Do you remember my very first shot with the D800, the picture of my dog Lulu on the back porch from this post? You might want to take another look if you don't.
Well, a terrible problem has cropped up. There is huge, obvious, blatant pixelization in part of the shot: look at the peace signs on her collar:
Horrible! That's the worst stairstep pixelization I've seen in a long time. The D800 has let me down and I'm never photographing with it again.
Mike
(P.S. Good morning. Hope you've had your coffee, or you might not realize right away that I'm just being a wiseass again....)
Original contents copyright 2012 by Michael C. Johnston and/or the bylined author. All Rights Reserved. Links in this post may be to our affiliates; sales through affiliate links may benefit this site.
(To see all the comments, click on the "Comments" link below.)
Featured Comments from:
James Moule: "Having just received my new D800e in the mail yesterday (based partly on your recommendation), your post had a certain emotional impact."
Roger Bradbury: "As the great philosopher Charles Brown said, 'Good Grief!'"
CF Salicath: "Made my day! Good afternoon (from Norway)!"
Bob Rosinsky: "If you had photographed Lulu naked, this problem would not have surfaced."
Mike replies: Shocking!
So the world didn't end then, huh?
[The day's not over yet. --Mike]
Posted by: Dan Doviddio | Friday, 21 December 2012 at 10:31 AM
Perfect: you've captured the tone of many internet camera rants.
Posted by: Stephen Gilbert | Friday, 21 December 2012 at 10:35 AM
Real funny! Ha Ha! Scrooge.....
Posted by: Dennis Mook | Friday, 21 December 2012 at 10:50 AM
Imagine how the dog must feel having to wear a crappy pixelated color. Now all you need to do is find a 40MP thread pairs per mm weaving machine, or stop looking at your dog blown up at 100%.
Posted by: Sareesh S | Friday, 21 December 2012 at 10:51 AM
omg, shades of Poe's Law again.
Posted by: Peter | Friday, 21 December 2012 at 11:04 AM
Was it END OF THE WORLD joke?
Posted by: Oleg Shpak | Friday, 21 December 2012 at 11:09 AM
Phew,
I thought for a moment that the D800 failure was part of the Mayan end of the world thing - especially given those strange symbols on Lulu's collar.
Posted by: Stephen McCullough | Friday, 21 December 2012 at 11:10 AM
Proof that ignorance is bliss. I will continue to use my D700 with which I would not expect to see the peace symbols at all!
Posted by: Scott Kemp | Friday, 21 December 2012 at 11:12 AM
You do realize that is the collar's fiber that appears as pixelization, right?
Posted by: Andrew Chambers | Friday, 21 December 2012 at 11:12 AM
Mike, I don't thnk that is pixelization but that you are using an inferior uprezzing algorithm (that is an 800% crop, isn't it?)
Posted by: Alan Fairley | Friday, 21 December 2012 at 11:15 AM
Hahahah, I guess it's a particular case of dog collar moiré generated by a combination of the dog's skin temperature and the frequency of the hair thickness distribution!
Posted by: Max | Friday, 21 December 2012 at 11:18 AM
Fortunately, it seems to occur only on circles and diagonal lines. Wavy dog hair doesn't seem to be affected.
Posted by: toto | Friday, 21 December 2012 at 11:24 AM
Just think how bad it would be if you had gotten the D800E with no AA filter!
Posted by: Philip Morgan | Friday, 21 December 2012 at 11:27 AM
It's even worse - the peace signs are upside-down!
Posted by: Dan Gerth | Friday, 21 December 2012 at 11:28 AM
Mike, it's not the D800, it's that older, first generation collar. Those early, low-res models were like that, and they ate batteries, too. Poor Lulu, saddled with a sluggish old rig like that. Get her a newer one and she'll run faster, sharper and need far less post-processing.
John
Posted by: John Hunter | Friday, 21 December 2012 at 11:32 AM
So, what's the thread count of a 36 MP full frame sensor?
Posted by: Dave in NM | Friday, 21 December 2012 at 11:32 AM
I'm just sorry not having seen this the first time you posted it and started the joke.
All the best Mike.
Posted by: Marc Gibeault | Friday, 21 December 2012 at 11:34 AM
Just use SpotTone on the collar. Works miracles if used properly. Build the color up slowly and wipe the brush off gently before applying.
Posted by: John MacKechnie | Friday, 21 December 2012 at 11:40 AM
Thats it, I'm switching to Canine collars
Posted by: Kazi | Friday, 21 December 2012 at 11:44 AM
The State-of-the-Art for looms has passed this collar maker by. I think his loom needs to be updated with more resolution to solve the obvious "pixelation problem" that it has.
Don't scare me like that Mike, my Christmas present to myself is sitting in the closet and it is mostly your fault that it is there. It is a D800e, not a loom.
At least you got some micro-commission from B&H on the sale.
Posted by: Bob | Friday, 21 December 2012 at 11:49 AM
This Mayan Calendar thing has really disturbed things. I didn't understand that it would make April 1 follow Dec 20. I guess I need to adjust the clock on my computer...
Posted by: Dwig | Friday, 21 December 2012 at 11:52 AM
Jaggy lines all over the collar. Send it back!
Posted by: V. Roma | Friday, 21 December 2012 at 11:57 AM
"You do realize that is the collar's fiber that appears as pixelization, right?"
No way!
Mike
(P.S. You forgot to read the P.S.)
Posted by: Mike Johnston | Friday, 21 December 2012 at 12:01 PM
Hmmm - maybe it's the time to get a proper camera, like a 99$ point & shoot. Wouldn't see that pixelisation with that I guess ;-)
Posted by: Wolfgang Lonien | Friday, 21 December 2012 at 12:38 PM
Not only is it pixelated but the sensor is really crooked!
Posted by: Ed | Friday, 21 December 2012 at 12:50 PM
So are you going to get rid of the Dog or the Camera? ;-)
-Hudson
Posted by: Hudson | Friday, 21 December 2012 at 12:50 PM
Wait, you can't zoom in forever? I assumed that I could just keep mashing Enhance and Zoom forever. Maybe that's the latest Canon, and it's the Nikon that grants you infinite sexual prowess? I can never keep the two brands straight.
Posted by: Andrew Molitor | Friday, 21 December 2012 at 12:58 PM
You know, I think that dog collar could use a good washing.
Posted by: Arne | Friday, 21 December 2012 at 02:04 PM
Dog collars made of pixels - what will they think of next?!
Posted by: JohnMFlores | Friday, 21 December 2012 at 04:16 PM
The dog's fur on the left side looks out of focus to me...
Posted by: Iain | Friday, 21 December 2012 at 06:03 PM
Salvador Dali had the same problem when he started using ultra high rez three hair paintbrushes
And this morning on the subway there was a little kid wearing one of these
http://www.jinx.com/p/minecraft_creeper_premium_zipup_hoodie.html
Posted by: Hugh Crawford | Friday, 21 December 2012 at 06:55 PM
I like my 4x5. Not sure how may pixels the resolution comes out at. The sensor size is, well, 4x5 inches. The only camera which is better than it is the 8x10 I have been lusting after.
Posted by: Rahul | Saturday, 22 December 2012 at 12:00 AM
I thought for a moment that you said "starship pixelization", since the symbols remind me of the the very pixellated spaceships in my youth's Invaders game in the burger bar.
Posted by: Eolake Stobblehouse | Saturday, 22 December 2012 at 05:46 AM
guess you oughta puta a filter on that. the superficial flaws will distract from the fundamental flaws :D
Posted by: almostinfamous | Saturday, 22 December 2012 at 07:17 AM
So the camera is not perfect after all and the Mayans were wrong. Can't count on nuthin' no more.
Posted by: Dogman | Saturday, 22 December 2012 at 09:30 AM
Hi Mike,
Now you have gotten yourself into trouble. We are waiting to see some real pictures from you in the coming year...
Merry Christmas !
Marek
Posted by: Marek Fogiel | Saturday, 22 December 2012 at 10:43 AM
Ominous Mayan cataclysm warnings, Dragoon failures, inverted and pixilated early 90’s Oldsmobile emblems, I was starting to get worried.
Posted by: Jim A | Saturday, 22 December 2012 at 11:25 AM
For your amusement...
http://www.flickr.com/photos/78687170@N00/6049995683/sizes/o/in/set-72157621789238783/
Didn't think to pixel peep this back in 2011, but maybe should have.
Someone did comment that the fly better get out of the way cause a discdog's comin' thru!
Posted by: Marshall Smith | Saturday, 22 December 2012 at 07:55 PM
It's like having you best half princess and cancel the wedding because she has a spot on her back.
If you keep looking, you will always find imperfections on your D800.
PS: This is quiet schocking post. Is this a chrismast joke?
Posted by: `/1nc3nt | Saturday, 22 December 2012 at 08:03 PM
That is what you call Knit picking
(Sorry comment is so late but could not resist!)
Posted by: Andrew Hughes | Sunday, 30 December 2012 at 08:57 AM