All this talk of lighting makes me eager to do portraits again. Portrait photography was my only professional specialty. My breakthrough there came when a friend who owned a frame shop in Georgetown (a fashionable neighborhood of Washington D.C.) gave me a beautiful display space in her store. I hung fifteen portraits in the round room in the center of the store where she did her consultations for customers. Any of her customers who saw my work there would call me wanting work in just the style I happened to practice, which was a great boon.
In return, I'd leave the finished work at the frame shop for pickup—where of course it was only natural for people to go ahead and get their portrait framed.
I have very little of my "old" portrait work digitized, but here are a couple of examples I've showed here before:
My girlfriend S. has on her wall here a portrait of her son as a baby that I did for her 22 years ago. A straightforward naturalistic photographic style holds up well as the years go by.
I did many portraits by natural light and many by artificial light. My favorite artificial light was when I'd arrive at a client's house to find a room with white walls and a white ceiling—a single flash aimed up into the corner of the room made a beautiful three-way softbox that was also quite versatile, since the light would change depending on where you located the person.
Do you have a favorite portrait or portraitist? I'm not usually egocentric at all, but quite honestly my favorite portraitist is me. Maybe that's just because I can do work that exactly suits my taste, I don't know.
Mike
Original contents copyright 2015 by Michael C. Johnston and/or the bylined author. All Rights Reserved. Links in this post may be to our affiliates; sales through affiliate links may benefit this site.
(To see all the comments, click on the "Comments" link below.)
Featured Comments from:
No featured comments yet—please check back soon!
I think it is safe to say Mike, that most photographers like their own work best. That is partly because they do work to their own taste and partly that it is like their children, a piece of them.
Posted by: Jim Bullard | Friday, 27 March 2015 at 10:58 AM
Like the bottom image, love the top image, more?
Posted by: Wayne Pearson | Friday, 27 March 2015 at 11:01 AM
Mike, you are so right to be your own favorite portraitist. It is not ego, its what you like (not what you are like) I am my favorite portraitist of my grandchildren. But I do like David Bailey!
Posted by: James | Friday, 27 March 2015 at 11:18 AM
Rather than the usual suspects, here's some real worthwhiles, not so well known:
Jacques Sonck
Christophe Debon
Jonathan Auch
Russel Frederick
Dmitri Kasterine
Steven Hirsch
Robert Kalman
Jim Mortram
Roderick Henderson
Judith Jay Ross
Jean Francois Joly
Stephen Dupont
Michal Chelbin
Sarah Stolfe
Posted by: Stan B. | Friday, 27 March 2015 at 11:40 AM
https://www.flickr.com/photos/tomkaz/4550038540/in/photolist-mDDLFR-7W58Wm
I always liked this one I took of Margaret Holloway in New Haven Connecticut. She is know as The Shakespeare Lady. You can read about her here: www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1482639/posts
Avery interesting story.
Posted by: Tom K. | Friday, 27 March 2015 at 11:47 AM
I must say I am more in the formal portrait category and enjoy the likes of Yousef Karsh, or Irving Penn. Casual shots are nice, but don't evoke the sense of occasion I like in portraits.
Posted by: Alan | Friday, 27 March 2015 at 11:50 AM
This certainly doesn't hold for a formal portrait, but it wonderfully shows a typical posture of my twin daughters at pre-teen age:
Posted by: Markus Spring | Friday, 27 March 2015 at 12:08 PM
Paul Strand.
Posted by: Andrew Lamb | Friday, 27 March 2015 at 12:16 PM
Used an old OM 50 1.4 for this one (on a 4/3 Oly). My best portraits are usually family shots, and usually candids. Here my daughter concentrates on a book of Manga (or Banga) while I managed to get one good shot out of maybe six or seven attempts.
I'm not a portraitist, so for me this is a little like recording one good song on a guitar but likely not being able to play it again. But of course there's a big element to that for all us amateurs out here plucking away.
Posted by: John Krumm | Friday, 27 March 2015 at 12:19 PM
Like you, Mike, my favorite portraits are the ones I've made of people I've connected with and photographed. Does that make me my favorite portraitist?
I'm not sure. I love Bobby Grossman's work, mostly because he photographed my earliest music idols: Lou Reed, Debbie Harry, Talking Heads, Patti Smith, Robert Quine, etc... But it's a different kind of love than I have with my own portraits. Whereas my work is all about memories, Bobby's work is all about a window into a world that I couldn't experience directly, but knew through records and interviews and Bobby's photographs.
There's a deep emotional connection to both sets of photographs, but with Bobby's work, the photographs have to stand on their own.
So, I think I'd have to say that I've made my favorite portraits, but Bobby Grossman is my favorite portraitist.
And now, a few of my favorite portraits, along with a Bobby Grossman print in my living room:
Photo Of Lou Reed And Robert Quine By Bobby Grossman February 12, 2015
Dad, November, 2009
Dan in the Studio, August 26, 2012
Posted by: Maggie Osterberg | Friday, 27 March 2015 at 12:42 PM
Love good portraits! My results are somewhat variable, strangely :-). I have some very nice casual portraits going back almost to the beginning of my photo "career" (I think my first paid gig was to do at-home portraits of my 9th grade english teacher and her husband).
I think my favorite portraitist might be Lotte Meitner-Graf. I'm fortunate to have portraits of my father, his parents, and one of his siblings by her (my grandmother found her Old Bond Street studio in London). No shots of Richard Dyer-Bennet by her sadly. Her archive is getting digitized and a bit is visible at http://lottemeitnergraf.com but the biggest variety of examples seems to be at http://www.art.com/gallery/id--a773120/lotte-meitner-graf-posters.htm
Here's my father:

Posted by: David Dyer-Bennet | Friday, 27 March 2015 at 01:03 PM
I recognize these two photos from you review of the Contax Aria, which might be my favorite film camera I ever owned. It was just the right one for me, though I've certainly owned 'better' ones.
Posted by: Patrick Perez | Friday, 27 March 2015 at 01:37 PM
Bill Brandt and Sakiko Nomura are my favorite portraitists.
Brandt's "portrait" portraits are quite nice, but his nudes strike me as being some of the most beautiful people-pictures ever made. Stark. Strange. Unreal. Portraits of tone and line and body, rather than people.
Sakiko Nomura's color work on 8mm film (as in the amazingly gorgeous book Night Flight) is the polar opposite of Brandt. Grainy, soft, blurry, and a hedonistic revel in color and gloom. People become shadow-cloaked smears of orange and pink, or strangely abstracted patches of darkness and color. Wonderful, beautiful, fantastical stuff, particularly if you're only familiar with her rather pedestrian black and white work.
Pairing Bill Brand's Nudes: A New Perspective with Sakiko Nomura's Night Flight makes for a very satisfying visual experience. They're perfect complements.
I'm not much of a portraitist myself. I'm too wrapped up in my own peculiarities to consider what makes a portrait any different from an insect photo or a nocturnal landscape. I take pictures of people I know, and I like to think I do it well (though idiosyncratically--I would never try to compose or blur the table in the first picture out, for instance), but I don't have much luck with people I don't know.
Posted by: James Sinks | Friday, 27 March 2015 at 01:54 PM
Mike, bite your tongue, Using the entire room as a soft box is so anti-gearist. And it will also cut-down on your online sales 8-)
I don't do portraits, but this is technique works well for shooting large products. If the room has a large door you can put the subject in another room, for a great North-Light look.
I find it amazing, that with all the online-lighting-gurus, this is the first mention of this simple, but elegant, technique I've seen. Jus' sayin'.
Posted by: c.d.embrey | Friday, 27 March 2015 at 02:29 PM
My favourite portraitists hands down are Karsh, Hurrell and Halsman. Together they cover everything that drives me to shoot portraits - Karsh is classic elegance, Hurrell is Hollywood's glamour and Halsman is the slightly crazy spark of creativity.

If I were to pick my favourite portraits it would be the iconic portait of Audrey Hepburn in turtleneck by Karsh - this one:
for its elegant form and impeccable lighting
and the multiexposure/composite shot of Clint Eastwood as Harry Callahan by Halsman - this one:
for the perfect embodiment of Dirty Harry and his "Do you feel lucky" attitude.
I know having the most renowned artists as favourites is kinda boring, but I can't really help it - after all, they're the most renowned not without reason...
Posted by: marcin wuu | Friday, 27 March 2015 at 02:34 PM
Sally Mann is hands down my favourite portrait artist.
Posted by: Paul | Friday, 27 March 2015 at 03:20 PM
I would not call myself a portraitist. But even a broken clock is right twice a day.
My friend and fellow Olympus shooter, Mike Gordon:
Mike also used the Olympus 45/1.8 to catch me:
As I'd heard, that lens is excellent for portraits.
Posted by: Moose | Friday, 27 March 2015 at 03:36 PM
Both taken with the Zeiss 85 f2.8 if memory serves?
Posted by: Rod Thompson | Friday, 27 March 2015 at 04:02 PM
My loved ones usually aren't all that keen to have their picture taken but a good excuse is "I've just bought this camera / lens and I want to try it out, can I please take your picture?"
This has often worked and some of my favourite portraits are amongst the first shots I've taken with new kit.
Available light and casual pose is my style.
Posted by: Alan | Friday, 27 March 2015 at 05:07 PM
I love the style...natural!
Did you shoot these in the film days? What camera, film and lens did you prefer?
Please post more, they're very good.
Posted by: Clayton Ravsten | Friday, 27 March 2015 at 06:26 PM
Hard to pick a favourite, but I think Arnold Newman's portrait of Igor Stravinsky, 1946, would have to be it. Since I first saw this photo in the early 1970s I've never been able to forget it
http://arnoldnewman.com/content/portraits-0 (image 33)
Posted by: Lynn | Friday, 27 March 2015 at 07:33 PM
Jane Bown.
Posted by: Sergio Bartelsman | Friday, 27 March 2015 at 07:51 PM
I love to shoot portraits. It's the most challenging, and partly for that reason the most rewarding, of all the things I shoot.
But many of my favorite portraits are by Alec Soth. http://bit.ly/1yl3XhA
Just a few examples:
http://bit.ly/1967cmP
http://bit.ly/1NkLIBI
http://bit.ly/1xlCUHR
Posted by: Joe Holmes | Friday, 27 March 2015 at 07:59 PM
Back in the day, early 50's, my mother worked in the darkroom for a photographer in Oshkosh who did studio and wedding photography.
One day she brought me to work to show off her first born son and the owner Joe thought I was so cute that he used me for a model for his advertising and portfolio. I was only about three at the time.
Posted by: M JANNESS | Friday, 27 March 2015 at 08:02 PM
For highly dramatic portraits, its hard to beat Karsh. For "real world" portraits, no real favorite.
Posted by: Richard Newman | Friday, 27 March 2015 at 09:21 PM
Might sound obvious, but Arnold Newman, Edward Steichen, August Sander. They aren't in the canon for no reason.
Posted by: Bernd Reinhardt | Friday, 27 March 2015 at 10:30 PM
Back in the film days I did a lot of portrait work. This "Yamica Boy" was one of my favorites. Available light, Tri-X, Pentax 6x7 with 135mm lens.
Posted by: Clayton Jones | Friday, 27 March 2015 at 11:57 PM
Dan Winter's middle years were pretty great ... . .
Posted by: gary isaacs | Saturday, 28 March 2015 at 10:51 AM
Portrait using strobes.
Posted by: Louis McCullagh | Saturday, 28 March 2015 at 05:11 PM
Edward Steichen is the most interesting portraitist of all from what I've seen. His lighting is genius. The style of those shots is exquisite. But, yes I do like Jane Bown at the opposite end of the style range. And many of Cartier-Bresson's portraits are memorable.
Posted by: Richard G | Saturday, 28 March 2015 at 09:02 PM
[M]y favorite portraitist is me. Me too.
A 'head-and-shoulder' portrait of a female yellow-vented bulbul, perched outside our window.
Posted by: Sarge | Saturday, 28 March 2015 at 10:16 PM
Sieff
Avedon
Not me!
Posted by: Olivier Anthony | Sunday, 29 March 2015 at 07:48 AM
Here's one of my wife and daughter taken in 1983, with a Pentax SV and Super-takumar 55mm, on Kodakchrome. Diffuse light from a window was used.
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=17994774&size=lg
Posted by: Animesh Ray | Sunday, 29 March 2015 at 09:18 AM
Although some portraits are among my favorite images, as well as some portraitists, portraiture is oddly one of my least favorite forms of photography (just barely a click above scenic landscapes). I'd rather lick a razor blade lollipop than shoot a portrait.
Posted by: Kenneth Tanaka | Sunday, 29 March 2015 at 10:18 AM
Who doesn't like portraits? They are probably one of the two pillars of amateur photography, the other being landscapes.
My favourite portrait, and my most visited shot in Flickr by an order of magnitude, is this :
As for other photographers' work: my favourite portraits are probably anyone by Kirk Tuck with Renee in it. That lady is more than photogenic!
Posted by: Rodolfo Canet | Monday, 30 March 2015 at 06:25 AM
Like you, Mike, I'm going to say that I am my own favorite portraitist. And I don't think there's anything egocentric about it. It's just the simple fact that the resulting portraits are the end product of a collaboration between my subjects and myself. That personal aspect naturally makes me inclined to favor my own work. Take this shot of my Grandma, for instance:
https://www.flickr.com/photos/ghosstrider/11656099225
My grandmother is notorious for disliking having her picture taken. Results usually show that. I was thrilled that I was able to get this photo of her when I was home for Christmas two years ago. I'm not a professional and I don't even shoot a lot of portraits. Nevertheless, if I had to pick a favorite portrait, this probably gets the nod just because I knew what went into to it and it makes me happy every time I see it.
Posted by: Chris | Monday, 30 March 2015 at 07:15 AM
For me, I love portraits that capture a brief expression of who they are. A brief time where the smile isn't forced, the pose isn't perfect. But you capture a feeling, a mood.
This pic is of my son - distracted by his little brothers, annoyed by the scar on his nose, talking about his deceased mother. I have many pictures of him smiling - but this photo, this simple shot, captures what lies buried beneath.
I want to capture portraits of people as they are, not who they want to be.
Posted by: P | Wednesday, 01 April 2015 at 07:31 PM