See if you can wrap your head around this. Half tragic, half funny, and half absurd. (You see what I did there.)
In North Carolina (and I have to admit, this makes me shake my head about North Carolina—sorry, all you perfectly blameless North Carolinians), a teenage boy was found with nude pictures of a 16-year-old male on his phone. So he was prosecuted for sexually exploiting a minor.
Who was the minor? Himself. They were nude pictures of himself. Selfies, as we aging-out hipsters say now.
Mind you, this teenager did not post said pictures on the Internet. They were not available for public viewing. They were just on his own phone, apparently kept private as a personal matter between himself and his girlfriend, who is the same age and also shows up in several shots...and who was also prosecuted for exploiting her minor self.
The boy had to take a plea deal to avoid jail time and registration as a sex offender.
Oh, and about the "minor" bit? Sixteen is the age of consent in North Carolina. So neither of the two could have been charged with a crime for having actual sexual intercourse.
If that ain't cray-cray enough for ya, get this: the boy was charged as an adult. For sexually exploiting a minor. Even though when he took the picture (as the offender) of himself (as the victim), he was the same age as, well, himself. The trouble was, by the time the authorities discovered these (private) pictures on his (private) phone, he had turned 17.
So they had no choice.
Well, no, that has to be wrong. They did have a choice. The authorities could have thought about it for a minute or two and come to the conclusion that they themselves have mush for brains, and that they themselves should not be allowed to wield sharp implements or drive motor vehicles under the influence of their own richly evident inability to reason. They must have all been football players who took one too many shots to the head under the Friday night lights.
Sorry, I should stick to reporting.
But, you'll have to guess the race of the boy, I won't get in to that. (You can guess, though, can't you? Take a stab. And this isn't a rip against North Carolina in particular, but against the whole United States these days. We've been going backwards.)
The authorities in this case ought to be charged with malicious prosecution in my opinion. They themselves have done far more damage to these young people than the young people ever did to themselves. Is "causing completely pointless psychological distress to normal young people" a crime in North Carolina?
It clearly should be.
Mike
(Thanks to John Camp)
Original contents copyright 2015 by Michael C. Johnston and/or the bylined author. All Rights Reserved. Links in this post may be to our affiliates; sales through affiliate links may benefit this site.
(To see all the comments, click on the "Comments" link below.)
Featured Comments from:
michael Ryan: "I am often particularly filled with ire when I frequently see the meme 'if you haven't done anything wrong you have no need to worry' on social media in relation to recent loses of civil rights in western countries and rights to privacy. No one should ever have seen his private photos on his phone nor had the right to see them never mind prosecute him in this Kafkaesque manner for a non-crime. I'll be quoting this story in future as an example of why your rights matter next time somebody quotes that meaningless nonsense to me. I've alway told them that the it's one of those things—you'll never know why they're so important until it's too late."
Sometimes it seems like the main useful purpose of the internet is to call out and shame people in power for doing insane/stupid/greedy/cruel/small-minded things, so I'm happy to see you do your part.
Posted by: John Krumm | Tuesday, 22 September 2015 at 02:09 PM
Any of the mush-brained adults involved in prosecuting this boy should probably be similarly prosecuted for having viewed said child pornography. Zero tolerance being zero tolerance and all that... fair is fair, right?
Posted by: Kurt Triebe | Tuesday, 22 September 2015 at 02:33 PM
It seems there is an inexhaustible number of ways in which the world can make you sad.
Posted by: Patrick Dodds | Tuesday, 22 September 2015 at 02:34 PM
While I think the whole case is ridiculous, I completely object to your injection of race into this. As a native of North Carolina, this constant assumption that all southerners are all racists is getting really old. Spend some time here before you launch into unfounded accusations.
[Sorry Joseph. I didn't mean to specifically slam North Carolina on that count. Anywhere in America, that particular kid persecuted in that particular way would be black in my opinion. Just the way it is with us. --Mike]
Posted by: Joseph Brunjes | Tuesday, 22 September 2015 at 02:45 PM
This is crazy. How did we get here?
Posted by: martin Fennell | Tuesday, 22 September 2015 at 02:55 PM
Sometimes, when I hear stories like this, I just feel really disappointed in those we've entrusted to protect us, and in where a large part of popular sympathy seems to have moved in the last 30 years. I wonder how much of taxpayer money went into this "investigation" and "prosecution."
Posted by: cfw | Tuesday, 22 September 2015 at 03:01 PM
"We are charging you as an adult for having explicit photos of a minor - yourself". Somewhere Joseph Heller is laughing.
Posted by: Andrew McFaul | Tuesday, 22 September 2015 at 03:04 PM
While attending college in NC a friend would parody the state license plate motto from "First in Flight" to "First in Flight, Last in Civilization".
Posted by: Howard | Tuesday, 22 September 2015 at 03:21 PM
Seems like another example of "zero tolerance" madness. Kid has an aspirin at school...suspend him for drugs. Kid bites his pop tart into the shape of a pistol...expel his butt. Kid shows his teacher a clock he built...haul him away in handcuffs. Kid acts like a kid (heaven forbid!)...off with his head.
These days I wonder who shows the most maturity, the kids or the adults in charge.
Posted by: Dogman | Tuesday, 22 September 2015 at 03:21 PM
One more point--most of this zero tolerance nonsense has nothing to do with race. It's just lazy authority figures who don't have the backbone or intellect to make a judgement call.
Posted by: Dogman | Tuesday, 22 September 2015 at 03:27 PM
It's not unusual for public defenders to spend a total of... 7 minutes with their clients, the vast majority of which are urged to simply cop a plea. Guilt or innocence never figures into it:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=USkEzLuzmZ4
Posted by: Stan B. | Tuesday, 22 September 2015 at 03:34 PM
And people wonder why everything on my cellphone is encrypted and protected by a complex password! Jeez!
Posted by: Chas | Tuesday, 22 September 2015 at 03:36 PM
Similar case in the UK recently. Hammer to crack a walnut.
Posted by: Malcolm Myers | Tuesday, 22 September 2015 at 03:37 PM
Luckily he's not a Muslim or he'd have been in real trouble.
Sorry state of affairs in this country of ours.
Posted by: Greg | Tuesday, 22 September 2015 at 03:39 PM
The authorities in this case ought to be charged with malicious prosecution in my opinion
Charge themselves ?
That would make more sense than anything they've done so far.
Posted by: Nigel | Tuesday, 22 September 2015 at 03:51 PM
Rest assured Mike, incompetence is color-blind... the prosecutor, judge, and a third of the sheriff's office are persons of color.
Funny how some selective media outlets left that out and played the race card right off the bat... rather like the recent "inventor" who placed a Radio Shack radio into a briefcase.
Posted by: Frank | Tuesday, 22 September 2015 at 04:10 PM
Well said.
Posted by: Kenneth Voigt | Tuesday, 22 September 2015 at 04:13 PM
Are you sure this wasn't a story made up by Larry David?
Posted by: Manuel | Tuesday, 22 September 2015 at 04:20 PM
Good grief. Paranoia and stupidity rules in this case. I have a couple of teenage nephews, albeit here in England, and I worry about things like this happening to them.
Posted by: Roger Bradbury | Tuesday, 22 September 2015 at 04:25 PM
Last one out, please turn out the lights. We might as well return to the sea.
Posted by: Michael Matthews | Tuesday, 22 September 2015 at 04:36 PM
I just read an article about how innocent poor (mostly black) people are forced to accept plea deals just to avoid lengthy prison sentences. Many are jailed for minor misdemeanors simply because they cannot afford bail. When I saw "plea deal," first thing I thought of was skin color; his family probably couldn't afford a decent lawyer either.
What's next? Will they treat suicides as murders, and confiscate the killer's assets? Oh I shouldn't be giving them ideas.
Posted by: toto | Tuesday, 22 September 2015 at 04:51 PM
Its symptomatic of the dumbing down of America.
Posted by: Mark Kinsman | Tuesday, 22 September 2015 at 05:01 PM
A misguided group of fully grown human beings (let us not call them adults) is trying desperately to bootstrap a complete lack of common sense into an abrupt thought of some consequence. Why don't "they" deal with the real problems around us/them? I don't think any new problems need to be invented.
Posted by: Rick Wilcox | Tuesday, 22 September 2015 at 05:10 PM
That's why we call it the Excited States of America. It's the same absurd jump in logic that declares a shooter who shots at more than one person a "terrorist". Yup your story is right up there with the idiots who charged the nerdy kid with building a digital clock and bringing it to school. Whatever happened to good old fashioned level headed logical reasoning?
Posted by: Eric Rose | Tuesday, 22 September 2015 at 05:15 PM
This is edgy! I like......
Posted by: Clifford Gwinn | Tuesday, 22 September 2015 at 05:51 PM
Thank you very much for that, Mike. I think. I moved away from the States some time ago, and sometimes I get reports, like this one from North Carolina, that make the whole place seem like a madhouse driving itself ever madder, and not in a nice way. But then you, too, are a voice from the madhouse (if you'll pardon the compliment), so I relax a little: at least some of us have more brains than god gave a goose, as my mom used to say.
Posted by: Michael | Tuesday, 22 September 2015 at 05:57 PM
I hear ya Mike. I'd read about that before. Apparently reason and logic aren't taught in NC schools.
Posted by: James Bullard | Tuesday, 22 September 2015 at 06:24 PM
One becomes speechless.
Posted by: Bassman | Tuesday, 22 September 2015 at 06:24 PM
You mean they were colored photos?
Posted by: Herman | Tuesday, 22 September 2015 at 06:43 PM
I am often particularly filled with ire when I frequently see the meme "if you haven't done anything wrong you have no need to worry" on social media in relation to recent loses of civil rights in western countries and rights to privacy. No one should ever have seen his private photos on his pone nor had the right to see them never mind prosecute him in this Kafkaesque manner for a non crime. I'll be quoting this story in future as an example of why your rights matter next time somebody quotes that meaningless nonsense to me. I've alway told them that the it's one of those things – you'll never know why they're so important until it's too late.
Posted by: michael Ryan | Tuesday, 22 September 2015 at 06:53 PM
No Country For Old Men.
Posted by: 01af | Tuesday, 22 September 2015 at 06:58 PM
I don't believe this. It's a joke right? Your diversions into the characters of said officials hardly even scratched the surface of the moronic, irrational, mindless, ludicrous, brainless stupidity of it all. I'm still not convinced this isn't a joke. It has to be ...
Posted by: Kefyn Moss | Tuesday, 22 September 2015 at 07:01 PM
That is the most ridiculous story I have ever read on TOP. You made this up to entertain us, now didn't you?
Posted by: Darlene | Tuesday, 22 September 2015 at 07:23 PM
There's a certain party (guess which one) that wants government to closely monitor private sexual and reproductive choices. Environmental destruction, workplace safety, firearms--not so much.
Posted by: Richard Khanlian | Tuesday, 22 September 2015 at 08:07 PM
Well, since you made a point of it I suspect the race is Negro.
As if it made a difference. Here in NC many strange things occur. :) You might find you're your own grandpa.
We're not the only state with stupid laws, and idiotic police and prosecutors. If we included zero tolerance to stupidity, we'd all be in jail. LOL
Posted by: walt | Tuesday, 22 September 2015 at 08:35 PM
From Free Range Kids
A Grandma Reflects on Sex Offender Laws: “My Husband Would Have Gone to Jail”
I was just 16 when I met my husband of 21. Today, he would be considered a sex offender. I wonder what would have become of us if we had these laws back then. We have been successful, happily married for well over 40 years with children and grand-children. My grandfather is in a Hall of Fame, yet he married my grandmother while she was just 15, he being 20! People say, “Well that was different back then”. Really? I don’t believe that human behavior changes just because we are in a different century.
http://www.freerangekids.com/a-grandma-reflects-on-sex-offender-laws-my-husband-would-gone-to-jail/
Posted by: Speed | Tuesday, 22 September 2015 at 09:25 PM
From March, 2010 "Inconsistent Pleadings: Town of Sexting Teens Not Also Hotbed of Kiddie Porn" http://www.theawl.com/2010/03/inconsistent-pleadings-town-of-sexting-teens-not-also-hotbed-of-kiddie-porn
Are we turning our kids into criminals? We just may be, thanks to the laws equating “sexting” photos with child pornography." http://www.freerangekids.com/sext-or-kiddie-porn-who-decides/
Posted by: c.d.embrey | Tuesday, 22 September 2015 at 09:36 PM
I live in North Carolina,and we can be a bit backwards, but this kind of child abuse done by the police and prosecutors is just malicious. It could happen in any state, though. The role of the police, and sadly the role of government in general has shifted from serving the public to finding ways to harass and punish the public. The extent to which you are harassed and punished is inversely proportional to your net worth and your degrees of separation from being Caucasian.
Things like this are more common in the south because our elected officials are more likely to be religious and therefore are more likely to adopt zero tolerance policies against behavior that they themselves have zero tolerance for, even when that behavior is ubiquitous and "normal."
The educational and experiential level of citizens in the USA has been declining for years and everyone from police to elected officials is less educated and has less common sense.
We live in an increasingly unforgiving and uncaring society where we are all supposed to worry only about ourselves.
The officials that dealt with this situation should be locked up themselves for a long time. They should all be stripped of whatever power they have. They should all lose their jobs. But, none of that will happen. In a nation where we can't agree that torture is wrong and where the architects of torture go unpunished, can we really expect consequences for the likes of these officials?
For those who are not white and rich, we can expect more of this kind of thing.
Posted by: Edward Taylor | Tuesday, 22 September 2015 at 10:21 PM
I brought this story to Mike's attention because it involved photography, and seemed really stupid. But I was a newspaper reporter for 20 years and it's not nearly the weirdest thing that I've seen come out of the courts. Well, okay, it's probably in the top 10, but still...
I once did a long story about a guy who went to a biker bar with a friend, and got in a fight there, in which his friend shot and killed another biker. The prosecutor charged him with first degree murder (as an accomplice of the shooter) in an effort to get him to testify against his friend, and say that his friend had planned to go there and shoot this other guy. He refused, because he testified that that wasn't the truth, but he was convicted and given a life sentence. The guy who did the actual shooting pled self defense, and was acquitted of the murder charge. So the guy who didn't do the shooting served a full life term (which at the time in Minnesota, was 17 2/3 years with time off for good behavior) and the killer did no time at all. Makes you proud.
Posted by: John Camp | Tuesday, 22 September 2015 at 10:24 PM
would the last one out turn on the lights......
Posted by: gene | Tuesday, 22 September 2015 at 10:40 PM
Wow. I thought USA was part of the free world? Seems more like a story from North Korea to me.
Posted by: Svein-Frode | Wednesday, 23 September 2015 at 02:10 AM
It is the manifestation of "anarcho-tyranny"; an expression coined by Samuel T.Frances.
Criminals are condemned already to live on the fringes of society, and paradoxically it becomes therefore quite difficult to catch and punish them properly, by stark contrast ordinary citizens trying to lead good and quiet lives are easy prey to a state apparatus designed to instill obedience and submission. Being able to punish people for doing nothing wrong is the key feature of totalitarian regimes.
A manifestation of the inexorable creep of the tyranny of the state as it crashes against a constitution designed to protect the citizens.
As you rightly point out it has an additional nasty little twist in that it is frequently a symptom too of the simmering race war in the USA.
This broader anarcho-tyranny is a situation most strongly manifest by far in the USA, but likely to spread eventually to us all.
For those of us on the outside it's like driving past a road accident, horrible but fascinating.
Posted by: Craig Arnold | Wednesday, 23 September 2015 at 02:25 AM
It's an insult to western values of reason and enlightenment.
Posted by: Sean | Wednesday, 23 September 2015 at 04:11 AM
So we really do live in Wonko the Sane's asylum.
Posted by: Andrew Hughes | Wednesday, 23 September 2015 at 04:15 AM
As a European, I just fell of my chair while reading this!
Is this modern North America?
This looks like Early Mediaval Rural Primitive Wasteland, where people were burned for keeping a black cat...
Over here, people are more and more doubting the earnestness of the concept of the 'American Way Of Life' and the idea of America being the 'Promissed Land'...
Of course, all people and each country are entitled to their own opinions and morals...
Posted by: Philippe Debeerst | Wednesday, 23 September 2015 at 04:44 AM
I am not surprised by this, unfortunately. I live in a nearly neighboring state where an elected government official, who has had four marriages and a few kids in between some of those legally sanctioned unions, has become infamous by selectively refusing to issue and or sign marriage licenses that provide a pair of people certain legal rights to participate in the very institution that person has made a mockery of through her personal behavior.
She can do this, she says, because she has been "washed clean of her sins." Maybe she meant her "senses."
Posted by: Jack | Wednesday, 23 September 2015 at 05:29 AM
As police forces (globally) are given more powers, to you know, stop terrorism, those same laws are being misused as fishing expeditions to intimidate the general public. I have no idea where it will end, just that police states don't seem to last.
Posted by: Paul Van | Wednesday, 23 September 2015 at 06:50 AM
The Puritanism that plagues some states of the US seems to update itself, as time goes by, reaching this absurd. Unbelievable.
Posted by: Hélcio J. Tagliolatto | Wednesday, 23 September 2015 at 07:31 AM
Like I said before, High Noon in America. It's these kinds of things, one after another, that keep tugging at your sleeve, saying, "Pull your head out of the sand."
Just one more utterly absurd case that indicates, yet again, what an increasingly authoritarian society ours is becoming, and incipient totalitarianism. Even Kafka is shaking his head at this one. I mean, I hate to sound alarmist, but, uh . . . .
I do hope those kids can find some legal relief somewhere. The shame is not theirs, it's ours.
Posted by: Doug Thacker | Wednesday, 23 September 2015 at 08:24 AM
I had to read several accounts of this story to find out how the photographs were discovered in the first place. Apparently the cops were investigating a rape (or sexting) and decided to seize and search every kids' phone, without a warrant, of course.
Sounds like the fruit of the poisoned tree and the prosecution of a victimless non-crime raises some serious questions about local law enforcement and prosecutors and whether there was some other motive.
Without effective defense, this kid's case was cooked from the start.
(Sorry, I have to get back to downloading child-porn into my noisy neighbor's computer via WiFi before I call the cops.)
Posted by: Gabby Johnson | Wednesday, 23 September 2015 at 08:39 AM
What is with the USA and all this paranoia about sex? It's ok to let wackos buy automatic weapons in case, you know, the guvmint infringes on your rights or some such, but sex, no way, not allowed.
What are they putting in the water?
Some of my countrymen (Canadians) are extra extra careful about buying travel insurance when traveling to the US, for fear that the insurance company will try to get out of medical payments given the least excuse. But I'm equally worried about being caught up in some legal nightmare. Like having all my cash confiscated by the police, the way a street gang would do it.
Remember when we used to make fun of corruption in the so-called third world.
Posted by: Robert Roaldi | Wednesday, 23 September 2015 at 08:43 AM
I guess it's too late for my daughter who has posted pictures of my 2 year old granddaughter in the bath tub. I'll miss her. Oh boy, I better delete them from my phone too.
Posted by: JF | Wednesday, 23 September 2015 at 09:42 AM
One of the many things I would do if I had the resources necessary, is to fund a legal team to address this sort of idiocy. It would be so much fun to repay the "grown-ups" in this story for their bravery and due diligence.
Posted by: John Seidel | Wednesday, 23 September 2015 at 10:29 AM
Thank you, Frank, for this clarification:
"the prosecutor, judge, and a third of the sheriff's office are persons of color"
And you, Mike, knowing what "assume" makes of us, are usually more careful in both vetting and commenting on what you choose to report.
Posted by: McD | Wednesday, 23 September 2015 at 11:14 AM
A sad commentary on the politically correct paranoia that saturates many local governments. As well as the utter lack of intelligent evaluation or decision making. I have only one issue with it - the use of "cray". There has been a computer company named Cray since at least the '70s. They build what are called "supercomputers", the extremely fast, high performance machines needed for many tasks today. The least of which is more intelligent than the folk in NC who did this-even without the benefit of AI software. The company's name shouldn't be inadvertently associated with this stupidity.
Posted by: Richard Newman | Wednesday, 23 September 2015 at 11:20 AM
Well, as Charles Dickens said, " The law is an ass." And as Rosemary Leary (Tim's daughter) said, "The law sucks."
Posted by: PWL | Wednesday, 23 September 2015 at 12:31 PM
Whoa Mike! We don't know for sure the prosecutors were/are football players. Let's not start saying things like that until we check our facts.
Posted by: Jim Meeks | Wednesday, 23 September 2015 at 12:33 PM
Links to stories by legitimate news organizations or I'm calling Humbug on this one.
And I'm someone who is always trying to get people to notice how the levers of power are crushing people.
Posted by: Maggie Osterberg | Wednesday, 23 September 2015 at 01:03 PM
N.C. just prosecuted a teenage couple for making child porn — of themselves
Or from the local paper:Lawmaker: Child porn law misused against sexting teens, but tools needed to fight predators.
From the local paper's coverage:
October 2014
Sheriff’s Office investigates allegations of statutory rape involving a 14-year-old girl and a group of teen boys.
Late fall 2014
Investigators examine the phone of Cormega Copening, then age 16. They are looking for photos or video of the alleged sexual activity with the 14-year-old. Copening is not suspected of participating in the incident, but investigators thought someone might have sent him these images.
Instead of finding evidence of the alleged statutory rape, investigators find sexually explicit photos Copening made of himself and a sexually explicit image of his girlfriend, 16-year-old Brianna Denson.
Investigators examine Denson’s phone. They find the picture of her that was also on Copening’s phone.
February 2015
Copening arrested on five felony charges of sexual exploitation of a minor: four charges based on two photos he made of himself, one charge for the photo of Denson on his phone.
Denson arrested on two felony charges of sexual exploitation of a minor: one for making the photo for herself and one for having her photo in her possession.
July 21, 2015
In a plea bargain, Denson is sentenced to a year of probation on a misdemeanor charge of disseminating harmful material to minors. The final adjudication of the case is postponed a year.
Sept. 4, 2015
In a plea-bargain, Copening is sentenced to a year of probation on two misdemeanor charges of disseminating harmful material to minors. The final adjudication of the case is postponed a year.
July 21, 2016 and Sept. 2, 2016
Denson and Copening’s next court dates, respectively. If they comply with the terms of their probation, the misdemeanor charges will be dismissed. They will have no criminal convictions from this incident.
Then they can ask the state to expunge from the public court records the files of their arrests and charges.
Sources: Court records and the Cumberland County Sheriff’s Office
Posted by: Maggie Osterberg | Wednesday, 23 September 2015 at 01:09 PM
Wonder where I would have ended up as teenager if people in power had been so stupid then. As any normal kid, I was fascinated with anything that went bang and at a very young age was making explosives. All the ingredients for gunpowder were available then even in my small town. Myself and a few likeminded buddy's from 7th grade thought aspirin bottle bombs were a lot of fun and blowing up anthills even more so. Our whole gang of twelve year olds would probably hauled off as terrorists now.
Posted by: John robison | Wednesday, 23 September 2015 at 04:04 PM
States within the US are democracies aren't they? If these laws are what they want at the ballot box, then who are we to say that they are dim-witted pc-centric morons? It may be true (or not), but that is what the voters want apparently.
Posted by: Martin | Wednesday, 23 September 2015 at 04:29 PM
I assume that they charged his phone, too.
Posted by: Arg | Wednesday, 23 September 2015 at 05:36 PM
I wanted to comment, but then I thought, this is already absurd, so I won't. Da-Da.
Posted by: mbka | Thursday, 24 September 2015 at 06:17 PM
@ Craig Arnold: "Being able to punish people for doing nothing wrong is the key feature of totalitarian regimes."
Like me, Craig lives in England. The government here is frequently trying to introduce laws to let them look at everybody's communications. They say that this is to fight terrorism. Defenders of their efforts often say that if you've done nothing wrong, you have nothing to be afraid of.
Craig's phrase above is the answer to this reasoning. Though thinking about it, the defenders either cannot or will not accept this answer.
Then there's this."(A) dying culture invariably exhibits personal rudeness. Bad manners. Lack of consideration for others in minor matters. A loss of politeness, of gentle manners, is more significant than is a riot." Robert A. Heinlein.
Heinlein wrote a future history of mankind, one period of which was 'The Crazy Years' to which this refers. Science fiction is not meant to be prediction, but he happened to be right this time. I'm not just pointing the finger at the USA; it's here as well.
Posted by: Roger Bradbury | Friday, 25 September 2015 at 02:08 AM
Mike,
Reminds me a bit of this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k3jt5ibfRzw.
Except it's not funny, wholly real, and an indication of the pathetic poor standards of many in public life.
Posted by: Patch | Friday, 25 September 2015 at 08:39 AM
School District Bans Tag for Reasons of 'Emotional Safety'
The Mercer Island School District outside of Seattle has banned tag because it is too emotionally and physically dangerous for kids.
In fact, it has banned all games in which kids do not "keep their hands to themselves."
https://reason.com/blog/2015/09/25/school-district-bans-tag-for-reasons-of
Posted by: Speed | Friday, 25 September 2015 at 10:39 AM
Dear McD,
And where did Mike say they weren't? He ain't the one making assumptions.
And, not so by the way, you can have rampant institutional racism even when you have people of color in positions of authority.
Not an assumption, a sadly well-established fact.
pax / Ctein
Posted by: ctein | Saturday, 26 September 2015 at 05:14 PM
It's disappointing that you somehow connect invisible dots to imply that this episode was driven by race. The reality is, you don't have any factual information to support that implication, it's purely based on assumption. Racial grievance is very much in vogue today... sorry to see that you've jumped on that bandwagon.
Dale
Posted by: Dale | Sunday, 27 September 2015 at 12:37 AM