Bob Adelman 1931-2016
Commitment above all: Bob Adelman was found dead last Saturday in his apartment in Miami Beach. The funeral was Wednesday. The police are investigating because he had a head wound when he was found, but there were no other signs of foul play and he might have died of old age at 85. The obituary to read about Bob, who was one of the great photographers of the Civil Rights movement in America, is David Walker's at PDN. The quintessential reporter with a cause, Bob Adelman "had unusual access to Civil Rights insiders and events because he covered the struggle from its beginnings in the 1950s," writes Walker, "and approached the movement as an activist first, and a journalist second...'his subjects knew which side he was on. And he stayed the course.'"
Nik Software is free, uh-oh: Google has announced that it is giving away Nik software plugins for free. Nik, which was founded in 1995 by Nils Kokemohr and includes the sharpening protocols developed by the late Bruce Fraser, was bought by Google in 2012 to help lure photographers to Google+. Google dropped the price from $500 to $150, and development slowed and support slackened. Now, as Kevin Purcell writes, there are "many questions, but the big one is 'will this software ever be updated again?' (Just to keep it going on future Windows and Mac operating systems.) Or is this a step towards discontinuation? Has tech support ended too? It's starting to look dead. Google hasn't responded to the many questions or put up a FAQ." Maybe orphaned software is the 21st century version of a discontinued but much loved and needed film or paper: different category, but I still miss WriteNow, the lean-and-mean word processor that was architecture-specific to 680x0 and died when the newer chips came in. Still the best WP I've ever used.
Digital color book: In our discussions of color photography recently, a book surfaced that has gotten glowing reviews from people who've read it. It's an e-book by Russian photographer Pavel Kosenko called LIFELIKE: A Book on Color in Digital Photography. As far as I know it's only available as a download; here's the page. Sounds like it might be a good one if you're engaged with improving your relationship with color. We've heard good things.
How successful are Kickstarter photography books? Overall, photobooks on Kickstarter have been an astonishing success. "Here's an interesting statistic: The top 100 photo book campaigns raised a total of $5.7 million dollars. That's an average of $56,708 per campaign. But—the total raised by these 100 campaigns is more than one-quarter of all dollars raised by the 8,599 photo book campaigns that have been successful so far. This gives a whole new meaning to the term 'one-percenter,' since this 1% of successful photographers raised 26% of all of the money raised for photobooks." The quote is from Tim Greyhavens' recent article "Top 100 Kickstarter Photobooks." Tim pressed all the data and extracted all the juice. Number one, if you're curious, was British art photographer Kirsty Mitchell's The Wonderland Book, which raised a whopping $464,496 from a goal of $97,300. Very interesting article if you either like photobooks or would like to get one crowdfunded.
Shocking: Nikon and Canon are ending new product development. Every day is April 1st at New Camera News.
Mike
(Thanks to Kevin Purcell, Tom Kwas, and Oren Grad)
TOP is off on Saturdays. See you on Sunday for a new 'Open Mike.'
Original contents copyright 2016 by Michael C. Johnston and/or the bylined author. All Rights Reserved. Links in this post may be to our affiliates; sales through affiliate links may benefit this site.
Good cheap SD cards; and the best SD cards.
(To see all the comments, click on the "Comments" link below.)
Featured Comments from:
David Cope: "I've just downloaded Nik Collection and it's awesome. Totally making me rethink my digital approach (from toe dipping to hey! come on in, the water's fine!). I love Silver Effects Pro's darkroom-inspired methods, and control points are to die for as is Zone mapping. The collection can be used standalone too, so even if Nik is longer developed then that, for me, future proofs them against incompatible host applications. I use the 'Edit with...' option in Capture One and that works fine, giving me a variant after external editing in Nik. I'm going to test sending out B&W files to Ilford's Photo Lab for printing onto real silver paper (RC) and also exploring using that process for paper negatives for alternative and contact printing/toning on to fiber paper."
Mike, I am currently reading John Rohrbach's, "Color, American Photography Transformed" and a book I think you would enjoy. From a review: "Rohrbach’s scholarship has done: help us to think more deeply about how color does (and doesn’t) alter the meaning of images." (https://collectordaily.com/color-american-photography-transformed-ed-john-rohrbach/). This is NOT a book of only history or process, but what Color MEANS to making images. I just found this video, which you might enjoy: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Npfp4gFmS7E.
Posted by: lyle | Friday, 25 March 2016 at 10:15 AM
My favorite note-taking, idea-saving, and short-form writing tool is Evernote. It's folders and tagging combined with a good search engine (it will search through PDFs that you save and will automagically OCR any JPGs that have text in them!) makes it easy to save something and find it later.
My favorite longer form writing tool is Scrivener. It takes some learning (it incorporates both an outlining and index card metaphor), but it's ability to help me organize my thoughts, re-organize them, and then re-organize one last time is unparalleled.
Posted by: JohnMFlores | Friday, 25 March 2016 at 10:34 AM
How can I take better crappy pictures without better gear?
[Taking the crappy ones is easy. Anyone can do that. The reason for better gear is having the proper "quality of file" for when you get a great one. --Mike]
Posted by: toto | Friday, 25 March 2016 at 11:26 AM
One solution to the problem of orphaned photography-related software is what happened with LightZone. This photo-editing program was "adopted" by a group of dedicated fans and transformed into an open source project, after its original creators gave up on it five years ago. So it has been kept alive and is even updated periodically (Lightzoneproject.org). I rely on it myself, since AFAIK there is nothing else quite like it.
Posted by: Carl Siracusa | Friday, 25 March 2016 at 12:41 PM
If only Nikon would buy Nik (or had bought Nik), and then perhaps give us Capture NX3. I might then consider buying a newer Nikon camera than those with RAW files that can be edited directly with Capture NX2... not that I need* anything better than the current collection.
(*need and want, are not the same!)
Posted by: Dave Stewart | Friday, 25 March 2016 at 01:01 PM
The elegance of the Motorola 68000 architecture was breathtaking. Had it come out 6 months sooner, we would not have had to live with the ugly monstrosity that is the Intel x86 for the past 35 years (and for as far as the eyes can see).
Posted by: Al C. | Friday, 25 March 2016 at 03:39 PM
It would be interesting to know how the success rates of kickstarter photo books compares to more traditional ways of getting a book published. How many books are submitted to publishers that never make it.
Posted by: Julian | Friday, 25 March 2016 at 04:37 PM
Being one of those few people in the world who does not own any device that uses iOS no color for me. The book is not available for Windows or Kindle devices.
Oh well, I have no lack of good photo books to read thanks to your regular recommendations.
Posted by: Daniel Stevenson | Friday, 25 March 2016 at 04:38 PM
According to this Nik is probably dead for desktop users: http://www.pcworld.com/article/3048347/software/googles-high-end-nik-collection-photo-software-is-now-free-and-probably-dead.html
The writing was on the wall when Google bought it, supposedly to get at least one person on the planet to use G+.
Posted by: D. Hufford. | Friday, 25 March 2016 at 04:44 PM
What gets under my skin is the fine-tuned cynicism with which Google killed these very fine products. If they simply said they were discontinuing them, there'd be some indignation and impotent fist waving from the photographic community, blog posts would be written about how these large and evil corporations devour and spit out smaller innovative ventures, and anyone remotely interested would be hating on Google - at least until the next distraction came along.
But by the simple act of giving it away for free instead, they garner nothing but high-fives and 'thx for the heads-up - just installed!!' and 'awesome!' on every photographic forum online. Call them out, and you're just spoiling the party - because who doesn't love FREE?
When it's finally officially abandoned in 6 month's time, then the majority of users will be thinking it was free anyway, so what's the fuss. Those of us who paid hundreds of dollars and who use some parts of the collection as an integral part of our workflow will just have to hope it keeps working in the future, without any maintenance updates.
And while smartphones continue to eat the large camera corporations from underneath, the reason Google bought the company that owned Nik was to get hold of Snapseed - the mobile image-editing technology.
Posted by: mani | Friday, 25 March 2016 at 04:54 PM
I thought Canon and Nikon ended new product development some time ago.
Posted by: Ben Rosengart | Friday, 25 March 2016 at 05:06 PM
I wholesaler efex stays viable for a while. I'm yet to find it's equal in ease of use and quality but I'm open to suggestions.
Posted by: Steve D | Friday, 25 March 2016 at 07:31 PM
" Maybe orphaned software is the 21st century version of a discontinued but much loved and needed film or paper" ... come up to Rochester and I can guide you to Velox street. At least it's something.
Posted by: Earl Dunbar | Friday, 25 March 2016 at 09:09 PM
Oh, man, how I miss WriteNow. It was fast, clean and somehow had everything that I needed in its minimal footprint. Another bit of software that I miss is Ready, Set, Go. It was page layout software that, while more capable and complicated than WriteNow, was easy to understand and use. I would switch back to the pair of them in a heartbeat. I may as well show my age, I miss VisiCalc, too. Really, I do. The common thread is simplicity.
Posted by: John Seidel | Friday, 25 March 2016 at 09:23 PM
I agree with you Mike - WriteNow was the best word processor. Lean, functional, no extra overhead, no automated processes fighting you...
Posted by: Mike Kukulski | Friday, 25 March 2016 at 11:29 PM
Is photography really ephemeral now?
I had been a longtime user of Aperture. It was hard to accept that the glorified Apple could seemingly abandon it without conscience. Now I use Lightroom. Nik is also a product that I use. Adobe seem to be far more commercially obsessed with the idea of moving us all to subscriptions, which, over time, will extract far more money from us. If they push Lightroom this way, it will mean another move. Other than using film, which I occasionally do, how can we secure our photo base?
Posted by: Robert | Saturday, 26 March 2016 at 01:12 AM
Ah WriteNow. An absolute classic and totally agree with you Mike. It was the best! https://systemfolder.wordpress.com/2010/05/03/mac-classics-writenow/
Posted by: Curtis Brown | Saturday, 26 March 2016 at 01:28 AM
Kickstarter and self-pub services have totally changed the photobook landscape. The monograph from Aperture or whatever is no longer the only endpoint and to plenty of people it's not even an interesting one.
Social network, develop a following, kickstart your book, print on blurb. Buy books done the same way by like minded people, and send it goes. There's a whole ecosystem out there and lots of the usual suspects don't even seem to know it's happening.
This isn't a bad time for photobooks, is the best time ever, in a lot of ways.
Posted by: Andrew Molitor | Saturday, 26 March 2016 at 07:43 PM
Google has also abandoned it's Picasa desktop software and ended Picasa Web Album online, and says it has moved users photos to Google Photos online.
I have about 75,000 images organized by software that's no longer supported, and is no longer available for download in case the old copy gets corrupted.
My mistake, entrusting my pictures to what is basically a Search Engine/Money Sucking corporation rather than a photography company. Like Nikon. And it's Capture 4 and Capture NX software...
It used to be one thing to lose a favorite film stock or a paper like Agfa Portriga. But at least the scoundrels couldn't walk into your home and deface or randomly shuffle all your prints or smash your bookshelves. In the digital age, we are at the mercy of our corporate overlords.
Posted by: Alan Carmody | Saturday, 26 March 2016 at 09:34 PM
My personal experience of Nik software is that their tech support is very prompt and customer-led.
Late last year I had a problem with significant banding on Nik SilverFXPro files with specific settings. Within 12 hours I got a reply saying they were developing an update to address the problem. 3 days later the tech support guy phoned and patiently took me through a complicated update procedure resulting in a patch that worked. Three weeks later the public update came out which resolved the problem for everyone else as well.
Similar but different issue this year which was handled equally well.
Has this level of support dropped dramatically in recent weeks or is my experience an exception?
Posted by: Adrian | Sunday, 27 March 2016 at 05:24 PM
@Robert, I think you should welcome Adobe's move to a subscription model. It's the best way to ensure that the product stays in production for as long as you want it. It aligns their interests with yours, which is best for everybody.
Posted by: Ben Rosengart | Tuesday, 29 March 2016 at 12:14 AM