We had too much excitement here yesterday. I was returning home from breakfast along the main road—a six-lane divided highway with stores and malls on either side, you know the sort—and an odd sort of police vehicle went careening past in the other direction: it was an armored car, but with police lights and sirens. Turns out it belongs to the FBI. Straggling behind, also with lights flashing and sirens wailing, were a black-and-white police cruiser and not one but two ambulances.
I learned later that they were among many more such vehicles converging from all directions—we'd had another of those deplorable "mass shooting" events, the sixth in Wisconsin since 2004. It happened right across from my local mall—one of those pathological ever-escalating wife-abuse incidents, except the malefactor not only killed his wife but also shot up everyone at her workplace (a beauty spa), killing two other people and injuring a number more. The killer was fleeing the building when he encountered two armed men coming toward him—hunters returning from up north who had grabbed their rifles and were going in to help. So he disappeared back into the building.
For hours, the police didn't know where the shooter was. The roads were blockaded, the mall was closed (although some of the shops stayed open, as apparently there was no coordinated effort to tell them what to do), and an entire enormous hospital complex was put on lockdown, lest the shooter try to get at the people he'd injured to finish the job. His own neighborhood, miles away, was flooded with SWAT and bomb squads. Later, he was found to have crept into an out-of-the-way office somewhere in the building where the beauty spa was, locked the door, and shot himself to death. (Apparently thinking very little of his two children from start to finish.)
All a little too close to home. The lot where I often park when I visit the bookstore was behind police lines, being used as a staging area for law enforcement operations. And an odd detail: I've snapped the very building where the shootings occurred. "Test shots" for a long-ago digicam...the Sony P150, if anyone remembers that one.
7.2 MP in a digicam was the latest thing in the summer of '04.
Pretty horrid.
It's a fad, these "mass shootings." Like nihilist assassins in Fin de siècle Europe, or suicide clusters, or copycat killers; a contagious idea. It is one infection that can't become a thing of the past too soon.
Mike
Original contents copyright 2012 by Michael C. Johnston and/or the bylined author. All Rights Reserved. Links in this post may be to our affiliates; sales through affiliate links may benefit this site.
(To see all the comments, click on the "Comments" link below.)
Featured Comments from:
Dennis Ng: "Heard about this even in Hong Kong. In fact you complete the story as the last I heard of it was when their priority was to find the gunman."
Craig: "It's hardly a fad; things like this have been happening for a long time. Surely you remember the source of the '80s expression 'going postal'? And before that there was Charles Whitman, the Texas Bell Tower Sniper...I don't think humans deal well with the pressure of living in a densely-packed society of millions. Things like this are one way the stress expresses itself from time to time."
Geoff Wittig: "These horrific events just make me crazy. As a physician, I see it as a public health calamity. Yet the NRA and its malevolent allies in Congress managed to de-fund and literally outlaw the CDC's efforts at collecting data and researching the plague of gun violence. Mission accomplished!"
Mike replies: I refrained from mentioning this in the post proper, but just before the news of the Azana shooting began saturating the airwaves, I saw the one and only TV ad I've seen from "the men and women of the NRA"—I could write a book about the little ironies like this that rain down on me constantly. Incidentally, the ad was anti-Obama, despite the fact that Obama has shown little discernible enthusiasm for any sort of gun control issues (or even discussion of them).
It's is sad to see. Many blame everything from Guns to Movies and video games. It's deeper that that. Guns have been around for hundreds of years and openly carried. Violence on TV has been around for over a generation.
I think it this national seems of gloom and hopeless. No jobs, people at all time records levels of assistance just to get by. I think we all sense it at some gut level. Even my photography is more somber and reflective.
Posted by: Ed head | Monday, 22 October 2012 at 05:55 AM
US gun laws are completely incomprehensible to anyone not native to that country.
In the USA, where owning a gun is legal and easy, in 2011 there were over 9000 shooting deaths. In the UK, where owning a gun is not legal except in very tightly-controlled circumstances, there were 51. So with 6 times the population, over there you have 180 times the number of gun deaths.
More guns = more shootings; it really is that simple in spite of what the gun lobby might say.
Posted by: David Paterson | Monday, 22 October 2012 at 06:20 AM
CDC statistics from 2009 ...
Homicide deaths: 16,799
Firearm homicides: 11,493
Number of suicides: 36,909
Firearm suicides: 18,735
Number of emergency department visits for assault: 1.8 million
http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/fastats/homicide.htm
In 2006 there were 119.2 million visits to hospital emergency departments.
http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nhsr/nhsr007.pdf
Total US deaths in 2009 from all causes: 2,437,163
http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/deaths.htm
Posted by: Speed | Monday, 22 October 2012 at 06:40 AM
Here's a post from Loren Coleman, a guy who makes it his business to deconstruct these kinds of events: http://copycateffect.blogspot.ca/2012/10/azana-shooting.html
Posted by: Richard | Monday, 22 October 2012 at 07:06 AM
The yahoo hunters should be educated, and I struggle to not use a word stronger than that. You do NOT chase or scare a killer back into the building.
Posted by: David | Monday, 22 October 2012 at 07:25 AM
Of course it's an infectious disease--at least for men.
Our society leaves many men lonely and angry. Common media trivializes the value of a life not belonging to the "strong and handsome". And to seal the deal fame becomes an end in itself.
Offer a twisted mind an inexpensive gun-- with respect to the above mass murder/suicide becomes a "meaningful" way.
Posted by: jb | Monday, 22 October 2012 at 08:04 AM
More disheartening to me are the senseless gun incidents, such as the story on CNN today, concerning the nine year old girl in a costume at a Halloween party critically injured by a shotgun blast from a party goer when she was mistaken for a skunk.
Posted by: Tom Duffy | Monday, 22 October 2012 at 08:06 AM
>Apparently thinking very little of his two children from start to finish<
Hell, how do you know that?
Posted by: cb | Monday, 22 October 2012 at 08:12 AM
It does happen here, but thankfully rather less often than it seems to in the states. In the UK it always seems to be individuals (men) with an interest in and access to guns. Same there huh? In cases like this I always feel sorry for the random victims and their families and appalled at the level of self-absorbed shown by the perpetrators. How often are the victims more physically vulnerable than the killers?
Posted by: Shotslot | Monday, 22 October 2012 at 08:13 AM
It seems that humans are given to waves of mass and/or contagious hysteria/irrationality that is totally beyond my comprehension. Maybe that why I'm a landscape photographer. I share your hope that this current contagion passes soon.
Posted by: Jim Bullard | Monday, 22 October 2012 at 08:23 AM
I am not sure why a shooting like this is special and even national news when it goes on all the time all over the nation. Because it is Wisconsin? Slow news day? Little over a year ago the same sort of beauty salon slaughter happened five miles from my house and yesterday a family including a baby and its children were slaughtered a few miles away in the other direction. Just local news here.
A daily local carnage clock subtended by a description of the most spectacular event of the day as a permanent part of a national newspaper like the NY Times might have some meaning.
Posted by: Winsor | Monday, 22 October 2012 at 12:09 PM
I wouldn't call it a fad. The number of mass shootings in the US has averaged around 20 _annually_ since around 1980 (see http://boston.com/community/blogs/crime_punishment/2012/08/no_increase_in_mass_shootings.html and many other such links).
It is become part of the culture, and seemingly we are back in the nineteenth century wild west.
Posted by: Eric Jeschke | Monday, 22 October 2012 at 12:37 PM
"Hell, how do you know that?"
cb,
It seems self-evident to me. To kill both their parents violently on the same day? What kind of legacy does that leave them? They'll deal with it the rest of their lives. If he had had their welfare uppermost in mind, you don't think it would have suggested other, more reasonable alternatives to him? Like getting help? Or just exercising adult self-control and refraining from the act?
In any event, I did say "apparently."
Mike
Posted by: Mike Johnston | Monday, 22 October 2012 at 02:42 PM
Average of 20 mass shootings per year. Thankfully there's all those guns around so people can protect themselves, otherwise the number could be much higher.
Posted by: Robert Roaldi | Monday, 22 October 2012 at 02:57 PM
Whatever the solution to incidents like this is -IF there is one - the commonly expressed "ban the guns" approach hinted at above,has already been shown to be ineffective. We have the history of alcohol prohibition with its legacy of highly organized crime,which is still with us. We have the banning of addictive drugs, where the last numbers I saw indicate that 90% of illegal drugs are successfully smuggled into the U.S. We have the example of "ban the gun" cities such as Chicago and Washington D.C. where gun crime is rampant, not only killings but all the other ones where no one dies of wounds, criminals using guns get whatthey want without shooting, etc. These are what I call "armed criminals full employment and security laws". Any solution to the problem isn't simple, or likely to be 100% effective, and isn't going to be solved in this forum. So, lets get back to photography, shall we??
Posted by: Ri chard Newman | Monday, 22 October 2012 at 03:13 PM
Another Brit, shaking his head sadly.
I would love to see gun ownership in the USA treated as seriously as the right to drive a car. I.e. it would require passing an exam in which one was required to demonstrate that one knew how to use, maintain and secure a weapon properly. And, given the nature of the item, be combined with a home visit to ensure that the weapon would be robustly stored. This exam should have to be retaken every 3 years at considerable expense to the examinee.
It is possible that UK gun laws may be too strict, it is certain that American gun laws are too lax.
Posted by: Ed | Monday, 22 October 2012 at 03:21 PM
You don't have to have a gun, a van will do. A man is under arrest in Cardiff in Wales. He is charged with murder, 13 counts of attempted murder, four counts of actual bodily harm and one of dangerous driving. Karina Menzies was killed as she pushed two of her children out of the way of the van.
Posted by: Roger Bradbury | Monday, 22 October 2012 at 03:57 PM