(Political content warning. You have been warned! Not too bad though.)
Let's face it—not the best week, for TOP or the United States of America.
I hope you missed as much of the Convention as possible. It was, frankly, awful, and I use my words carefully. Republicans shouldn't mind me saying that, because there weren't any Republicans there. Politics aside, I just want to point out a few more instances of American Irony, which, as I keep saying, is my bête noire. First, the man is a real estate developer, and his clearest policy promise is...a giant construction project. Stop it please. Why does he want to build a wall? Because he's adamantly opposed to immigration and hates immigrants...and oh yeah, is married to an immigrant. Ouch...have pity.... Next, his immigrant wife copies parts of her speech from the black First Lady they all claim to loathe (prompting the most hilarious Chris Christie quote yet—it's not plagiarism because "ninety-three percent of the speech is completely different from Michelle Obama's speech"), but nobody seems to notice that the parts she lifted concerned honor, personal ethics, and character. Uncle! Uncle!
And have I mentioned that his name is Trump? Which means to play a card capable of overriding the cards in the suit being played. Really, it's gonna kill me some day. Irony body-blows, smashing me in the conceptual kidneys. I ache.
Now, I know I opened the door, but no comments on the political situation, please. I'm lonely and I just needed somebody to listen to me. (I'll read them myself, though, even if I don't post them.)
Meanwhile, back at the Farmhouse-by-the-lake-almost*
So here on TOP, we started out the week with l'affaire de Ctein, which was unpleasant. Then I wrote a long, off-topic "Open Mike" about how turning things around and looking at them from different perspectives can sometimes brighten your mood. To be honest, that was to cleanse the palate, or flush the toxins, pick your preferred metaphor. Blog are nice that way—everything, good or bad, gets supplanted in due course, and before you know it we're talking about something more pleasant again.
Strife sells, unfortunately. Graph of TOP traffic over 17 days.
Guess which dot represents the day I wrote about Ctein.
From there we moved to discussing wildlife, or at least squirrels and turkey vultures (I still don't know what they were); random farmland on the way home from the grocery store; a nice video with nothing in it but water vapor; whether Fuji really mixes some sort of secret sauce into its sensors; and lastly a trip down Memory Lane to the tune of "Sensors You Remember," with illustrations by you. (D. Hufford's shot...wow.) Really, it's bad to be sentimental about sensors. But I have the feeling a lot of the tech magic of recent decades in photography is buried in those little chips. Where the heck did Kevin Purcell go, anyway? He must be on vacation. It's not like him not to comment on a post that features sensors front and center.
Finally, tonight, before I step away for the weekend (the whole weekend this weekend, I hope), I will be posting "A Short History of Digital Cameras." Nostalgia is nice, but we shouldn't forget why we were so anxious and eager to get rid of those old sensors in the first place—the ones we're now waxing nostalgic about. The "History" post will take a quick look back at all the stairsteps we so agonizingly climbed to get to the sensors we have today.
Oh, and remember how, two weeks ago, I was perseverating over how I was going to buy, for myself, a new camera with IBIS (which stands for in-body image stabilization, something my old Konica-Minolta 7D also had)? Well, now I don't have to! No, I take that back—now I can't. The refrigerant is leaking from my 20-year-old central air conditioner, and all of the money I earned from the Four-Book Photobook sale (plus a little more, just to make sure it hurts) is going to have to go for a new air conditioner. All of it. Every penny plus five or six hundred from my bank account. Ya hate that. So I don't get to buy a new camera. Or even a lens. For the foreseeable. There goes that. Fired down.
As I say, bad week. One good thing: I got top comment on a New York Times article! Fired up. Go to "What Republicans Really Think of Trump," by Nicholas Kristof, then click on the Comments—that'll be the little speech balloon with the number in it, like on the right, above. Then click on "Readers' Picks." "TXinD76" (right at the top) is me. (For you film virgins, TX is Kodak Tri-X, and D-76 is Kodak's mainstream B&W developer formula.) I've never had the top comment on a Times article before. It was an Editors' Pick, too.
My father only voted for a Democrat one time in his life—William Proxmire of Wisconsin, I believe because Proxmire was a fiscal hardliner about balancing the budget. Dad threw in with Connally in the '80 election (he had friends in both the Connally and Reagan campaigns), and the horse he bet on didn't win. The job he wanted at the time was Director of OMB, which eventually went to David Stockman under RR.
"A History of Digital Cameras," coming up. See you again soon.
—Mike the Ed.
*Old Milwaukee joke: "UCLA" stands for "University of Cudahy Down by da Lake Almost," spoken in a think M'waukee accent. My house in Western New York is four layers of houses from the lake.
Original contents copyright 2016 by Michael C. Johnston and/or the bylined author. All Rights Reserved. Links in this post may be to our affiliates; sales through affiliate links may benefit this site.
(To see all the comments, click on the "Comments" link below.)
Featured Comments from:
No featured comments yet—please check back soon!
No post mentioning what "trump" means would be complete without acknowledging that in the north of England it's synonymous with "fart". Make of that what you will...
Posted by: Paul Bartlett | Friday, 22 July 2016 at 03:23 PM
I won't miss the politics. I will say that last night I went out to dinner with friends and they showed me a photographic technology that's in common use that I'd never heard of or seen before, and it astonished me.
Posted by: John Camp | Friday, 22 July 2016 at 03:26 PM
I guess its's been a shi#y week all around, or statistically we're all due for some bad luck. Besides the train wreck that is Trump my wife was rear ended driving home from work. Stopped at a light the driver behind her watched the wrong light change and accelerated without looking*. Luckily her insurance is picking up the $6000 in damage to the Mini. Even luckier for me is my wife refuses to drive the Miata to work for fear it will get scratched up in the parking lot. And even luckier than that is she came away from the accident with just a bit of muscle stiffness.
The next day we had the gas company check for leaks (as required by law). The stove is leaking (hopefully repairable), and the pipe to it is leaking. All told that will eat up a nice lens.
I'm still waiting for the third disaster to fall, but maybe Trump is filling that spot.
At least we've got our health, family, friends, dogs and cameras that are still more than adequate. So maybe it's not such a bad week after all.
* I don't know how you do this. The body shop owner blames it on screens, both cell phone and built in. He said summer used to the slow time of year, but now the fender benders never stop. He claims it's tracked right along with the rise of screens in cars and pockets. Makes me think twice about walking or photographing near roads. Might be safer on the train tracks :)
Posted by: Larry Gebhardt | Friday, 22 July 2016 at 03:52 PM
The Kristof article is definitely worth saving. Congrats on your comment and your choice of father. Judging from the response, quite a few people on both ends of the political spectrum agree with him. The real GOP has gone MIA, and now David Duke is going to run for the Senate as a Republican. Ugh...
This has been a week of thin skins and bruised egos everywhere. I never could get past the "one name" thing anyway. Condolences on your A/C, and here's hoping we all have a better week next week.
Posted by: Randy Cole | Friday, 22 July 2016 at 03:58 PM
Neither Trump nor Clinton should be allowed within 5 miles of the White House. The damage either of them will do do the U.S., although different in nature, may not be recoverable. Yet there isn't a viable alternative. With every election there are people who talk about emigrating due to the results, but this time I think some may really do it. Unfortunately, I'm too old to start over.
Posted by: RNewman | Friday, 22 July 2016 at 04:22 PM
Thank you so much for that, Mike. Sometimes, sitting here in England -- which itself has lost the plot -- I imagine that the entire population of the US is somehow mesmerized by D Trump, who gets free publicity by capering randomly in public. What is most loathsome, though, is the orchestrated hate coming out of the Cleveland convention (can't find it in my heart to give them the name of an American political party). My grandad, like your dad, was a lifelong conservative through and through, an Army officer, a West Point graduate. He is long dead, but the only actual political remarks that I heard from him were when some politician said something particularly nasty, muckraking, about another politician. For him there were standards of behavior, in public life as in private, and he would just suggest that it would be better to keep your mouth shut than to say such things.
Posted by: Michael | Friday, 22 July 2016 at 04:25 PM
I was there for the first session and it had moments that were quite out of the norm as far as my experience of these sorts of things.
The highlight? NPS loaned me a 24-70 2.8 when I realized I wanted image stabilization. Thank you Nikon, I was planning on using my Sony a7(with a Nikon lens) but....
The floor fight over the rules change was quite a show. Memorable and very out of the ordinary AFAIK. And I take it the craziness just ramped up later, glad I was in....
Spending the next day at the Chautauqua Institution was exactly what I needed, what a great place!
Posted by: Doug Chadwick | Friday, 22 July 2016 at 05:14 PM
I've had a photo featured in The Guardian, but I think I've been more excited those couple of times I've had a featured commend on TOP.
It's complicated…
Posted by: Kalli | Friday, 22 July 2016 at 05:38 PM
Whew! For a while I wondered, why would anyone put Texas in D76? The result would be way too grainy.
Posted by: David L. | Friday, 22 July 2016 at 05:54 PM
Mike, you shouldn't hold back, we want to know how you really feel about DJT :)
Perhaps it is also time to reflect on and give thanks for the wisdom of the "assembly of demigods" that drafted the US constitution - especially the bit they included about "Separation of powers". Kinda see why they put that in there now can't you.
Dave.
Posted by: Dave Elden | Friday, 22 July 2016 at 06:53 PM
I can't find the D Hufford shot you liked - any chance for a link?
Posted by: T. Edwards | Friday, 22 July 2016 at 07:18 PM
Mike, I've been wondering... do you have the capacity to schedule posts? Could make the weekends less long...
Anyway, too much politics makes me ill. Especially today's politics, with all the frenetic reporting. I'll gladly vote for the candidate who promises to limit presidential campaigns to two months, tops. I'd prefer to hear nothing from anyone about it before labor day... But alas, there are clicks to be had, eyeballs to win, electrons (and raised funds) to be spent...
Posted by: Ben | Friday, 22 July 2016 at 07:59 PM
old southern joke: "UCLA" stands for 'Undeveloped Counties of Lower Alabama'.
Posted by: jbeal | Friday, 22 July 2016 at 08:27 PM
I would propose that the people who support Trump are just as much Republicans as the "tea party" people are! In factI'm not sure there are really any real Republicans left-- or Democrats either.
Posted by: jim woodard | Friday, 22 July 2016 at 08:41 PM
Thanks for speaking up, Mike, and it's entirely appropriate. The Trump supporters I know are very vocal. Those I know who are against him--the overwhelming majority--are completely silent. This is a time to speak up!
Posted by: Marc Rochkind | Friday, 22 July 2016 at 08:44 PM
Yesterday, in a London cafe, I heard someone say...
"Back in a tick, need to take a Donald."
Apparently, Donald Trump has now supplanted Forrest Gump as Cockney rhyming slang for a 'dump'.
Posted by: Steve Jacob | Friday, 22 July 2016 at 08:58 PM
Yeah, it's been a crap week. I have two X-T1's because, as everyone knows, when you're really serious (ha ha) you buy two of the same: when one of them goes down you can keep working.
I'm traveling. The other night I go out to shoot something important . . . and both bodies are on the fritz. On one body, the rear LCD won't come on, and the other body won't record an image at all. It's completely unheard of for two bodies to malfunction at the same time, isn't it? I mean, what are the odds? My first thought was tin whiskers, but I think the cameras are too new for that. Anyway, they'll eventually go off for repair, but for now I have to lug around dead weight.
My ace in the whole - the trump card, if you will - is the Ricoh GR, a true champ of a camera, and still working like one.
So things could be worse - and may yet turn out to be. You just never know. Speaking of Trump, I mean.
Posted by: Doug Thacker | Friday, 22 July 2016 at 08:59 PM
Unfortunately, we have a choice between a confirmed liar and a "bull in a china shop".
A peaceful undertaking such as photography settles my mind. Keeping the tv off also helps!
Posted by: Dick Drake | Friday, 22 July 2016 at 09:03 PM
Did I just say "ace in the whole"? Given the week it's been, I'm quite sure that should have been "hole" - which, along with dry socks, and in keeping with the advice of my father, I'm trying to keep with me at all times.
Posted by: Doug Thacker | Friday, 22 July 2016 at 09:11 PM
I have relatives whose ancestors that helped found the Republican Party, and all you have to say is "party of Lincoln" or "party of Teddy Roosevelt" or even party of Eisenhower or Rockefeller and boy do you get a look!
Look up trump or trumpery in the dictionary. It's uncanny.
Posted by: Hugh Crawford | Friday, 22 July 2016 at 09:36 PM
Remember the old saying about things you can and can't control? Your opportunity to influence the selection of a presidential candidate this year expired a decade or two ago.
Participate in local politics; become active regionally; become active at the state level; go national. Each move up the ladder raises your personal political influence.
Short of making multi-million dollar donations, owning a newspaper, radio/TV station or popular on-line property, that is the only way to raise your influence beyond one vote among a hundred million or so.
When I was a young kid the national conventions were exciting -- especially the part where all the balloons fell from the ceiling and people marched in the aisles. Now I read a book (or TOP) or watch a movie.
Posted by: Speed | Saturday, 23 July 2016 at 12:14 PM
"or at least squirrels and turkey vultures (I still don't know what they were)"
Since you saw the unknowns in the sky, you can be fairly sure they weren't squirrels.
Posted by: Bill Tyler | Saturday, 23 July 2016 at 08:43 PM
Mike, I feel your pain. My last lens purchase magically morphed into a new washing machine. I must admit it's a much more sensible purchase and one we use every few days with wonderful results. Maybe the lens will go on sale again in the future when I have saved up some more money.
Posted by: Frank B | Saturday, 23 July 2016 at 09:36 PM
Hats off to you, Mike. I trust Americans to make the right choice.
Posted by: David Lee | Sunday, 24 July 2016 at 06:39 AM