, just that the balance of advantages and drawbacks finally shifted subtly in the EVF's direction. I decided that, with the X-T1, I appreciated the EVF's strengths more than I missed the OVF's strengths.
And of course I've used a variety of cameras that had hinged or tilting viewfinders like the GX8's too, including the clip-on EVF of the quirky Ricoh GXR (which led to my discovery that I like tilting VFs), to the one on the Panasonic GX7, which I owned.
Of everything I've ever owned or seen, though, the GX8's viewfinder is among the best implementations ever. The team that worked on it did an outstanding job. It's not as flat-out amazing and wonderfully different as the dual OVF/EVF on the Fuji X100[x] and X-Pro1 and X-Pro2 (I've used the X-Pro1 and X100S, thanks to Art E. and Ken T.), but I enjoy using it even more than those.
Visually and in terms of optical size, the GX8 VF is even a little bit better than the X-T1's, and the X-T1's is outstanding too. The tilting GX8 EVF is well masked so that you can block out extraneous light, has good eye relief, is adjustable, and the tilting feature is wonderful, allowing for great flexibility and, with the finder at about 45°, a camera-holding position that I find very comfortable.
Of course, the GX8 is marred by having a flip-out viewing screen, which is more of a video feature, rather than the easier-to-use flip-up screen such as the X-T1 has.
Can't have everything.
Okay, okay...TOP doesn't actually give out an "innovation of the year" award. But the GX8 eye-level finder is the coolest camera feature I experienced in 2016, anyway, and it deserves all the praise I can heap on it. I truly hope this feature survives to make its way into future Panasonic cameras.
Kudos to Panasonic, and keep it up.
Mike
Original contents copyright 2017 by Michael C. Johnston and/or the bylined author. All Rights Reserved. Links in this post may be to our affiliates; sales through affiliate links may benefit this site.
Like what you read?
Give Mike a “Like” or Buy yourself something nice
(To see all the comments, click on the "Comments" link below.)
Featured Comments from:
D Evans6: "I completely agree. I love my GX8, and keep the viewing screen closed most of the time. Otherwise, being left-eyed, I would be continually smudging it with my nose."
Dave_lumb: "Flip-up screens are fine when using the camera horizontally, but hopeless when using it vertically. In that instance flip-out screens definitely have the edge."
Henry Richardson: "The Minolta Dimage 7i I bought in 2002 had a tilting EVF too. I sure liked that feature. You can see a photo of it here."
s.wolters (partial comment): "I did not try it yet, but the best innovation of 2016 seems to me the improvement of the stabilization on the OM-D E-M1 Mark II. Five seconds handheld exposures!"
I had a Contax RTSiii and found the v/f great indoors, or in overcast light. But in bright sunlight, those light blue letters just washed right out. The Aria was much better, with its green lettering system.
Posted by: Peter Gilbert | Monday, 02 January 2017 at 09:27 AM
Mike, you are missing the most commonly used viewfinder of modern cameras ... the LCD. I have the X-Pro2 and now find that I only use the OVF or EVF whenever I can't use the LCD. It is getting to be a rare occasion when I don't use the LCD now that I'm mostly making pictures inside or in bad weather. Even outside on a bright day I use the EVF or OVF only as a last resort.
Posted by: John Holmes | Monday, 02 January 2017 at 10:43 AM
Yeah, I saw that when it came out, and Fuji has it again (with an option) for their new DMF camera. I wish every camera had this feature---including the OVF's! And I agree with you that a *good* (meaning, pleasing to me for some reasons)VF makes a big, big difference in shooting.
Posted by: tex andrews | Monday, 02 January 2017 at 10:49 AM
Hmm. Well perhaps there's more to the GX8's rotating viewfinder than its predecessor's? I was attracted to the GX7's tilting viewfinder when it was introduced in 2013. It seemed clever and handy. But surprisingly in actual practice I didn't find it so useful. I prefer to keep the camera AWAY from my face as much as possible, to which end I find the tilting high-res screen to be THE (almost) must-have feature on my list. The P.O.V. enabled by the tilting viewfinder just isn't that far off the standing eye axis unless you're on your knees.
To each his own.
Posted by: Kenneth Tanaka | Monday, 02 January 2017 at 11:29 AM
I'm looking forward to testing the Fuji GFX, which is reported to have a detachable (upgradeable?) EVF with 3.7M dots, .85x mag and an optional attachment for tilt. The viewing screen has 3-way tilting, all in a weather sealed package, with a 43.8x32.9mm sensor and 51.4MP. The lens line looks promising, too.
The Leica S007 still has the most gorgeous OVF, but comes at a cost (in dollars and size/weight), and still has lens AF motor reliability issues.
Leica is expected to announce a new M on January 18th, and rumors abound regarding possible changes to its RF/viewing system, either in this model or another forthcoming one. I've loved traditional M viewing from film and digital; it will be interesting to see if any changes represent the future or merely present an additional option.
Posted by: Jeff | Monday, 02 January 2017 at 11:34 AM
It is, indeed, the best thing sinced slice bread (how old am I, huh?). Though mine's on a GX-7.
Posted by: Stephen | Monday, 02 January 2017 at 12:01 PM
Mike,
Thanks, pal, I have a GX7 and very little money, and I have come to find myself satisfied with it and my OMD-EM5ii in a way that I have not been since film. Cameras for years, I thought, till I saw the announcement of the GX-8, but after reading about it, I though, that's a pile of money for a little good ans a problem I don't have (that pesky shutter business: is it a real thing or not?), and now I think maybe it would be a good idea after all.
Oh well....
[Nothing wrong with a GX7. I believe Carl Weese still shoots with his.
Oh, and check out Stephen Scharf's Featured Comment for the new upgrade *I* can't afford. --Mike]
Posted by: Bill Pearce | Monday, 02 January 2017 at 12:39 PM
When I first checked out the GX8, for some reason, I thought it didn't have a microphone jack. For me that was a deal breaker. I love the GX7 I purchased from you but alas I had to replace it with the G85. My sweetie is very excited to get my GX7 as she is sick and tired of lugging her 5DmkII and all that heavy L series glass around when we travel. The G85 has a wonderful EVF as well.
Posted by: Eric Rose | Monday, 02 January 2017 at 12:48 PM
Mike, in case a few of your readers aren't familiar with the quirky Ricoh GXR that offered a clip-on EVF, here's a photo of mine with the A12 "M" mount (module).
https://flic.kr/p/ynVybF
Posted by: Ned Bunnell | Monday, 02 January 2017 at 01:02 PM
OM-n series. best viewfinders by a mile in my opinion, especially give the small form factor of the cameras. Not to mention interchangeable screens. This is why I cannot warm 100% to the otherwise great qualities of the Fuji XT-1. I still use my OM's and when I bring one up to the eye, the difference is palpable...
Posted by: Richard Tugwell | Monday, 02 January 2017 at 01:21 PM
I have never handled a GX-8, so there may well be details of the way it implements the tilting EVF that make a big difference in the user experience. However, "looking on from the outside", it appears to be a copy of the EVF of the Konica-Minolta A-2 that I bought in 2004.
I really liked that camera, and especially the tilting EVF. It has since been replaced by my Sony A6000, but I really, really wish the Sony cameras had inherited the tilting EFV, as I often find the tilting screen to be a poor substitute for the tilting EVF when I want the capability to frame the image while looking down.
- Tom -
Posted by: -et- | Monday, 02 January 2017 at 01:39 PM
Back in the day, I was hot to trot for the revolutionary small OM-1. Instead, I opted for a substantially larger Nikkormat FT2 with a somewhat smaller VF simply because it was so damn sharp and contrasty as opposed to the Oly's VF that was as flat as it was large.
Right now, EVF's are overwhelmingly superior in the dark, perfectly adequate in the shade, and at times, barely tolerable in direct sunlight/contrasty lighting. When EVF's equal LCD's- mirrorless will have finally come of age operationally.
Posted by: Stan B. | Monday, 02 January 2017 at 01:48 PM
Flip-up screens aren't very useful for shooting in portrait orientation...
What we need is a flip up screen that can also rotate 90 degrees.
Posted by: Dave Millier | Monday, 02 January 2017 at 01:58 PM
20 years ago I used a Nikon RF with a 1:1 VF. I've been looking for something as perfect ever since. Personally, I haven't found it yet, but in our world of infinite possibilities I'm still hopeful.
Posted by: Josh Hawkins | Monday, 02 January 2017 at 03:27 PM
@ Dave Millier: "What we need is a flip up screen that can also rotate 90 degrees.".
Buy a Fuji X-T2. It's as close as exists today.
Posted by: Kenneth Tanaka | Monday, 02 January 2017 at 04:26 PM
The innovation is that it is *in-built*, and as such originated in the GX7, although the GX8's is a much-needed upgrade.
Tilting EVF's were a common hotshoe-mounted accessory for VF-less Olympus and Panasonic cameras for a few years, until the GX7 integrated it, and that was the innovation.
Like you, I loved the tilting feature of my GX7 EVF.
Posted by: Arg | Monday, 02 January 2017 at 06:10 PM
I mostly agree with you about the Peugeot 604. Wide track, wide tires and good fore/aft weight distribution, together with whatever they did in the linkage details, made it a joy to steer.
I loved my gas version, until the minor repairs I could do moved into full falling apart mode.
The Audi 5000CS Turbo Quattro that overlapped with and succeeded it was also a joy to drive/steer. The all mechanical full time quattro drive and weight balance made it an amazing handling car in the curvy stuff. Lighter/quicker on its feet than the 604 for that.
I had a GX7; used it for over 10,400 shots and liked it a lot. I never could find a use for the tilting aspect of the EVF. I don't recall ever wanting to look down and not using the LCD screen for the purpose. I can't imagine what the GX8 can have changed that would make me use it differently.
If they had dropped the tilting feature on the GX8, it would have had zero effect on my choice to buy or not. Never have wished that the EVFs on my GM5 and ZS50, which are otherwise located in the same place on the bodies, tilted.
I also had a tilting EVF accessory for Pens, and never tilted it in use.
We're all different. And thus all such awards, "real" or casual are expressions of taste, not some form of absolute.
[What else? --Mike]
Posted by: Moose | Monday, 02 January 2017 at 10:58 PM
I notice that the GX80/85 is already being heavily discounted. At around £450, the £200 cashback deal makes it £250 in the U.K at the moment (until Jan 9th, I think). That'll learn 'em for not including a flippy EVF (or focus mode switch).
Posted by: Brian Taylor | Tuesday, 03 January 2017 at 05:07 AM
The GX8 is from 2015.
I did not try it yet, but the best innovation of 2016 seems to me the improvement of the stabilization on the OM-D E-M1 mark II. Five seconds handheld exposures! I have a VF-2 tilting viewfinder that I still use for table top and macro work now and then. On a tripod at my home studio.
A tilting LCD is much more useful outdoors for waist level and semi overhead shots. Almost as versatile as my old Rolleiflex.
Posted by: s.wolters | Tuesday, 03 January 2017 at 06:57 AM
IMHO, the best thing about flip-out ("flippy") rear screens is that they can be reversed against the camera body, to show no screen at all. I'm sure they're great for video or weird angles, but being able to just look through the viewfinder (EVF in most cases) is refreshing to me, even though I barely used film cameras at all. Perhaps because it comes without the discombobulating momentary brightness and distraction of a settings screen or live view as I bring the camera up to my eye.
(Knowing that, in the future, the phrase "bring the camera up to my eye" will disappear like the Dodo.)
Posted by: MarkB | Tuesday, 03 January 2017 at 09:29 AM
I tried the GX-something-or-other (don't recall which but it might have been an 80) in a department store a week ago. I need a +diopter so I dialled to the max. I couldn't get a clear image and I said so to the assistant who said that GX models have a generic viewfinder and don't work as well as those on other makes tailored to the camera.
That sounded odd, (+2.5 is +2.5, no?) but the fact is that I couldn't get a clear image.
Anyone with a Panasonic who can comment on this?
Meanwhile I am still hunting for something I can put a normal or short tele lens on - that has super-fast AF, image stabilisation in the body, and face detection.
I am hovering around a D5500 body only, an X-e2 with 35 1.4 or an EM-5 with something or other.
Posted by: David Bennett | Tuesday, 03 January 2017 at 04:00 PM
I love the car steering analogy. I bought my last car (Infiniti G37S) mainly because of its sublime steering feel. I enjoy the power from its V6 engine and the luxury features but the real reason I love the car is because of the way steering feels and communicates. Incidentally, I also own the GX8. I put my GX7 up for sale once I peered through the viewfinder of the GX8. I'm able to resist the lure of new cars and new cameras now because I think what I have is truly special :-)
Posted by: Jay | Thursday, 05 January 2017 at 08:01 PM