The O-GPS1 is powered by a single AAA battery so it doesn't drain a camera's power
Our current major advertiser, Pentax, has just announced the O-GPS1 unit, a versatile, weather-resistant GPS unit that tracks both basic geographical and celestial body location data for earthbound and astrophotography purposes.
Mounted on the hot shoe of select Pentax DSLRs, the O-GPS1 unit records latitude, longitude, altitude, and universal time coordinated (UTC) of shooting locations with captured images. Image files with this GPS data may be used to track shooting locations and review location data on a personal computing device. The GPS location data also helps sort and file recorded images. The O-GPS1 works on the K-5 and the K-r, and most function work on the 645D.
In addition to location data, the GPS unit works with the Pentax Shake Reduction (SR) system to offer unique advanced applications, including Astrotracer, Simple Navigation, and Electronic Compass.
The O-GPS1 will ship in July 2011. It is available for pre-order now at the Pentax Webstore for $249.95.
Mike
ADDENDUM (request for information):
Dear Folks, Dear Mike,
I was looking for a technical paper online that would give the limits (horizontal, vertical, rotational) of the sensor shift in the Pentax K-5. If I knew that, it'd be simple geometry to figure out what it could do for astrophotography, in principle (practice is always another matter). Anyone reading this have that info? Please email me: ctein@pobox.com
pax / Ctein
Send this post to a friend
Please help support TOP by patronizing our sponsors B&H Photo and Amazon
Note: Links in this post may be to our affiliates; sales through affiliate links may benefit this site. More...
Original contents copyright 2011 by Michael C. Johnston and/or the bylined author. All Rights Reserved.
Nice. They made something heavier and clunkier than my phone just for GPS... when my phone can already take GPS tagged pictures. Way to go.
Posted by: psu | Tuesday, 07 June 2011 at 09:09 AM
I would guess it hasn't escaped your notice that all DSLRs are "heavier and clunkier" than your phone too.
In any event I'm sure no one will mind if you prefer your phone....
Mike
Posted by: Mike Johnston | Tuesday, 07 June 2011 at 09:17 AM
Interesting - I wonder how long before Pentax (or someone) offers a generic, stripped-down GPS unit that is usable on all cameras?
If you could trigger the GPS to take a reading from the flash (or pc) contact and hold the data in storage until you can download, read or print it, it would be workable with any camera made that has a way of triggering a flash.
Image such a device attached to an 8x10 camera, or mounted to an old Spotmatic! Unless, such a device already exists?
Posted by: Paul Van | Tuesday, 07 June 2011 at 10:08 AM
Drat. This sounds like a very useful device, but I have a K-20. Perhaps this is a good reason to upgrade and buy a K5.
Posted by: Ted | Tuesday, 07 June 2011 at 10:50 AM
"ASTROTRACER function, which couples the unit with the camera’s SR (Shake Reduction) system and enables users to photograph celestial bodies. The unit can calculate the movement of stars, planets, and other bodies using the latitude obtained from GPS data and the camera’s alignment data (horizontal and vertical inclinations and aspect) obtained from its magnetic and acceleration sensors, then shifts the camera’s image sensor in synchronization with the movement of the objects. As a result, stars and other bodies are captured as solid points rather than blurry streaks..."
Amazing!
Posted by: Andre | Tuesday, 07 June 2011 at 10:56 AM
OMG! That would be, like, an invasion of my privacy!!
;-)
Posted by: Gary | Tuesday, 07 June 2011 at 01:33 PM
That sure look like the ultimate GPS gadget....reminds me of the optics used in Dune.....I wonder wether it could retrieve my Nikon lens cap I mysteriuously seemed to have lost today?
Greetings, Ed
Posted by: Ed | Tuesday, 07 June 2011 at 01:55 PM
Wonderful innovation by Pentax,...pity about the continuing lack of a 24mm f/2 after TEN YEARS of DSLR production......but presumably Pentax has its priorities...??
Posted by: Bob | Tuesday, 07 June 2011 at 02:18 PM
@psu
Chances are your cellphone uses SkyHook, not true GPS. If you want that functionality you can just buy an EyeFi card and be done with it.
Posted by: Dolan Halbrook | Tuesday, 07 June 2011 at 06:31 PM
That's a big ol' blob of electronics in the hotshoe! Definitely not gonna fit in the camera holster...
Yes, yes, I understand that it has its own batteries and some 50-odd channels of GPS goodness. Oh, and it converts your K-5 into a compass and way-finder and astrophotography rig... but the really interesting thing (to me, anyhow) is that it records not only where you took that picture, but also the direction you pointed the camera! Could make "seasonal landscape time-lapse" much easier, or just add a creepy CSI-factor to street photography.
Posted by: MarkB | Tuesday, 07 June 2011 at 06:47 PM
@Paul Van
Jobo has made just such a device for several years now. I think with film you'd still have to jot down the time and frame number and manually match that info up later though.
http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/756237-REG/Jobo_GPS256_photoGPS2_Hot_Shoe_Activated_GPS.html
Posted by: Andre | Tuesday, 07 June 2011 at 07:43 PM
Dear Folks,
Mark Banas kindly sent me the tech info.
In theory, the GPS module could track for 8 minutes pointed at the celestial north or south pole. Pointed at the celestial equator, the tracking time is inversely proportional to the focal length of the lens-- for a 30mm lens, it would be about 20 minutes.
As a point of reference, the following photograph of the center of the Milky Way:
http://ctein.com/top/Comet_Halley.jpg
was made in 1986 with a lens of normal angle of coverage and moderate aperture (Pentax 67 105mm f/2.4). Exposure time was only 5 minutes on ISO 400 film. A digital exposure of the same length would capture **considerably** more faint detail ...assuming a sufficiently dark sky (I was at 10,000 ft in the middle of the Pacific ocean).
This is theory-- in practice, the exposure limit is more likely to be controlled by how accurately the sensor can really determine camera position and orientation. Still, even 1 minute exposures with large aperture lenses would get results similar to my film photo.
I'd love to have a chance to try this out at some point.
pax / Ctein
Posted by: ctein | Tuesday, 07 June 2011 at 07:57 PM
O-GPS1 Specifications-
http://www.pentax.jp/english/news/2011/201107.html
Astroarts's test ,looking great-
http://www.astroarts.jp/news/2011/06/03hoshinavi/pentaxgps.jpg
Posted by: gleeman | Tuesday, 07 June 2011 at 08:30 PM
Dear Gleeman,
Thanks! OK, for those who didn't click thru, Pentax is claiming a maximum exposure time of 5 minutes. It is independent of focal length at the equator, but decreases with focal length at the pole. That's the opposite of what I predicted, but it is consistent with pointing accuracy rather than sensor travel being the limiting factor.
I couldn't glean much from the jpg-- to small and of low quality, plus I can't read Japanese.
Still, much appreciated info, gleeman!
pax / Ctein
Posted by: ctein | Tuesday, 07 June 2011 at 09:10 PM
So glad I recently sold my 5D Mark II for the K-5. This camera is phenomenal and keeps getting better.
Good on ya Pentax!
Now, about that 16-50 2.8 redesign...
Posted by: Mark Sperry | Tuesday, 07 June 2011 at 09:26 PM
You are welcome, pax
The spec. is using equatorial coordinate system,so it is independent of focal length at celestial poles( Declination 90°).hope this help.:)
gleeman
Posted by: gleeman | Tuesday, 07 June 2011 at 11:13 PM
P.S. Oops, I read the table backwards. Exposure duration is constant at the celestial poles, decreases with focal length at the equator. Ignore my comments about pointing accuracy.
pax / confused Ctein
Posted by: ctein | Tuesday, 07 June 2011 at 11:54 PM
You are welcome, Ctein
Actually, the spec. is equatorial coordinate system, so it is independent of focal length at the celestial pole(declination 90°),hope this helps.
for those who don't know how much does the astrotracer cost...
http://www.toast-tech.com/shop/index.html
( japanese yen)
See?The O-GPS1 is a stealth me.
(and max 5min is a lot of time to k5.)
gleeman
Posted by: gleeman |
Posted by: gleeman | Wednesday, 08 June 2011 at 12:45 AM
Hmmzzzz, Mark,
It also contains a function to point itself to the nearest Pentax service center. Whoops.
Greetings, Ed
Posted by: Ed | Wednesday, 08 June 2011 at 12:55 AM
The problem with hot shoe accessories is that they block the shoe. Why don't they pass the shoe through for flashes?
Posted by: Friedrich | Wednesday, 08 June 2011 at 03:43 AM
Ctein: note that the table represents declination, not latitude. In other words, allowed exposure time depends on what you point the lens at in the sky relative to celestial equator, regardless of camera location on Earth. The numbers look as they should.
Posted by: Ivan Glisin | Wednesday, 08 June 2011 at 04:14 AM
I am also glad to have recently switched to the Pentax K5. This new tool is much more than GPS, and it will be really useful. I am looking forward to try it with the 15 Limited:)
Posted by: Paulo Bizarro | Wednesday, 08 June 2011 at 05:29 AM
Please check link for more photos of the astrotracer feature of the unit. Unfortunately the text is Japanese.
http://www.pentax.jp/japan/products/o-gps1/feature.html
and
http://www.pentax.jp/japan/products/o-gps1/astrotracer.html
Posted by: jeff1101 | Wednesday, 08 June 2011 at 09:57 AM
Hmmzzzz, Ed,
"It also contains a function to point itself to the nearest Pentax service center. Whoops."
Ha ha! Finally, a camera that annoys you with an "idiot light" and directions to the repair shop until you get some random, minor thing fixed. Why did BMW have to start us down that road? ;)
Posted by: MarkB | Wednesday, 08 June 2011 at 12:25 PM
Dear Ivan,
Yeah, I said it was celestial coords in my original post.
I read the table backwards at quick glance, as my PS indicated.
pax / Ctein
Posted by: ctein | Wednesday, 08 June 2011 at 01:13 PM
Paul Van -- if I understand you, such devices have existed for years. Fairly cheap, too. Software exists to match the GPS trace stored in the GPS device up with the images using the timestamps in the EXIF data (you need to make sure your camera clock is set accurately).
Of course, since it's a separate device, it can't tell which direction you were pointing the camera.
The category name seems to be "gps logger". One brand is Holux.
Posted by: David Dyer-Bennet | Thursday, 09 June 2011 at 08:15 AM
I will buy one the GPS I meant, on top of the camera which has to tagged along, if it really works.
In fact, it start my research on Pentax as I plainly ignore Pentax (other than 645d and 67) camera so far. I only knew k-r and k5 beacuse this forum from time to time "off track" to Pentax :-). If it really works and just for snapshot of some wide field astro photos (50 to 200mm), it would be god sent.
Can I get away with the lowest spec one such as k-r (in orange, to match my planned purchased of Celestron C8 :-) My Mak 5 inch is too small and 1900mm/F15 is too long a focal length).
For the comparsion with iphone (which I have 10 astro programs on) and ipad etc., one must have to real and compare with how much effort to get those "bloody" tracking system work.
Piggy-back is fine but the GEM mount/tripod/goto/... it is light setup you have as one would say as it is less than 100 pound. It is heavily than my 8x10 setup by a huge margin. Can try etx backpack etc. but still it is quite a setup. All this is just to take a snapshot of the milky way, not even start to deal with real astrophotos. BG-4 ...
Hence, I am watching this very very closely. Hope it work. Please.
BTW, the latest innovation here is Astrotrac which is great because it is 2 pounds. You still have to polar aligned (why pentax need not, would it have rotation field or it compensate even the RA movement). I just bought the Manfrotto 410 yesterday to prepare to mount it when I bought it in due course. I may now wait for this development instead. They are same price. I think it is lighter as the 410 is heavier than the camera body of at least the k-r.
Cheers!
Posted by: Dennis Ng | Friday, 10 June 2011 at 07:34 PM
real world shoots from eti_forest
http://sky.ap.teacup.com/eti_forest/
Posted by: gleeman | Friday, 24 June 2011 at 09:22 PM
The time limit is related to the celestrial position not earthly position.
Posted by: Dennis Ng | Monday, 04 July 2011 at 04:12 AM