For some reason, every now and then I just really enjoy seeing pictures of photographers at work.
Mike
(Thanks to J.C.)
Send this post to a friend
Please help support TOP by patronizing our sponsors B&H Photo and Amazon
Note: Links in this post may be to our affiliates; sales through affiliate links may benefit this site. More...
Original contents copyright 2012 by Michael C. Johnston and/or the bylined author. All Rights Reserved.
Mike Johnston browsing a web site called The Sartorialist?
Methinks the web maketh for strange bedfellows. <\;~)
Moose
Posted by: Moose | Friday, 27 April 2012 at 03:22 PM
Here's another great one:
http://www.thesartorialist.com/photos/on-the-street-les-tuileries-paris-3/
Posted by: Jed | Friday, 27 April 2012 at 03:26 PM
I knew I saw it before... She reminds me of... Dali.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Burning_Giraffe
Posted by: Dragos Bora | Friday, 27 April 2012 at 03:48 PM
Moose,
It's true I wore the same four pairs of jeans all the way through the Bush Administration, but they were black jeans, which I think makes me fashionable.
Dapper Mike
Posted by: Mike Johnston | Friday, 27 April 2012 at 03:51 PM
You don't say!
For a class, last term, I dug into the national archives of Canada, and put together a little series of photographers at work from different eras.
Here are the links to the pics. Click on the thumbs to see the full-size pics
Dry plate photographer changing plates, 1897.
W.H. Ellis was rather famous in his day for being one of the founders of forensic science (what the CSI guys do in the lab). One of his students discovered the way to test for alcohol in breath.
Ororeangnak, unidentified Inuit man, Fox News Cinematographer George Valiquette, and naturalist J. Dewey Soper taking a picture of an Inuit man, possibly Nu-Kud-lah, 1923.
In 1923 was held in Pond Inlet, Canadian Arctic, a rather mediatized trial for the murder of a white trader by an Inuit. For the first time, a court of justice was set up there with lawyers and the whole shebang. As most things involving First Nations in Canada, things did not go well. The cinematographer is a French Canadian working for the American Fox News (for the movie theatres, back in the day!), and the photographer is a major Arctic naturalist. The current description of the picture is limited, and I'm the one to lay claim to having identified the circumstances and the Inuit men on it.
Woman photographer photographs female munitions worker at the Dominion Arsenals Plant, 1942.
The National Film Board of Canada has the most amazing archives of documentary photographs. There are plenty more by Harry Rowed, but this one is rare enough to show a woman photographer AND crop/perspective marks. You can see that the two horizontal lines are not perfectly parellel. In the enlarger, when you tilt the easel until they become parallel, the vertical line will be perfectly straight (try in Photoshop!).
Photographer Michael "Miki" Berens at the Standish Hotel, ca. 1950.
This guy was an amateur photographer (albeit a wealthy one: Linhof Technika, anyone?) for a Gatineau hotel, shooting the famous people (mostly jazz musicians) and the patrons. Who knows who took this picture, but there's a dirty joke hidden in it... Note also the raised lensboard to compensate for the parallax of the wire finder. That's how pros did it in the day!
Mike Robinson daguerreotyping Gabor Szilasi, by Arnaud Maggs, 2003.
Three Canadian photographers, the last frames of a 35mm roll and the earliest publicly available photographic process: bookends for the history of analog photography. Szilasi, a Hungarian émigré, is worth checking out if you like HCB/Doisneau style; Maggs is also a graphic designer, and a typologist a little bit like the Bechers; Robinson is one of the rare serious daguerrotypists left.
Posted by: Michel Hardy-Vallée | Friday, 27 April 2012 at 03:58 PM
Must be her shooting stance.
Posted by: Daniel Clements | Friday, 27 April 2012 at 04:05 PM
Especially THAT photographer...
Posted by: Rob Atkins | Friday, 27 April 2012 at 04:25 PM
"It's true I wore the same four pairs of jeans all the way through the Bush Administration, but they were black jeans, which I think makes me fashionable."
Not in mourning?
Moose
Posted by: Moose | Friday, 27 April 2012 at 05:16 PM
Ha!
Posted by: Charles Maclauchlan | Friday, 27 April 2012 at 05:20 PM
Is she shooting or dancing? (Didn't they say Cartier-Bresson kind of danced while working?) Wonderful.
@Jed: A Minolta SRT on the street in 2012? Incroyable!
Posted by: robert e | Friday, 27 April 2012 at 06:15 PM
I look at the Sartorialist because it's one of the best street-photogaphy sites --- street photography of a particular kind. A few weeks ago (or maybe months ago, I dunno) the guy had a whole series on photographers outside of fashion shows. I couldn't find it in the archives...but here's another one that will get Mike J. aroused, if I remember correctly his taste in film cameras -- she's using a Minolta.
http://www.thesartorialist.com/photos/on-the-street-les-tuileries-paris-3/
Posted by: John Camp | Friday, 27 April 2012 at 06:18 PM
Some more than others. Here are some more and some others ...
http://www.thesartorialist.com/?s=pretty+photographers
Posted by: Speed | Friday, 27 April 2012 at 06:50 PM
Despite being in Milan, I gues her name is NOT Manfrotto!
Cheers,
Walter
Posted by: Walter Glover | Friday, 27 April 2012 at 07:27 PM
She is a strict adherent to the philosophy of photography, approximately translated to english as "The Decisive Shoes"
And now I am, too.
Posted by: Andrew Molitor | Friday, 27 April 2012 at 08:13 PM
Down boy.
Posted by: Jim Witkowski | Friday, 27 April 2012 at 08:38 PM
I've seen videos of The Sartorialist and how he works, and I wouldn't call that street photography per se; it's more like an impromptu fashion shoot held on the street as he directs their action and poses. I very much doubt that he happened to shoot her as she was taking a shot.
Posted by: Poagao | Friday, 27 April 2012 at 11:04 PM
Fashion is not my thing either but every once in a while that dude lands a gem. This shot is one of them.
Posted by: MJFerron | Friday, 27 April 2012 at 11:37 PM
The picture lost something for me once I realised it had been posed. Don't know why.
Posted by: Paul Mc Cann | Saturday, 28 April 2012 at 01:49 AM
Hmzzz,
I see something weird in most of these pictures....all those ellegant women shlepping around with heavy DSLR's. I once read a discussion in a girl photographers forum and they were discussing Canon en Nikon DSLR's, heavy 2.8 lenses, that sort of stuff.
And then men like moi, Ctein and Mike are using u4/3 camera's because we like the agility and lightness on our feet they provide (I weigh about 90 kg BTW).
Now what's that all about, any amateur or pro-shrinks can come up with a theory? I mean, Pana made a pink GF1.....
Greetings, Ed
Posted by: Ed | Saturday, 28 April 2012 at 03:47 AM
Looks like madelung disease to me. Hunchbacked and thin shanked.
Posted by: Mike O'Donoghue | Saturday, 28 April 2012 at 04:41 AM
She certainly has all the angles...
Posted by: Tom higgins | Saturday, 28 April 2012 at 07:41 AM
If that's how street photographers look in Milan, maybe I should move there.
On the other hand, I'd be instantly ostracised if the standard is rigid.
Posted by: Eolake Stobblehouse | Saturday, 28 April 2012 at 08:12 AM
Pretty rear view, but an absolutely atrocious stance for a photographer...
Posted by: RobG | Saturday, 28 April 2012 at 08:26 AM
Meh! She's obviously using a tele-zoom rather a prime lens. Not impressed.
The legs on the other hand........
Posted by: John MacKechnie | Saturday, 28 April 2012 at 09:49 AM
Reading the comments, you can tell that TOP readership is predominantly male.
Personally, I love the photographic aspect ofThe Sartorialist as much if not more than the fashion aspect. Excellent editorial portraits, IMO.
Posted by: Jayson Merryfield | Saturday, 28 April 2012 at 10:45 AM
A street photographer in Havana:
Fom the series, "See See Havana".
Posted by: Herman Krieger | Saturday, 28 April 2012 at 12:03 PM
And this is why cameras need image stabilisation.
Posted by: Miserere | Saturday, 28 April 2012 at 01:30 PM
Here's another for your intellectual curiosity.
http://cafephilos.wordpress.com/2008/05/05/imogen-and-twinka/
[Note: Not work / school friendly --Ed.]
Posted by: Bill Mitchell | Saturday, 28 April 2012 at 01:58 PM
Hot girl with a kit lens is as big a turn off to me as hot girl scooping her dogs poo into a plastic bag.
http://www.thesartorialist.com/photos/all-the-pretty-photographers-part-iii/
Posted by: Paul | Saturday, 28 April 2012 at 02:00 PM
That jacket's not doing her any favours.
Notre dame est une bossu.
Posted by: Hugh | Sunday, 29 April 2012 at 07:53 AM
Bit_ _ stole my look!
Posted by: Joe Boris | Monday, 30 April 2012 at 05:21 PM