If I told you the most famous artwork in Japanese history is Hokusai's woodcut "The Great Wave," can you picture it in your mind?
Under the Wave off Kanagawa from Hokusai's Thirty-Six Views of Mount Fuji. Popularly known as "The Great Wave."
I found this article in The Wall Street Journal very interesting. Hokusai is having a moment, worldwide. Written by Ellen Gamerman.
Put me in mind of this finalist from our recent Keck Photo Contest:
By Ken Jensen, who gave me his permission to talk about it here. Ken's picture, simple on the surface, gave me more to look at than I would have guessed at first. Primarily about those two blues and the tan color of the beach, with those accents and edges of white, there's a pretty light in the print. It makes me sense movement—of the wave, the wind pushing spindrift off the wavetop and no doubt moving the clouds, The rivulet of tidal wash in front balances the second, grayer stria of clouds. Look at the modulation of lighter and darker colors within the wave, the way the spindrift accents the white foam on the water.
The print has a perfect degree of detail, fine but not fastidious. The white mass of the breaker at the right is echoed in the clouds, and of course prefigures what's about to become of the cresting blue wave. I like that little dark line of sand slurry at the edge of the water, which itself echoes the chunk of distant dark horizon on the left. The picture as a whole gives us a sense of "balancing imbalances."
The winning photograph in the contest is actually very similar, although also very different. Incidentally, Hokusai's print was made possible by "a color new to Japan—a vibrant Prussian blue created from synthetic dye in Germany."
Ken's print is prettier than the JPEG, if I may say. Thanks to Ken for sending his print (and the JPEG) and for letting me talk about it.
Mike
(Thanks to Ken Jensen and James Erlandson)
Original contents copyright 2015 by Michael C. Johnston and/or the bylined author. All Rights Reserved. Links in this post may be to our affiliates; sales through affiliate links may benefit this site.
(To see all the comments, click on the "Comments" link below.)
Featured Comments from:
Dennis: "Of course I pictured that image immediately! (In fact, I saw the first line containing ;most famous artwork in Japanese history' and pictured it before I saw the word 'wave'). The photograph is very nice, and I appreciate it more after reading your commentary. Nothing like these waves shot recently off Nantucket."
Mike replies: Amazing sights. I've never seen conditions like that.
Jochen Brueggemann: "I'm kind of bewildered by your perception of this photograph. In my humble opinion it's just an assembly: Light and color of the rather light foreground and the unlit background seem blatantly contradictory to me. Besides that, I appreciate your site very much."
Mike Cytrynowicz: "[Ken's photograph is] very beautiful indeed. Also, the dark blue sliver of ocean at left, anchoring everything else. To me, a Bill Jay/David Hurn image, well observed yet quite spontaneous. Also, the triad of more contrasty / more extreme value elements, ocean sliver, darker sand churn almost at center plus white foam at right—these three elements form a rhythm, not unlike the triangles of classical painting. My eyes are led to the white foam, then to the delicate wisps...."
Ken's photo was a little slow loading, and I had pretty much finished reading your description when it started coming up on my iPad. Truthfully I am afraid I was expecting another minimalist beach scene which are all to common these days.. Instead there it was, the dynamic power of the surf on a less that perfect day. Excellent indeed.
Posted by: Terry Letton | Thursday, 19 March 2015 at 01:14 PM
Mike,
Have you ever viewed David Baker's 'Sea Fever' series? I think you will like it!
Regards, Brian
Posted by: Brian | Thursday, 19 March 2015 at 02:00 PM
There is a modest little book of black & white photographs, made in Cornwall that cleverly echoes Hokusai’s Mount Fuji series. By Trevor Burston, the title is “36 Views of Saint Michael’s Mount”. The book's printing and layout are effective and tidy, though there are virtually no posted pictures from it.
Posted by: John Garrity | Thursday, 19 March 2015 at 05:55 PM
While an entirely different medium, the woodblock process has parallels with film photography. In order to create a print, the artisan must cut a different woodblock for each color. Every block thus contains only a small segment of the whole image, but in the end they must align perfectly or else the lines and colors will overflow into other sections. Furthermore, since the raw paper sometimes becomes the "white" sections, the carver has to be able to set those areas off by making them negative space in each block, and the grey sky in the Fuji print necessitated a delicate application of sumi-ink wash that went around the white to create that effect. This reminds of me the need in photography to get the bands in the light spectrum to overlay as we wish them to.
The printing process was done entirely by hand, one block at a time for each color, and so a mistake in the placement of the paper on the final block could ruin the work that went into the previous imprints for that sheet. The whole method involved the physical learning of a mechanical process, but when you see a master woodblock printer at work you see the synthesis of mind, body, and materials into one "flow." (The same applies to the craftspeople who make traditional paper umbrellas, embroidery, etc.)
The whole creation process itself can become an act of beauty, and I imagine we could say the same for printers like Adams or Ctein, or for any other master of their craft.
(On a related note, the Japanese like to talk about the "way of the samurai", but I think the "way of the craftsman" would be a better ideal to represent of Japan's cultural legacy.)
Posted by: Alex Vesey | Thursday, 19 March 2015 at 08:19 PM
Download a high-res (148 MB tiff) scan of The Great Wave from the US Library of Congress.
http://www.loc.gov/pictures/collection/jpd/item/2008660568/
Posted by: David Brown | Thursday, 19 March 2015 at 09:48 PM
Nice article, and nice photograph by Mr. Jensen.
I was at the MFA on Monday, and the wave is looming large there.
I also saw this:
http://www.mfa.org/collections/object/meditation-by-the-sea-32950
As well as a Gordon Parks exhibit, of photographs he made on returning to his hometown in 1950. It was on assignment for LIFE, but I guess the story never ran.
http://www.mfa.org/exhibitions/gordon-parks
Anyway, they had the catalog there, and it was fun to compare the Steidl printed book directly to the prints. The book held up pretty well. It was a good show, worth checking out for anyone in Boston.
Posted by: Ben | Thursday, 19 March 2015 at 10:17 PM
"...Hokusai's woodcut "The Great Wave," can you picture it in your mind?"
Well, yes I can, and it doesn't look like that. That one looks seriously faded, the blues muted, the colors of the boats almost gone, sky streaky, with cloud detail missing. Here's that "... vibrant Prussian blue ..."
I'm not saying you're wrong. You appear to have used the image from the WSJ, which is credited "Photo: Museum of Fine Arts, Boston", so I must assume it is a photo of their original.
As the Met exhibit runs concurrent with the MFA, theirs is a different copy, and indeed, it looks in better shape.
We almost certainly will miss the MFA, but as it happens, Carol's sister's 60th. birthday is in early Sept., so we will be in NY for the big "surprise" party while that exhibit is running. I may be able to see it in person (again, I believe, but it's been so long ...)
I do like Ken Jensen's image. It reminds me of many other waves, including a beautiful print from a friend on my wall.
It also reminds me of revelations about Monet and water I received from the show Monet in Normandy at the SF DeYoung Museum a few years ago. It was the first Monet show or book I'd seen that was arranged chronologically.
I was amazed to see the progression of his depiction of sea water. In early paintings, the water in harbors was flat and unconvincing. Then, suddenly, from one to the next, he had figured out how to create a realistic looking/feeling impression of the small waves of a harbor.
At least in this exhibit, which covered most of his active painting life, he never did figure out how to do incoming ocean waves convincingly. Obviously the curator was well aware of this, and included a single Corot of a wave breaking on a beach in golden light, to show how it's done.
Posted by: Moose | Friday, 20 March 2015 at 12:47 AM
Without a problem.
Posted by: Davd Boyce | Friday, 20 March 2015 at 01:24 AM
Woodblock printmaker David Bull is documenting on youtube the different steps of his own reproduction of the print. He has lots of interesting comments on this unique printing technique and the great wave itself.
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLK-Wicsj5rAasS2g7e-Z9eFUdG6I7ZqED
Posted by: Xavier | Friday, 20 March 2015 at 03:55 AM
Re: Jochen Brueggemann. You might be right, but I've encountered similar lighting conditions many times when shooting landscapes. All it takes is a small opening in the clouds for the sun and you can have an absurdly bright foreground combined with extra dark clouds behind. Adjusting for white waves or snow makes it even more of a contrast.
Posted by: John krumm | Friday, 20 March 2015 at 02:01 PM
"As well as a Gordon Parks exhibit, of photographs he made on returning to his hometown in 1950. It was on assignment for LIFE, but I guess the story never ran."
Oh good!, We may be in Boston before it closes.
Gordon Parks is one of those few who may be accurately called men of many parts or renaissance men. I was privileged to have dinner with, and sit next to, him after a talk he gave in Oakland many years ago. An unaffected, thoughtful and delightful person to talk with.
Posted by: Moose | Friday, 20 March 2015 at 06:18 PM
"Download a high-res (148 MB tiff) scan of The Great Wave from the US Library of Congress."
Thanks so much for that link! The colors, particularly in the boats, are much better than in the WSJ site.
The scan doesn't reach the top of the histogram. Whether a true reproduction of an original that doesn't get to pure white anywhere or a scanning artifact, pulling it up to the top makes it look a little more open and appealing to me.
No way to know what an original looked like when new.
Posted by: Moose | Friday, 20 March 2015 at 06:27 PM
"As well as a Gordon Parks exhibit, of photographs he made on returning to his hometown in 1950. It was on assignment for LIFE, but I guess the story never ran."
Oh good!, We may be in Boston before it closes.
Posted by: Gia Hoang | Monday, 23 March 2015 at 12:25 AM