[The bird picture is our current print sale print —Ed.]
It's not my usual thing. I don't make emotive, evocative photographs. My subject matter sometimes is awe-inspiring—total eclipses, space launches, aurorae—so I'm used to making photographs that elicit a "that is just so amazing" reaction. But they aren't deep.
That's fine. I'm not trying to be deep. If there's any message I'm trying consciously or unconsciously to convey in the assembled body of my work, it's "oh wow, look at that!" For me, that's a sufficiently profound artistic statement to make about the world, because the truth is that most people don't really look at the world. They see scenes in passing, they don't give them their full and undivided attention. The biggest compliment I can get about a photograph is when someone says (and they often do), "I never noticed that before" or "I never saw it that way before."
Then there's the photograph that TOP is selling this week. It's a whole different thing for me, maybe unique, certainly uncommon.
It didn't start out that way. DDB (David Dyer-Bennet, he of the Lincoln Memorial photograph) and I were walking back from a sushi lunch in St. Paul wending our way through the mazelike Habitrail that is the above-street walkways and parking ramps of downtown St. Paul. We were passing through one of those walkways. (I couldn't tell you which one—I've walked it dozens of times and it still confuses me. I only hope I never find the Minotaur.) There they were. Ghostly, dusty impressions of pigeons in the glass, backlit by the sun so they glowed against the shadowed buildings.
DDB and I are both strong believers in the dictum that the camera you have with you makes better photographs than the one you left at home; we were equipped. We both took out our cameras. We both went to work. It was a challenging subject, technically. I'll go into that tomorrow or Friday morning, when I discuss the making of this print. For now, I'll just leave it with saying that it was not easy to get a photograph I was happy with.
Consequently, I wasn't thinking hard about the emotional connotations of the scene. The information was all there in my head—I knew what produced impressions like this, I knew the likely fate of the bird, I had all the pertinent knowledge. My attention, though, was concentrated on capturing the light, the composition, the photographic qualities that would make it a photograph worth looking at.
When I pulled it up on the monitor in DDB's studio, it started to hit me. It knocked me in two conflicting directions. It was gorgeous, an ethereal vision of the spirit of flight, angel wings, the dove of peace, of transcendence. It was there in the pale icy soft-blue glow of the light on the dusty impression of feathers, set against the mundane hues of the background buildings. Unquestionably it was a beautiful photograph.
But, it was...awful. A record of a thoughtless, unnecessary death. What had created this beauty very likely killed the creature who created it. It was creepy and ghoulish, a morbid voyeurism.
And it keeps flipping back and forth in my brain. It's the emotional equivalent of the optical illusion that either looks like a vase or two profiles, the staircase that goes up and down at the same time. It delights me and it disturbs me at the same time. I can't separate the feelings.
Of course I had to do my best to concentrate that essence and distill it into a print. I wasn't sure what had worked on the screen would work on paper. It did, better than I had any reason to hope.
I am entirely uncomfortable with the photograph. Along with experimental curiosity, that's the reason why I've offered it for sale here in two different sizes. Some people will want to hang this on their wall. Some won't. Some will want it to have a dominant voice, some will want it to be a disquieting little whisper in the corner or in a box.
Me, for myself, I don't know. The photograph unsettles me. I'm okay with that.
Ctein
Original contents copyright 2014 by Ctein. All Rights Reserved. Links in this post may be to our affiliates; sales through affiliate links may benefit this site.
(To see all the comments, click on the "Comments" link below.)
Featured Comments from:
Mark Steigelman: "I can relate. I witnessed United Airlines flight 175 going into the South Tower of the World Trade Center. The thought of it makes me beyond sad, but at the moment of impact, before I even had time to think about what was happening, I was mesmerized by the beauty of the unfolding scene—the plane entered the tower like a sperm going into an egg and the sunlight shimmering glass explosion that followed. I went from awe to despair in a matter of seconds."
Over on duckrabbit, John Macpherson has posted When Worlds Collide.
http://www.duckrabbit.info/2014/10/when-worlds-collide/
A beautiful picture with a hopefully happy ending.
Posted by: FK | Wednesday, 29 October 2014 at 01:54 AM
It would be interesting to see also how DDB has interpreted the same scene. When I see many taking photographs in the same context, I often wonder how different can be the reaction of different people to the same "input".
Posted by: Marco | Wednesday, 29 October 2014 at 03:52 AM
I've found several similar images, the result of birds that mistook the sky reflected in my patio or door window for the flight path and I have yet to find any that resulted in the death of the bird who made the impression.
My guess is they lived to tell the tale. On the other hand, they did make a beautiful 'impression' and you made a beautiful photograph!
Posted by: Len Kowitz | Wednesday, 29 October 2014 at 06:18 AM
Kind of reminded me of the memory of this one from Arthur Fellig "WeeGee":
http://kottke.org/08/07/the-most-beautiful-suicide
Posted by: Bob Gary | Wednesday, 29 October 2014 at 08:58 AM
Correction: I thought the suicide pix was WeeGee's, given the usual nature of his work, but it actually was taken by Robert Wiles, a photography student who just happened to be across the street at the time.
Posted by: Bob Gary | Wednesday, 29 October 2014 at 09:03 AM
Ah, the wonderful skyways of Minneapolis and St Paul. For the uninitiated, the skyway system consists of enclosed paths that connect the closely spaced buildings within each downtown area. In January, the average low temperature is 7 degrees F (-14 C) so the skyway system enables the public to comfortably move between buildings without going outside. Skyway traffic is high during the day when it is packed with employees who work downtown, but there is still some nighttime activity for the theater and bar crowd.
Fun fact: You can always tell who works downtown and who doesn't, because the latter is always wearing a coat in the skyway while the former is unencumbered by any cold weather gear.
Posted by: HT | Wednesday, 29 October 2014 at 09:47 AM
To make you feel better, I live in a house with the big doors open most of the time. Woodpeckers and mourning doves fly in often and steal the cat food. When startled they fly out and often attempt to go through a closed window. Most of the time, they just fly away, often they are stunned and I revive them, but it is very rare for them to meet their demise.
Posted by: David Zivic | Wednesday, 29 October 2014 at 09:58 AM
Be of good cheer Ctein, the pigeon almost certainly survived. From the spread of the wing it looks as if the bird was slowing, possibly trying to land, when it struck the glass. Fatal window-strikes generally happen head-on and at full speed.
Pigeons are a tough bunch — they bounce.
Posted by: David Miller | Wednesday, 29 October 2014 at 10:17 AM
Like the photographs in Sally Mann's body of work called "What Remains", this is a disturbing photograph that brings thoughts about death and beauty, but not one that many people may want to hang on their wall. It will be interesting to see the response.
Posted by: Randy Cole | Wednesday, 29 October 2014 at 10:20 AM
For what it’s worth, I have experienced this kind of bird-collides-with-window event twice. The first time was in the mid-90s, when I was at work one day. I heard a thump and looked up to see the dusty impression of a pigeon on a nearby window. If I pressed my face to the glass and looked down I could see the pigeon there, alive but stunned. After a while it flew away, apparently unharmed. (Yay!)
(I did get a photo, but unfortunately I only had a point-and-shoot film camera with me, so the result is not great. Not focused on the impression: http://www.blork.org/mondaymorning/index.php?showimage=30)
The second time was a few years ago at home. My sweetie heard a thump on a second-floor patio door. We looked and saw a dazed, possibly dead, mourning dove on the balcony. Then a kestrel (I think) swooped down, picked up the mourning dove, and flew to a pole about 100 metres away. The kestrel pecked at the dove for a minute, then took flight again, flying straight towards us with the dove in its claws. As in “Yikes! He’s going to crash into the window!” towards us. At the last second the kestrel pulled up and flew over the house and away with its dinner.
I’m pretty sure the kestrel had actually forced the dove into our window (I read somewhere that this is a hunting tactic, to chase prey until it tires or crashes into something). But I have no idea why we got the spectacular post-mortem flyover.
Unfortunately the mourning dove left no appreciable impression on the glass.
Posted by: Ed Hawco | Wednesday, 29 October 2014 at 11:28 AM
This one survived:
https://www.flickr.com/photos/119534784@N05/sets/72157649021440191/
Posted by: Nick Cutler | Wednesday, 29 October 2014 at 01:23 PM
Many Thanks Ctein. You've answered a question about an image I have that's been driving me crazy for over two years. Everyone who's seen it loves it but it still leaves me conflicted. Now I know why.
Cheers
JW
Posted by: JCWilson | Wednesday, 29 October 2014 at 01:27 PM
David Miller beat me to it, as my thoughts were similar. Had it not become aware of the impending collision, it would've looked more like this one (that I also linked to in the original article):
https://lh4.googleusercontent.com/-OZQaPf9PXnQ/UdSoz9q8OtI/AAAAAAAAyHM/flOiG68h9-A/s1440/DSC_2280.jpg
And had it become aware earlier, or being going slower, you might have just had the likes of this:
https://lh4.googleusercontent.com/-vJrHxQhT8Zs/U90spMDSVPI/AAAAAAAA7U0/eAGmYIbrjg8/s1280/DSC_0637.jpg
Posted by: Dave Stewart | Wednesday, 29 October 2014 at 03:09 PM
Just because I can, this should be Google Street View looking at the skyway segment Ctein's photo was taken in (the print was on the glass you see in Street View, so the background in his photo is mostly behind us). They do apparently clean those windows occasionally, because I don't see any signs of bird prints on the glass in the Street View.
Marco, sorry, I don't seem to have any of my shots posted at my site.
Posted by: David Dyer-Bennet | Wednesday, 29 October 2014 at 03:25 PM
Dear Marco,
It might make an interesting topic for some future column, but this particular situation wouldn't be that interesting. DDB and I were highly constrained by the physical circumstances. If I decided to do a column like this, I'd go through our many joint photo trips with him and find better examples of our different visions.
pax \ Ctein
[ Please excuse any word-salad. MacSpeech in training! ]
======================================
-- Ctein's Online Gallery http://ctein.com
-- Digital Restorations http://photo-repair.com
======================================
Posted by: ctein | Wednesday, 29 October 2014 at 04:52 PM
I agree with David Miller. I have bird feeders in my side yard and birds frequently hit a window on that side of the house if something startles them and they attempt a sudden escape. It can happen several times a day. A couple of times a bird has fallen to the ground stunned but then flies off seconds later. Most simply bounce off, resume flying (albeit in a different direction) but over the years none have died as a result of colliding with my windows. I do occasionally see dead birds along the road when I am walking but that is the result of combined impact from both the speed of the bird and the car. Robins in particular have an unfortunate habit of swooping low in front of cars although they generally manage to avoid collisions at the last second.
Posted by: Jim Bullard | Wednesday, 29 October 2014 at 05:33 PM
I think I'd rather fly into a window than be a barnacle goose gosling. Check it out at: http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2014/10/28/barnacle-gosling-s-death-defying-cliff-dive.html
Posted by: Marshall Smith | Thursday, 30 October 2014 at 01:04 AM
Pigeons are not only a tough bunch, they are in fact flying survival systems.....check the pigeons at a railwaystation. They don't need to be pampered with consumer freindly walkways in -14 degrees, they will flock at a heated railway slip...and loose some toes or whole feet when they get cought when a train has to change track....and survive, breed 3 to 4 nests a year. Remember pigeons can track their pedigree to velociraptors and tyrannosaury and not to impertinants apes like us....
Greets, Ed.
Posted by: Ed | Saturday, 01 November 2014 at 02:51 AM
Dear Ed,
Heh. Oh, I know, I know! If you ever watched Elmo stalk prey (in his case, a soft drink can) you'd never doubt his reptilian origins–– there is the slow smooth approach and then the sudden lunge. And, the way he systematically deconstructs a chicken bone and scoops out the marrow argues against a placid vegetarian heritage.
Still, I'd feel awfully bad if I saw a velociraptor injured or killed, assuming (a) that I wasn't struck dumb with awe and (b) it wasn't attempting to make me its lunch.
pax \ Ctein
[ Please excuse any word-salad. MacSpeech in training! ]
======================================
-- Ctein's Online Gallery http://ctein.com
-- Digital Restorations http://photo-repair.com
======================================
Posted by: ctein | Monday, 03 November 2014 at 05:57 PM