Ralph Kidding, of Kidding Camera Company, yesterday held a press conference to announce Kidding's new camera. We've removed all the interesting bits of his talk and just extracted clues to the technical specs of the new camera, because that's the only thing anybody is interested in. Here are some high points from Ralph's presentation. Warning—he's a kidder.
• The new camera will have an actual name rather than a hard-to-remember designation consisting of alphanumeric hash.
Kidding! It will be called the ZRZ-01.1X Mark I. That's to distinguish it from our Z-RX 011X Mark I, which is an entirely different camera, and the competitor's XRZ-01.1Z Mark I.
• Frame rate is only four frames per second, slow enough to require users to actually pay attention to what they're shooting and anticipate the optimum moment of exposure, but fast enough to be ready for the next shot.
Kidding! It shoots at 16 frames per second. Point it and hit it, you ought to get something.
• The camera is made larger than absolutely necessary because we thoughtfully studied optimal ergonomics for adult hands. It's designed to be comfortable and secure to hold and operate.
Kidding! We made it as small as possible, because we could. It's the size of a pack of cigarettes, and there's no place to hold it. You have to operate it holding it uncomfortably with your fingertips. But don't grab it the wrong way, because you'll be sure to hit a button by mistake and change a setting.
• There's just one autofocus point so you always know where it's focused, shown by a small rectangle in the viewfinder that changes from red to green to confirm focus. Switch the lens to manual focus and focus peaking comes on; half press the shutter and all the focusing aids disappear.
Kidding! There are 59 AF points that randomly light up, come off and on in delightful patterns, and never go away. Some of the 59 rectangles don't even correspond to focusing points, but they look good. Plus, we'll decide what our camera will focus on. It's our camera. Who do you think you are?
• However, it focuses securely even in very low light and locks on extremely quickly.
Kidding! The important thing is the top spec, for marketing purposes. You won't notice it isn't consistent until after you bought it, and by then, well, to be honest, we don't care.
• We kept the controls to a functional minimum, to enable operating the camera to become second nature.
Kidding! We loaded it with as many dials and buttons as possible. All of them do many different things, all are very complicated to set, and some of the controls even change functions spontaneously to remind you of what else they can do. Several buttons don't do anything but create pleasant noises and nice lights in the viewfinder!
• We kept the features to a minimum too. We build dedicated accessories that make our equipment configurable for different kinds of work.
Kidding! It's all about the shopping checklist. Whoever has more, wins. We load up on the features even if they work so poorly they're useless.
• The controls are designed to be silky smooth and pleasant to the touch, with a beautiful feel, and solid and durable for long-term consistency.
Kidding! We didn't even think of that.
• No video. If you build a boat, it's made to either be rowed, sailed, or propelled by an engine. No boat does all three well.
Kidding! Boats!?! We build cameras. We've got eighty guys at this company who don't even care if the camera does stills.
• Menus are for restaurants. Our camera can be hard-configured when connected to a computer, but the in-camera controls are minimal. For instance, there is no JPEG processing at all because we find that 99% of our customers process using standalone software.
Kidding! This baby has eighteen layers of menus, all denoted by enigmatic symbols, and none of the layers has options that all fit on one screen—they all have to be scrolled. Plus, we've used names for every function that are proprietary to our company alone. It's all right there in the 585-page manual.
• The viewfinder is critical to the photographer's interface with the world, so it's large, clear, and bright, and never obscured by informational overlays during the act of shooting.
Kidding! Viewfinders? [Sing-song voice] Af-ter-thought. There's all kinds of stuff you can put on there. We have nine different combinations of clutter for the viewfinder, all of them really cool and futurey-looking. As a joke, one of the viewfinder configurations makes it impossible to see anything through it at all. And one screen can't be gotten out of. You have to turn off the camera and turn it back on. No reason, we just thought that was funny.
• As a courtesy to loyal customers, we're not inflating the price on introduction so we can stimulate sales with deep discounts later, destroying the investment of early adopters. We've chosen one very fair price that we intend to stick to.
Kidding! Gouge, baby, gouge! Plus, we'll be replacing this in two years, clearing out the old model for pennies on the dollar. Our customers better be ready to live for the moment. Clock's ticking! Carpe diem, baby! It's all about the churn!
• Also as a courtesy to customers, we have designed the sensor and processor as a factory-replaceable module. Future upgrades might cost 60% of the cost of this camera, because the development cost of sensors and processors is a large part of the cost of a digital camera, but at least our customers won't have to replace bodies they're used to and expensive accessories they've collected that fit those bodies, nor get used to a whole new suite of controls. Our cameras are accordingly made not only to last, but to wear beautifully.
Kidding! That would be insane. Might as well take a hatchet to the neck of the goose that lays the golden eggs. Bodies are disposable. Want the latest sensor, you gotta pay us for the rest. Heck, half the time we change stuff just to change it, no other reason. Makes sense though, because in three years this thing will look old enough to enter college. We live in the disposable age. Get with the program.
• Because the sensor and processor is a module, it was easy to make the camera configurable out of the gate. You can choose one of three sensors based on your own needs. No more paying for more pixels than you want or having to buy different bodies for different purposes.
Kidding! One size fits all, all the toppings every time.
[And so forth.]
Thanks, Ralph. We look forward to the announcement of the ZRZ-01.1X Mark II, two years from now. In the meantime it will be great fun to speculate about all the things that might be different about it, and then argue about the speculations as if they were true, while we hugely exaggerate the very small flaws of the Mark I, half of which are only theoretical anyway. The Mark I ships as soon as you're all bored with talking about it.
Mike
Disclaimer: No commentary on any particular camera or company intended.
Original contents copyright 2016 by Michael C. Johnston and/or the bylined author. All Rights Reserved. Links in this post may be to our affiliates; sales through affiliate links may benefit this site.
(To see all the comments, click on the "Comments" link below.)
Featured Comments from:
adamct (partial comment): "Oh, but Kidding Camera Company did away with 585-page manuals a long time ago. Now there is a PDF, downloadable from the Kidding Camera Support website, that is 400 pages long, with the same 25 pages of content appearing in 16 different languages. The manual was originally drafted in Mullukmulluk, then translated (poorly) into the other 15 languages.
"The manual is incredibly useful. For example, when going through the menu system, you may be confronted with the choice of whether to set Elevated ASA Smoothing (Kidding's proprietary name for High ISO Noise Reduction) to High, Low, Off, Automatic or Variable. Confused by the Automatic and Variable options, how they differ, and what it is that causes them to change the degree of Elevated ASA Smoothing applied, you may wish to consult the manual. There you will learn that in the Elevated ASA Smoothing sub-menu, you have the choice of setting the camera to High, Low, Off, Automatic or Variable."
Hugh Smith: "Back in the day (does anyone actually know what that means, Ralph? Anyway...) Pop Photo ran their annual April Fool's issue and two stand out in my mind. The first was a Smashelblad wherein a tiny hammer smashed the 8x10 mirror. Thoughtfully, it came with a small broom for cleaning after every shot. The second was a 'Dark Bulb' for those who didn't have a darkroom. Simply screw the bulb in and, when turned on, the room went instantly black. Now the upturn to this is we actually had a customer come in and ask for it. When I told her it was a joke, she left in a huff mumbling something about my not keeping up with the times. Just mi dos pesos."
Ken: "Helloooo.... Is anybody there? Bueller? You forgot to provide the links to pre-order.... Kidding!"
Luke: "You left out the way the tripod mount blocks access to the card and battery. This is an important and common feature these days. Oh, and focus-by-wire with so much wired-in hysteresis that you cannot focus by rocking the focus ring. A Pana, Oly and Fuji specialty."
You may be (Ralph) Kidding, but that's the saddest story I've read all day.
Posted by: Joe Holmes | Thursday, 04 February 2016 at 07:28 AM
KA*
*kidding alert
Posted by: Richard Parkin | Thursday, 04 February 2016 at 07:42 AM
Thank you for the humor this morning! I can only hope and pray that this will be forwarded to engineers and executives at all of the camera companies!!
Posted by: Alan Smith | Thursday, 04 February 2016 at 07:47 AM
Nice try.
But always remember: Truth is stranger than fiction.
(I'm not laughing while saying this.)
Posted by: Mark | Thursday, 04 February 2016 at 07:51 AM
I'll take the No Kidding camera any day, thank you :-)
Oh, and speaking about camera naming - and German language, as we did yesterday - do you know how to count to ten in German ?? It goes like this:
3, 2, 1, 4, 5, 4.2, 6, 7, 8, 8.2, 9, 240.
Posted by: Soeren Engelbrecht | Thursday, 04 February 2016 at 08:07 AM
Brilliant - enjoyed that.
Posted by: Andy Munro | Thursday, 04 February 2016 at 08:09 AM
Oh I must quickly get three of them. One for each hand...I mean one for each shoulder and one around my neck, all with the famous Kidding 10-1000 f.7 super (in every way) zooms. The depth of field is so thin on those lenses that there is no focus plane at all! With all of them set up totally different I will be ready for any situation whenever I actually leave the house to take pictures. I can't wait to download test patterns to blow up to 200% and compare them to my photos of my bedroom wall. I know these cameras will make my cat pictures so much better. I may turn pro. I am ditching the Nikon D50 and the Canon 1DX II. They are so last week!
Posted by: Fred | Thursday, 04 February 2016 at 08:16 AM
And here I sit just hoping and praying the batteries in my 8x10 Deardorff don't die because I am not sure how I would replace them.
Posted by: Daniel | Thursday, 04 February 2016 at 08:23 AM
The lenses? Unless they get DxO marks in the stratosphere, what good is the camera?
Posted by: Daniel | Thursday, 04 February 2016 at 08:25 AM
You must be Kidding!
Posted by: Terence Morrissey | Thursday, 04 February 2016 at 08:35 AM
Spot on!
Posted by: Robert Billings | Thursday, 04 February 2016 at 09:05 AM
I can't quite put my finger on it, but something about the way you wrote this makes me think you were being ironic and possibly even sardonic.
Posted by: Gordon Lewis | Thursday, 04 February 2016 at 09:13 AM
You forgot to mention that one of the interchangeable sensors is Monochrome only.
Posted by: KeithB | Thursday, 04 February 2016 at 09:17 AM
Our new body will be backward-compatible with all previous lenses, included discontinued mounts. We know how much money you have invested in your glass.
Just kidding! We're introducing Mark II versions of all of our most expensive lenses. Each lens will have a minimum $800 increase over the Mark I version because they now feature hydro, olio, aero, and intelligence-phobic coatings. Each lens also features a new grouping of three elements which does nothing to the image but adds a totally cool set of letters and numbers to the lens name.
Posted by: Greg Boiarsky | Thursday, 04 February 2016 at 09:19 AM
"It's all right there in the 585-page manual."
Oh, but Kidding Camera Company did away with 585-page manuals a long time ago. Now there is a PDF, downloadable from the Kidding Camera Support website, that is 400 pages long, with the same 25 pages of content appearing in 16 different languages. The manual was originally drafted in Mullukmulluk, then translated (poorly) into the other 15 languages.
The manual is incredibly useful. For example, when going through the menu system, you may be confronted with the choice of whether to set Elevated ASA Smoothing (Kidding's proprietary name for High ISO Noise Reduction) to High, Low, Off, Automatic or Variable. Confused by the Automatic and Variable options, how they differ, and what it is that causes them to change the degree of Elevated ASA Smoothing applied, you may wish to consult the manual. There you will learn that in the Elevated ASA Smoothing sub-menu, you have the choice of setting the camera to High, Low, Off, Automatic or Variable.
Best regards,
Adam
P.S. On camera size: I often feel like cameras should either be as small as possible (I love my Panasonic GM-5...the ergonomics are surprisingly good, but when I buy a small camera I realize and accept that I am making ergonomic tradeoffs), or as big as is helpful. What it shouldn't be, in either case, is HEAVY. I don't care if a camera is the size of a Nikon D5 or the Canon equivalent, as long as it doesn't weigh as much as those cameras do. Back in the day, I used to use my Nikon FE-2 with a motor drive grip attached...but without any batteries installed, so the motor drive wasn't functional. The ergonomics were outstanding and the grip didn't weigh much of anything without batteries. Wouldn't you like to have a big, ergonomic camera with a truly large LCD on the back (2x current LCD size) and a big, beautiful viewfinder, that didn't weigh more than your current Olympus or Fuji cameras?
Posted by: adamct | Thursday, 04 February 2016 at 09:33 AM
I assumed that you were spoofing Sony (I seem to be sending them most of my SS checks), until you mentioned the 585 page manual. Sony cameras come with 5 page manuals which might as well say: "here it is, you figure it out!"
Posted by: Bill Mitchell | Thursday, 04 February 2016 at 09:51 AM
Cracking me up. Hilarious, and so true.
Posted by: Doug Thacker | Thursday, 04 February 2016 at 10:14 AM
DMD!
Just Kidding.
Posted by: Andrew Hughes | Thursday, 04 February 2016 at 10:18 AM
Mike, you forgot the Buy it Now link to B&S
Posted by: Mark Kinsman | Thursday, 04 February 2016 at 10:28 AM
Made me laugh. A couple of additional points from me:
1. We will provide a long-lasting battery with a precise battery meter so that the camera does not feel like an unreliable electronic appliance and does not die unexpectedly in the middle of your once-in-a-lifetime trip when you finally reach the place you've always wanted to photograph
Kidding!
- in fact we will keep making the body smaller without paying attention to battery size, so that the estimated battery life of the Mark IV.4.240b model will not be long enough to turn the camera on AND take a photo - you will only be able to do one or the other before the battery dies
2. Photography is a visual art. Acknowledging that we have devoted significant time and resource to developing accurate white balancing and metering - all provided automatically by the camera without using a ubiquitous "grey-card-o-meter-to-the-right" that every advanced amateur carries at all times.
Kidding!
- as any kid following Internet fora knows for certain, sharpness is the only criterion that is applied while judging contemporary photographs. There is also dynamic range, but only if you mean by that the option to "lift shadows by 23 stops" and produce "single shot HDR" effects that everybody wants. Digital photography has nothing to do with pleasant visual effect achieved with the help of your sensor/processing engine in camera - it's all about what we can do to the RAW files "in post". Actually, if you're not prepared to spend many additional hours in front of your computer manually correcting the images produced by our camera's automated systems, you're not a true photographer and clearly you do not understand automation.
3. Lenses are only good if they are comfortable to use and carry, and if they don't scare away your subject from a distance. We will develop a lens line that includes good quality, modestly fast, small size prime lenses with pleasant tactile controls (aperture ring, focus ring with mechanical stops and usable distance scale), that will actually last longer than the almost-obsolete-at-time-of-purchase camera body.
Kidding!
- it is obvious to all camera shoppers that lenses are only as good as their size suggests. We will produce random, incoherently designed zoom lenses with humongous maximum apertures, chart-topping sharpness stats and 25-axis stabilisers just for bragging rights. If they become too large to actually use, we will just make the online images of the lenses for B&H smaller. Once you buy and shoot test charts - you will surely be hooked. At least until you notice the back pain and your subjects shying away from the battleship-sized front element.
Posted by: JBo | Thursday, 04 February 2016 at 10:44 AM
A nice laugh but, as we all know, most successful humor is rooted in truth. This one hits close to home. So, which of the current camera companies' products come closest to the No Kidding camera? I nominate Fuji, whose cameras aren't perfect by any means. But I'll bet if Mike submitted his wish list to them, they'd take it under serious consideration.
Posted by: Steve Biro | Thursday, 04 February 2016 at 10:46 AM
While wildly exaggerated, there is much validity in these satirical comments.
Posted by: Wayne | Thursday, 04 February 2016 at 10:59 AM
Does the Kidding camera takes the new Sony FE G Master lenses?
Posted by: Paulo Bizarro | Thursday, 04 February 2016 at 11:08 AM
The 585 page manual is large enough to read.
Kidding... we put it on microfilm because we were unable to print a small enough font on paper.
Posted by: JimF | Thursday, 04 February 2016 at 11:09 AM
As your art commentary continues to imitate my life...
My wife, born in '85, graduated from the Corcoran recently...last one before the GM affiliation I believe. Miraculously turned that MFA degree into a great position on C St. [and they say it can't be done!]
I too traded in a 5DmkII and 1DmkIII on the 5DS. And like another reader promptly stopped doing much commercial work. Now use my small camera for 90% of shooting [Leica D-Lux Typ 109 in my case.]
And, all Kidding aside, I can barely hold on to the tiny thing! I put a grip on it, which greatly improved things. Still wish it had half the buttons.
I think a 3D scan and print of an M3 body with a well cut out for various compact models would be a fantastic project for someone. [give in to auto-focus and auto-ISO, cover up the LCD and buttons...just leave the aperture, shutter speed, and trigger available. wow.]
Thanks for the constantly relevant commentary. Wish I'd found your site years ago.
:)
Posted by: Chris Stump | Thursday, 04 February 2016 at 11:09 AM
Well--sailboats with auxiliary engines are the norm in many size ranges.
Posted by: dd-b | Thursday, 04 February 2016 at 11:14 AM
Not only is it a sensible size, we realise that digital technology frees us from having to design cameras shaped liked bricks (because there's no longer a need to push strips of film through them), actually considered how human hands work best, and designed the body and controls accordingly.
Posted by: Norm C | Thursday, 04 February 2016 at 11:36 AM
Heh heh heh.
Consider the 1970s MZ motorcycle, the TS250/1, aka The Supa 5. Most of them don't tickover. It's a 2 stroke and you have to add oil to the petrol, every time you fill up. It's ugly. It takes skill and practise to ride smoothly. The kickstart is on the left and you have to learn the starting technique. The front brake is poor.
But they are economical on petrol, robust and easy to maintain. I don't know about now, but when I rode them, nearly every spare was reasonably priced and often common across the range.
They were often bought by people who didn't choose a bike to impress others, but just for what it did. You are not treated as a mug by the manufacturers. It was quite common for MZs and their owners to be scorned by other riders who were being taken for a ride in more ways than one.
Other marques have owner's clubs. For MZ there's a rider's club, because it's about riding them, not just having them. I think they are great. I've had two.
Posted by: Roger Bradbury | Thursday, 04 February 2016 at 11:39 AM
I've read many good and excellent posts here. Sad to say, this was not one of them.
[But it was remarkable...by definition, since you remarked on it. --Mike]
Posted by: toto | Thursday, 04 February 2016 at 11:56 AM
April is 2 months away.😡👎
Posted by: Dennis | Thursday, 04 February 2016 at 11:57 AM
I'm ordering the Delux Plus (French accent, please,) which is not listed on the website and is only available to the rarefied select customers (none of you know who you are except me,) and has the two most crucial features not included in the plebeian release.
1 - The full manual (with the edition of 4 additional languages, including Urdu,) is printed and beautifully bound. It is pesonally delivered by an executive of UPS or FedEx, your choice.
2 - An additional and secret (DON'T tell anyone you heard this from me!) shooting mode has been added. Il s'appele Le moment décisif. This allows you to shoot just like HCB without even looking at the camera.
Voila!
Posted by: Earl Dunbar | Thursday, 04 February 2016 at 11:57 AM
Now the ALPA 12TC is a real joke.
Posted by: Dennis | Thursday, 04 February 2016 at 11:59 AM
Instant classic. It will join Great Photographers on the Internet in the Hall of Fame of internet photography articles. It currently only holds 2 articles, I believe.
I look forward to the third in 2026.
Posted by: Miserere | Thursday, 04 February 2016 at 12:15 PM
I can barely contain myself, waiting for the year of teaser videos to begin. Life becomes so... well... pointless without teaser videos!
Posted by: Jamie Pillers | Thursday, 04 February 2016 at 12:15 PM
The camera naming thing is just *killing* me! When Olympus came out with the original OM-D E-M5, everyone called it the "OMD" because, well, that's enough. I wish the camera companies would take a clue from automobiles. Can you imagine if Porsche came out with the "912"? (Ok, they did. But they figured out branding, even with numbers, in what -- 1976.) Apple also gets this right with their laptops and desktops, and *almost* fixed it for the iPad line, but then blew it. Here comes the iPhone 7!
Will Olympus come out with a Pen-F mark II in 18-20 months? Sure thing. That article about how Yoshihisa Maitani had to get the original Pen F manufactured elsewhere because the Olympus factory manager thought it was "too simple." "The accepted wisdom was that real cameras had to have lots of controls." No! Not lots of controls! The *right amount* of controls, well thought out.
Oh well.
Posted by: SF Murph | Thursday, 04 February 2016 at 12:18 PM
Over at the Kidding!Rumors site they are saying that the Firmware Update v.2.02.31.00.5 will include a 4K remastered edition of the Monty Python Ministry of Silly Walks. I can't wait
Posted by: Jim Richardson | Thursday, 04 February 2016 at 12:37 PM
Ha! Yes! Maybe this is the camera you hanker for:
http://theonlinephotographer.typepad.com/the_online_photographer/totally_completely_okay_t.html
Posted by: psmith | Thursday, 04 February 2016 at 01:23 PM
We will, of course, provide firmware updates introducing new features that can be supported by existing hardware, based on feedback from our users.
Kidding! If you suckers come up with some great ideas, we'll definitely make them available to you... in the Mk II, which is more or less the same camera but with some updated software.
Posted by: Christer | Thursday, 04 February 2016 at 02:09 PM
Thanks Mike! Funny and perfect antidote to the wailing banshees on others sites arguing about stuff like the merits of 50, 400 or a zillion focus points.
Posted by: David Cope | Thursday, 04 February 2016 at 03:57 PM
For a second I thought you wnere kidding but everthing is ,in fact, true.
Posted by: D. Hufford | Thursday, 04 February 2016 at 04:40 PM
So why is it that I visualize this guy when I'm reading that?
Posted by: hugh crawford | Thursday, 04 February 2016 at 05:43 PM
The Nikon Coolpix A has changed my mind about holding a camera by my fingertips: it works very well when the lens isn't long and the camera is well designed. The fact that the camera fits a coat pocket greatly increases the likelihood of me having it with me too.
Posted by: Oskar Ojala | Thursday, 04 February 2016 at 05:47 PM
Mike,
It seems to me that many of your ideas for an ideal camera can already be found in some older models. My Leica M8.2 only places the focus where I want it to, has essentially no distractions in a big clear viewfinder, sparse menus with few options, and simple controls that are a pleasure to use. It's drawbacks are poor high ISO and an ancient low res rear LCD. These shortcomings make me treat it as my "film" camera, with ISO 640 as the highest usable speed, and no ability to critically review images. With prices low for such an old model, it could even be considered relatively affordable these days.
I think as new updated camera models are introduced, feature creep leads them farther and farther away from their intended original concept. I moved on from a M 240 because of the frustrations that you outlined above.
Posted by: BDR | Thursday, 04 February 2016 at 08:15 PM
Had planty of customers over the years asking for a left handed camera, just like the many on the web (almost always dated April 1). Priceless, but a bit curley for new staff.
Posted by: Rod | Thursday, 04 February 2016 at 08:56 PM
"For convenience, some, most, or many settings will be reset each time the camera is turned off. Please reference your camera's specific firmware version as described in the manual."
Posted by: Scotto | Thursday, 04 February 2016 at 09:41 PM
Did you know that Ralph Kidding was a former marketing manager at Olympus? Kidding!! He's actually the current CEO.
Posted by: Arg | Friday, 05 February 2016 at 03:11 AM
You left out the way the tripod mount blocks access to the card and battery. This is an important and common feature these days.
Oh, and focus-by-wire with so much wired-in hysteresis that you cannot focus by rocking the focus ring. A Pana, Oly and Fuji specialty.
Posted by: Luke | Friday, 05 February 2016 at 05:49 AM
As it turns out, the 585 Kidding manual is horribly confusing, so everyone needs to wait until noted internet writer and Kidding camera expert Jhon Rogan puts his "Complete Guide to the Kidding ZRZ-01.1X Mark I" up on his website for download before actually using any of the advanced features.
Posted by: Nicholas Condon | Friday, 05 February 2016 at 08:18 AM
The following is an excerpt from a real manual:
"NR turns noise reduction on [...]. Hold ADJ to display the NR setting [...]. Use the [...] knob to tailor NR for the present [...] conditions. In general, the higher the number, the more aggressive the noise reduction. Settings F1-1 through F4-4 are recommended. F5-1 through F8-4 use a different algorithm, where the -x part of the setting indicates the degree of mix between the DSP-processed and unprocessed signals (-1 is about 50% processed, -4 is 100%). A small m appears to remind you that a Mixed setting is in effect, e.g. NRm F5-1."
That's it. There are essentially 32 different NR settings, and it's anybody's guess exactly what they all do. In fact, a small cottage industry has sprung up with one guy writing a massive manual to explain this manual. It involved a lot of reverse-engineering to figure out just how the thing worked.
Posted by: Dave New | Friday, 05 February 2016 at 11:25 AM
One more thing this camera should have:
Controls are positioned and operate consistenly from model to another. If you buy the 'pro' version and later get a consumer version for your spouse, they pretty much work in the same way for all the features they share.
Kidding! We move all the controls around along with where information is displayed. It's more fund to try and figure out where to adjust the ISO speed rather than actually adjust it.
Posted by: Josh | Friday, 05 February 2016 at 02:41 PM
"Had planty of customers over the years asking for a left handed camera, just like the many on the web (almost always dated April 1). Priceless, but a bit curley for new staff."
The first 35mm SLRs were left handed, with the shutter release and wind lever on the left side. Exactas and Exaktas were great cameras.
My Graflexes are left handed, Makinas were left handed, I used a left handed Linhof for a while, and some Rollies are pretty left handed.
I can't think of 21st century cameras that are left handed, and most are downright unusable by someone with a disability that prevents them from using their right hand. If I were a camera reviewer I would make a point of trying every camera left handed. It is one of the things Sony botched with their A7 grip, compared to CaNikon, where you can use the camera upside down with your left hand.
Posted by: hugh crawford | Saturday, 06 February 2016 at 02:03 AM
I half expected the jokes to come true, but no. They look odd these lefties even if they are budgy mock ups for a gag.
Posted by: Rod | Sunday, 07 February 2016 at 03:55 AM