« What's Japanese for 'AAAAAIIIIEEEEEEEE!!!'? | Main | The Lomography Petzval Portrait Lens »

Thursday, 25 July 2013


Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

At a perhaps more philosophical and theoretical level, painter René Magritte was obsessed with the relationship between words and pictures, and made a number of sketches, notes and paintings on the subject.

IMO, the "Stroop test" is a powerful illustration of just how much our brains associate word and image. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stroop_effect

Extrapolating, I suppose we ought to be aware of many kinds of contexts and associations that can affect the way photographs are interpreted--text, physical setting, colors (or lack thereof), medium, frame, etc.

When our family cleaned out my Dad's house a decade ago, we didn't have time to salvage all of the many,many photos of long-gone relatives going back deep into the 19th century. These went into an auction lot. A few years later, a geneologically-minded cousin notified me that she had purchased the photo of a much-loved Great Aunt off the web after searching on her name. I didn't have the courage to tell her that my siblings and I were undoubtedly the origin of the image.

Mike you ARE a teacher

I would certainly struggle to approach some of Joel-Peter Witkin's work without any captions, but the information on his subjects adds hugely to my understanding of his photographs. (I used to think I was a purist and that all art should be able to stand on its own without captions, but Witkin changed my mind on that...)

The comments to this entry are closed.



Blog powered by Typepad
Member since 06/2007