1985 and now: a brother and sister, or a couple who are still
together? Don't know. Photo by Chris Porsz.
I love projects like this, and (the Design You Trust article's claim notwithstanding) there have been many of them over the years, from The Rephotographic Survey Project on down.
Rephotography is thought to consider only sites, but just as many have been done of people (for example, Young Me / Now Me). The new one from which the photos above were taken was done by a professional paramedic and amateur documentary photographer named Chris Porsz from Peterborough, Cambridgeshire. The project is called Reunions. (I don't think Chris has much of a gift for titles—his earlier book, New England, is not about New England, but about newer towns in England. You know what I always say, "editors needed everywhere." But I digress.) Over the course of a decade, Chris tracked down the same people in Peterborough who he originally photographed as much as 40 years ago, and recreated the poses, sometimes in the same places.
Some examples of such comparative rephotography inevitably work better than others, but it's always fascinating to me how photographs themselves change in time, as well as how photographs show change. There's a book of Chris's project, Reunions, that you can buy directly from him, or you can see various examples of his work in this article at Design You Trust or elsewhere.
Fascinating.
Britain's turn for the great GX8
Looks like it's Great Britain's turn for the excellent deal on the Panasonic GX8, the Micro 4/3 camera I liked so much and keep yammering on about.
My further rummaging in the wilds of the Internets has suggested that the "shutter shock" problem that the GX8 has been asked to shoulder alone is only relevant with certain lenses...a statement which of course I am in no position to guarantee, which is why I have to be careful when I talk about it. But although I have read many good things about this kit lens, the 12–60mm ƒ/3.5–5.6—lenses generally really are good these days, and this one seems to be a case in point—I haven't heard anything about people detecting any evidence of shutter shock with this camera/lens combination.
I can't guarantee that.
Anyway, you can pre-order the camera and lens in the UK for only £869. It's also available with the 14–42mm lens, with the excellent 12–35mm ƒ/2.8 (which also is allegedly immune to shutter shock), or with the 14–140mm. The body only is already out of stock.
Jane the incomparable
Finally in the UK category is a new book that came out a year ago of the work of Jane Bown. (No, not "Brown"—no "r." It's Bown. I believe it's pronounced not like "bone" but like the bow of a ship with an "n" added on—rhymes with crown.) A modest photojournalist who made unfussy pictures with minimalist equipment, Jane's spare yet eloquent style puts her into the very top rank as far as my opinion is concerned—she's among my own favorites, certainly. I admire her greatly and always find things to love in her work, as well as things to admire and emulate. She died around this season of the year two years ago, after a successful career that saw her receive appropriate appreciation and recognition as the years warped and woofed onward, and at the end. The trajectory of her career was something that went just about right for her, and stands as a model for what every photographer of her talents ought to get.
(A brief insight into her character, quoted from Wikipedia: "She described her childhood as happy, brought up in Dorset by women whom she believed to be her aunts. Bown said she was upset to realise, at the age of twelve, that one of them was her mother and her birth was illegitimate. This discovery precipitated her into delinquent behaviour in her adolescence, and acting coldly towards her mother.")
The book is A Lifetime of Looking. It's also available in the U.S., but barely (a handful of used and new copies from third-party sellers).
Like Harry Gruyaert's book was for color photographers—inspirational!
Mike
(Thanks to Marcin Wuu)
Original contents copyright 2016 by Michael C. Johnston and/or the bylined author. All Rights Reserved. Links in this post may be to our affiliates; sales through affiliate links may benefit this site.
Like what you read?
Join our support campaign or buy something
(To see all the comments, click on the "Comments" link below.)
Featured Comments from:
Peter Wright (partial comment): "I have A Lifetime of Looking by Bown (and the Gruyaert). I agree, it's inspirational, and should be in your collection if you have any interest in street, portrait, or the UK in the second half of the 20th century. However I was astonished when I read that there is no 'r' in her name. I had to go and check the covers of my books by her—and right enough! All this time I was 'seeing' an 'r' where one didn't exist! (Especially ironic given the title of the book!) So that's my humbling experience for the day...."
Tom Burke: "I haven't seen that particular Brown book, but I have seen other collections of her work. She worked for The Observer, a U.K. Sunday newspaper, and her work didn't necessarily appear every week, so normally you just saw one portrait in isolation, once a week or less. In that context I think it works brilliantly. But I did wonder when I saw a number of her images all at once if perhaps there was some similarity, possibly even a certain sameness, to the collection. Of course, it could also be that portraits aren't my thing. Certainly her work is highly regarded here, and has been for a long time."
Tom Burke: "(D**n spelling auto-correction! I wrote her name correctly....)"
Thanks for the heads-up on Jane Bown's book -- ordered!
Posted by: Darlene | Wednesday, 16 November 2016 at 11:38 AM
Daniel Meadows revisited people from his 1970s Free Photographic Omnibus photographs.
https://vimeo.com/57256053
Posted by: Dave_lumb | Wednesday, 16 November 2016 at 11:44 AM
Your Rephotography item brings back so many memories of my early college days but without any photos, darn it. Two friends burning their draft cards - one later becoming head of a local environmental organization and the other a successful attorney - and, of course, neither retaining their earlier times "dress codes". Thanks for inciting the recollections.
Posted by: Dave Van de Mark | Wednesday, 16 November 2016 at 11:47 AM
Are you aware of the Brown Sisters project by Nicholas Nixon?
http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2014/10/03/magazine/01-brown-sisters-forty-years.html?_r=0
Most remarkable. A few years ago, I saw it in a wonderful exhibition.
Posted by: Fritz | Wednesday, 16 November 2016 at 11:53 AM
Apologies for "throwing a spanner in the works", but there are Panasonic cashback deals available here in the UK, and they are NOT quoted as being available via Amazon UK purchases. If anyone buys via that link, it could cost them £100 more than elsewhere. Panasonic don't list Amazon amongst their eligible retailers.
Mike, I suspect there are a fair few UK fans of the site would rather support it by purchasing via your affiliate links, if you had one for the likes of Wex. Have seen others mention it before, but never any response from yourself as to why not. So, why not?! I personally prefer them over Amazon for most costly photo bits and pieces, and have also purchased quite a few secondhand bits from them. They may be our nearest equivalent to your B&H.
Details of Panasonic promotions... and participating/eligible retailers:
http://promotions.panasonic.co.uk/promotions/promotions/view_terms/170
Wex, and claim back £100:
http://www.wexphotographic.com/buy-panasonic-lumix-dmc-gx8-digital-camera-body-with-12-60mm-lens/p1595797
[There are a great many photo equipment retailers and discounters, some of whom undercut the major sources in price, and some of those are reputable and some not. As a matter of long policy I only recommend those I know to be reputable and safe to buy from. Beyond that, you're on your own. --Mike]
Posted by: Dave Stewart | Wednesday, 16 November 2016 at 11:55 AM
I have 'A Lifetime of Looking' by Bown (and the Gruyaert). I agree, it's inspirational, and should be in your collection if you have any interest in street, portrait, or the UK in the second half of the 20th century. However I was astonished when I read that there is no "r" in her name. I had to go and check the covers of my books by her – and right enough! All this time I was "seeing" an "r" where one didn't exist! (Especially ironic given the title of the book!) So that's my humbling experience for the day...
And by the way, a study of Jane Bown (got it right!) is the perfect antidote for "latestitis". Jane used only the same type of simple film camera for almost her entire career (an Olympus OM1), seems to have had few lenses, hardly if ever used flash or a tripod, and probably didn't know how to spell "photoshop" having never moved to digital. She even preferred if at all possible to use one exposure value: about 1/60 at f/2.8. My favourite quote of hers came when she was asked why she took so few shots on an assignment (usually about 2 rolls) and she replied (I paraphrase) "Well I discovered that the best shots were at the beginning and at the end, so I just stopped taking the ones in between!"
Posted by: Peter Wright | Wednesday, 16 November 2016 at 12:21 PM
Got to mention another Bown book, Unknown Bown 1947-1967. Most of the photos (if not all) were taken on a Rolleiflex. It's a lovely book full of sensitive street and reportage, reminiscent of Vivian Maier.
Posted by: Andrew Lamb | Wednesday, 16 November 2016 at 12:32 PM
There is also a dvd about Ms Bown, Looking for Light: Jane Bown. Available from Amazon UK. Region 2 only. Which leads me to suggest Mike or another TOP reader might want to do an OT piece about all region dvd players.
I’m sitting here in Novelty, Ohio and have a whole bunch of dvds from other parts of the world which play on the all region player as easily as a domestic dvd.
Posted by: Bob Curtis | Wednesday, 16 November 2016 at 12:37 PM
It's a bit harsh to criticise Chris Porsz caliing his book New England. Surely it was the colonials who showed a lack of imagination when they re-named that part of North America, which I'm sure already had a name - they just had to ask ;-)
PS For a everything else that's happening on your side of the pond, always look on the bright side of life:
https://youtu.be/SJUhlRoBL8M
Posted by: Richard Parkin | Wednesday, 16 November 2016 at 12:46 PM
Go to MACFILOS.com read mike Evans on gx8 he is Leica person but head over heels w Panasonic and Leica Panasonic lens for that camera...ENJOY
Posted by: John Wilson | Wednesday, 16 November 2016 at 01:16 PM
Good to see Dave Lumb mentioning the great Daniel Meadows. Amazon UK has some very cheap 2nd hand copied of the book https://www.amazon.co.uk/Bus-Free-Photographic-Omnibus-1973-2001/dp/186046842X as does Amazon in the US https://www.amazon.com/Bus-Free-Photographic-Omnibus-1973-2001/dp/186046842X
Posted by: John Wilson | Wednesday, 16 November 2016 at 02:58 PM
"40-140" in the GX8 article should read "14-140". I have that lens on the GX8 and it makes a great combination.
[Thank you! Fixed now. --Mike]
Posted by: David Evans | Wednesday, 16 November 2016 at 04:30 PM
Peter Wright:
The same thing happens with The BerenSTAIN bears.
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/arts/berenstain-bears-debate-is-a-case-of-schrodingers-nostalgia/article25972071/
Posted by: KeithB | Wednesday, 16 November 2016 at 04:41 PM
Mike wrote, " ... unfussy pictures with minimalist equipment ... "
What would constitute minimalist equipment today? A cell phone certainly but how many steps up the equipment ladder before minimalist no longer applies?
Posted by: Speed | Wednesday, 16 November 2016 at 05:03 PM
If Panasonic UK are not giving cashback on purchases from Amazon, I'd have to question why. I'd also have to question if you'd receive a manufacturer warranty, especially as Panasonic UK is currently giving a two year warranty, for a limited period.
The reason that I and other UK visitors to the site have recommended Wex, is because they are a large well established company that is well regarded, and to use your terminology, they ARE a major source. Hence the comparison with B&H. No grey imports, and no, they're not necessarily the cheapest.
Of course if you're happy to recommend folk pay an extra £100, and only have a maximum of a one year guarantee, from a non photo-centric company, rather than deal with "the UK's largest online specialist photographic retailer"... well, I'd also have to question why for that!
[]
Posted by: Dave Stewart | Wednesday, 16 November 2016 at 05:16 PM
I am equally astonished as Peter Wright - the spine of my Jane Brown Exposures book has strangely morphed into Jame Bown Exposures! The spelling in all the bookmarked articles about her life has also been mysteriously altered.
I am totally mystified. Makes me wonder what other altered realities I've lived with. Mike now I understand, when you say everyone needs an editor.
Posted by: Lynn | Wednesday, 16 November 2016 at 07:12 PM
It's inappropriate to criticise the title "New England". There is a part of Chris's home town of Peterborough known as New England. Not everyone takes the American world view.
[In that case, I take it back. --Mike]
Posted by: Dave Wilson | Wednesday, 16 November 2016 at 11:47 PM
Anybody been wandering around outside in the fog at night? Because it sounds like we have people leaking between worldlines here! In particularly, the one where it's Jane Brown and the one where it's Jane Bown. (I think of Larry Niven's story "For a Foggy Night" as the classic one on this.)
Posted by: David Dyer-Bennet | Thursday, 17 November 2016 at 02:33 AM
Dave Stewart is right about Wexphotographic and about Panasonic. In U.K. Panasonic regularly run cash backs and often give 3 year warranties but they usually only apply to bricks and mortar shops even though the purchase may be online. I think the latter is due to not undercutting shops that are holding stock. Wex does have an affiliate program:
https://darwin.affiliatewindow.com/merchant-profile/2298
I also see that it may be problematic for you to link to companies of which you have no personal knowledge.
Posted by: Richard Parkin | Thursday, 17 November 2016 at 02:36 AM
It is no longer necessary to refer to us in "Great" Britain. Just plain Britain will do now. (Thinking about it, have you considered dropping the "United" bit?)
Posted by: Anthony Collins | Thursday, 17 November 2016 at 03:03 AM
As others have said, there are active Panasonic UK promotions running which exclude Amazon UK as an approved retailer. WEX is probably the best known of the specialist photographic retailers in the UK but there are plenty of others to choose from, all of whom very good to deal with.
I would also note that the Amazon pricing of the GX8 is not currently especially competitive, not withstanding the eligibility for the Panasonic promotions. For example, the 14-42 kit can be had for between £749 and £800 from various photo specialists c/w Amazon's £999; the 14-140 kit from £1049 c/w Amazon's £1274 and the 12-35 kit from £1179 c/w Amazon's whopping £1567. When you bear in mind the additional £100 saving that can be had on top of these prices, the choice would appear clear!
Posted by: Martin Cockett | Thursday, 17 November 2016 at 08:13 AM
Regarding the book title "New England". I live in the tropical paradise of New Britain literally half a globe away from Old Britain. The neighboring island is New Ireland. I produce websites and stuff for small time tourism businesses on both islands -- which has led me to discover the world's WORST search term -- New Ireland.
First google hit is a bar in New York! LOL.
Cheers, Geoff
Posted by: Geoffrey Heard | Friday, 18 November 2016 at 03:07 AM
Peter Wright wrote "She even preferred if at all possible to use one exposure value: about 1/60 at f/2.8"
I have been told that when she would hand her (two) rolls of film over to The Observer darkroom, they would ask her what the lighting was like when she took the photos, and then develop the film accordingly.
She kept her camera in a shopping bag too, only bringing it out when there was something worth taking a picture of.
Posted by: Simon Grosset | Friday, 18 November 2016 at 11:02 AM
I'd like to bring together two pretty unrelated subjects from this post: Jane Bown & the GX8. Peter Wright says she used an Olympus OM1 a lot, which was my first SLR back in the late 70s.
There used to be a lot of articles declaring that "now" digital was as good as 35mm.This topic has died down somewhat. I wonder, is today's GX8 on par with the OM1 resolutionwise, especially where b/w is concerned? What would the differences in IQ/ appearance be?
Maybe one of you can enlighten me be it from practical experience or scientific deduction.
Posted by: Hendrik | Sunday, 20 November 2016 at 07:59 AM