Coffee
I won't be writing a lot more on coffee, and there's a reason for that.
I've raised my game considerably when it comes to my morning cup: I'm now roasting all my own coffee; I got myself a good burr grinder (the #1 most important purchase if you want good coffee), and I've put together a small "personal library" about coffee and learned an awful lot about it. As with most subjects, it's much more extensive than meets the eye, and much more fascinating than you'd think, once you get into it.
Aye, but here's the rub: I can't be a coffee connoisseur. Why? A very good reason: I can't smell. (I was going to say "I don't smell good," but hey, I shower.) That is, I don't have a good sense of smell.
They say that dogs' sense of smell is ten to 100 times as good as ours, but that they can't taste very well at all. Food is all in the nose for them. It's long been known, anecdotally and scientifically, that for humans, too, the most exquisite and sophisticated appreciation of flavors is a confabulation of taste and smell. Well, I've become convinced that half of the appreciation of coffee, if not more, is in the nose as well. And I just have a very poor sense of smell.
That isn't just the way I was born: I had chronic sinus infections for years, acquired a dependency on nasal spray for a time, and finally had to have an operation on my sinuses in 1988. I've probably had 80 to 100 sinus infections in my life, and used to have to get my sinuses flushed regularly. (Stop me if this is too much information). I breathe clearly, now, finally, but can't smell worth a damn.
The bottom line with coffee is, I can't appreciate the nuances. I like the good stuff, and I can tell the difference between what I like and what I don't, but I'm convinced I'm not getting the whole picture. So I figure I'm just not suited to be a coffee connoisseur. That fits with what I've long known about myself: I like good coffee, but I don't really mind bad coffee all that much. It has to be really bad before I can't drink it.
However, I have discovered that roasting your own is very easy—almost too easy. The roaster I bought is easy to learn and simple to use, although it takes up a significant amount of room and you need a Shop-Vac to clean up with. It's only as big as a large toaster oven or small microwave, but it needs clear space around it when you use it. Cleanup takes 30 seconds if you do it slowly, so don't be put off by that. They say it can be expected to last for 2–3 years of regular use, but green coffee beans cost 1/2 to 2/3 what roasted coffee costs, so I figure, for me, the roaster will pay for itself 1 1/2 to 2 times over before it goes to the big roastery in the sky. If you drink a lot of coffee and have the space, the money savings alone could be reason enough to learn to roast.
And even I can smell the aroma of roasting coffee.
The car
I'm frankly astonished by the Subaru-Toyota sports car that's just been introduced (and that I've been writing about). See if you follow: Subaru's version is called the BRZ, which, among other things, is Serbian for "quick"—or so I've heard; Toyota's version is called the FT-86, but will be sold as the Scion FR-S in North America, Scion being Toyota's budget brand targeted at young people. The two companies' cars are mechanically the same, but have different styling, tires, and options lists, and, more importantly, different suspension setups. Toyota did the styling and contributed some engine technology, but Subaru did the engineering and is building all of them.
Why astonished? Despite being talked about since almost forever, this thing comes completely out of left field. To begin with, it's small, and it's light, at least by today's standards—Ron Kiino in this month's Motor Trend calls it a "Miata coupe," and he's not far off, except that you can't get 200 hp and 150 pound-feet of torque from any known unblown Miata engine. And Mazda no longer sells a blown Miata. Yes, the Subaru-Toyota has a stick shift and the all-important rear-wheel drive, which are getting uncommon, and the engine's just a four-banger, albeit a boxer like in a Porsche. I love four-cylinder engines. Give me one any day, as long as the car it's in suits it.
All business: the BRZ from the helm. Photo courtesy Motor Trend.
Made by Subaru, you did get that? Subaru, which virtually forged its identity on full-time all-wheel-drive cars long before they were so common (remember when AWD vehicles were called "4x4s" and you had to switch manually into four wheel drive whenever you needed it?) And it significantly bucks some some very pervasive trends: the engine (at least for now, as introduced—the enthusiast base is already salivating for the inevitable STI version) is naturally aspirated, when everybody and his uncle is building turbos and putting them in everything (have you heard the one about the Turbo Chevy Sonic? It's true, and is reportedly a great improvement). It's dedicated to handling, in this day of horsepower über alles, when luxury carmakers will drop in engines that are too big even to the detriment of handling. (Mercedes AMG, I am talkin' 'bout you.)
No CVT, no turbo- or supercharger, no cylinder management, no AWD, no keep-up-with-the-Joneses horsepower for guys who are afraid their masculinity will be threatened if they don't cart around a whacking big thirsty engine they never need.
Yeah, it will have sat-nav available and a nanny or two. But it's not loaded down with a bunch of features. For the most part it's just basic, pure, old-fashioned sports car.
If you've been reading me on cameras for any length of time, you know what a breath of fresh air this is to me. I mean, BMW should really be ashamed of itself for not abandoning that old tagline "The ultimate driving machine." (Although it does seem to be gradually replacing it with "Sheer driving pleasure," which is more accurate.) Did you know that there's actually a BWM that has a cabin so well insulated from sound that buyers complain they can't hear the V8 well enough—so BMW actually pipes fake V8 engine noise into the passenger cabin through the stereo system when the car is switched to "sport mode"? I am not making this up. They're nice luxury cars, and I'm not slagging you if you own one, but, really, the days of the "ultimate driving machine" are completely over and gone even at BMW. Everything's market driven and the market is focused on "luxury" to a fault or "economy" in the breach.
And now here comes a pure driving machine, a Miata coupe with the engine Mazda won't give us. And it's been engineered from the ground up. All new. Any idea how uncommon that is, in this day and age? You can count the number of clean-slate cars on your fingers and toes, and if you lop off the one-percenter end of the market you won't need your toes.
It's like a camera coming along that had a 6-MP full-frame sensor, no viewing screen, no JPEG engine, buttons and knobs assignable by loading in third-party apps, and that had a viewfinder like an OM-4T*. And that was made of metal with leather gripping surfaces. The whole photography world would do double-takes. No, triple-takes. We'd all be shaking our heads and wondering, from what alternative universe did that thing come?
That's the BRZ. I can't wait to drive it. This, you will probably hear about from me again.
Mike
"Open Mike" is your host going off-topic and astray. Sundays only.
P.S. Here's my coffee library:
Home Coffee Roasting: Romance and Revival by Kenneth Davids. The basics of home roasting. Contains most of the information found in his more basic Guide to Buying, Brewing, and Enjoying.
Everything But Espresso: Professional Coffee Brewing Techniques by Scott Rao. The science behind brewing the perfect cup (essential). There's a companion volume for espresso if that's your interest.
The World of Caffeine: The Science and Culture of the World's Most Popular Drug by Bennett Alan Weinberg and Bonnie K. Bealer. (You might have to buy this one used!)
Uncommon Grounds: The History of Coffee and How It Transformed Our World by Mark Pendergrast. The history of coffee from its mythological origin-story to the advent of Starbucks; some overlap with the title above, but a different focus.
Javatrekker: Dispatches From the World of Fair Trade Coffee by Dean Cycon. On-the-ground view of direct trade and fair trade. Entertaining. Coffee is the world's second most valuable legal commodity, after oil, so the economics of it are important.
There's also a lot of information on the web, of course, although a lot of it is pretty far-flung.
*Don't say B&W-only, Mike. Don't say it. Don't say anything about a square sensor. These things will just make people crazy. Do not make people crazy.
Send this post to a friend
Please help support TOP by patronizing our sponsors B&H Photo and Amazon
Note: Links in this post may be to our affiliates; sales through affiliate links may benefit this site. More...
Original contents copyright 2011 by Michael C. Johnston and/or the bylined author. All Rights Reserved.
Featured Comment by Karl: "To be honest, I'm not crazy about the body styling. After driving one it might well become beautiful, but as I see it now it looks a bit over- styled. The sculpture to it feels a little forced, a bit too much. The line is clean then broken. Just my opinion."
Mike replies: True, its looks are only so-so. But then, the major requirement in terms of appearance is to, let us say, keep the lack of appeal at bay, which they've more or less done. I mean, look at the parentage here: Subaru, whose WRX is one of the strangest of modern designs, to put it politely; and Toyota, whose previous sports car was the MR2. Considering that lineage, it's pretty amazing that the new baby isn't quite a bit...er, less attractive.
Featured Comment by Earl Dunbar: "Oh man, the new OM-D is going to be a sexy OM-4T with a big B&W sensor! Yaaaa hooo!!!"
Mike replies: I know nothing. Unfortunately, I mean that un-ironically.
Featured Comment by JH: "When I read that BMW was using this sound system to pipe in engine noise for the new M5, I collapsed in laughter. When I had a E46 M3 and was a BMW Club Instructor for track days, I cornered the M brand manager at a club gathering and gave him an earful about the car being so quiet. He calmly explained they could not make loud exhausts or engines because of the European laws regarding noise. So I suggested, jokingly, of course, the could at least put the noise through the sound system (which is networked with the engine management system). Oh my god, am I responsible for this travesty?"
Mike replies: Oh, so you're the guy!
"It's like a camera coming along that had a 6-MP full-frame sensor..."
No, it's like a new, back to basics film camera... a total photography machine with no frills, no excess, no electronic BS, just what's needed and nothing more. (In other words... the Nikon FM3A with better marketing.)
Posted by: Craig | Sunday, 29 January 2012 at 03:22 PM
I know whereof you speak about lacking a sense of smell, as mine is so bad, I have never knowingly smelled a fart in my life.
I do have a sense of taste, though, and I can sometimes taste smells if they're strong enough by sticking out my tongue.
Yet, despite these handicaps, I am somehow able to discern various flavors of single-malt scotch whiskeys and can reliably identify my favorites. I have never been able to smell coffee brewing or bacon frying, yet some perfumes drive me to distraction (and I don't mean that in a good way).
Weird. But at least I now know I'm not alone!
Posted by: Jeffrey Goggin | Sunday, 29 January 2012 at 03:55 PM
The Toybaru does look fabulous. AE86 fanboys have only been demanding this for ~20 years now. About bloody time. I have long desired an AE86 but held off due to the fanboy effect pushing up the prices of the parts.
The first test should be whether or not it allows the electronic nannies to be turned off... and unlike some Lexuses, have them stay turned off.
Posted by: Indigoid | Sunday, 29 January 2012 at 03:59 PM
Mike, a car built after 1990......need I say more.....!
Greetings, Ed
Posted by: Ed | Sunday, 29 January 2012 at 04:18 PM
I used to be a car nut, but then I found photography. I don't often get excited about cars anymore, but I totally get your fascination with the BRZ. Related: I used to own a '94 Miata. What a car.
Admittedly I've only read about the BRZ on TOP, but the thinking behind it strikes me as so right. And unfortunately so rare. Pity they couldn't make it better looking, though.
Posted by: Kalli | Sunday, 29 January 2012 at 04:28 PM
more importantly, different suspension setups.
So, which company does the good one?
Posted by: Paris | Sunday, 29 January 2012 at 04:37 PM
So... what is it about BMW's MINI Cooper that keeps it off your list? Bet your son would pick a MINI over one of "those" in a heart beat!
Cheers...
Posted by: MichaelG | Sunday, 29 January 2012 at 04:51 PM
You forgot to say that this post is off topic.
Or maybe it is on topic, if the comparison to a wildly improbably camera is germane.
And as for the coffee library: you make me want to take pictures of coffee and coffee paraphernalia, and so make coffee table books.
So I guess it is on topic after all...
Posted by: Michael | Sunday, 29 January 2012 at 05:06 PM
"So, which company does the good one?"
Paris,
Dunno yet, because I haven't driven them, but there are descriptions in MT. I think they like the Subie.
Mike
Posted by: Mike Johnston | Sunday, 29 January 2012 at 05:07 PM
I live a couple of blocks away from Steep and Brew here in Monona Wisconsin and at times when the wind is blowing just right I can smell the coffee roasting. Sometimes it smells like burnt toast. Not sure what they are roasting then, maybe some of the darker roasts.
Posted by: Mark Janness | Sunday, 29 January 2012 at 05:10 PM
This post encapsulates every article about cameras on the net even though it only mentions them in passing. Only a guy would write this article. Nothing wring with that of course, but reading things like this reminds me of what a boys only club photography (or at least photography chats) tend to be. So much of the internet is filled with guys obsessing about various things, cameras, guns, cars, even perfume! I kid you not, if you go to basenotes.net, you will find an overwhelming number of men obsessing about a product that is predominately consumed by women, perfume. I'm sure there are many other examples scattered across the net.
A thought experiment, would you have written the same article if you thought it was going to be read by mostly women? I bet not. I don't think I have an actual point other than this article made me wonder if I am in yet another all male group.
Posted by: Isaac Crawford | Sunday, 29 January 2012 at 05:20 PM
I almost replied to the OM follow-up post about not getting excited about camera rumors with my thoughts on the Subaru BRZ or "Breeze" as I call it. (Still not a good name no matter what you call it). I was not expecting anything at all from this joint venture, kind of like I'm not expecting much big on the digital OM. But, man, once the final announcements came I love it. I am even more excited by all the reviews I've read. I'm with Mike and, in fact, I've argued on another off topic post in the past that I wanted a lightweight car that makes driving exciting by being lightweight and agile. What's the fun of high horsepower when everyone has to go the same speed anyway? At least in the US, just because you have 500 hp doesn't mean you get to go 100mph wherever you want. You're still stuck going 35 mph like everyone else. So if you don't need room for storage why are we wasting money on heavy, lumbering land barges?
My wife likes large cars and so she has one that we can use when we need to carry large things but I want the lightest, most agile car I can get. I am very interested in what a rear-drive car will be like since as Mike has said, these cars seem to have disappeared a long time ago. It's about time one of these came back. If it weren't for the fact that I won't need a new car for 5-10 years and I have $0 in extra spending right now, I'd be itching to go to a Subaru dealer this year.
I really like these lines from Evo.co.uk online who gave both iterations of the car 5 out of 5 stars. (You'll have to read down the list for the reviews).
"It makes a Scirocco seem synthetic, an RCZ anaesthetised, a 3-series Coupé over-complicated. This is a pure driving device like an Elise or an MX-5 with sharpened sinews. This is how a proper sporting coupé should be."
Posted by: Jona | Sunday, 29 January 2012 at 05:24 PM
"You forgot to say that this post is off topic."
Michael,
No, all "Open Mikes" are off-topic, as is explained in the tag line every week. Look just below the "signature."
Mike
Posted by: Mike Johnston | Sunday, 29 January 2012 at 05:38 PM
Mike, I must be married to your sister! My wife used to get severe sinus infections three or four times a year. Then she had her sinuses roto-rootered and has been better. She still gets infections but much less so.
Oh yeah, bring on a pure driving machine. I still miss my old Alfas.
Posted by: John Brewton | Sunday, 29 January 2012 at 05:44 PM
I kept expecting to read that the car had a cup-holder for the coffee...
Posted by: Dave Stewart | Sunday, 29 January 2012 at 05:53 PM
The car you describe is similar in spirit and execution to the original Datsun 240Z.
They are very good looking in the flesh -- smooth and well proportioned.
Posted by: Speed | Sunday, 29 January 2012 at 06:36 PM
Just building my new car at the moment...
1972 MG Midget.
it's getting a 4 cylinder 125 HP K series engine from a modern MG; already got a modern 5 speed manual gearbox and modern suspension.
Should be 125 Horsepower, in a car that'll weigh less than 750kg.
0-60 in about 6.5 seconds;
50 miles per (UK) gallon.
Posted by: Hugh | Sunday, 29 January 2012 at 06:37 PM
In all the talk about coffee, was there a mention of the vessel into which the coffee is placed, before sipping/drinking???
I would think that to ensure the receptacle for the brewed coffee would be as important as the hardware and method by which the coffee itself is ground and then brewed.
Your thoughts, please.
Posted by: Bryce Lee | Sunday, 29 January 2012 at 06:43 PM
I am all for devices which have one primary function and do it really really well. It's not just the lack of complexity, it's the intimacy and immediacy of thought and response that marks such devices out from "general purpose" tools.
I do occasionally borrow a friend's Elise for a bit of track-day fun. This really is for me the epitome of the state of the art driver's car. Responses are almost telepathic, grip and feedback astonishing. Performance is brisk (0-60 in 5s) yet it uses a naturally aspirated Toyota 1.8VVT engine with 189hp.
The secret is very low weight and a very low C of G. It does not even need a roll bar and has a great ride, but manages to corner almost totally flat.
Having said all that my fast driving days ended with the universal application of speed cameras in just about every mile of the British road network. Now I just want to arrive as calm and comfortable as possible and haul people and gear around when I need to.
But I keep wondering what a photographic Lotus Elise would be like.
Posted by: Steve Jacob | Sunday, 29 January 2012 at 07:05 PM
Speed,
Very true. The 240Z was better looking than this car, but this car of course benefits from another 40 years of development of mechanicals and improvements in reliability. ...And rustproofing, of course!
I never drove an original Z. Would have liked to, though.
Mike
Posted by: Mike Johnston | Sunday, 29 January 2012 at 07:12 PM
Jona:
FYI, there are parts of the U.S. where you can get away with driving a car at 100+ mph for an hour or more at a stretch (and No, I'm not saying where!). Just because it's technically illegal, doesn't necessarily mean that it can't be done or that doing so means you're driving unsafely...
Besides, more than half of the fun of driving an overpowered car isn't going fast, but accelerating to the speed limit (or thereabouts) very quickly. 8^)
Posted by: Jeffrey Goggin | Sunday, 29 January 2012 at 07:48 PM
Please DO keep us updated...I'm salivating over this car. As a Toyota AND Subaru fan...drooling...and I can actually afford it!
Now if only I could justify that Fuji folder.
Posted by: Marty | Sunday, 29 January 2012 at 07:49 PM
Wait...would a Leica MP be an accurate comparison...related to the above FM3A reference? I've never owned my own Leica, so don't have the relevant appreciation, but the MP has often called to me as the best picture making tool of the 35mm variety.
"Where's the ....?"
"It doesn't have one."
I like that in both cars and cameras. ...women, too, but I digress.
Posted by: Marty | Sunday, 29 January 2012 at 07:56 PM
Re: coffee, I'd recommend checking out http://www.amazon.com/Caffeine-Blues-Hidden-Dangers-Americas/dp/0446673919
Posted by: Rhys | Sunday, 29 January 2012 at 08:18 PM
"No, it's like a new, back to basics film camera... a total photography machine with no frills, no excess, no electronic BS, just what's needed and nothing more."
No electronics, but a terrible time not being able to see my images, having to figure out how the heck I'd get them processed, what I'd do with them once I got them (get them scanned maybe?), etc. I'm a little tired of hearing film thought of as more "pure" photography; It's a fine form, and if you enjoy it or it suits your style, great.
But anymore, digital is the MUCH simpler way for most people to take photos. It's not a frill... it eliminates issues that would get in the way of photography for many people. Having film doesn't make it a pure photography machine any more than an equivalent digital camera would.
Sorry if this is a little bitter and not related to the post... but it's something that I see a lot of people say they want, that makes me hope they never get their way. (Like aperture rings on lenses!!)
Posted by: David Bostedo | Sunday, 29 January 2012 at 09:07 PM
BRZ could be a very nice car except for the fact that it's a butter face.
Posted by: JohnMFlores | Sunday, 29 January 2012 at 09:27 PM
Hi Mike, Love the Sunday "Open Mikes". I am now using the AeroPress, not on a daily basis, I am stuck on a french press, but when I want a really really good cup of coffee. Am saving up for the Breville grinder. Thank you for the tips. The AeroPress works great.
Since I am having to save up to buy a $200 coffee grinder I will not be getting the SubaruToyota Coupe anytime soon, but it stirs my automobile desires. I also love light, quick 4 cylinders. All I can afford is a Civic. But I love it.
Ken James
Posted by: Ken James | Sunday, 29 January 2012 at 09:37 PM
" For the most part it's just basic, pure, old-fashioned sports car..."
...and it's got two, count 'em, TWO CUPHOLDERS!
http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/coupes/1111_2011_tokyo_motor_show_subaru_brz_first_look/photo_07.html#photo
Sorry Mike, I couldn't help myself. It was the perfect opportunity to comment on both halves of your piece.
Posted by: Dave | Sunday, 29 January 2012 at 09:44 PM
We actually taste with our smell. It is not that we are sucking the fumes of the food through our nose, no a large percentage of our taste actually comes from our olfactory nerves. That why you can barely taste your food when you have a cold and your nose is all stuffed up.
Posted by: Bernd Reinhardt | Sunday, 29 January 2012 at 10:37 PM
Cars, coffee, and photography. Mike, you're like the long lost twin I never had. On or off topic, keep it up!
Posted by: Eric | Sunday, 29 January 2012 at 11:44 PM
Well not all male. I'm here too.
I'm pleased I read sufficiently far to see the bit right at the end "... like a camera coming along that had a 6-MP full-frame sensor, no viewing screen, no JPEG engine, buttons and knobs assignable by loading in third-party apps, and that had a viewfinder like an OM-4T*. And that was made of metal with leather gripping surfaces."
It seems to me, that each of us would like our particular selection of operational controls exposed on our camera. Of course my 'in-camera multiple exposure on a single frame' button is likely not desired by many others. (It'd be quite a large button too, to fit all those words. Or even the ICMEOASF acronym. Just glides off the tongue, doesn't it?)
But it's the button I want.
Oh yes, back off topic: my little Citroën C3 manges to happily zip around 'down under'.
Posted by: Thingo | Sunday, 29 January 2012 at 11:44 PM
Whatever all that stuff is in front of the shift wouldn't be in a real sports car, and the headlights are just embarrassing, but what do I know , my sports car doesn't even have a heater or a radio.
Posted by: hugh crawford | Monday, 30 January 2012 at 12:27 AM
Mike, you should try Durian, the fruit of a tree popular in Asia. They say it "Smells like hell and tastes like heaven". Personally I've never been able to get it past my nose. Most large hotels over there have signs on the door - "No Durian".
By the way, AWD did not replace four wheel drives. They are different systems.
Posted by: John | Monday, 30 January 2012 at 02:02 AM
So... what is it about BMW's MINI Cooper that keeps it off your list?
Compared to a real mini, it's not very mini.
Posted by: Steve Smith | Monday, 30 January 2012 at 03:15 AM
When I saw the headline, I thought you might have taken inspiration from Aki Kaurismäki's Take Care of Your Scarf, Tatiana (http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0110832/), in which one of the two loner-rockers has a coffee machine installed in his car.
Posted by: Ben | Monday, 30 January 2012 at 04:27 AM
For fellow Brits, a little translation...
Scion FR-S = Toyota GT86
Miata = MX-5
Chevrolet = If you've seen one, That'll be a Daewoo
OM-4T = OM-4Ti
Posted by: Ben | Monday, 30 January 2012 at 04:36 AM
I agree with you that the grinder is the most important purchase (I wish I'd seen your post before buying one for 5 times the price).
What type of coffee do you typically drink and what other gear have you bought?
Posted by: Guy Platt | Monday, 30 January 2012 at 06:16 AM
I completely missed the asterisk at the bottom. I want a B&W only, square sensor camera! I don't care if it drives others crazy and it's because I'm square. I also want it manual focus just like I like my cars with a stick shift. It will never happen so at least someone finally made the car I've been wanting. Why Mazda never made a coupe Miata or Honda a coupe S2000 is beyond me. I'm not a convertible guy. I'm surprised you like this car this much, Mike, since I thought you were the roadster type.
Posted by: Jona | Monday, 30 January 2012 at 08:58 AM
Also looking forward to reading more here and elsewhere about the BRZ. 30 more HP than Miata? Nice, but with 200 additional pounds over the Mazda, it may need it.
Posted by: David | Monday, 30 January 2012 at 09:08 AM
So, re the car, what are the cup holder specs?
Posted by: Patrick Dodds | Monday, 30 January 2012 at 09:11 AM
Forgive my insensitivity but why did you go down the road of home-roasting and burr-grinding with your known olfactory shortcomings?
(Unfortunately I have a super-sensitive nose. I say unfortunately because it makes my wife nuts. All sorts of odors/fragrances set me off...)
Cheers!
Posted by: SeanG | Monday, 30 January 2012 at 09:12 AM
And here I thought this was going to be a rant about drinking coffee in a car.
Posted by: Riley | Monday, 30 January 2012 at 11:35 AM
Mike,
The March 2010 issue of Automobile magazine has an article on the SubToy. Just as interesting is the article on the first Japanese sports cars, the Honda 800, Mazda Cosmo 110s, Toyota 2000gt and the Nissan Fairlady Z432.
toys for boys, and the men who can afford them!
Joe
Posted by: Joe B | Monday, 30 January 2012 at 12:17 PM
Sorry- make that the March 2012 issue of Automobile magazine
Posted by: Joe B | Monday, 30 January 2012 at 12:17 PM
Piped-in noise. That's a good line to use. Now camera manufacturers can claim that their sensors are totally noise-free even at ISO 102400, and people found it eerie, so the manufacturers had to add some noise.
Posted by: toto | Monday, 30 January 2012 at 12:24 PM
My sense of smell is also somewhat impaired, but I do love my coffee and drink a full pot every day, sometimes more.
I have only seen the profile photo of the BRZ, but I like it. Reminds me of a 1930s Bugatti.
Posted by: Dave Jenkins | Monday, 30 January 2012 at 12:49 PM
I think a marriage made in heaven would be Subaru joined with Lotus.
Posted by: David L. | Monday, 30 January 2012 at 01:01 PM
Until these cars get at least 50 mpg with significantly reduced pollutants, I'm not interested. I regard all high performance cars as failures unless they meet high energy use standards. The world cannot afford these dinosaurs no matter how fast moving they might be.
Posted by: Dennis | Monday, 30 January 2012 at 01:14 PM
Dennis,
This isn't likely to be an inefficient car, although actual mileage remains to be seen. You can reserve your disapprobation for luxury cars with huge engines (some even have 500hp now), and pick-up trucks sold and driven for style rather than utility, and for minivans and SUVs, all of which are much worse energy-hogs than the BRZ is likely to be. The BRZ weighs 2700 pounds and has a 4-cylinder engine. Although not designed to optimize high mileage, it is definitely well over on the "more efficient" side of the ledger in today's automotive world.
Mike
Posted by: Mike Johnston | Monday, 30 January 2012 at 01:38 PM
I share your interests in cars, photography, and coffee, though my non-coffee-drinking coke-for-breakfast partner would kill me if I succumbed to roasting my beans.
Of all the cars I've owned, the red 97 Miata was my favorite. Sweet handling, inexpensive, and reliable. It was the MGB that the Brits should have made.
Unfortunately, the convertible form factor didn't work for me, and now I drive a Cooper S, red like the Miata. The Subaru/Toyota looks interesting, but I don't have my hopes up as I haven't found any recent Japanese cars as pleasing to the eye as those coming out of Europe.
Posted by: James Gaston | Monday, 30 January 2012 at 01:39 PM
Mike,
This months UK Tog Gear mag does a head to head on both, and I think pretty conclusively falls for the Subaru. which heartens me hugely as a long time impreza driver!
Kev
Posted by: kev | Monday, 30 January 2012 at 03:12 PM
You know where all this is leading. Before long you are going to move to the big island and GROW your own coffee.
I can think of worse things to do than put some Gabby on the Victrola and watch the sun set over the coffee plantation.
Posted by: Mike Plews | Monday, 30 January 2012 at 03:28 PM
"You know where all this is leading. Before long you are going to move to the big island and GROW your own coffee."
Mike,
I actually heard from a reader this morning who DOES grow Kona on Hawaii. [s]
Mike
Posted by: Mike Johnston | Monday, 30 January 2012 at 06:07 PM
Lady: "Sir, you smell!"
Benjamin Franklin: "No Madam. You smell. I stink."
Posted by: Michael Bearman | Tuesday, 31 January 2012 at 12:24 AM
Mike,
Pump the brakes, this thing looks like crap.
Posted by: Ned | Tuesday, 31 January 2012 at 12:33 AM
Isn't the car making car noise on the stereo in the same league of silly as the fake shutter and zoom sounds pretty much every digital pocket-cam and cameraphone makes on the default settings?
I expect it can be turned off just like those...
Posted by: Bernard Scharp | Tuesday, 31 January 2012 at 05:50 AM
There's always a silver lining. Since you can't be a coffee connosieur, you don't have to try this:
http://gadgets.boingboing.net/2009/05/22/kopi-luwak-the-most.html
Posted by: Rick Popham | Tuesday, 31 January 2012 at 07:05 AM
Remembering that you also were afflicted with audiophilia, there is a parallel with your olfactory limitations. My wife, an occupational medicine doc, has commented (when seeing my copy of Stereophile) that very few middle aged men have much upper range hearing and that she recommends that the first step in deciding on high audio should be a hearing test.:-)
Posted by: Ed Richards | Tuesday, 31 January 2012 at 07:58 AM
I like seeing the mentions of the BRZ - despite being a big Subaru fan (have bought six of 'em now, including two STIs and a WRX) I also wasn't expecting much, but the BRZ has really lit my fire. In fact, I'm pretty sure that I'll be trading in my STI for one this summer. Yes, I'll lose power and AWD, but I'll get much better mileage (I get 21.5 in my '08, I'm expecting more like 28-30 from the BRZ), I'll get more day-to-day fun-to-drive, and I'll get that RWD feel.
I absolutely love rally racing and rally cars, but having driven a turbo Impreza for 10 years, I'm ready to try something different for a change. I do have an old Lotus Elan in the garage but that's not something I will drive every day!
One big advantage for me of the BRZ over something like the Miata is the back seat. Yes, it's tiny, but it's big enough for my kids' car seats!
I am somewhat disgusted that Toyota is using the Scion name for their version. I want nothing to do with Scions!
(David L: Car & Driver's initial drive said that the BRZ felt like a collaboration between Subaru and Lotus, not Subaru and Toyota. If that's not a good sign, I don't know what is!)
Posted by: Jeff Kyle | Tuesday, 31 January 2012 at 09:56 AM
"My wife, an occupational medicine doc, has commented (when seeing my copy of Stereophile) that very few middle aged men have much upper range hearing and that she recommends that the first step in deciding on high audio should be a hearing test.:-)"
Ed,
There are some parallels. Music lovers with hearing loss report nearly universally that they can still get great pleasure out of listening to music. However I know of at least one case where a speaker designer might have left the business because his hearing was going bad. His designs, which I thought had particularly lovely, well-balanced bass, were marred by increasing treble stridency. This was mentioned with increasing urgency in reviews. And then he abruptly closed down his company. I never did learn whether his hearing was the real reason he got out of the audio field, but I've always suspected it.
I'd love to see an audiologist again, to chart my downward course--when I was tested as a teenager my hearing was as good as can be measured. I know it isn't any more, but I'd love to know in what way.
Mike
Posted by: Mike Johnston | Tuesday, 31 January 2012 at 10:33 AM
I'd wait a year for Subaru to come out with an STI variant. 0-60 in sub 7 seconds isn't that impressive (what Road and Track is claiming - when they say sub 7 that means just under). For comparison my 07 WRX wagon does it in 5.7.
That being said, I'm hoping the work with Toyota brings some better fit/finish to the table, our 2011 4Runner is quite a few notches above the Subie in fit and finish. Also, I'm surprised they bothered with a slush box option without going to a dual clutch. I toe heel everything, but I'm looking forward to a nice dual clutch paddle setup in my next ride considering how often my body is wrecked.
Anyways, it's very exciting to see a well put together price point rear drive sports car again. Too bad this didn't come out 10 years ago ;) I have a feeling an S4 is more likely to be my next ride.
Posted by: John Rodriguez | Tuesday, 31 January 2012 at 10:40 AM
No, JZ. You´re not THAT guy.
That guy is a product manager at Ford Europe who happened to decide the european Puma did´n sound that good, specially with the 1,7 125bhp engine [which by the way, is a truly lovely car].
So they decided to put a plastic membrane on the passenger firewall to create indoor exhaust enhanced pipe sound.
Posted by: Iñaki | Tuesday, 31 January 2012 at 01:20 PM
Sorry for your sinus condition limiting appreciation of the smell sense, that indeed is important for sensing the full extent of the coffee aroma, as you correctly point out that it is a combination of taste and smell. For home coffee roasting, sense sight will also serve you well, as you'll observe the various levels of the roast, City, Full City, etc.., especially with the upgraded version of the Behmor home roaster model that you purchased (more on that in a minute), where they have improved the visibility of the beans, thus the ability to observe the beans in the roasting chamber; this is quite important, as skilled roasters will tell you that observing the roast level with your eyes is part of the art.
Paradoxically, a declined sense of smell, will come to your advantage too, sparing some of the strong roasting smell that can be overwhelming (not a major deal, though, with the home coffee roasting machine that you are suggesting here, as it features a smoke-reduction mechanism eliminating much of the smoke and smell of the roasting). I agree to you that to have great coffee and be able to enjoy and appreciate the delicate nuances and subtle flavors of the coffee, one should roast on his/her own; that way, the flavors will still be preserved, as the beans tend to lose the flavors in a relatively short time and if you buy already roasted beans, even whole beans, if it's been quite a while after roasting, the coffee will lack in its aromatics.
Now, back to the Behmor home roasting machine, in my opinion, this is the best choice you could have made when buying a machine for your home coffee roasting, and it's the best piece of advice you could have given for people wishing to roast their own beans at home, because this is a mid-range kind of home roaster, not like the cheap air poppers that lack in capacity as well as durability, and it is affordable unlike the good higher-end home drum roasters that are much more expensive and can be purchased probably in the range of $800-$1,000+ (usually with a higher capacity, though). This Behmor version is known as a great machine that does the job well in many aspects - visibility of the beans, airflow, cooling, chaff collecting, smoke suppression etc. - despite its lower price; some say that it can be compared in its quality to the commercial Probat roasting machines. It roasts in batches of up to 1 lb.
Personally, I have suggested just this afternoon to a friend to buy this home drum roaster, but there's a caveat: this home roasting machine is not best for those who like roasting at a dark level, as it unfortunately roasts at just beyond the Full City roast level. This is not an issue for people who prefer the medium roast that allows for sensing more of the flavors of the origin. If one likes dark roasts too and will need to buy roasted coffee when preferring a dark roast, this should be taken into account when buying, if a factor in the buying decision is saving money down the road.
Posted by: JoeS | Tuesday, 31 January 2012 at 03:36 PM
I wonder if my wife will consider upgrading our 1997 Subaru Legacy Outback (155K city miles) to one of these? Does it take an infant car seat? Just a thought....
Posted by: Jimbo | Tuesday, 31 January 2012 at 05:39 PM
My wife and I have owned several Subarus, and the manager of the local dealership is a friend. He actually likes cars, which is unusual.
In a conversation with him, a few years ago, I suggested that I'd really like, and would buy, a car with the suspension and brakes of the WRX and a peppy but normally aspirated engine. Say, 170 to 200 hp. More responsive in city driving, better gas mileage, lower insurance premiums, etc. (I had a WRX at the time.)
Surprisingly, he said I was not the only person who had asked for such a vehicle, and that he thought he could sell a ton of them.
There's a good chance that I'll buy a BRZ, despite its unfortunate looks. Like you, Mike, I'm mostly interested in handling. They'll produce an STI version eventually, but I'm not interested; I express my manliness in other areas.
Posted by: Paris | Wednesday, 01 February 2012 at 02:03 PM
http://www.automotto.com/entry/soundracer-makes-your-boring-car-sound-like-a-v8-powerhouse/
Does a Prius have a cigarette lighter?
Posted by: Mike Plews | Wednesday, 01 February 2012 at 04:46 PM
May I introduce the best way to make coffee?
Manual grinding gives you best smell:
http://www.zassenhaus.com/index.php?p=2&u=0
Vacuum Brewing delivers best aroma:
http://www.bodum.com/de/de-ch/shop/detail/1208-01/?navid=87
Unfortunately these techniques are not common in the US. I heard that in NYC there are one exquisite Coffee Shop offering Vacuum Brewing.
Of course you have to have the best beans. Maybe a Luwak? ;-)
Posted by: `/1nc3nt | Thursday, 02 February 2012 at 05:05 AM
Mike, I think you should not blame yourself for not being able to sort out the coffee tastes. I have a pretty good smeller that often requires me to throw clothes I have worn to a restaurant into the hamper because of the lingering food odors. I drink good coffee from Peet's who taught the Starbuck's boys their trade, using a burr grinder and a French press. It is difficult for me to sort out the different coffees, too. I have not gained any wine expertise either even though I have drunk a lot of it over the years. The latest thing we schlubs are supposed to sort out are very expensive salts from different parts of the world. Really, little tastes, that are not completely overwhelmed by the taste of salt and flavors of the food it is on! What we really know is that golden eared individuals cannot hear the differences in audio they think they can hear in double blind studies, sort of like mediums who can' contact the spirit world with skeptics present. Wine experts are fooled by cheap wines in blind tastings. It is all marketing and suggestion and a group of people getting a lot of money by fooling you. Your reaction to coffee is one of the few honestly expressed reactions around. Trust it. You could have the nose of a bloodhound and it probably would not be any different.
Posted by: Winsor | Sunday, 05 February 2012 at 02:41 PM
contacted my local subaru dealer about arranging a test drive of a brz when the car is available. got an obnoxious reply saying test drives were right out - all cars were already allocated to buyers and would i like to get on the wait list. cripes. i won't buy a car under those circumstances, no matter how much the filthy hacks in the motor trade laud the damned thing. i try driving every car i consider buying. no exceptions.
thus no brz for me ....
Posted by: bloodnok | Sunday, 26 February 2012 at 08:50 PM