So I found another Carl Zeiss lens hiding on the shelves. If you haven't been following along, we've been talking about Zeiss lenses because Saturday was Zeiss's 125th birthday as a camera lens manufacturer.
(And how about this theme shot. Who says I'm not good with color, huh?)
I took this portrait of the two Big Dogs with the Zeiss I found:
That's a Rolleiflex 6008AF and an original Pentax 67. The Rollei has a Schneider 80mm on it, and the 67 is sporting a 135mm ƒ/4 Super-Multi-Coated Macro-Takumar.
Here's the lens I used. It's a Contax/Yashica mount Zeiss T* 60mm ƒ/2.8 Makro-Planar "C" lens, on a C/Y to NEX adapter.
If you don't recall (or never knew), the Makro-C was a much smaller and usefully less expensive 1:2 version of Zeiss's 1:1 S-Makro Planar lens for Contax. These still go for around $500. I bought this one for more like $300, but that was before the age of mirrorless and adapters! They've gotten a new life now. The C (for compact) had exactly the same optics as the contemporaneous 60mm ƒ/2.8 S-Planar. No difference, not even the coatings. I got that directly from Zeiss.
The S-Planar weighs 20.2 ounces and the Makro Planar C weighs 9.2 ounces. That was one big difference. The C was an MM lens and was manufactured by Tomioka, the optical division of Kyocera, in Japan. Design and quality control specifications by Zeiss.
Now you're going to laugh, but get this: I shot the portrait of the Big Dogs under the overhead fluorescent fixture, and I couldn't get the "Rolleiflex" lettering on the front of the prism to light up for the camera...
...so I used the iPhone as a fill light!
Ha. If you look back at the shot of the big dogs, you'll notice it. Now that I've told you. (Of course if you're a tabletop guy you noticed it at first glance, but then how many tabletop guys are out there?)
Just having some fun in the office late on a Sunday night.
Mike
Original contents copyright 2015 by Michael C. Johnston and/or the bylined author. All Rights Reserved. Links in this post may be to our affiliates; sales through affiliate links may benefit this site.
(To see all the comments, click on the "Comments" link below.)
Featured Comments from:
JK: "That Makro-C is a classy little lens. Despite not being the world's biggest Zeiss fan, I've never been able to bring myself to sell mine. Its only weakness, for anyone hoping to use it for general photography, is that it's very much optimized for closer distances. Japanese Contax users have a saying: 'Infinity on the 60mm Zeiss Makro is three meters.'"
Andy F: "I bought a set of CY lenses early last year which includes the 60mm ƒ/2.8 S-Planar. Its a huge and heavy lens, I didn't realise there was a compact version, though I do have the 45mm pancake :-) ."
Eric Rose: "I've always lusted for one of those Rolleis. And finally a good use for an iPhone ;-) ."
Iñaki (partial comment): "By the way, it is very telling to see (pity you might not have the models there!) those 'medium format' cameras (contrary to sheet film or field cameras) against an SLR system or even a contemporary medium format digital camera. The Pentax, in my humble opinion, is a very telling story. Because there is nothing to compare it to, it seems of a 'reasonable' size. Only when compared to a APS-C or 35mm peer do I notice how big they are."
Mike replies: Ask and you shall receive: er, see:
This is all this LX is good for, as it is grievously wounded (i.e., it's busted). It's pleased to be able to serve and be useful once more, perhaps for the last time.
I prefer the theme shot in black and white (I like warm blacks)...
Posted by: Kefyn Moss | Monday, 23 March 2015 at 04:22 AM
I was sat in a bar last week using the torch on my wife's iPhone to light her whilst I shot her with my own 4s. Saw some bemused looking faces trying to figure out why I wasn't just using the flash on my own phone. Even if the torch is off camera, it's hardly flatteting light. It's definitely better suited to highlighting small details than lighting faces.
Posted by: Sean | Monday, 23 March 2015 at 04:40 AM
Ha. I love that your fill light is a camera. That just happens to be resting on another camera. I can relate to this all too well ;)
Posted by: Dan Rosenthal | Monday, 23 March 2015 at 04:43 AM
Yep,
Mobile phones and tablets are now extremely useful light sources for product photo, specially tablets with a white background, or image with full color, as a area light.
And,
got to give it to product naming responsibles:
Schneider 80mm
vs
Asahi-Pentax 135mm ƒ/4 Super-Multi-Coated Macro-Takumar
There you have quite a tongue-twister
Posted by: Iñaki | Monday, 23 March 2015 at 04:59 AM
...great you still have that one...I still wish I had my 25, 35, 85 Zeiss lenses from my C/Y system back in the 80's...
Posted by: Tom Kwas | Monday, 23 March 2015 at 07:33 AM
I once used a first gen iPad as a source of colored light on a Bristlecone pine at an elevation of 11,000 feet for a long exposure image at night. I sat the iPad on a small folding chair, used an app called Flashlight, chose the color, and it came out pretty good.
http://littleredtent.net/LRTblog/2013/07/27/bristlecone-and-star-trails/
Hello from the Missouri Ozarks! I just bought a house here, and am enjoying the sunrise over the lake. Hope you're doing well, Mike!
Posted by: Edie Howe | Monday, 23 March 2015 at 08:19 AM
The interesting thing that I've been noticing on tabletop shots such as this isn't so much the addition of the fill light, nor the shadow of the lens on the Rollei, but the change/addition of the color temperature across the scene. The fill is much cooler than the foreground, and the table in the left rear is obviously catching a bunch of a fluorescent in the kitchen.
That said, the color rendition of digital, especially in mixed light, is miles better than film ever was... so it's a bit of a moot point.
Nice cameras, by the way. I've always wanted to try the 6008.
Posted by: Jim in Denver | Monday, 23 March 2015 at 08:59 AM
Mike, you have some wonderful machines in your collection! That Rollei in particular would have me staying in the film era just on its own. (What am I saying? At my house, a Hasselblad 501CM, a Nikon F2, and FM3a ARE keeping me in the film era!)
I remember once that you said that you tend to regard your 'photography' and your ownership of 'cameras and lenses' as separate hobbies. Personally, I found that a very helpful point of view, as it can also apply to me, and otherwise I would need to admit that I had a disease and needed to get help.
Posted by: Peter Wright | Monday, 23 March 2015 at 09:28 AM
Don't you love the iPhone's flashlight? It has more or less replaced my giant, weapon-sized Maglite at home. And like you, I love it for emergency fill light. I used it to illuminate the front of this church during a long exposure:
https://www.flickr.com/photos/38416856@N04/14956361868
Posted by: emptyspaces | Monday, 23 March 2015 at 10:03 AM
There are starting to come out a new type of light: compact LED panels.
I have a couple biggish ones, panel: hand-sized. Bulky for a LED product, but wireless and give a ton of light, pretty soft.
Then I two tiny ones, a credit sized one and one even smaller. Sadly they use their charge pretty soon, and the bigger one only works with its own app. But they do give a bit softer light than a phonecamera flash.
I hope others will come soon, it should not be hard to make a really good one, considering the great power economy and the compactness of LeDs.
Posted by: Eolake | Monday, 23 March 2015 at 02:10 PM
I look at the Zeiss 21mm in Nikon mt, and then the 20mm Nikkor. I really don't care how optically superior the Zeiss is (which it undoubtedly is), or how much more well made it is (which it also is)- I ain't gonna lug that thing around on my FM3A or F3. My photos are gonna be a bit less sharp at the corners, but the rest of my body (and my back pocket) is gonna be a whole lot happier.
Posted by: Stan B. | Monday, 23 March 2015 at 02:52 PM
I'd rather have the camera and lens you've used as a rest for your iPhone. The combination of an E-M1 and Panasonic Leica 45mm f/2.8 macro lens is just sublime. The ability to take hand held sharp shots at macro distance still amazes me. On topic, the fixed Zeiss branded zooms on my RX10 and RX100M3 cameras are excellent.
Posted by: Dave Wilson | Monday, 23 March 2015 at 03:29 PM
By the way,
it is very telling to see [pity you might not have the models there!] those "medium format" cameras [contrary to sheet or field cameras] against a SLR system or even a contemporary medium format digital camera.
The pentax, imho, is a very telling story. Because there is nothing to compare it to, seems of a "reasonable size". Only when compared to a APSC or 35mm peer I do notices how big they are.
[I don´t have any background with Zeiss glass. The Zeiss Jena was good, but not quite there with the SMC peers, so didn´t pay too much attention. And the Cosina glass was not attractive, price wise, to make the investment, compared to the Cosina-Voightlander SL series].
Posted by: Iñaki | Monday, 23 March 2015 at 03:57 PM
Good to see that your E-M1 is still getting used ;)
Posted by: Kirk in PDX | Monday, 23 March 2015 at 07:41 PM
Man up and shoot the big dogs, instead of using them as props. It would go a long way to improve your street cred. You are quickly falling into iphoneographer territory.
[Been there and done that, Ed. I put in my 10-to-15 thousands of hours souping film and making prints, shot with everything from that Contessa to an 8x10 Deardorff and everything in between. Just came across a nice 6008 shot the other day (made with a loaner camera), from about 22 years ago. Times have changed. --Mike]
Posted by: Ed | Monday, 23 March 2015 at 09:17 PM
Last year I stopped into a used shop here in Japan that has all kinds of used stuff (musical instruments, computer gear, books, etc.). They also have a packed glass case with old camera gear so whenever I am in the neighborhood I check to see what they have. Last year they had a Yashica ML 55mm f2.8 macro (manual focus) with original front/rear caps and a Kenko 52mm skylight filter for $5. I looked it over and it was in really good shape so I bought it. Bought an m4/3 adaptor for about $10 and it mounts fine to my Olympus E-M5 and E-M10.
Posted by: Henry Richardson | Tuesday, 24 March 2015 at 12:00 AM
Would love to see the 6x7 next to the Nikon D800.
[Can't help you there. My former D800 has gone the way of all cameras and now resides in Hawaii, and many of the dollars spend on it are back snugly in my wallet. Alas. --Mike]
Posted by: Jim Simmons | Tuesday, 24 March 2015 at 01:54 AM
Given power consumption for normal use, if you use an iphone as a flashlight does it need charging twice a day?
Posted by: Jerry Lewis-Evans | Tuesday, 24 March 2015 at 03:49 AM
Sounds like you're fine keeping the LX as a non-working example of another time in SLR design. However, if you wanted to fix it, you could send it to Eric Hendrickson. He's a former Pentax service manager and does a wonderful job repairing any of the film cameras.
Posted by: Ned Bunnell | Tuesday, 24 March 2015 at 11:42 AM