The comedian John Mulaney has a bit in which he ridicules the emotional reticence of the Irish. “I'm Irish,” he says, “and Irish people, they don’t tell you a thing. Irish people keep it so bottled up. The plan with Irish people is, ‘I’ll keep all my emotions right here’”—he clutches the middle of his chest—“‘and then one day, I’ll die.’”
Which is good comedy, but also the fate of stories.
I like people, and I’m sad when they die, but I also fret about the wholesale death of stories. It's like the extinction of the birds. Almost all stories die. Or rather disappear, when the people who know them expire. It gets to me every time I pass an old age home or come across a nameless carte-de-visite portrait in an antique store. Everybody has a story, but some peoples’ stories are astounding. They disappear anyway.
Historians don’t help; historians just give us a sense of false security, like someone’s paying attention—you know, it happened, after all, so it won’t just be lost. We live our little lives thinking known things are just known. And yet you probably can’t even name your own great-grandparents. They’re that far forgotten to you. And you’re one of the few people by whom, to be fair, they really ought to be remembered. Never mind if something really intricate and astonishing and memorable happened to one or another of them. Each one of them lived a whole long rich life, replete with events and struggles and successes and failures, and all you probably know about them is that they all each had at least one child.
Almost all stories die. On the other hand, some bad ones never do; I’ve read the freakin’ Iliad three times. I’m like Charlie Brown kicking Lucy’s football with that book. For some reason I think finding a better translation is going to make it a better story. But they can translate that thing a hundred times and it’s never going to be as good a story as it was to people who truly believed the gods were in charge.
And that’s another thing about stories—sometimes even the people they happened to don’t know them, entirely. Because we can only understand with our own understandings. Homer thought that when it rained a lot it was because Poseidon was angry. Q.E.D., according to Homer. That was all he knew, that's how he explained storms that thwarted human will, so that’s all he could report: we can't put out to sea; Poseidon must have not wanted us to. If you really look into things, though, you'll find there’s always another dimension of a story left to discover.
Homer wasn’t much for coincidence. If Achilles got struck by a deadly arrow in the heel, well, it had to be because the goddess made his body invulnerable everywhere else, right? Legend has it that the arrow that killed Richard the Lionheart made so paltry a wound that the King plucked it out, cast it on the ground and kept walking. It wasn’t the gods that made the flesh wound turn gangrenous and, eventually, mortal. But the chroniclers of Richard’s time knew nothing of septicemia or the germ theory of disease. The teller of tales can only chronicle what he knows. We each of us can only track the paltry arrows of our own thoughts.
I'm sympathetic to Mulaney's Irish. It's sometimes better, as they say, to let sleeping dogs lie. (Is that an Irish expression?) When Keith Richards wrote his autobiography, he said he had to spend two years immersed in reliving his own life, and you got the impression that wasn't exactly easy. Still, I think everybody should write an autobiography. Otherwise, the stories that you know the best, the stories that are so important to you, will only go away, lost like a bird falling out of the sky.
Mike
"Open Mike," the whimsical editorial page of the always mutable TOP, appears only, but not always, on Sundays.
Original contents copyright 2015 by Michael C. Johnston and/or the bylined author. All Rights Reserved. Links in this post may be to our affiliates; sales through affiliate links may benefit this site.
(To see all the comments, click on the "Comments" link below.)
Featured Comments from:
a top reader: "Mike, I agree with you that everyone should write an autobiography. And regarding Keith Richards, I say that people with demons especially should write autobiographies.
"And when I say, 'write an autobiography' I actually mean, 'tell stories.' Storytelling is a powerful therapy. I've had my own troubles. My adolescence was dark, troubled, and deeply traumatic. For years I couldn't go out in crowds, I couldn't go to new places, I couldn't meet new people, I couldn't do new things. I could only live my routine. I could only sit with my back to a wall. I could only socialize with the people I knew. I could only eat at the restaurants I knew. I could only sleep in my own bed, with the door closed, the windows blacked out, and every source of light--down to the LED clock--extinguished. I still couldn't make it through a day without nightmares or a night without flashbacks.
"Even living my regimented routine—living the same day every day, no matter what—there were ghosts everywhere. Everything I heard was an echo of something darker. Everything I saw was reflection of the worst moments of my life.
"The thing I did was write. I wrote short fiction. I wrote long fiction. I wrote tall tales. I wrote short novels. I wrote critiques. I wrote histories. I wrote biographies. I wrote autobiographies.
"I told stories.
"From thirteen to twenty-five, I wrote three or four pages a night, five nights a week, and I rewrote it all on top of that. Doing the math—Courier New 10pt, single spaced, 1" margin, I come up with something like 16,000,000 words. I'll be the first to tell you that most of those words were garbage. I'm not a very imaginative story-teller and I'm not a very good writer, but I did it anyway. I wrote for myself, and for the most part, my audience was one. Sometimes it was two, occasionally it was three, and once or twice it became hundreds or thousands of people—but one was my target, and that was liberating in its own way. I could tell the same stories over and over again, picking away at little bits and pieces of my past. I could tell them in whatever form seemed best—sometimes my past came out as autobiography, sometimes as fiction, sometimes as dialogue, sometimes as poetry, sometimes as history, sometimes as simple chronology.
"Over the course of those 16,000,000 words I gave my ghosts names. I wrote down all those echoes. I described the reflections. I took the incomprehensible overwhelming mass of my trauma and...didn't exactly explain it, but I explored it, I explicated it, and I came to know it, to accept it, and to manage it.
"I still carry ghosts. I still hear echoes. I still see reflection. I still have bad nights. I still have bad days. I still have bad weeks. I've even had a few bad months recently. But the bad years are over, and have been for a long time. I can go new places. I can sit with my back to a crowd. I can sleep in strange beds. I credit that to story-telling. To autobiography. I recommend it highly."
Don Craig: "So here's a story about finding a story by finding an old luggage tag while mud-larking (sifting through the mud near the river banks at low tide) on the Thames in Greenwich. It takes the internet and some interested helpers to assemble the tale, but it's remarkable how much was retrieved from that luggage tag."
Carl Blesch: "The problem with the stories that my deceased family members told is that I didn't listen. Oh, I remember hearing some, but I was too full of my own life to want to really listen and prompt them to elaborate. Several times my father talked about how he used to spend his university summers working at Glacier National Park. But to this date, that's all I know. Why did he work there? How did he get the job? Who did he work with? What did he do? What did the workers do after hours? (Now there's a loaded question!) After he passed away, I found a leather-bound album of photos from those summers. Now I sure wish I'd listened.
"I've already started writing my stories for my children, knowing that they aren't interested now (and believe me, I can't blame them), but at some point in time, most likely after I'm gone, they may be."
One of the great privileges of being a physician is the opportunity it offers to meet all sorts of different people and (if you take the time to listen) hear their stories. This falls into two general categories: The first is shutting up long enough to let the patient tell you the story of their illness and how they have experienced it. When teaching a med student I always asked them to introduce themself to the patient, ask why the patient had come in and consciously make themself not ask another question but simply listen to the patient for 5 minutes before interjecting. This is very difficult for students, and doctors for that matter, to do--everyone feels they are under tremendous time pressure. Studies have shown that on average doctors interupt the patient in 13 seconds. However, if you do listen carefully the patient will frequently "tell you" in so many words what is wrong with them--lead you to the diagnosis. Sadly, due to time pressure and having to deal with computers in the exam room we are losing these stories. It's hard to point and click them into an electronic health record.
Secondly, I have taken care of many elderly folks over my 30 years of practice. Many of us tend to view old people as kind of a uniform type--we tend to largely ignore them in one way or another. However, they have all led long lives that have paralleled incredible historical events--and most have fascinating stories to tell. Early on I started noting their birthdate, and adding 10, 20, 30, 40 years to the date to place the phases of their life in historical context, and then I would ask them about it. One guy who was admitted from a nursing home had participated in the discovery and translation of the Dead Sea Scrolls. Most had fought in the war, or had other war or depression related personal stories. Years ago I took care of a very old lady with gray-blue hair. I deduced that she has been in her teens and 20's during the roaring 20's I asked her if she had been a flapper. She developed a twinkle in her eye, brought her hand up to her hair and said, "I sure was! I wore my hair in a bob. I still wear my hair short, you know!" and told me about gin soaked dance parties. These interactions always made my day.
Posted by: Steve Rosenblum | Sunday, 13 September 2015 at 02:00 PM
Read Rick Bragg. I'd start with "It's All Over But The Shoutin'" but his book of stories from the New York Times, "Somebody Told Me" is worth a read.
My favorite story teller, is and probably always will be, Charles Kurault, whose stories will probably last forever in some dusty CBS video vault.
Posted by: Bill Mitchell | Sunday, 13 September 2015 at 02:22 PM
Interesting Sunday OT. I am a huge fan of Storycorps: http://www.npr.org/series/4516989/storycorps
Posted by: Bob Rosinsky | Sunday, 13 September 2015 at 02:25 PM
Let sleeping dogs lie; especially if it is an Irish Setter.
Posted by: Herman | Sunday, 13 September 2015 at 02:30 PM
Yes, it's sad when stories die, just as it is when people die, but if this weren't the way of things there be no room on the planet for new people and no room in our collective memory for new stories.
Like sadness itself —and joy— it's part of the human condition.
Posted by: David Miller | Sunday, 13 September 2015 at 02:46 PM
It surprises me that you have not been able to enjoy the Iliad. It took me three times to realize that the book must be read with a certain rhythm. It is poetry, after all....Not a novel. Oddly enough, it may be the greatest existing example of the survival, through the ages, of the very thing you lament in this writing.
Posted by: Wayne | Sunday, 13 September 2015 at 03:54 PM
Funnily enough: http://www.theguardian.com/culture/2015/sep/12/michael-palin-diary
Posted by: Stephen | Sunday, 13 September 2015 at 04:42 PM
Regarding the 'Iliad', I read it twice. Not to try to make some sense of it, but because I felt I needed to keep my memory of that epic poem alive. (Well, at least it's supposed to be a poem, though for some reason the translation I read presented it in the form of prose.)
It's probably because I live in an old country that shares a Mediterranean tradition and history, but although I was 33 the first time I read 'Iliad', I was as marvelled as a child. It was so vivid, so grandiose! And the characters are so insightfully depicted in both their glory and vileness, with all their weaknesses and strengths. (Especially Hector and Achilles, of course.) It's all about how human beings behave under the testing conditions of war, which brings out their best and their worst. In that regard 'Iliad' is fascinating.
One aside is that I learned a lot about ancient Greece's costumes, down to the way they roasted meat and drunk their wine, which made for a very interesting read.
All in all it is an absolutely compelling read, much more so than 'Odyssey'. All European mediterranean countries have their epics: ancient Rome had 'Aeneid', and Portugal produced 'Os Lusíadas' (albeit some twenty-four centuries later). It's something of a collective celebration of our peoples' deeds. Is it true? Is it historically accurate? Certainly not. But it's wonderful nonetheless.
[I am always more moved by thoughtful praise than by careless disparagement, in this case by your take on the Iliad over my own. --Mike]
Posted by: Manuel | Sunday, 13 September 2015 at 05:11 PM
Just to support Don Craig's citation of http://spitalfieldslife.com/ which has wonderful stories. It is the only blog other than TOP that I read every day. Since TOP is really a dog blog ;-) I would recommend http://spitalfieldslife.com/2015/01/13/libby-halls-dogs-of-old-london/
Posted by: Richard Parkin | Sunday, 13 September 2015 at 05:24 PM
First this
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/09/10/t-magazine/1970s-new-york-history.html. Why Can’t We Stop Talking About New York in the Late 1970s?
And now this post. Perhaps I ought to get back to work on a couple projects.
Posted by: hugh crawford | Sunday, 13 September 2015 at 05:39 PM
Somewhat serendipitously, Monday's post on Signaland is about my great grandfather. It's the first in an intermittent series of photographs of artifacts that have been passed down, passed along, and passed on, losing their stories and pasts over the years, but acquiring the patina of history--that is to say, mystery:
Past Lives: Clyde Doley's Notebook
Posted by: James Sinks | Sunday, 13 September 2015 at 07:14 PM
It seems to me that the truth of events is lost as soon as they occur. What people remember and believe happened is almost always wrong or incomplete, just ask any crime investigator trying to make sense of witness statements. I suppose that is also a pseudo-Poseidon effect - we assume a lot and then remember it as truth, and base the next part of our factual-story on our fiction, because we have nothing else. The memories we live by may - or may not - be formed accidentally, but parts of them never happened. I suppose one could ponder Plato's cave, instead of re-reading Homer. . .
Posted by: Martin | Sunday, 13 September 2015 at 07:58 PM
I came to feel just that same aching sense of loss when I found myself in the midst of a long research project trying to trace the doings and feelings of those bearing a religious tradition further and further back, into the Nineteenth Century and beyond. The trail grew colder until it vanished. This was in Sri Lanka, where the written record is eaten by termites, or just molders away. We can never know.
Later I experienced that same pathos of distant loss in the disappearance of my own parents' stories.
But still later I came to think this pathos, which gripped me for years, was indulgent. What is born passes away. And there is enough more intimate and immediate grief to deal with.
Posted by: Michael | Sunday, 13 September 2015 at 08:06 PM
Perhaps you need to read the Iliad just one more time (go back to Lattimore's peerless transation, please). The story is about anger. Specifically, Achilles's anger towards Agamemnon. He gets so angry, that his anger destroys one of the only things he loves unambiguously, his cousin Patroclus.
The gods, I thought, were more like Hepburn and Tracy nattering away in the background.
It's a pretty good story.
Posted by: Ben Rothfeld | Sunday, 13 September 2015 at 08:07 PM
I wouldn't strictly call it off topic. Sit down with someone and their family photo album and wait for the stories that each one brings forth. I've learnt quite a few golden nuggets of family history from my otherwise reticent father this way. I'm even planning on doing my own (limited) pictorial autobiography using photos from the time of each story.
Posted by: Kefyn Moss | Sunday, 13 September 2015 at 08:35 PM
Autobiography? Isn't that what Facebook is for? I thought they were saving all my posts for my ancestors.
Posted by: Dave | Sunday, 13 September 2015 at 11:59 PM
I don't think you're approaching Homer right. For me, the pleasure of his stories is that society is so different—the customs are nearly incomprehensible in some ways—but people are very nearly the same.
It also helps to remember that this work was composed orally and written down later. I'm currently reading the Lombardo translation to my son. It's definitely different from reading it to myself.
Posted by: Ben Rosengart | Monday, 14 September 2015 at 12:49 AM
I treasure the snippets of stories told by my parents about themselves so now I try to do the same for my own children. I know they may not appear to be that interested but hope that after I'm gone they too will treasure their old mans ramblings.
Maybe.
I've also told the I want no polished eulogy at my funeral. Tell it like it was. He was a crabbed bad tempered old b*****d.
Posted by: Thomas Paul McCann | Monday, 14 September 2015 at 06:32 AM
If you want classical stories, try Herodotus rather than Homer. Much more fun and some of them are at least partially true.
Posted by: Alan Hill | Monday, 14 September 2015 at 07:08 AM
The Odyssey is much more interesting than the Iliad, but surprisingly the chapters about Odysseus travels are the least interesting (maybe except the cyclop episode). The Samuel Butler translation is very good for both (but better for the Iliad). He somehow keeps the poetic rhythm in his prose.
You can find it free on the net.
In Hebrew we were lucky to have a great poet do a masterpiece of translation to Homer.
Posted by: Yoram Nevo | Monday, 14 September 2015 at 09:25 AM
Great piece of writing, and it touched something deep inside me.
I have done some autobiographical writing, and it has been illuminating. However, for me, I came to see that writing was not the answer. My real autobiography is connected with how I FEEL, and how one feels cannot be put into words.
It's also connected with how I take photographs. I have to be in the moment, connected with the inside and the outside world, to take a photo that I end up keeping. It's a moment of consciousness and feeling translated (more or less) into a visual image.
Thanks for thoughtful piece.
Posted by: Mike | Monday, 14 September 2015 at 01:33 PM
Speaks to value of the mundane in photography as opposed to the rock star who shall remain unnamed. 😀😀
Posted by: Dennis | Thursday, 17 September 2015 at 03:01 PM
Regarding the Iliad, have you read Julian Jaynes' book, 'The Origin of Consciousness in the Breakdown of the Bicameral Mind'?
Or, from another side, Christopher Logue's 'War Music'?
Posted by: Ben | Friday, 18 September 2015 at 07:34 AM