The Panny pancake (28mm equivalent) is cheap right now.
The Panasonic GF3 deal from Saturday is over now, but I was wrong this time—the deal actually did last all day. First time I can remember that happening with a camera. Thirty-six TOP readers bought themselves one.
And by the way, apologies to those who wanted to avail themselves of the deal but couldn't. I know nothing about where Amazon will ship and why, where the Gold Box Deal of the Day is available and where it isn't, and all the other internecine fine points involved in those special-price offers. I'm just an affiliate; I don't work for Amazon. I don't think I've ever spoken to anyone from Amazon, and wouldn't know how to do so if I had to.
As several commenters noted, there is a flood of "de-kitted" 14mm ƒ/2.5 Panasonic wide-angle lenses on eBay, for as little as $159.99. That compares very favorably with B&H's new price of $303.59. Dealers or individuals are buying the kits for the sake of the cameras and jettisoning the bundled lenses.
Mysteriously, there are Panasonic 14mm lenses listed on eBay priced as high as $599.50. (Plus forty-eight dollars shipping.) This, while typical, has always seemed very strange to me. Why are these listed? How can they hope to sell? Not only does the selling price make no sense compared to the best price for the same item on eBay; not only does it make no sense compared to the new price from B&H; it even makes no sense compared to the price from a front-line bricks 'n' mortar retailer. The "Completed Listings" show no 14mms selling for higher than $280—versus a whopping 26 listings currently offering new 14mm lenses for more than that. As soon as the de-kitted lenses from Panasonic's GF3 fire sale are gone, I'm sure those overpriced lenses will still be there.
Always check B&H!
The logical explanation is simple: potential buyers exist who won't check new prices elsewhere. There are other possible explanations too, of course—maybe there are people in the world who can't buy from a discounter, or from the U.S., and who live in the mountainous rainforest of Rongo-Rongo and don't have local retailers. Or whose religion forbids them from buying anything when the price begins in anything but a "5." Or something.
But it does underline a simple rule for most of us: always check the new B&H price for anything before buying something new or used on eBay. Always.
I always do. And consistently, over the years, I've seen used items offered and sold on eBay for supposedly "rock bottom prices" that cost more than B&H is selling them for new.
The difference is the price of ignorance, I guess. I don't mean "ignorance" as an insult; I mean it literally. The buyers didn't know.
Not throwing stones
I buy an embarrassing amount of stuff from eBay. What can I say? It's the virtual camera fair (real camera fairs are still fun, once in a while—although I haven't been to one in years) and pretty much anything you've got to have now if you can possibly find it are sitting there innocently awaiting your greedy clutches. Catnip. I'm a sucker, as much as anybody.
But really, it doesn't cost anything but a few moments to do a quick round of basic comparison shopping before you bid to win. Those de-kitted 14mms might really be a bargain, right now, but not everything on eBay is.
Mike
Send this post to a friend
Please help support TOP by patronizing our sponsors B&H Photo and Amazon
Note: Links in this post may be to our affiliates; sales through affiliate links may benefit this site. More...
Original contents copyright 2012 by Michael C. Johnston and/or the bylined author. All Rights Reserved.
Following on my purchase of an OMD (I refuse to designate it an E-M5 - in fact I can't usually remember that) I've just ordered one of these 14mm lenses from a UK supplier. A little more expensive than the far eastern offers but still pretty cheap compared to my shelf full of FF Nikkors. I already bought a Panasonic 20mm 1.7 and I'm looking lustfully at the Olympus 45mm 1.8. This body and these three lenses are my substitute for an almost-purchased Fuji X-Pro 1 kit - a narrow escape I believe.
Now every time I pick up my D700 it feels like it's doubled in weight since the last time I used it. But the controls and the viewfinder! An OMD doesn't even come close. Mind you the live histogram's not bad.
I'm looking forward to your thoughts on the OMD Mike!
Roy
Posted by: Roy | Monday, 21 May 2012 at 02:35 PM
This has been, for some time, the most underrated lens in 4/3, IMHO. I bought it with the GF3 last August as an entry into 4/3 and a high quality small camera I could use when I didn't want to carry my Pentax K-5.We spent a month in Provence. I ended up using this combo for 50% of my pictures and 50% of my blog posts. I also had the 20mm which accounted for another 30% and really didn't want for anything else. Once home I got the G3 and just took delivery of the E-M5 which I love. I have added the 45mm Oly and a long zoom and feel like I'm set (and then they announce the new fast zoom!!!).
I still use the GF3 a lot because of it's size and I don't miss the extra 4 megapixels at anything under 13x17. It's a winner.
Having taken delivery of Ctein's wonderful print and read his printing scold, I must go back to the woodshed and at least buff up my burn/dodge skills.
Posted by: Jim Weekes | Monday, 21 May 2012 at 02:44 PM
Good advice and may I add check KEH used prices to compare used items on Ebay.
Ebay is good for two things. Finding items at a bargain price and finding items you can't find elsewhere. If the price is the same I might as well buy from a reputable retailer like B&H or even Amazon.
Posted by: MJFerron | Monday, 21 May 2012 at 02:48 PM
I sold more than one used lens on ebay for the price of new ones from b&h. It always surprised me so I carefully asked once. Turned out buyer had nothing to do with photography; she was a single mom who wanted to photograph her baby. She had no idea about any camera stores on Internet.
Posted by: Oleg Shpak | Monday, 21 May 2012 at 02:56 PM
I too always check at B&H first. But after a recent purchase at B&H I then found it cost less at Amazon. So now I check at B&H and Amazon before making a purchase.
And I always check the shipping costs.
I have to admit if B&H is more but not by much I will go with B&H. Customer service is tops there. Amazon not so good but better than most.
Posted by: John Krill | Monday, 21 May 2012 at 02:59 PM
I bought a GF3 because of your post. I have a G2 and had been thinking about that lens, and my wife has a 5 year old point and shoot that she wanted to upgrade, so this was the perfect solution. She gets a camera that's perfect for someone who's getting more interested in photography and wants a better camera, and I get to use that lens. Plus, I signed up for the Amazon card and got an additional $30 off, so the whole thing was only $280.
So thanks, TOP!
Posted by: Robert S. | Monday, 21 May 2012 at 03:30 PM
Ebay often proves the axiom about a fool and their money. I buy much of my gear second hand on the Bay with great savings and success, but the first rule of buying there is always do your research!
Posted by: Dave | Monday, 21 May 2012 at 03:35 PM
I got a GF3 with 14mm pancake in the UK recently for about the same price after cashback. It looks like retailers had a lot of stock to clear now that the GF5 has been announced.
For the price, it was an astonishing deal. My LX5 is now redundant - the GF3 is the same size, has better performance and is 2/3 of the price. It will be interesting to see if comparable discounts are offered on the GH2 in due course.
Posted by: Peter R | Monday, 21 May 2012 at 03:55 PM
Good advice here Mike. I bought my Pentax FA* 24/2 on eBay, after waiting about 3 months for a good auction (which ended up being a Buy It Now, and not really a bargain price, but solid).
Incidentally, within hours of this auction popping up, the other related auctions dropped their prices. Like any market, there are also expert sellers, so the buyer should beware.
Pak
Posted by: Pak-Ming Wan | Monday, 21 May 2012 at 04:02 PM
I took advantage of this deal. I'm looking to this to see how a micro 4/3 camera can do with some of my Nikon macro stuff (got an adapter coming as well). And I hope to evaluate the image quality relative to the LX5 I usually grab as my small camera. For daylight shots the LX5 is pretty good, but it's not so hot as the light fades.
Posted by: Larry Gebhardt | Monday, 21 May 2012 at 04:08 PM
I find ebay most useful for selling things.
I do sometimes buy photo gear there, but only if I'm sure I know what the current state of the market is, and if I feel I have the self-control to wait for a good price.
Posted by: David Dyer-Bennet | Monday, 21 May 2012 at 04:50 PM
I got one of these from a US address - not quite as cheap as from Asia ($185 vs $165 as I remember, but came with a small neoprene bag, and was well packaged); still a decent price for a lens of this quality. I haven't used it much (it's been a hell of a semester), but hopefully things will change now that I'm not teaching anymore. Of course there's always the house which needs to be cleaned up as well.
Posted by: Steven Ralser | Monday, 21 May 2012 at 04:58 PM
Sometimes, eBay pricing just bamboozles me.
Some of them are so outlandish as to suggest they're hoping for buyers who hold an unshakeable conviction that eBay is always the cheapest place to buy, so much so that they won't even bother to check elsewhere.
A year or two ago I saw someone selling a Pentax *ist-D and whatever kit lens came before the DA lenses started to appear. They wanted something like $600 for it. At the time KEH were asking about $250 for the same body with the newer 18-55 kit lens.
Posted by: Paul Glover | Monday, 21 May 2012 at 05:14 PM
Some dealers, and even Amazon UK are selling these "de-kitted" lenses. It should be noted that such purchases will be very unlikely to qualify for any "cashback" offers.
As I commented in the earlier post, in the UK there's a £50 cashback offer running on most Panasonic lens purchases until the end of May. That applies to some kits too.
Posted by: Dave Stewart | Monday, 21 May 2012 at 06:01 PM
A lot of folks believe that "you get what you pay for" business, and figure that the most expensive item is the best. There must be something wrong with the cheaper ones, otherwise why should they be so cheap?
Posted by: hugh crawford | Monday, 21 May 2012 at 06:31 PM
I really wish I could justify buying this lens because it's so cute, it's my most used focal length, and (at the moment) it's rediculously cheap. But I already have two lenses (Panasonic 7-14 and Olympus 14-42II) at this focal length, and I can't figure out how I will use the little prime. I'm not very concerned about "pocketability" or speed in a wide angle. Most test sites don't seem to rate the sharpness of the 14mm higher than the zooms I already have at that focal length (except the tests that were recently posted on the Lensrentals blog). Ideas?
Posted by: Chris | Monday, 21 May 2012 at 09:42 PM
As I said economics makes no sence.
1) Pana sells an excellent 14 for lets say about 303 dollars....
2) Pana/Amazon sells it in a kitt with a GF3 for 314 dollars
Now personally I think about the profit models of these pricings and then I know someone with a Pana system is not supposed to buy the GF3/14 kitt. And also that the resell value of the GF3 will go down.
I think someone at Pana sure knows how to call Amazon and B&H......or the other way around, and I now have a bad taste in my mouth. That is why:
http://www.marktplaats.nl
and
http://www.fotoapparatuur.nl
are the places were I buy my stuff. Always secondhand and never new. It reduces the amount of energy and materials wasted as well which makes ecological sence.
Greetings, Ed
Posted by: Ed | Monday, 21 May 2012 at 11:39 PM
Gotta love it when deals like these come along. I just bought a GF1+20/1.7 new for 2990 SEK, whereas the 20/1.7 alone cannot be found for less than 3850 SEK here.
Posted by: Christer | Tuesday, 22 May 2012 at 02:02 AM
Dammit, I wasn't going to look any further at this lens and now I've gone on eBay for a quick check and oh wow, I'll never get a wide angle for my digital stuff at that price any other time, BUY IT NOW!
Budgeting now starts again in June.
Posted by: Ade | Tuesday, 22 May 2012 at 10:18 AM
I have been buying from B&H from this site for a while now. I think they are excellent. Very good customer service and unlike Amazon they will ship to a PO Box in Volcano Hawaii. Amazon will ship books and CDs to me but not camera stuff. I have no idea why that is.
Posted by: Ernest Theisen | Tuesday, 22 May 2012 at 11:39 AM
I believe that there is also a "check the price on KEH" corollary to your "check B&H" postulate.
Posted by: Vadim Gordin | Tuesday, 22 May 2012 at 12:37 PM
Well of course you should check B&H, if the item is current. But I'm surprised only 2 people mentioned KEH.
They sell used equipment, so their stock spans the whole history of modern photography. They are completely reputable, and have a liberal return policy. Their prices are a bit high, but their grading of condition is very conservative.
If the eBay price gets even close to the KEH price, then it isn't a bargain any more. How close depends on how much you value "peace of mind."
(Selling stuff to them is a whole different deal, though.)
Posted by: Paris | Wednesday, 23 May 2012 at 12:19 PM
this Panny 14mm 2.5 lens is excellent! I can really recommend it :)
Posted by: Peter Hovmand | Friday, 25 May 2012 at 06:00 AM
Thanks for the tip, Mike. I just bought one locally that I found on Craigslist. The guy sold it to me on the street outside my workplace, for $210, which is about $20 more than I'd pay for one from Hong Kong or Taiwan (including sales tax that I would have to pay at my door before the postman handed it over).
The guy said that he had sold three of them; all from GF3 kits. The list price in my local shop is $430. Can't beat that kind of savings (and door-step service). And don't worry about my local shop just yet. I bought my 25mm f1.4 from them for full list price a couple months ago.
Posted by: Phil | Friday, 25 May 2012 at 08:26 PM