The common question: "Should I buy a Canon, or a Nikon, or something else?"
Mike's Ultimate Answer: Yes.
Mike
*Shortest post ever?
Send this post to a friend
Please help support TOP by patronizing our sponsors B&H Photo and Amazon
Note: Links in this post may be to our affiliates; sales through affiliate links may benefit this site. More...
Original contents copyright 2011 by Michael C. Johnston and/or the bylined author. All Rights Reserved.
Featured Comment by Daniel Clements: "Oh, good! That means I did the right thing."
Featured Comment by Pascal Sauvé: "Your shortest post comment made me think of an anecdote... When he wanted to inquire about the success of his new book Les Miserables, Victor Hugo sent a letter to his editor simply saying this: '?' Reply from his editor: '!' Now that is the shortest post. Ever."
Featured Comment by Russ: "Sorry, the correct answer is...maybe."
Featured Comment by Sheridan: "Mike, now we know: you are a Vorlon!"
Mike replies: Actually, "Mike" is just part of my encounter suit.
Featured Comment by Ophelia: "Succinct, accurate, to the point, and very very wise. Same thing that should be said if someone asks if they should buy a PC or a Mac, really. No, I'm kidding—of course you should buy a"
Featured [partial] Comment by Ben: "Socratic questioning is a really old concept, but another suggestion for the ultimate answer in almost anything is 'Why?'"
Mike replies: ...At least when you're five.
Featured Comment by Daniel Fealko: "Follow-on question: 'Why?' Dan's Answer: 'Because.'"
Mike replies: Are you by any chance the father of a five-year-old?
Featured Comment by Thomas Osborne: "...Just to the right of the Pentax ad."
Mike replies: Yes, the real answer is you should use a Pentax K-5 because that's what I use and you must be just like me.
Featured Comment by Miserere: "'Cos everyone wants to be like Mikey...."
Mike replies: 'Zackly. Who's guruing whom here?
Featured Comment by Patrick Perez: "So you didn't want to recommend the Lamborghini Murcielago?"
Mike replies: I recommend you go with the Ferrari 599.
Featured Comment by Maggie Osterberg: "Q: 'Should I buy a Canon, or a Nikon, or something else?' A: Mu! ::gong::"
Featured Comment by Boglev: "I am shocked—no one mentioned Ricoh GRD!?"
Featured Comment by Dennis Huteson: "What will you sit on now Mike, now that you've got rid of that rickety old fence?"
Featured Comment by Murchu: "Good. That's that sorted, then."
More interesting, and 1/3rd shorter, would have been to answer "No"
Posted by: chrisv | Tuesday, 29 March 2011 at 06:22 PM
Perfect.
Posted by: Will | Tuesday, 29 March 2011 at 06:23 PM
With the demise of Contax, the rest is...irrelevant.
Posted by: Hélcio J. Tagliolatto | Tuesday, 29 March 2011 at 06:43 PM
I think you over analyzed that Mike.
Posted by: Jim Bullard | Tuesday, 29 March 2011 at 06:47 PM
LOL. A specious answer to an unanswerable question - I like it !
Posted by: Damen Stephens | Tuesday, 29 March 2011 at 07:13 PM
Amen, I cannot understand why brand choice (and subsequently, brand loyalty) is treated such a big deal on the internet. The same people probably walk into the supermarket and buy whatever dish soap is on special offer.
Posted by: Jonathan Irwin | Tuesday, 29 March 2011 at 07:16 PM
I've been watching reruns of Babylon 5 recently and this reminds me very much of how the Vorlons answer questions, e.g. Confused human: "Do you mean A or B?"; Vorlon: "Yes."
Socratic questioning is a really old concept, but another suggestion for the ultimate answer is almost anything is "Why?".
Posted by: Ben | Tuesday, 29 March 2011 at 08:17 PM
I thought you'd say No.
Posted by: Robert Meier | Tuesday, 29 March 2011 at 08:22 PM
Best answer ever!
Posted by: Yador | Tuesday, 29 March 2011 at 08:58 PM
there is always a charm in something else!!
Posted by: ranjit grover | Tuesday, 29 March 2011 at 08:59 PM
Something to be said for just getting a camera and going out to shoot, eh.
Posted by: Mike | Tuesday, 29 March 2011 at 09:05 PM
Absolutely. Got a good laugh out of this, probably because it's so true.
Posted by: michael | Tuesday, 29 March 2011 at 09:09 PM
I concur
Posted by: Redza | Tuesday, 29 March 2011 at 09:09 PM
Agreed.
Posted by: Peter Barnes | Tuesday, 29 March 2011 at 09:13 PM
I think the whole debate should come down to what system do you feel you can use the best to get the images you want to create. They are so very close performance wise. I personally use Canon, never owned one until digital. Learned to use the wheel in the back with my thumb to adjust shutter speed. I picked up a D700 and was lost. Im sure I could get used to the dial difference but I know the Canon so well why bother. I think its best to master what you have instead of chasing the carrot.
Posted by: jhupe | Tuesday, 29 March 2011 at 09:28 PM
Mike --
Precisely. We all get asked this stupid question. I wish that i had thought of your response earlier.
-- gary ray
Posted by: gary ray | Tuesday, 29 March 2011 at 09:45 PM
As long you buy something?
p.s. as long as you use it, I suppose
Posted by: sam | Tuesday, 29 March 2011 at 09:48 PM
I started with something else then switched to canon. I think that is what Mike refered to in his scriptures.
Posted by: Ramon Acosta | Tuesday, 29 March 2011 at 10:05 PM
I think I would be sorely tempted to say "no" ;)
Posted by: Steve Jacob | Tuesday, 29 March 2011 at 10:42 PM
Yes the answer is no.
Posted by: MJFerron | Tuesday, 29 March 2011 at 11:02 PM
Right. The hardware makes the photographer great. HA HA HA! Pfffffft....
All hardware today dwarfs the skill of 90+% of the users.
Look at all the posted crap.
Posted by: Malcolm | Tuesday, 29 March 2011 at 11:11 PM
!
Posted by: charlie | Tuesday, 29 March 2011 at 11:20 PM
"Mu."
Posted by: Matthew Robertson | Tuesday, 29 March 2011 at 11:55 PM
If these two great companies were to merge and produce a single homogenised camera, would this result in posters to most photographic fora having nothing much to say, and instead have to go out and actually take some pictures?
I understand from my source at the negotiating table that the only argument is whether the new camera should be a Ninon or a Cakon.
Posted by: James | Wednesday, 30 March 2011 at 02:18 AM
May be funniest post ever, instead of shortest...
Posted by: Borf | Wednesday, 30 March 2011 at 03:10 AM
When friends ask me if they should buy a Canon or Nikon, I'm just so relieved they didn't ask me if they should buy a Mac or a PC.
Posted by: Joe | Wednesday, 30 March 2011 at 06:40 AM
Neither:-
Why be a sheep?
Neither has a stabilised sensor, therefore lenses cost more.
Nikons underexpose and the lens bayonet is "backwards".
Canons bring up the shadows so that results generally look brighter and more cheerful.
Sorry if this comment has been too serious......
Robin (Sony/Minolta owner)
Posted by: Robin P | Wednesday, 30 March 2011 at 06:42 AM
Photography is a three-edged sword.
Posted by: Kosh | Wednesday, 30 March 2011 at 07:02 AM
I prefer ffs myself
Posted by: Sean | Wednesday, 30 March 2011 at 07:21 AM
Mike,
Is that light I see at the end of the tunnel?
Posted by: Danny Chatham | Wednesday, 30 March 2011 at 07:35 AM
So I'm 2/3 of the way to doing it right, then (having a Nikon and a "something else" (Olympus) camera).
If I spend the money to add a Canon, and thus have exactly the right hardware, will my pictures be better?
Posted by: David Dyer-Bennet | Wednesday, 30 March 2011 at 08:29 AM
A Cannikonnentaxlbladpus for me!
Posted by: Mike Plews | Wednesday, 30 March 2011 at 08:32 AM
I find interesting that your shortest post is producing the longest list of Featured Comments.
Posted by: Luc N. | Wednesday, 30 March 2011 at 08:32 AM
Actually for years, I have been presenting the same ultimate answer as yours, though the common question I received is often shorter, that is, "Should I buy a Canon, or a Nikon?"
In that the whole thing becomes a little zen.
Posted by: Roland L | Wednesday, 30 March 2011 at 08:33 AM
Reminds me a little of the reputed question number 20 in an Oxford or maybe Cambridge University Philosophy Finals Exam..."Is Question 20 a fair question?" to which one candidate wrote "Yes, if this is a fair answer".
The story ends with the report that the candidate got a First, of course.
Posted by: Len Salem | Wednesday, 30 March 2011 at 08:33 AM
Just do it!
Posted by: Bryce Lee | Wednesday, 30 March 2011 at 09:02 AM
neither one nor the other but the opposite
Posted by: Marcelo Guarini | Wednesday, 30 March 2011 at 09:28 AM
"So I'm 2/3 of the way to doing it right, then (having a Nikon and a 'something else' (Olympus) camera). If I spend the money to add a Canon, and thus have exactly the right hardware, will my pictures be better?"
Hold on there David! The question was an OR choice, not an AND choice.
Mike
Posted by: Mike Johnston | Wednesday, 30 March 2011 at 10:30 AM
My answer to that question is "None of the above".
If you are willing to rely on a total stranger to decide which camera you should use, then you should spend your money on more photography lessons instead.
Posted by: Ed S. | Wednesday, 30 March 2011 at 12:16 PM
"Or" is convenient, allowing the possibility of "inclusive" or if one wants it. At least, I found it useful for creatively misinterpreting the question. :-)
Posted by: David Dyer-Bennet | Wednesday, 30 March 2011 at 12:30 PM
That is so last century.
Little less conversation, a little more action, please.
Elvis Prestley, circa 1968
Posted by: inaki | Wednesday, 30 March 2011 at 12:55 PM
Sounds more like Confucius than Lao Tzu.
Posted by: Rob Atkins | Wednesday, 30 March 2011 at 01:25 PM
I'm deeply puzzled, and must say that though I am a regular reader of this blog, I don't really understand what's going on with this post, Mike...
I just can't agree with you on this subject.
The ultimate answer is "42".
Posted by: Nicolas | Wednesday, 30 March 2011 at 01:56 PM
Eh, why?
Posted by: Ed | Wednesday, 30 March 2011 at 02:23 PM
Featured Comment by Patrick Perez: "So you didn't want to recommend the Lamborghini Murcielago?"
Mike replies: I recommend you go with the Ferrari 599."
Oh dear, another tiresome Ferrari/Lamborghini debate! I'll stick w/ my Veyron.
Patrick
Posted by: Patrick Perez | Wednesday, 30 March 2011 at 03:37 PM
my memory failed me with the reply about the Lambo. Certainly I was referencing your column, but the sad state of my memory is heightened by the fact that I had read the Automobile magazine column before you had posted about it.
I have somewhat expert knowledge of personal computers (and yeoman of photo gear). I HATE getting asked what should I buy questions. I keep promising to myself I'll answer one with words to the effect that "I'll answer xx if I can tell you who to marry". The catch is, I'm not particularly good/knowledgeable at being married!
Patrick
Posted by: Patrick Perez | Wednesday, 30 March 2011 at 03:45 PM
Recently heard and kind of related...
What is the equation for the optimal number of lenses?
Optimal number = N + 1
Where "N" equals the number of lenses that you currently own.
This is closely linked to the equation for working out the number of lenses you have to buy before you spouse will leave you: -
Separation = S + 1
Where "S" equals the number of lenses you own just before separation occurs. For example, "If you buy one more lens...blah, blah, blah..."
You're in trouble when "N" = "S".
Posted by: Dan Hillier | Thursday, 31 March 2011 at 01:37 AM
The real answer is "who cares".
Posted by: Craig Norris | Thursday, 31 March 2011 at 06:17 AM
The ultimate answer is "42".
Would you bring a Canon, or Nikon, to go hitch hiking in the galaxies?
Posted by: Roland L | Thursday, 31 March 2011 at 07:02 AM
Mike, your post is a full bodied, mature, meticulous, and wholly meritorious outgrowth of scholarly probing and practical sagacity.
Posted by: Bruce | Friday, 01 April 2011 at 11:49 AM
Since stupid questions deserve stupid answers, I'm saying a) it depends, and b) I bought Pentax...
Posted by: Al Patterson | Friday, 01 April 2011 at 11:27 PM
in the words of Rudyard Kipling " if "
Posted by: josh | Tuesday, 05 April 2011 at 11:59 AM
As form follows function, camera follows need. Until you know what you want to DO with a camera there can be no answer!
Posted by: terry goyan | Wednesday, 06 April 2011 at 10:48 PM