John Lehet by MJ
Please put aside a little of the money you get for Christmas or Hanukkah for our Winter-quarter print offer!
I've been living with all of the proof prints for six days now, and it took John (the photographer) and me four days to sift through the possibilities and make a decision—he sent many variations of several prints on many papers, which were virtually all "good but different." After considering many options, we went in the direction of simplicity and purity: we'll be offering only one image at one size on one type of paper. A rather radical choice in certain ways, as you will see.
Vermont photographer John Lehet would never say this about himself, I'm almost sure, but, knowing him, I feel comfortable saying that photographic prints in his case are just the visual manifestations of his spiritual voyage—he's a longtime Buddhist who has been deeply involved in meditation practice for many years*. Accepting his work this way opens it up for me.
John is deeply into process, which I would define as the methods used to sort, clarify, and redact one's work into final form, and we'll talk about that—John is unusually insightful on that subject. The equipment he used will be fun to discuss, too.
Although of the highest possible quality in every way, the Winter Print will not be expensive, either.
That's all I'll say for now. We will offer four single prints in 2017, all by different master printmakers—one during each of the four seasons**. As for John's photograph, we won't decide on the date of the "reveal" until after Christmas, but it will be in the first few days of January.
Mike
*When I asked him if it was okay if I said this, he said yes, but added a paragraph explaining with uncommon thoughtfulness why he doesn't care for the word "spiritual." I should see if I can get him to write a short post about meditation—that would be very interesting.
**Also, I'm discussing bargain photo book sales with other publishers, too. More fun in the New Year.
Original contents copyright 2016 by Michael C. Johnston and/or the bylined author. All Rights Reserved. Links in this post may be to our affiliates; sales through affiliate links may benefit this site.
Help Support Mike or TOP
Give the writer a small gift or Patronize our affiliates
(To see all the comments, click on the "Comments" link below.)
Featured Comments from:
No featured comments yet—please check back soon!
". . . it took John (the photographer) and ME four days . . ." [emphasis added]
Posted by: bandbox | Tuesday, 20 December 2016 at 10:24 AM
Mike: No need to post, of course, but you have a mistaken pronoun in your second paragraph. It' not "it took John...and I," but rather "John...and me." As always, me loves reading your blog!
[Thanks, fixed now. Maybe I need to pay more attention to my Strunk and White. --Mike]
Posted by: Doug | Tuesday, 20 December 2016 at 10:43 AM
Looking forward to the details. Coincidentally, I am in the midst of reading a book which may be of interest:
"Photography as Meditation" by Torsten Andreas Hoffmann, Rocky Nook publisher. It is quite interesting, short chapters with photo examples, Torsten discusses the commonality between elements of Zen Buddhism meditation and the act of photography.
Highly recommended.
Posted by: Mark Kinsman | Tuesday, 20 December 2016 at 12:00 PM
' . . . added a paragraph explaining with uncommon thoughtfulness why he doesn't care for the word "spiritual."'
They can be tricksy things, words. And one like 'spiritual' is more so than, say, 'automobile'.
I was in a small group listening to Thomas Moore speak about one of his books. There was some restlessness in the group, a sense of uncertainty or disagreement.
Finally, someone asked Mr. Moore what he meant by 'religious' and 'spiritual'. He explained that 'religious' meant to him true devotion to closeness to the Divine, however named. He defined 'spirituality' as something related to the spiritualism of the late 18th and early 19th centuries, much of the New Age movement of the 20th and the hucksters and con men who used the ideas of these movements to gain control over people and relieve them of excess funds.
As an ex Catholic monk, who left that life on good terms with himself, his church and his God, that makes sense. It was, however rather directly the opposite of the definitions held by at least most of his Berkeley audience.
He would, it seems, describe his many best selling books as essentially religious, with psychology, while his fans there would likely call them something like psycho-spiritual.
Once terms had been defined, things went very well.
Posted by: Moose | Tuesday, 20 December 2016 at 12:55 PM
'. . . "Photography as Meditation" by Torsten Andreas Hoffmann'
Thanks for the mini review, Mark. I've tried a few similar sounding books.
I found The Practice of Contemplative Photography - Seeing the World with Fresh Eyes by Andy Karr and Michael Wood very helpful. Its roots are in Tibetan Buddhism, and especially the teachings of Chögyam Trungpa.
OTOH, they led me to God is at Eye Level, by Jan Phillips, which sounded good in their description, but did nothing for me.
I found The Tao of Photography, by Philippe L. Gross, Duane Preble and S. I. Shapiro, interesting. I find myself in dialog with it, wandering between agreement and disagreement, irritated at its non Tao tendencies to be directive and didactic, enlightened by some of its ideas and images. So I suppose it must be pretty good.
Then again, I find the secular, descriptive and critical approach of Why Photographs Work, by George Barr (another Rocky Nook title) useful as well. It gives me interesting images and lots of idea and opinion about them to interact with. I find I can learn as much, maybe more, through disagreement as agreement.
Posted by: Moose | Tuesday, 20 December 2016 at 01:52 PM
He'd be a good guy to fix your website too....
Posted by: Frank Petronio | Tuesday, 20 December 2016 at 02:31 PM
I've studied Buddhism on and off, but would not call myself religious. I see it as a philosophical leaning, but respect those who seek the spiritual aspects too. Not there is anything wrong in calling oneself spiritual, but is a term that is so loaded. Does it inform my Photography? Yes, yes it does.
Posted by: David Cope | Tuesday, 20 December 2016 at 03:30 PM
'It took x and me a year to ...' is completely acceptable in many English dialects including, probably, mine when spoken (and, you understand, I am writing this -- or, in fact, dictating it to my butler of course, as one does not do one's own writing on the internet -- in my country house in Devonshire, as I am down from town for Christmas).
(Some of the above is a lie, but prescriptive grammar must die nonetheless.)
Posted by: Tim Bradshaw | Tuesday, 20 December 2016 at 06:34 PM
Your book offers might actually be called "curated remaindering". That sounds a little harsh, but the fate of most photo books otherwise is far worse. And the curation part is vital. I hope that you can do this every year.
scott
Posted by: scott kirkpatrick | Wednesday, 21 December 2016 at 10:08 AM
Mike,
I would welcome a post on meditation. I think it would fit in very well with your Hopi commandments. Mindfulness to me means trying to understand things including other people's points of view and also having compassion for everyone.
More fun in the new year made me think of the X album "More Fun in the New World" that I've been listening to at work recently: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dUsA76rGzYk&t=1151s
Posted by: Jona | Wednesday, 21 December 2016 at 10:26 AM