A prolific portrait photographer...at the DMV.
We had an eventful day here yesterday. Zander got his driver's license in the morning, and went off for his first-ever solo drive in the evening—with his admittedly nervous father watching the taillights recede down the alley. Later, I managed to set up Wi-Fi for the house, which of course turned out to be much easier than I thought it would be, even if I did have to call for help to both the ISP and Apple. (Everything worked from the start except my main work computer, which obstinately refused to recognize the signal.)
In between, we went down to the Milwaukee Auto Show, and I snapped happy snaps of cars, motorcycles, and showgoers to my heart's content. Ever notice that when you first take a bunch of pictures, you're all proud of yourself, and eager to show them off, just because they're something new that you've created?* But my auto show snaps look like every other auto show snap you've ever seen, mainly just car after car with pinpoint reflections all over shiny metal.
Remember that Toyota-Subaru I wrote about a while back? That was what I really wanted to see. Scion said their version, the FR-S, isn't out yet, but—yay!—Subaru had a bright blue BRZ on display.
Emphasis on "on display." I was hoping I'd get to sit in it, to see if I fit (I'm 6'2" and 230, but hey, I fit in my old '01 Miata), but no such luck—the car was roped off and nobody was allowed to touch. Very...anticlimactic.
It brings up an interesting point: it might actually be a long time before I can even sit in one, much less drive it. Dealers aren't going to be doing test drives, because they'll be able to sell their entire allotments without offering test drives. And it's quite possible that dealers will have their allotted cars sold before they arrive—meaning that other interested parties won't even be able to plant their butts in one. It's possible it could be a year before I can even find out how comfortably my aging frame can fold into the front seat. For a while, anyway, it looks like the only way you're going to be able to try one is going to be to buy one.
And you thought buying cameras by mail order was bad.
Meanwhile, Zander discovered his new favorite car at the Scion booth—a Scion tC in "Cement." (That's the color, not a reference to a certain recently famous Porsche.) Good thing he's just about to start a new job. He'll have to save his money. Even cheap cars are expensive these days. (Can you name the cheapest American car ever?)
The picture at the top of the page—the one single snap I lazily made at the DMV, waiting with Xander and bored—turned out to be my favorite of the day (proving, yet again, that you never know where the next good picture is coming from). It makes this post very on topic—note the yellow sign. The guy in the picture takes more portraits every day than almost any of us. There's a downside, of course—most of his portraits look exactly like driver's license mugshots. Because they are driver's license mugshots.
Xander's looks perfectly in keeping with the genre.
Mike
*This is a bit too graphic for me, but Phil Davis used to say that photographers with new work were just like two-year-olds being potty trained who are proud of their poops. "Mommy, Mommy, look what I made!" I'd be inclined to cut photographers more of a break—or at least concoct a more dignified description—but it's true, it does usually pay to give new work some time to cure and mature so you can get over that first flush of enthusiasm and edit a little more objectively. After all, even poop becomes fertilizer eventually when it's processed properly.
Send this post to a friend
Please help support TOP by patronizing our sponsors B&H Photo and Amazon
Note: Links in this post may be to our affiliates; sales through affiliate links may benefit this site. More...
Original contents copyright 2012 by Michael C. Johnston and/or the bylined author. All Rights Reserved.
ADDENDUM: The cheapest-ever new American car in nominal dollars was the 1923 Ford Model T. Introduced in the fall of 1922, the early '23 "tin lizzie" cost $290, which proved to be the culmination of the frugal Henry Ford's relentless lifelong push to increase sales by constantly lowering prices. By 1923, of course, his Model T Fords were competing with a new and somewhat unforeseen competitor: used Model T Fords. No production car would ever cost as few dollars again.
A 1923 Model T Ford. I'm not sure if this was the body style
of the cheapest version.
The cheapest functioning new camera ever, to my knowledge, was a plastic 35mm camera offered as a prize by Bazooka Bubblegum. To get one you had to send it $1.99 and five comics, which you had to collect by buying the bubblegum.
The first car we saw yesterday was probably the best—this Duesenberg just inside the door. A car very similar to this was probably the diametric opposite of the '23 Model T above—the most extravagantly built car in history. It would cost more to duplicate this car today than Volkswagen Group spends to build a Bugatti Veyron. A Duesenberg set the record for the highest price ever paid for an American car—10.3 million dollars for the Whittell Duesenberg, a Murphy-bodied 1931 Model J coupe.
Featured Comment by Derek Lyons: "Proud of yourself, and eager to show them off? Nope. If anything, I'm (in)famous for being guardedly close and not sharing until I've had a chance to review and edit them. Sometimes, I'll sometimes even toss a whole set into the archives and not revisit them for weeks or months. My current record is seven months between the session (of photos taken for a series I'm working on) and release.... Though there's an even older set I'm still cogitating on, which'll be a year old in a few weeks."
Featured Comment by Eric Ford: "I laughed, hard, at that analogy about new work and potty training. You could probably say that of many art forms. Certainly as a writer and having sat through writing classes/workshops I can say it applies to that field as well."
Yes, the over poop-sharing urge is strong among us. I've slowly weaned myself from it over the past couple years. The other extreme can be bad too, never sharing. How are you supposed to find out if your poop actually doesn't stink?
Off the poopy topic: isn't it about time Wisconsin starts accepting credit and debit cards at its DMV testing centers?
Posted by: John Krumm | Tuesday, 28 February 2012 at 01:11 PM
"No Credit Cards Accepted", did I read that right? Is that cash fee for the portrait or the license I wonder...
and what a great post link to the cement Porsche.
Posted by: Ed Kirkpatrick | Tuesday, 28 February 2012 at 01:18 PM
I'm not so sure Phil Davis isn't right, when I look at some shot I took a few days later...And even with the ehanced processing photoshop gives, some of it never does make even moderately good fertilizer. By the way I'm similar in size to you. Have you ever tried to fit into the driver's seat of a Nash Metropolitan?? Its the only car I ever got into that I needed help to get out of.
Posted by: Richard Newman | Tuesday, 28 February 2012 at 01:46 PM
Interesting that you'd ask about the least expensive American car. I'd like to know what the group mind turns up. I've been pricing the upcoming Toyota Prius C, which starts at 19,710, and gets 53/46 mpg. Given my current car, and current gas prices, gives me a 2,500 discount over 10 years. (A typical lifespan for cars I own.) I've modeled several gas price scenarios, and this is looking like a very good deal. (Some scenarios reduce the price to around 11,500 or so, an excellent price for any new car.) Very like counting megapixels, though: I see a substantial savings because I'd double my effective gas milage.
The try it before you buy it problem is likely to be much worse, though. I wanted a Prius when they first came out, but the wait list was so discouraging that I essentially forgot about it for years.
Posted by: Will Frostmill | Tuesday, 28 February 2012 at 01:57 PM
"Can you name the cheapest American car ever?"
YUGO? Though not American-made, but still.
Posted by: Slobodan Blagojevic | Tuesday, 28 February 2012 at 02:10 PM
I have the feeling that, if I pulled out a real camera (not a sneaky cell phone) in a New York MV office, I'd probably get shot. Only question is whether it would be by a customer or the staff.
Posted by: Peter | Tuesday, 28 February 2012 at 03:23 PM
How to tell if you are too drunk to drive:
1. Go to the restroom and look in the mirror.
2. Get out your driver's license and hold it up to the mirror beside your face.
3. If you look as bad as your driver's license photo, YOU'RE TOO DRUNK TO DRIVE.
Posted by: Bill Rogers | Tuesday, 28 February 2012 at 03:38 PM
When I shot film and developed it myself, I'd develop a whole bunch of rolls, dry them and then contact them and put them in a binder. I wouldn't really go over them for a few months and by then the "Look what I made!" would have faded and I could look at them objectively. That's also when I'd find the hidden gems.
Posted by: Jim Weekes | Tuesday, 28 February 2012 at 04:01 PM
Mike, I'm about 6'2" and close to '230' in American parlance. Since we won't buy cars in the UK without a demonstrator, I'll endeavour to sit in one for you - purely in the interests of reasearch you understand.
Amusingly, as weight is mentioned and my mass is somehat more than desired, I am fully aware that the best way to improve my cycling ability is to reduce my weight and not the bike's... another recession busting plan I think!
Posted by: Mike Shimwell | Tuesday, 28 February 2012 at 04:30 PM
Have you ever considered how odd it is that you have to get a permission slip from the government before you drive the car that you own on roads that you paid for at gunpoint?
Posted by: Mandeno Moments | Tuesday, 28 February 2012 at 04:32 PM
Don't sneer. Richard Avedon got his photographic start making mug shots of his fellow merchant seamen.
Posted by: Bill Mitchell | Tuesday, 28 February 2012 at 04:37 PM
My Subaru dealer told me that there will only be about 3000 BRZs for the whole US this year, about 5 or 6 per dealer, and that, as you mentioned, most will be pre-sold.
Sad. It's a great idea, but apparently they're not really serious about it.
Posted by: Paris | Tuesday, 28 February 2012 at 04:39 PM
"No Credit Cards Accepted", did I read that right? Is that cash fee for the portrait or the license I wonder...
Ed, I just renewed my Alberta licence and it was the same payment restriction even though the registries are privately run.
No credit cards, cash or debit only....and if you used debit, they charged an extra handling fee. I felt like going to the bank and getting it all in the smallest change possible!
Might have to go to the Calgary Auto Show. The Scion iQ is intriguing...
Posted by: Martin | Tuesday, 28 February 2012 at 04:53 PM
Be careful about shooting government employees doing their work in government offices! It shouldn't be a big deal, but nowadays you take a real chance of being hassled if you do something as dangerous as take a picture of a federal building. Maybe the DMV is more lax about it, but living near DC has made me wary of shooting anything relating to the government.
Posted by: Isaac Crawford | Tuesday, 28 February 2012 at 05:27 PM
"Have you ever considered how odd it is that you have to get a permission slip from the government before you drive the car that you own on roads that you paid for at gunpoint?"
Mandeno,
I'll take it you're writing from another alternate Universe...
I certainly don't consider it odd at all. The thought of drivers who are any less prepared cluttering the road than those who already do is something I find distinctly alarming, though.
In my view the training for drivers ought to be stiffened considerably. At the very least, everyone should go through a one-day performance driving course at a closed track, centering on safety maneuvers such as panic stops, ice braking, and skid recovery. I'd prefer it be three days. And I think everyone ought to be required to demonstrate proficiency with a manual gearshift as well. And I think the driving age should be raised to 18 nationally, and that very young and very old drivers should be tested more frequently.
Finally, I don't have a gun pointed at my head. And never have. So far...fifty five years and counting. Courtesy of the police and armed forces ably provided by my government. In lots of places in the world, people do have guns pointed at their heads, and that's not funny.
Mike
Posted by: Mike Johnston | Tuesday, 28 February 2012 at 05:47 PM
According to the inflation calculator here -
http://www.bls.gov/data/inflation_calculator.htm
- $290 in 1922 had the same purchasing power as $3,912.67 in 2012. (You said the 1923 model was introduced in fall '22.) I would have to think that's in the running for cheapest ever, although I'm not nearly enough of a car guy to really know.
That's using CPI. There are a bajillion ways to calculate inflation; that gives one reasonable estimate.
The term that's usually used for dollars when you haven't adjusted for inflation is "nominal", which makes sense -- they are dollars in name only, not in purchasing power. Adjusted dollars are usually called "real". "Absolute" could be confusing, because there's a sense in which adjusted dollars are absolute: they allow you to compare prices from different eras. Hope that's helpful, not just pedantic.
Posted by: Andrew Burday | Tuesday, 28 February 2012 at 07:14 PM
"The guy in the picture takes more portraits every day than almost any of us." And no photoshopping.
Posted by: toto | Tuesday, 28 February 2012 at 08:27 PM
At some point, I would think that almost everyone buys cameras by mail order.
Those who are on the tip of the money pyramid (digital back, Nikon D3 users and so on) simply buy "the next flagship" the second it's released. I don't think they even bother on trying the equipment.
Those on the bottom (who have 'some lenses' and can't afford to change the system they're in) just buy "the best they can afford", whatever that model is.
For me, the only time I've really tried a new camera before actually buying it was when I got a brand new Olympus D520. I couldn't decide between that one and the Coolpix 2000.
Posted by: Gaspar Heurtley | Tuesday, 28 February 2012 at 08:44 PM
@Andrew Burday: another way to do this type of comparison calculation is to determine how many months of pay [for the average worker] is required.
Posted by: Sven W | Tuesday, 28 February 2012 at 09:32 PM
Andrew, that's intriguing. It may also be useful speculate whether it is possible to manufacture a Model T for $3,912.67 today. Remember, the thing had no starter, no airbags, no seat-belts, no... I could go on and on.
More instructively, the Tata Nano, introduced a couple of years ago at $2500, is a technologically superior car, delivering a much safer and faster ride.
I know I'd rather be safe in a $30,000 Volvo, BMW or Chrysler 300 (or a $2,500 Nano) than sorry in a $3,912.67 model T. Thank goodness for technology.
Posted by: Mani Sitaraman | Tuesday, 28 February 2012 at 09:56 PM
I managed to get some seat time in the BRZ at the Toronto Auto Show the other week. If you fit in a Miata you'll fit in this, although it's much smaller than I thought it was going to be. It's significantly shorter than my Genesis Coupe, enough so that the rear seats are completely useless. Should be great to drive though, it had a very functional interior, nothing special, but good nonetheless.
My report from the show:
http://bdfd.com/en/News/1/1/417/Canadian+International+Auto+Show+2012++My+Commentary+and+Best+of+List
regards
Rob
Posted by: Rob Smith | Tuesday, 28 February 2012 at 10:04 PM
And you know what, sometimes those auto show snaps don't come out too bad!
http://www.flickr.com/photos/rob_smith_photography/6898319661/in/photostream
even with the pinpoints and the shiny metal.
Posted by: Rob Smith | Tuesday, 28 February 2012 at 10:06 PM
Sold out BRZs and no test drives should be no surprise. It's that way for any hot new car. The 1990 Miata was the same way: list price (and then some!), no test drives, nonrefundable deposit if you even want to be on the list. It was egregious avarice by wanker car dealers, and it bit them in the ass later. No one had anything good to say about that kind of profiteering.
Same thing with any hot car though: 1964 mustang was the same way, and various others through the years. Give them a year or two to cool down and then prices and availability get back to normal.
Much of the time, the cars that get hyped up so much and overpriced like this aren't even worth it, though hopefully the toyota/subie will be better than say the 1990 miata (which, while interesting and fairly fun to drive, was gutless with no torque and performance-wise left a lot to be desired. It was light and RWD though, that was about all it had going for it IMNSHO.)
Agreed with Mike re: driver's tests. 3-day track event in your own car should be mandatory. Refreshers for 1 day every 2 years thereafter too. Skip Barber and others have Teen driving programs, which when my boys get to that age, they will definitely be attending.
-Ed
Posted by: Ed | Wednesday, 29 February 2012 at 12:24 AM
That car show anticlimax really reminded me about the period of time after the X100 was announced, but no real cameras really existed (although there where roumors of some beta cameras around). I was very eager to try it out and when the big photoexcibition in Lillestrøm was held, Fuji-Norway announced that you could see the new camera there. Joy-o-joy, I took the train over there, and found the Fuji boot quite fast after arrival. The boot was quite large with a big part of it set up as a beach scene where one could try the different Fuji models, taking pictures of your own kids or something. No X100 was to be seen there however. Finally I noticed it, over in a corner there was a small glass display with a X100 mock up in it. The mock up iteslf, however authentic in shape, was not working and there was no way to touch it. The Fuji representative did not know much, no price and no information about the camera itself that could not be deducted from the paperwork. He did'nt even know when the camera would arrive in the country.
The rest of the sales boots of the show was boring, but the photo excibitions was not, so the trip to Lillestrøm was not a total vaste after all.
Posted by: Thomas Tveit Rosenlund | Wednesday, 29 February 2012 at 02:24 AM
And of some strange origin! The new Bentley for Jeremy Clarkson.....
http://www.bentleygreenpower.com/
Greetings, Ed
Posted by: Ed | Wednesday, 29 February 2012 at 03:02 AM
Zander's first solo car ride huh? For a laugh he should retell the experience for his buddies at http://www.firstcarstory.com/
Posted by: Ed Buziak | Wednesday, 29 February 2012 at 07:15 AM
A gallery exhibit of driver license mug shots might be fun to see. I'd love to read the accompanying cards of artist statements or the curator's introductory remarks.
Posted by: Robert Roaldi | Wednesday, 29 February 2012 at 07:42 AM
Not to be a nag or anything, but does your state have restrictions for new drivers? It can be a very, very good idea to keep his first 5000 miles of driving solo miles--friends tend to be large distractions and/or temptations for inexperienced drivers.
Posted by: Alex Bier | Wednesday, 29 February 2012 at 12:22 PM
Got the Bazooka Cam beat. My first camera, around 1954, cost fifty cents and two Wheaties box tops. Of course, the Wheaties may have cost more than the bubble gum, but I bet I still came out ahead. I still have a picture from that camera, too.
Posted by: Rob Reiter | Wednesday, 29 February 2012 at 01:54 PM
Back in the day I did send in the Bazooka comics and received a really crappy plastic 120 film camera called a Diana. It was flimsy and leaked light and I took a roll or two before giving up on it.
Many years later I found a new-in-the-box Diana in the Salvation Army thrift store for $1.50. After learning how to use it, it has become my favorite camera for the past 15 years. It has given me many great photos and I have a special feeling when using it. I developed a confidence that I could make a great image while using it and for me that is the most important factor about a camera.
First pic from original camera, second taken more recently
http://jonshiu.com/misc/Dad.jpg
http://jonshiu.com/misc/Shiu_Jon_Wawona.jpg
Posted by: Jon Shiu | Wednesday, 29 February 2012 at 05:41 PM
http://www.oldwoodies.com/gallery-cyclecars.htm
Cheaper then a Ford T, but the difference was to smal to matter in the end......and an inspiration for the Bentley boys BTW in my earlier post.
Greetings, Ed
Posted by: Ed | Thursday, 01 March 2012 at 01:23 AM
Well, Zander would be a better driver, since his father also likes cars. That hobby usually runs through the genes, hahaha. As for the Model T, it symbolizes how Americans started to produce that culture of making and purchasing cars. It was the first car that was truly designed for the masses.
Posted by: Delsie Maidens | Friday, 02 March 2012 at 10:12 AM