I'm having trouble finding a musical term. Is there a word for it when you sing or play two melodies, and each one works alone but you can also sing them both at the same time and they work together? I'm not talking about a "round" where you play the exact same melody but with a delay.
TIA,
Mike
The general term would be counterpoint.
Posted by: Øyvind Hansen | Saturday, 17 August 2013 at 12:34 PM
Counterpoint.
Posted by: almostinfocus | Saturday, 17 August 2013 at 12:35 PM
Polyphony? Harmony? Duet?
Posted by: Will Duquette | Saturday, 17 August 2013 at 12:36 PM
Mike, are you thinking of counterpoint?
-John
Posted by: John King | Saturday, 17 August 2013 at 12:45 PM
Mike, is polyphony the word you're looking for?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polyphony
Posted by: Hans Muus | Saturday, 17 August 2013 at 12:46 PM
Hi, Mike. Biphonic says this web page.
Posted by: John Seidel | Saturday, 17 August 2013 at 12:47 PM
I think it might be polyphony
Posted by: Lesley | Saturday, 17 August 2013 at 12:49 PM
Contrapunt
Posted by: Johan | Saturday, 17 August 2013 at 12:50 PM
1. Put this into the big G search engine:
two melodies sung at same time
2. Decide whether polyphony is your thought.
Posted by: Charles | Saturday, 17 August 2013 at 12:51 PM
"Round" is canon
Posted by: Johan | Saturday, 17 August 2013 at 12:51 PM
Mike, one more http://www.potsdam.edu/academics/Crane/MusicTheory/Musical-Terms-and-Concepts.cfm
http://piano.about.com/od/musicaltermsa1/g/GL_texture.htm
I may have forgotten the link the first time, so here are two links to explore. Polyphonic or Biphonic?
John
Posted by: John Seidel | Saturday, 17 August 2013 at 12:52 PM
Point counter point (Kontrapunkt, if you prefer it in German)
Posted by: Valerij Tomarenko (@En_De_Ru) | Saturday, 17 August 2013 at 12:52 PM
Counterpoint.
Posted by: Peter Klein | Saturday, 17 August 2013 at 12:55 PM
Counterpoint
Posted by: marcvezina | Saturday, 17 August 2013 at 12:59 PM
Perhaps you're talking of a fugue, it may be of two, three or more voices...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fugue
Posted by: Marco Maroccolo | Saturday, 17 August 2013 at 01:01 PM
counterpoint?
Posted by: Jonas Yip | Saturday, 17 August 2013 at 01:02 PM
harmonies perhaps?
Posted by: rob | Saturday, 17 August 2013 at 01:04 PM
Hi Mike,
Polyphony...
"In music, polyphony is a texture consisting of two or more simultaneous lines of independent melody, as opposed to music with just one voice (monophony) or music with one dominant melodic voice accompanied by chords (homophony)."
Posted by: William Schneider | Saturday, 17 August 2013 at 01:06 PM
Were you referring to counterpoint?
Posted by: toto | Saturday, 17 August 2013 at 01:07 PM
Polyphony. Polytextual.
Posted by: bsrb | Saturday, 17 August 2013 at 01:10 PM
Interpolation? I could be wrong.
Posted by: Edie Howe | Saturday, 17 August 2013 at 01:10 PM
Partner Song as per:
http://scetv.org/education/emedia/guides/miasmusic.pdf
Perhaps there's a more technical term you're looking for?
Posted by: Ken Rahaim | Saturday, 17 August 2013 at 01:11 PM
Counterpoint.
Posted by: Dave in NM | Saturday, 17 August 2013 at 01:12 PM
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interpolation_%28music%29
Yep, I was wrong. But I bet Charles Cramer would know.
Posted by: Edie Howe | Saturday, 17 August 2013 at 01:12 PM
Could you be looking for the counterpoint?
Posted by: Karol | Saturday, 17 August 2013 at 01:13 PM
Polyphony?
Posted by: Jeff | Saturday, 17 August 2013 at 01:15 PM
Are you searching for "counterpoint"?
Posted by: David Miller | Saturday, 17 August 2013 at 01:16 PM
How about " Rhythm Sync "...
Posted by: Glenn C. Riffey | Saturday, 17 August 2013 at 01:18 PM
"Counterpoint" is the closest that I can think of, although as with "descant" the two tunes are not usually heard apart.
I can think of one brilliant example of this idea, from JS Bach's "Art of the Fugue" - "Canon in Hypodiapason". Two quite long, related but varying tunes are first played through separately, in sequence... both of them rather spiky and odd. Then they are combined, in a most satisfying way.
(It's not the familiar kind of canon, because there are multiple tunes commencing at the same time; instead of mutiple copies of one tune commencing at different times.)
Posted by: richardplondon | Saturday, 17 August 2013 at 01:18 PM
I hesitate to suggest anything so simple, but I would think "harmony" should do it. Or "counterpoint", if the relation between the two melodies is more complex.
Posted by: JL | Saturday, 17 August 2013 at 01:25 PM
Two or more concurrent melodies or themes are often called counterpoint -- J.S. Bach being the undisputed master of this idiom. I suppose a round might be called proto-counterpoint.
As you'd expect counterpoint has its own thick and tangled weeds -- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Counterpoint -- which seem to exist to torment the student of music, composition in particular.
Posted by: Ed Nixon | Saturday, 17 August 2013 at 01:26 PM
Sorta counterpoint but you don't generally sing the melodies alone. But Motown records...the melodies are good but you could just listen to James Jamersons bass lines and be happy.
Posted by: Paul | Saturday, 17 August 2013 at 01:30 PM
Hmmm; the example that comes to mind is "The Art of the Ground Round", from The Intimate PDQ Bach. But he does call it a round, and like you I think there's another, more specific, term.
Posted by: David Dyer-Bennet | Saturday, 17 August 2013 at 01:33 PM
Polyphony?
Posted by: JPH | Saturday, 17 August 2013 at 01:37 PM
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Overtone_singing
David Hykes and the Harmonic Choir perform all over the world
Jim
Posted by: Jim Metzger | Saturday, 17 August 2013 at 01:40 PM
I think you're talking about counterpoint. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Counterpoint
Music that has a multiple independent voices that are strong in and of themselves while also compatible with each other is called contrapuntal.
Posted by: Vincent Diamante | Saturday, 17 August 2013 at 01:42 PM
http://wiki.answers.com/Q/What_is_it_called_when_two_melodies_play_at_the_same_time
Posted by: Jim Witkowski | Saturday, 17 August 2013 at 01:47 PM
In the (classical) music world, That's typically called 'counterpoint'; two 'separate' tunes that, played together, will harmonize; while (possibly) having different melodic contours and rhythms, they obviously must have a related harmonic structure otherwise they wouldn't harmonize together. The two tunes can be played at the same time, or the second may have to start at a particular point after the beginning of the first tune. Sometimes, or perhaps more typically, counterpoint is not the interaction of two tunes, but the interaction of the one tune with itself (as in a round, or a fugue). After the initial presentation, the original tune may be varied in various harmonic, rhythmical or structural ways, e.g. the iterations is in a different key, the size of the intervals may be expanded or contracted, the rhythm may be altered, the notes lengthened or shortened, the melodic contour may be altered (instead of going up, go down). There are huge treatises on counterpoint, so this is not a comprehensive description nor perhaps even an adequate definition.
In many great photographs and certainly in most classical fine art, there may be a visual counterpoint -- the recurrence and variation of single theme, form or shape; or the interaction of multiple themes or shapes.
Serious appreciation of music seems to be a significant attribute of many of our greatest photographers.
Posted by: Woody | Saturday, 17 August 2013 at 01:48 PM
Polyphony when the melody is sung and played with the same rhythm, counterpoint with different rhythms.
Posted by: Manuel | Saturday, 17 August 2013 at 02:16 PM
Mike, I'm begging you. Please don't sing. Singing one song let alone two simultaneously would be more than we need to hear. Stick to photography and writing. Be happy justlistening to music. :-) (Tongue planted firmly in cheek...)
Posted by: Dennis Mook | Saturday, 17 August 2013 at 02:28 PM
I'd go along with fugue
Posted by: Salvador Ortega | Saturday, 17 August 2013 at 02:47 PM
Cacophony! :-)
Posted by: Jamie Pillers | Saturday, 17 August 2013 at 02:49 PM
Quodlibet or mash-up. Might also simply be called "two songs in counterpoint".
A popular one at Christmas time is a combination of William Dix's "What Child Is This"(Greensleeves) and Scott Soper's "Child of the Poor"
http://sojo.net/blogs/2012/12/20/what-are-you-singing-what-child-child-poor
Posted by: Andrew Kowalczyk | Saturday, 17 August 2013 at 02:52 PM
Resonate?
Mitklingen would be a german word
The two songs resonate with each other?
Posted by: Darko Hristov | Saturday, 17 August 2013 at 02:58 PM
Mike, what you are thinking of is a quodlibet. A "simultaneous quodlibet", to be precise. It's an old musical technique - two or more pre-existing melodies are combined and performed at the same time; often together with a new original tune. Johann Sebastian Bach did this, but quodlibets were in use even in the Renaissance. See here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quodlibet
Posted by: Werner Wittersheim | Saturday, 17 August 2013 at 03:13 PM
contrapuntal
Posted by: JTW | Saturday, 17 August 2013 at 04:08 PM
No idea what it is called, but this is these Aussie comics give what has to be one of the the funniest examples ever! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5Zan7LcKawc
Posted by: Scott Williams | Saturday, 17 August 2013 at 04:11 PM
Hi,
This may be the answer.
con•tra•pun•tal (ˌkɒn trəˈpʌn tl)
adj.
1. of or involving musical counterpoint.
2. composed of two or more relatively independent melodies sounded together.
[1835–45; < Italian contrappunt(o) (< Medieval Latin contrāpūnctus) + -al1. See counterpoint]
Posted by: Steve Mason | Saturday, 17 August 2013 at 04:23 PM
The first thing that came to mind was Charles Ives and two marching bands playing two different songs starting at opposite ends of a football field. This may not be what you had in mind, given that we're now talking about two compositions, each with their own attendant harmonies, rather than two stand alone melodies.
Posted by: Carl Root | Saturday, 17 August 2013 at 04:25 PM
Maybe a quodlibet?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quodlibet
Posted by: liebchen | Saturday, 17 August 2013 at 04:36 PM
Noise ?
Posted by: Nick Cutler | Saturday, 17 August 2013 at 04:38 PM
Ken Rahaim got it right: the term is "Partner Song," on the authority of my wife, Carolyn, lyric soprano and voice teacher at the New England Conservatory of Music for 29 years. She says she has whole books of them that she uses with students.
Posted by: Rodger Kingston | Saturday, 17 August 2013 at 05:35 PM
I should know this, having a Master's in music. I think the term you're looking for is being over thought. I did once work with a conductor who could whistle "humoresque" while humming "Swanee River." Craziest thing. I like the term siphonic though. Carol Burnett did it a lot on her show and it's done a lot in Broadway shows.
Posted by: Warren M. | Saturday, 17 August 2013 at 05:42 PM
Kontrapunkt, of which J S Bach is still the master. May I recommend Der Kunst der Fugue (The Art of Fugue), BWV 1080, as the ultimate example of the Kontrapunkt.
Posted by: Svein-Frode | Saturday, 17 August 2013 at 05:54 PM
Medley
Posted by: Alex Ibasco | Saturday, 17 August 2013 at 06:07 PM
Pick a Little plus Goodnight Ladies from The Music Man immediately comes to mind.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jbhnRuJBHLs
It begins to happen about the 2:20 mark...
Ken
Posted by: Ken | Saturday, 17 August 2013 at 06:18 PM
Puberty.
Posted by: Michael Steinbach | Saturday, 17 August 2013 at 06:44 PM
a mash-up
Posted by: jim clark | Saturday, 17 August 2013 at 07:16 PM
A more contemporary example of two simultaneous melodies can be found in r.e.m.'s "fall on me"
And this when sung in rounds gives me goosebumps every time: "carol of the bells"
Posted by: nwman | Saturday, 17 August 2013 at 07:35 PM
I got nothin'.
Posted by: Dogman | Saturday, 17 August 2013 at 07:46 PM
I have nothing to add that's useful here, but wanted to make two asides: 1. Your readers are fun:) and 2. Whatever you call it, when the melodies hit and mix juuuuuust right, there's precious little that can match that moment.
Posted by: Rob L. | Saturday, 17 August 2013 at 07:47 PM
" I did once work with a conductor who could whistle "humoresque" while humming "Swanee River." Craziest thing." - Warren M.
I do know the term for that. Whistling and humming counterpoint is called "whumzling." Harry Parker, a family friend and Harvard professor, demonstrated it for me back in the 50s. Maybe he coined the term??
Posted by: Carl Root | Saturday, 17 August 2013 at 07:56 PM
In my house we called it a cacophony
Posted by: lynn | Saturday, 17 August 2013 at 07:57 PM
In Argentina we call that a 'canon', quite appropiate for your site!
Posted by: Gaspar Heurtley | Saturday, 17 August 2013 at 10:03 PM
Mike, the word you're looking for may be "quodlibet." An example: Simon & Garfunkel's Parsley, Sage, Rosemary and Thyme. Bach wrote several of them and there are lots of other examples.
Posted by: William Porter | Saturday, 17 August 2013 at 11:06 PM
I don't know much about classical music, but I do own a copy of Random House Word Menu. Besides "counterpoint," which everyone else has mentioned, it also turns up "countermelody" and "obbligato." The definition for "countermelody" reads "secondary melody sounded simultaneously with primary melody."
Posted by: Philip | Sunday, 18 August 2013 at 12:14 AM
I don't know if this is an example or not ... A performance by Glee of two Adele songs: Rumour has it + Someone like you:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bQCVMkMlufI
[Unfortunately, the image quality is so-so]
Posted by: Sven W | Sunday, 18 August 2013 at 01:10 AM
One of the Charles Ives symphonies (he didn't like the term I understand) requires 2 conductors, one for each stream.
Posted by: Ross | Sunday, 18 August 2013 at 01:55 AM
What came to my mind was the once popular "Moonglow and the Theme From Picnic" which despite its use of simultaneity many web sources call a "medley"
Posted by: Ross | Sunday, 18 August 2013 at 01:59 AM
Beethoven's only opera 'Fidelio' . Google "Mir ist so wunderbar"
Watch on YouTube. The music is sublime.
Posted by: Paul Logins | Sunday, 18 August 2013 at 02:24 AM
'Chaos'.
(In the choir I used to sing in ... )
Posted by: Tim Auger | Sunday, 18 August 2013 at 03:09 AM
CANON, NO, not the camera but the contrapuntal compositional technique.
This technique was used in the Renaissance by the Franco-Flemish School's polyphonic vocal music (15-16 Th. century). Great Flemish style Music Masters like Dufay, Ockeghem, Obrecht, Gombert, Lassus, de Monte, des Prez etc... have written marvelous examples in the CANON technique!
In the Capilla Flamenca of the Habsburgs court, this chant was performed regularly.
In the 'Missa L'homme armé', by Ockeghem, a nice example can be heard.
In the earlier Gregorian Chant, the Canon technique was used too, then, it sometimes was called "chasing" (poursuite) meaning that the second voice was chasing the first one with a slight décalage in time.
Sometimes, even in more recent compositions, this décalage, but applied with a somewhat longer time lapse, was used to create an impression of echo.
The ancient Greeks already knew that technique, they might have invented it.
P.S.: please do forgive me my rather 'Barbarian' English!
Posted by: Philippe Debeerst | Sunday, 18 August 2013 at 04:12 AM
I'd wait for the next version, Mike. Rumour is it will let you sing three melodies at the same time and add a little faded border so it fits better on Facebook.
Posted by: robin | Sunday, 18 August 2013 at 05:00 AM
Heterophony.
Posted by: James M | Sunday, 18 August 2013 at 06:04 AM
Are you singing both parts at the same time? If so, it's called a miracle.
Posted by: Gene lowinger | Sunday, 18 August 2013 at 08:24 AM
Crab Canon.....Das Musikalische Opfer by Johan Sebastian Bach contains some. It is mentioned in Gödel, Escher, Bach by Douglas.R. Hofstädter....
Greets, Ed.
Posted by: Ed | Sunday, 18 August 2013 at 10:52 AM
It's called a canon, if two or more people sing (exactly) the same notes with a delay:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canon_%28music%29
Posted by: Oevad | Sunday, 18 August 2013 at 11:11 AM
Once at a high school jazz competition I sat through an amazing demonstration. One of the judges was a local hot shot trombone player and that day he opened my world up to microphonics. It works something like this: you play the note as you would normally play it. Then you hum an interval of that note. The two note's wavelengths collide and create overtones of a third note. While microphonics isn't the word you're looking for, I figured you already had that by now and your love of tube amps might get you to look up microphonics in a different context.
Posted by: Chad Thompson | Sunday, 18 August 2013 at 11:35 AM
Quodlibet might fit, it means that you take two existing melodies and play them together (carefully chosen so that they work together). It's usually seen as a musical "trick", commonly with humourous intention.
Obbligato is another option, more suitable if the melodies are not taken but newly composed. The term originally (18th century) meant obligatory, i.e. a part of a score (we're talking classical music here) that must always be played and exactly as written. But later the meaning was often reversed, i.e. an obbligato part is instead optional and the music works without it too. Today that use is more common, though the term is rare (most often used in discussions of older music). The obbligato part in this later sense is often marked "ad libitum" instead (though "ad libitum" as a general term is wider and doesn't fit the bill here).
Posted by: Per | Sunday, 18 August 2013 at 12:51 PM
Ken: funny, I thought of Music Man as well, but it was "Lida Rose/Will I Ever Tell You" that I came up with. After Sondheim's "Now/Soon/Later." :) Tried to backwards search it that way, but only came up with "Counterpoint duet", and like DDB , I think there's a one-word term for this. (Or maybe it's just me having read Sentimental Tommy too many times: "I wanted ONE word!")
Countertpoint/contrapuntal or non-imitative polyphony are probably the "most correct", but it's not satisfying the tip-of-the-tongue/one-word thing for me.
Posted by: Kathy Li | Sunday, 18 August 2013 at 12:56 PM
Ok i just wasted 5 minutes on this, particularly the cute but totally wrongheaded answers.
Posted by: Dennis | Sunday, 18 August 2013 at 01:38 PM
I know this is no answer, but it is fun - Gilligan's Island theme song / Led Zeppelin's Stairway to Heaven
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mg-MuLvAQe4
Posted by: Ken Lunders | Sunday, 18 August 2013 at 01:42 PM
I like partner song, although I don't know if that is the correct term. None of the other suggestions seem right to me. The example that comes to my mind is "The Sidewalks of New York" and "In the Good Old Summertime."
Posted by: Duncan | Sunday, 18 August 2013 at 03:22 PM
Counterpoint if it's two different melodies at once as part of the same piece of music - a very common technique in jazz - rather than just slamming two songs together. (I suppose that would still just fit the definition, but only in part). One definition I found reads:
'counterpoint (adj: contrapuntal) - two or more melodic lines of equal importance (i.e., polyphonic texture), especially when composed.' I guess that covers it!
It's a canon if it's the same melody with a delay, which is not what you asked for. It's a round if it's a canon with a longer delay and in the presence of primary/elementary school kids or a campfire.
Just one more answer for the pile. I think you've noticed by now (just by counting answers) that it's counterpoint. There's nothing like a frequent common answer to satisfy a query.
Posted by: Andy Sheppard | Monday, 19 August 2013 at 06:14 AM
hi Mike,
I wouldn't normally respond to a music question but came across the following interesting site while looking up the 5 tones in Close Encounters of the 3rd Kind;
http://www.ars-nova.com/Theory%20Q&A/Q116.html
best wishes
Posted by: Another Phil | Thursday, 22 August 2013 at 07:07 AM