A few snaps from yesterday. We had a lovely day at the lake, and the weather was perfect.
Ever since I mentioned the TOPcam at the end of Wednesday's post, I've been inundated with requests from people wanting to know more, because, of course, the popularity of B&W (and the pent-up demand for B&W-only cameras) is fierce. The unique TOPcam hybrid, which was created AT GREAT EXPENSE TO ME, is called the "Sony NEX-XXX" (that last bit is pronounced "tri ex"). Unfortunately—don't mass outside my door with cudgels and firebrands, please—I cannot reveal the identity of the shop that did the stunning masterpiece of a conversion. Their identity is top secret. They have an eight- or ten-year waiting list, and they don't want anyone to know they let me skip the line.
My bro' had a permit to burn brush, but needed a windless day.
That's fire, in the top pic. Of course, as I mentioned, the TOPcam is not capable of recording colors. For you lovers of colors, the fire was orange*.
Coming home from the lake I drove through endless clouds of bugs. What with our wet Spring and (so far) Summer, the bugs are flourishing. The front of the car is covered with bug grime. For some reason I felt bad when a lightning bug would get mushed against the windshield...you see a little streak of bright phosphorescence for a few seconds that then slowly, sadly fades. Sorry, little lightning buggies. I guess it's better than dying slowly in a jar.
I think I mentioned that I'm not big on fireworks, but I managed to see a show anyway. Coming home, I followed the colored blooms in the sky and got off the freeway an exit or two early. Come to find, the service road north of the airport was lined on both sides with vans, pickups, and SUVs, all festooned with persons. (I swear, everybody in this town has their own favorite strategic location from which to watch the fireworks, which originate at the Fairgrounds.) I stopped for a while and watched with the crowd.
You may consider this an ironic fireworks shot, not a straight fireworks shot. As I mentioned I mentioned, I'm not that big on fireworks, personally. But, for you lovers of colors, the sky was really dark gray, and the firework in the picture really was just white, nothing more. The TOPcam got the colors just right! The TOPcam is awesome.
Hope you had a nice one yesterday too, if you're a Murkin.
Mike
(Thanks to m3photo)
*Okay, I'll admit it, the top picture of those two really does look better in color. Shhh.
UPDATE: A "Satire Alert" belongs with this post. My NEX-6/24mm kit is bog standard. It will only take B&W faux-35mm pics because that's the kind of pics I like best, that's all. My intent is never to mislead. Carry on.
Original contents copyright 2013 by Michael C. Johnston and/or the bylined author. All Rights Reserved. Links in this post may be to our affiliates; sales through affiliate links may benefit this site.
(To see all the comments, click on the "Comments" link below.)
Featured Comments from:
Robert Roaldi: "Someday, someone will find your B&W fireworks photo and colorize it."
LOL. Probably one of your funniest posts ever...
!!!
;-)
Adam
Posted by: adamct | Friday, 05 July 2013 at 03:44 PM
While it won't work yet, I predict this link: http://www.google.com/trends/explore#q=NEX-XXX&date=today%201-m&cmpt=q will yield interesting results over the next few days...
;-)
Adam
Posted by: adamct | Friday, 05 July 2013 at 03:55 PM
That 2nd shot is beautiful.
Posted by: Patrick Dodds | Friday, 05 July 2013 at 04:48 PM
It's posts like these that make ToP so good. Thanks
Posted by: Tim Bradshaw | Friday, 05 July 2013 at 04:55 PM
So you've got your own, unique, Leica M Monochrom, presumably for a much smaller amount. Congrats!
And I just love the fireworks picture. I find the fact that it is black and white quite refreshing.
Posted by: Manuel | Friday, 05 July 2013 at 05:18 PM
Nice shots.
Posted by: Paul Richardson | Friday, 05 July 2013 at 05:18 PM
If I were you, I would have posted that picture of the fire in colour, claiming it was made using a combination of the ultra-fast frame rates your new camera is now capable of and the prototype motorized Leitz Tri-Colour Filter Carousel.
Posted by: Joakim | Friday, 05 July 2013 at 05:50 PM
You're a very funny man.
That first pic is seriously good.
Posted by: Ed G. | Friday, 05 July 2013 at 06:28 PM
Your lightning bug in a jar mention, made me think of a shared link by Richard Vanek yesterday, of the work of Polly Chandler... she has a photo that I liked, entitled - 'Like A Kid Wo Captures A Firefly And Leaves Only To Die In A Jar'.
As with your B&W firework image, last night's weather dictated otherwise for those in my neck of the woods, and their shooting off of fireworks, which in turn made me miss out on doing this year's installment of my annual Achromatic Fireworks series shooting, on the most fireworky night of the year.
Posted by: JPH | Friday, 05 July 2013 at 06:51 PM
So Mike, it seems you've become a humorist now. I enjoyed your entertaining post!
Did you have a pleasant Independence Day trip then? :)
Posted by: Phil Maus | Friday, 05 July 2013 at 06:57 PM
Can you do 'sepia toning' in camera? If so, I want one.
Posted by: Roger Bradbury | Friday, 05 July 2013 at 07:17 PM
I was looking for an SA, even suspected m3photo as the "tri ex" fixer.
I like the bottom of the two: the sun's orb shining through the thick brush fire smoke.
No color-fringing anywhere!
Posted by: Sarge | Friday, 05 July 2013 at 08:27 PM
"Okay, I'll admit it, the top picture of those two really does look better in color."
Thats why I shoot in color and convert appropriate frames in PS to black and white.
In my film days, rather than carry two cameras, I shot in 35mm color and did the B&W by making 4x5 internegs in the enlarger. The best of both worlds.
Posted by: rnewman | Friday, 05 July 2013 at 11:26 PM
Perhaps Mike has a dylectic camera;
he is using a TopCon camera with black and white film. Entirely understandable.
However I much prefer the first photo of the fishing pole with its
neck and head in the water the tail of the pole held by a humanoid standing on a rock.
Posted by: BRYCE LEE | Friday, 05 July 2013 at 11:53 PM
Mike,
"Dave fishin" is a beautiful image! Even the small jpeg rendered here shows wonderful tones and luminosity!
[Thanks to all for the nice compliments. I like "Dave Fishin'" too. --Mike]
Posted by: Michael T. | Saturday, 06 July 2013 at 02:55 AM
Mike, you should name your new camera TOPar or SOLar :-)
The first image is really good.
Posted by: Johannes | Saturday, 06 July 2013 at 07:55 AM
I fell for the joke (or was it wishful thinking). Anyway, did a search and for $2000+ you can get a Canon converted, see
http://www.maxmax.com/b&w_conversion.htm
Their explanation is informative on what needs to be done for such a conversion.I can understand the price just thinking about all those photocells that would have to be modified.
Posted by: Doug Howk | Saturday, 06 July 2013 at 08:54 AM
"Dave Fishin" is really nice. My eye danced all over the frame finding treats everywhere.
I hope you print it someday and tell us how it looks on paper.
Posted by: Ed Grossman | Saturday, 06 July 2013 at 09:18 AM
Love the first picture. Beautifully seen and composed. I wish that my "snapshots" looked half as good.
Also, I didn't know that Sony "Tri-X" involved conversion work in an aftermarket shop. I thought that it was a special edition released by Sony on April 1. And discontinued on April 2.
Posted by: Chaz L | Saturday, 06 July 2013 at 10:11 AM
You guys still have lightning bugs? Here in Rhode Island I see maybe three a year now. When I was a kid they were everywhere. The three times a year that I see them just make me feel sad that they're gone. I don't know why they're gone, but I assume it's something we (humans) did. Glad to hear y'all are still getting to enjoy them!
[I haven't read anything about it, but I've been thinking that too. I'll walk around on a perfect "lightning bug" evening and just see a few, and remember when I was a kid that they could practically light up the yard--they'd be twinkling all over the place. Just seems like there are a lot fewer of them now. Makes me sad, too. --Mike]
Posted by: BH | Saturday, 06 July 2013 at 02:02 PM
These are some great shots! I love the firework picture, so simple but astounding.
Posted by: Frances | Saturday, 06 July 2013 at 04:23 PM
I googled "Murkin" and found a range of different definitions in the "Urban Dictionary". However, I still have no idea of which of those definitions is applicable in this context. I'm sure it's not the one I already knew.
[American = Ammuricun = Murkin. Given the other definitions perhaps I should use "Murricun" in the future. --Mike]
Posted by: John | Saturday, 06 July 2013 at 05:32 PM
The first frame really speaks to me. Nice work.
Posted by: Mike Plews | Saturday, 06 July 2013 at 06:51 PM
Those three fire pictures are absolutely brilliant.
Posted by: robin | Saturday, 06 July 2013 at 08:29 PM
Go home, Mike, you're drunk. ;-)
Posted by: Ed Hawco | Saturday, 06 July 2013 at 09:26 PM
Speaking of fireworks... I've never seen them photographed like this before...
http://www.flickr.com/photos/daveyjphoto/sets/72157632164084857/
But I still prefer your b&w shot :)
Posted by: Paul | Saturday, 06 July 2013 at 09:53 PM
The first picture is truly stellar. I cannot image the first fire picture better in color. Sometimes life is better between black and white.
Posted by: Neely Fallon | Sunday, 07 July 2013 at 01:00 AM
Arm, Flame, Bush, Cloud, Sun is the only photograph in that group. Throw the rest away.
The guy fishing is corny and makes me seize up. The smoke pic shouldn't be there either, thoogh, it's better than FISHING PIC-which you should delete after giving the fisherman a copy..IF you even knew him, or, were even there!! (i think you downloaded it off of Flickr and then put it in that photoprogram you use)
The flame pic says everything and is a great photo about the entire world.
You had a good day.
Posted by: David | Sunday, 07 July 2013 at 04:39 PM