I was going to do a post called "Gimmicks We Like," but then I realized we don't like any gimmicks.
Mike, Curmudgeon-in-Training
Send this post to a friend
Please help support TOP by patronizing our sponsors B&H Photo and Amazon
Note: Links in this post may be to our affiliates; sales through affiliate links may benefit this site. More...
Original contents copyright 2011 by Michael C. Johnston and/or the bylined author. All Rights Reserved.
Featured Comment by David Dyer-Bennet: "Hmmm; 'A trick or device intended to attract attention, publicity, or business' (Google). Some other definitions seem to emphasize that the technique in question is somehow dishonest, which makes rather a difference in whether it's a bad thing or not."
Mike replies: David, I was thinking more in terms of gimmicks such as extreme HDR, Leica-skin stickers for your iPhone, modern tintypes, 3D, aperture-ring bracelets and lens coffee mugs, auto-retouching programs, selective color like the red cloak in Schindler's List, etc., etc. Nothing sinister.
But of course I do like some of these gimmicky things. Just some. When I don't have indigestion and/or am feeling curmudgeonly.
DD-B responds: "I like the revival in old processes (Pt/Pd, as well as tintype and so forth) in principle, but I have yet to see anything I like much in practice. Maybe it's because doing that stuff is a gimmick today?
"Shot my first 3D photos last weekend, we'll see how that works out (with a Nishika 8000; 4-lens, for lenticular prints; snap3d.com in Toronto still makes such prints). I have a friend whose family is into 3D to the extent that she has Viewmaster reels of photos from her wedding, which I think is very cool.
"And I like my Nikon 24–70/2.8 mug, too, so there! (I like it so much I don't use it; hmmmm.)"
Featured Comment by Patrick Dodds: "There seems to be an Internet trend towards declaring face detection a gimmick that is liked...."
Featured Comment by Doug Reilly: "Face detection is not a gimmick in a society with millions of closed-circuit security cameras. I call it a scary development in the science of surveillance."
Featured Comment by emptyspaces: "I try to dislike 'sweep panorama,' but I can't. Gimme that gimmick, please."
UPDATE: Oh, duh. I forgot body-integral image stabilization. That's a gimmick I don't just like, I love. —Mike
Gimmicks? How about "camera armor". I got suckered in on that one.
Posted by: Anthony Kerstens | Thursday, 08 September 2011 at 12:58 PM
Awww, you could've done a 'Gimmicks We Like' and just left it empty!
Posted by: Kevin Schoenmakers | Thursday, 08 September 2011 at 01:03 PM
I don't know.
What about print sales ?
:-)
Posted by: Nigel | Thursday, 08 September 2011 at 01:08 PM
Curmudgeon-in-Training? I think you are ready to teach a master's level class!
Posted by: Jim Couch | Thursday, 08 September 2011 at 01:08 PM
In training? Mike, you're flowers and sunshine compared to what I can be. You'll need a lot of training. :D
Posted by: erlik | Thursday, 08 September 2011 at 01:23 PM
I don't think you need the "in-training" part of your sig today ;-)
Methinks you should go back to bed with your favourite tipple, or take Lulu for a walk if her legs are ok, or just something different to normal.
all the best phil (interwebbing instead of washing-up)
Posted by: phil | Thursday, 08 September 2011 at 01:25 PM
> I was thinking more in terms of gimmicks such as... Leica-skin stickers for your iPhone, modern tintypes, 3D, aperture-ring bracelets and lens coffee mug...
I think of most of those as gewgaws. Now, this is a gimmick: http://blog.iamnikon.com/en_GB/product-news/the-d3100-red/ .
Roger
Posted by: Roger Whitehead | Thursday, 08 September 2011 at 02:37 PM
Thinking about what Patrick Dodds said... it seems to me that a lot of things, once they become useful, are no longer thought of as gimmicks.
Face detection might be one of these... To me, gimmicks are things that seem cool or look slick, but really have no utility or purpose. I.e. a TV whose screen border lights up with different colors.
Posted by: David Bostedo | Thursday, 08 September 2011 at 05:13 PM
I thought ring tones for cell phones was a gimmick, until it was pointed out that it was million-dollar business.
Posted by: Robert Roaldi | Thursday, 08 September 2011 at 09:31 PM
If you think modern tintypes are a gimmick, you have to check out Joni Sternbach's surf photos. They are the antithesis of gimmick.
http://www.clubofthewaves.com/blog/tintype-surf-culture-by-joni-sternbach/
Wet plates for wet culture, right?
The thing I hate most is when something I'm doing becomes popular, then inevitably is adopted by people who have no idea what they are doing, and then becomes an embarrassing cliche with the inevitable backlash.
Photoshop plugins that make "Polaroid PN contact print borders" make my teeth curl. Especially in color, and with the pod at both ends?
I'm hoping the current 3D thing either blows over or gets out of the gimmick phase soon. I've been into stereoscopy for years , my honeymoon photos are a mix of SX-70s and Viewmaster reels.
At least brush painting your car with hundreds of colors of paint never caught on.
Posted by: hugh crawford | Thursday, 08 September 2011 at 09:44 PM
Interchangeable lenses :)
Posted by: Kelvin | Thursday, 08 September 2011 at 10:49 PM
Curmudgeon in training? :)
Posted by: Michael Steinbach | Friday, 09 September 2011 at 07:56 AM
Re: in-body stabilization. That's not a gimmick. That's innovation.
Posted by: Edie Howe | Friday, 09 September 2011 at 09:00 AM
Fuji X100 - the whole camera is a gimmick.
Posted by: Bill Rogers | Friday, 09 September 2011 at 09:11 AM
Instagram.
Posted by: Ben | Friday, 09 September 2011 at 11:07 AM