Two discoveries that come to us via readers over the last couple of posts:
By _xST on Instagram (real name Shawn Theodore), who does street portraits. He shoots in a highly distinctive style yet finds an impressive and and lively range of creativity and inventiveness within that style. The pictures all look like they're his, and like they belong together, but there's little "sameyness."
It looks to me like _xST blends cooperative pictures in which people model for him with true "found" street photography, meaning the subjects don't know they're being photographed. Not sure of that. In any case, beautiful work and an exciting find.
By Chris Dorley-Brown, who has a light touch with both color and tone, via Lenscratch. Chris, who is well established as a photographer, was one of the winners of Lenscratch's "Foreign Exchange" contest, on exhibit until April 30th at 2731 Prospect Contemporary Art in Cleveland, Ohio. Scroll down at the link for a full explanation of what Chris's work is all about, and to see a selection. Well worth the look.
Chris posted in the thread, which was nice of him. As far as color is concerned he says he's made an effort to portray the "thin watery feel" of London light. Very different from the light on the street in _xST's work.
Two color photographers who are very different from each other but are both the real deal, I think. Both new and welcome discoveries for me.
Mike
(Thanks to John Krumm and Michael)
Original contents copyright 2016 by Michael C. Johnston and/or the bylined author. All Rights Reserved. Links in this post may be to our affiliates; sales through affiliate links may benefit this site.
Give us a Likes, preciousssss*: the main reason TOP exists is because people use our links when they buy stuff (no matter how insignificant) from Amazon, Amazon UK, and B&H Photo.
*Hobbit reference. —Gandalf
(To see all the comments, click on the "Comments" link below.)
Featured Comments from:
Eric Perlberg: "Having walked and photographed in many of the same East London locations as Chris Dorley-Brown I was blown away by his ability to create and/or capture a magical lighting that for me transforms his photos from good to special. I'm not sure how much of this is down to in-camera settings or how much is down to the compositing techniques he talks about in his interview here, nor do I know if I care. I haven't yet thought it through but while I found the NYTimes photos of Cuba you linked to the other day rather clichéd and Flickerised I find Chris's work transcendent. One of my definitions of important photography (important to me of course) is that I can only stand to look at a certain number of images before I'd rather go out and shoot to see how I can incorporate something of the magic into my own work. I wish I didn't have things to do today because I'm itching to get my camera out, lace up my trainers and start walking."
Dflanaganphoto: "I've been following _xST since I listened to his interview with Ibarionex Perello on the excellent The Candid Frame podcast. Here's a direct link to that episode."
I first learned of Shawn on The Candid Frame podcast. It's a good interview, if you want to learn more about him...
http://thisweekinphoto.com/the-candid-frame-293-shawn-theodore-aka-xst/
Posted by: John Krumm | Thursday, 24 March 2016 at 09:00 AM
Hobbit reference , by Gandalf?
Are you sure?
[No, *I'm* Gandalf. The reference is to Gollum. At least I hope I'm not Gollum. --Mike, who played Gandalf in his one and only theatrical experience in 7th grade]
Posted by: Bagga_Txips | Thursday, 24 March 2016 at 09:55 AM
It's interesting to me that Mr. Theodore's work is labeled as portraits. With only a few exceptions in the work displayed at the link in the article, I learned nothing about the subjects. This may certainly be generational (I'm 68 yrs old). When I view a portrait I usually reach a conclusion of some kind about the subject, e.g. bold, frail, young, old, haughty, confident, playful; you get the idea. The conclusion is drawn from the eyes, features, expression and setting. I can't see any of those details, other than setting, in the work. As I said, probably generational; I may just not be hip enough to get it. Regardless, I like the design and composition and would look at more of his work.
[I would say the work comes first, and the label is just shorthand to help orient people in open space. Once seen you can see pretty quickly what it is and isn't. But the description never has primacy, the thing does. --Mike]
Posted by: Bob Cook | Thursday, 24 March 2016 at 10:29 AM
Both excellent "finds", Mike! Shawn's work is very much in the vein of the hot, vivid color works of Constantine Manos and Alex Webb. It sizzles. It sweats.
Chris's work is, to my eyes, simultaneously very British (in its style of observation) while also being very much unto itself. I find his "The Corners" work particularly good at quietly orchestrating scenes-within-scenes to present such day-in-the-life, yet opinionated, views of London's regular neighborhood life. That "watery color" effect is very effective at capturing that gauzy thin overcast so characteristic of England. (I enjoyed reading this interview with him.)
While Shawn and Chris might seem to be photographic polar opposites they're actually sharing three-legged pants in my book. They're both aggressively using color to communicate with their photographs. Indeed, their photographs wouldn't work nearly so well in monochrome, would they?
Posted by: Kenneth Tanaka | Thursday, 24 March 2016 at 10:53 AM
I'm in my mid-seventies and Shawn Theodore's work fits my criteria of show me something different. They don't fit the mold of insipid PPA style portraits — and to me that's a good thing.
Posted by: c.d.embrey | Thursday, 24 March 2016 at 01:11 PM
Woody Allen once said he loved shooting in London because the diffused light created gentle shadows and soft tones.
I guess that's another way of saying 'watery' but London typically has a light hazy overcast which acts like a soft-box - allowing enough light to give foreground illumination without harsh shadows or backlight. It's slightly flat, but easy to work with, as Chris' image demonstrates.
Shawn Theodore's shots are strongly graphic - almost like poster prints. Highly structured with blocked, contrasting colours. Very deliberate and selective.
Interesting in both cases and both bookmarked. That's why we love TOP...
Posted by: Steve Jacob | Thursday, 24 March 2016 at 04:29 PM
Hi,
You might want to link to the 500px-website of Chris Dorley-Brown: http://chris3.500px.com/
Posted by: JeroenM | Friday, 25 March 2016 at 04:15 AM
Japan for me has the most beautiful light (and people). I travel a bit, but always find the combination of light and people in Japan the most harmonious combination, clean, bright and gentle, but brilliant.
Examples are on my site (sorry about the blatant plug!) in the "A Song for Sunday" gallery.
photokensho.net
The pictures are always more effective than words.
Posted by: Rod Thompson | Friday, 25 March 2016 at 07:51 AM
When I first encountered Theodore's pictures, my immediate reaction was "Pete Turner" with a hint of Eric Meola.
When I first encountered Dorley-Brown's pictures, my immediate reaction was "Joel Meyerowitz" and his Cape Light and Tuscany pictures.
These reactions / observations are not meant to be criticisms but if I were to be writing a critique of Dorley-Brown / Theodore's work (I was a regional photo critic for the original New Art Examiner), it would most likely begin with a mention of the aforementioned pioneers of color photography who, in essence, laid the table for those who followed.
Again, not as a criticism of D-B / T, s but rather as a perspective on the history of the medium and genre in which they work.
Posted by: Mark Hobson | Friday, 25 March 2016 at 08:23 AM