Funny. Yesterday's is the lead-in. Sorry, I dasn't reproduce 'em here, I could get in trubba.
Mike
(Thanks to Benjamin Marks)
Original contents copyright 2015 by Michael C. Johnston and/or the bylined author. All Rights Reserved. Links in this post may be to our affiliates; sales through affiliate links may benefit this site.
(To see all the comments, click on the "Comments" link below.)
Featured Comments from:
No featured comments yet—please check back soon!
Just one more moderately long post will make that Vanity Fair cover scroll out of sight. Please . . .
Posted by: Edd Fuller | Thursday, 18 June 2015 at 11:11 AM
Please post more frequently, Mike. It'll push that Jenner cover photo down the page to where I won't have to see it every time I visit TOP.
Posted by: Fairly Reasoner | Thursday, 18 June 2015 at 12:05 PM
I have a recollection of this discussion when 12 went to 18 went to 24 went to 36 and presumably 4 to 8 before that. Presumably in the chemical world the 4x5 users wonder about the point of 8x10.
I like the car analogy. I would think of it in Range Rover terms: extremely capable off-road but never taken off the asphalt.
I have one by the way and the IQ is brilliant. I often crop severely and all those pixels come in handy when you do that.
Posted by: Mahn England | Thursday, 18 June 2015 at 05:02 PM
Mike, I think you should come up with a car analogy for all the cameras you like to discuss. What's the Miata of cameras? What's the late-50s T-bird or the 68 Mustang fastback?
And, Edd Fuller -- yes, yes, yes. As I said elsewhere: I'm totally shocked and disgusted that Bruce Jenner decided to transform himself into...a 30-year-old.
Posted by: Joe Holmes | Thursday, 18 June 2015 at 09:04 PM