A few more recent books I think are tasty:
Looking at Ansel Adams: The Photographs and the Man
by Andrea G. Stillman (here's the U.K. link
) might fall as much into the category of "guilty pleasures" as "must haves." It takes an enthusiastic and involved look at Adams by telling the story of twenty of his photographs, including many of his most famous ones. Copiously illustrated with ephemera, it gives a window into Adams's processes and working methods as well as his everyday life, making him seem more like a real working photographer—and a real person—and less the avuncular dynamo of legend. And a nicely made book, too. (No accident—the author is an accomplished writer and editor and the venerable [founded 1837] Little, Brown is the official publisher of Adamsiana as designated by the Ansel Adams Publishing Rights Trust.)
Andrea Stillman met Ansel when she worked at the Metropolitan Museum of Art in New York City. After working together for two years on a major show there, he asked her to come to Carmel to be his assistant in the spring of 1974. As his administrative assistant rather than his darkroom assistant, she did everything from taking print orders to editing his prose for the following six years. She has continued to contribute to his legacy since his death in 1984, editing books, helping with shows, and narrating a TV program.
Ansel and Andrea, Carmel, California, 1975. Photo by Alan Ross.
• • •
The Changing Face of Portrait Photography: From Daguerreotype to Digital
by Shannon Thomas Perich is another yummy treat. It dives deep into the fathomless sea of the Smithsonian National Museum of American History's Photographic History Collection. There are obviously treasures there, and this book brings many out into the sunlight.
Rather than looking at individual photographs as a jumping off point, here we get to look at a succession of photographers. Happily, it's not just the "same old names" that (well, for old dawgs like me) are trotted out a bit too often. Yes, we get some heavies—Julia Margaret Cameron, Dorothea, and Avedon (a quirky look at the latter, and I like that too). But the book opens with George K. Warren (who?), and includes Henry Horenstein and Lauren Greenfield. Author Shannon Perich, an Associate Curator of the Collection, is showing some gumption, and I like that. This is not just a same-old-same-old type of book.
She also has a marvelous eye for what to show us. This is a guided tour of rare treats, beautifully and appropriately presented. You won't like all the photographers equally—remembering that most of us will differ in which we like better or worse—but all are interesting, and the sweep across time is a nice sampling.
There's also a valuable section on Nicholas Murray, a photographer whose name comes up far too infrequently these days.
Here's the U.K. link.
• • •
Neither of these books are indispensable, but both of them are treats—as fun as they are interesting. Bravo on both counts.
Mike
Original contents copyright 2012 by Michael C. Johnston and/or the bylined author. All Rights Reserved. Links in this post may be to our affiliates; sales through affiliate links may benefit this site.
(To see all the comments, click on the "Comments" link below.)
Featured Comments from:
No featured comments yet—please check back soon!
Andrea Stillman provides the narration on the excellent Ansel Adams iPad app, reviewed here: http://theonlinephotographer.typepad.com/the_online_photographer/2010/12/ansel-adams-app-for-ipad-just-released.html
Posted by: Stephen Gilbert | Friday, 14 December 2012 at 02:07 PM
I have "Looking at Ansel Adams" and it gets a thumbs up from me. It's more like a min-biography written around a series of images. Excellent book.
Posted by: Jim Bullard | Friday, 14 December 2012 at 04:22 PM
Mike,
If you will allow me to dissent from your praise of the Ansel Adams book. I have the book and find it troubling.
On one hand the photographs it examines overlap almost entirely (sixteen out of twenty images) with the ones in the well-regarded Examples: The Making of Forty Photographs. Most of the book simply goes over the same tired ground as this and the other popular Ansel books.
On the other hand, I find it frustrating that the Ansel Adams Publishing Trust continues to hold such tight control over Ansel's legacy, allowing only those from the inner circle to use Ansel's photographs in publication. I do not think this is what Ansel intended and it is a tragedy that Ansel's work suffers such constraints.
--Darin
Posted by: Darin | Friday, 14 December 2012 at 06:19 PM
I'm not sure which 20 photos the Adams book details, but He Himself did a great job in his book, Examples: the Making of 40 Photographs.
How much overlap between the two books' contents?
Posted by: Robert Burnham | Friday, 14 December 2012 at 09:04 PM
"avuncular dynamo", perfect!
Posted by: Michael Stevens | Saturday, 15 December 2012 at 05:15 AM
Out of curiosity, in "The Changing Face..." does the author mention William Mortensen?
Posted by: marcin wuu | Saturday, 15 December 2012 at 09:11 AM
"does the author mention William Mortensen?"
Marcin,
You can look for yourself who's discussed. Go to the Amazon page, hover your mouse over the book cover, then click on "Table of Contents." Eleven photographers are profiled in the book, Mortensen (who wasn't primarily a portraitist) not included.
Mike
Posted by: Mike Johnston | Saturday, 15 December 2012 at 09:22 AM
After reading this blog post yesterday I went and ordered LOOKING AT ANSEL ADAMS. Now after reading the the follow up posts here I'm wondering if I'm going to feel ripped off by the Adams Trust because I've had Examples: the Making of 40 Photographs sitting on my shelf for almost thirty years.
Posted by: Tom Swoboda | Saturday, 15 December 2012 at 10:38 AM
I have always held Ansel up as a bit of an icon, though I had never seen any of his work in the flesh, as it were.
This changed a month or so ago when many of his most famous prints were loaned to the Maritime Museum, Greenwich (London).
I have to say (dodging brickbats) that I was rather disappointed.
While I can appreciate how pioneering the work was, and the processing of the shots, my exposure to so much contemporary work of quality (though no doubt it and the whole genre owes much to Adams) made me realise how constrained the technical equipment and film was at the time.
My respect for the man did not diminish, but I gained little actual enjoyment from looking at the pictures themselves. In their full-sized glory they do not look very impressive by modern standards.
And not just because they were monochrome.
Posted by: Steve Jacob | Saturday, 15 December 2012 at 12:48 PM
"I'm wondering if I'm going to feel ripped off by the Adams Trust because I've had Examples: the Making of 40 Photographs sitting on my shelf for almost thirty years."
Tom,
Well, I don't know how I could do more to help you decide, before you see the book for yourself. You've read what I had to say about it, and you've read what Darin had to say about it.
My impression is that Stillman's book is nothing like "Examples," but then, my copy of "Examples" is put away and I can't compare the two directly. I'm just going from memory.
What Stillman is doing in my view is what Jim Bullard said: "It's more like a mini-biography written around a series of images." Just the greatly augmented secondary illustrations are worth the price in my view.
But you'll have to judge for yourself.
Mike
Posted by: Mike Johnston | Saturday, 15 December 2012 at 03:52 PM
Actually, it would be worth getting both books. In my note above I was just trying to point out that there's also an older book by Adams himself.
And in fact, if you sit down with his Basic Photo Series (even the skinny early editions from the 1960s by published by Morgan & Morgan), you'll find that Adams was always explaining his thinking, craft, and techniques to the reader.
His captions are marvels of how-to combined with explanations of why he did what he did to make a given photo.
What you do with all this technique is up to you and your esthetic tastes, but if you pay attention you'll learn the basics of the craft.
To be blunt, you can learn the basics of the zone system by reading the captions alone.
In that light, probably the most badly mistitled photo book of the last 100 years is Minor White's Zone System Manual, which becomes opaqueness personified when you start to read it. I like many things White did when photographing, but that book has led countless impressionable newbie photogs down pathways of mystification.
Posted by: Robert Burnham | Tuesday, 18 December 2012 at 11:11 AM