"An elderly American woman approached a gentleman she didn't know and, holding out a cell phone, asked: 'Would you please take a selfie of my friend and I in front of this window?'"
Little did she know the gentleman was a distinguished linguist...but, fortunately, a kindly one.
Read the story at the Language Log. It might make you smile....
Mike
(Thanks to Keith Barkley)
Original contents copyright 2014 by Michael C. Johnston and/or the bylined author. All Rights Reserved. Links in this post may be to our affiliates; sales through affiliate links may benefit this site.
(To see all the comments, click on the "Comments" link below.)
Featured Comments from:
Ian P: "Wow! My favourite blog linking to my other favourite blog...."
If it was in front of a window, maybe the photographer/linguist got himself in the picture after all.
Posted by: Dennis | Thursday, 20 March 2014 at 10:59 PM
It did make me smile, though it was more at the distinguished linguist acknowledging that a living language trumps him.
Posted by: Bron | Thursday, 20 March 2014 at 11:00 PM
He should have been seething at the "I" rather than the correct "me."
Posted by: Robert Meier | Thursday, 20 March 2014 at 11:11 PM
I no longer find any of the internet language cute. All this was funny maybe ten-twelve years ago, but now it is just sad.
Posted by: emptyspaces | Thursday, 20 March 2014 at 11:16 PM
I think the clue here is 'elderly.' If she is anything like my Mom then just being able to TAKE a picture with her phone is a miracle in and of itself.
Seriously I think it was just the fact that taking a selfie with a cellphone can be a challenge for anyone. So for an elderly person it might not be possible at all and having someone take it for you is more like have a remote camera shutter release that just happens to be human.
Posted by: John Krill | Friday, 21 March 2014 at 12:36 AM
Those incoherent art directors will get you all the time. "in front of this window" should have been "with that window in the background"
It would have been a better joke with a distinguished semiotician.
Posted by: hugh crawford | Friday, 21 March 2014 at 04:04 AM
There is also the issue of whether the photographer is always the button pusher. Many arts such as sculpture and cinematography have got past that. So that the creative force in the equation can delegate some of the mechanical tasks and still call the end result theirs. In which case a selfie is still a selfie even if someone else pushes the button as long as the idea and creative direction comes from someone in the frame.
Posted by: Nicolas | Friday, 21 March 2014 at 04:07 AM
I'm seething at the suggestion of a "candy store" in Peebles, can only assume the writer meant "sweet shop".
Posted by: RobinP | Friday, 21 March 2014 at 04:51 AM
How much artistic control would she have had to assume so that the photo would have become a self portrait even though she did not press the button?
Posted by: Carsten S | Friday, 21 March 2014 at 07:43 AM
Is it a selfie if someone else takes it?
Posted by: Peter Gilbert | Friday, 21 March 2014 at 08:35 AM
And as a distinguished linguist and a gentleman as well as a gentle man (as stated in the article), he understood that language comes from living humans and not from a book of rules originally based on Latin grammar warped into quasi fitting English. Fortunately, she did not make that request on the Internut, or she'd a been eaten alive.
Posted by: D. Hufford. | Friday, 21 March 2014 at 09:39 AM
What if the lady in question thought a selfie was a "cell-fie", as in a photo taken with a cell phone?
Seems a possibility considering she was American.
Posted by: Stuart | Friday, 21 March 2014 at 09:47 AM
Unfortunately one of the accomplishments of generations of English teachers is to train so many people to use "I" instead of "me" as paired objects, even though they know better in the singular. A little fear goes a long way.
But I like the idea of "take my selfie." Reminds me of a Tim Fite song...
Posted by: John Krumm | Friday, 21 March 2014 at 01:33 PM
The current magazine section of the german weekly newspaper "Die Zeit" has a small note on "Shelfies", defined as photos people take of their bookshelves. We TOP readers have more shelfies than selfies - don‘t we?
Posted by: Christer | Friday, 21 March 2014 at 01:34 PM
Reminds me of an old joke
Q: When is a photobooth picture not a self portrait?
A: When Andy (Warhol) puts the quarter in.
Posted by: hugh crawford | Friday, 21 March 2014 at 03:12 PM
The linguist had no reason to seethe, at least not for the use of the word "selfie". The woman after all simply took a picture of herself. She just didn't push the button.
Posted by: Kostas | Friday, 21 March 2014 at 04:26 PM
The word “song” has been similarly redefined. I blame MP3 players and their calling of any single track of music a “song” for driving in the final nail of that coffin.
Posted by: Andre Y | Friday, 21 March 2014 at 06:07 PM
Linguists study language as it is. Grammarians whack you in the chops with a ruler if you don't speak as they wish. This is my friends and I's understanding anyway.
Posted by: Dave Sailer | Friday, 21 March 2014 at 06:23 PM
Cellphie is my new favorite egg-corn.
Posted by: Joe S. | Saturday, 22 March 2014 at 04:14 AM
A clear distinction needs to be made.
A "Selfie" is pretty clearly a photo of ones self taken by ones self, very typically with one's cellphone. A photo of anything other than one's self taken with the same device is not a "Selfie".
What the kindly linguist was asked to do, and did, was to take, I suggest, a "Posey".
While on the surface this sounds like taking a posed photo, quick reference to a good dictionary reveals that spelled like this - Posy - the word refers to a small bouquet of flowers. Or, a group assembled to please.
Spelled this way -Posey - the reference is to an attempt with another intention altogether.
"Posey" means "affected and attempting to impress others".
Come to think of it, that definition would also fit many "Selfies".
But, I think that "Posy" or "Posey" would make an apt category up alongside "Selfie" as the next new photographic buzzword.
Posted by: Mark K Lough | Sunday, 23 March 2014 at 11:36 AM