Since Ctein has patently introduced the subject of Big Mysteries in the previous post, I'd like to review a strange case that has to do with our very own Universe, i.e. the internet. There is on the internet a blog called The Dilbert Blog that is written by a man who is signs himself "Scott Adams." Opinion is divided, but the growing concensus seems to be that Scott Adams cannot be the Dilbert Blog Writer, also called "D." S. Adams (the reason for the use of the first initial will become clear in a moment) is a cartoonist who is only "just good enough" at drawing, which is one of the main things a cartoonist does. Almost nothing is known about him apart from a few tantalizing details such as the fact this his tie flips up at the end for no apparent reason (see photo). According to the so-called "Identity theorists," who are surprisingly numerous, Scott Adams cannot be the author of the Dilbert blog. Their case seems persuasive, at least on the surface. First of all, cartoonists don't have to write much. The most words that the real Scott Adams is called upon to write in a day might approach eighty, and then only on Sundays. It is even rumored that the real Scott Adams refused to speak at all for some number of months, hardly likely to be a characteristic of a blogger who goes on an on all the time about a lot of crazy stuff, like how there is no such thing as Free Will and that we are all programmed but not by DNA. (Today, for example, "Scott Adams" seems to make the case that he is not rich, which seems to bolster the case that "D" cannot be Scott Adams, the cartoonist, who is third down from Oprah on the "Has All the Money" list.)
Searches have been made to determine the identity of the actual Dilbert Blog author, but the problem so far has proven remarkably robust and resistant to solution. Amateur sleuths amongst online aficionados have advanced a number of theories, and passions are running ever higher amongst the various schools of thought. Books have been written advancing various theories. Each book seems plausible, while you are reading it. But then, each proposed candidate seems to have at least one big problem that seems, on the surface, insuperable. I'll mention just the main proposed candidates:
• The Majority Douglasite Position: This group holds that the Dilbert Blog is written by Douglas Adams. On the plus side, he is a writer; he has the right last name; he clearly has the needed imagination to write about lots of whacky fictional ideas; and he was prolific, so the burdens of daily blogging would probably be a workload he could handle. Problem: he is dead. That is explained by "Douslasites" using some rather convoluted arguments: to wit, that he is not really dead, but only faked his own death by staggering around and clutching at his heart like Fred Sanford before being taken away by some out-of-work actors dressed as EMTs. Bolstering this theory is "his" suspiciously plain, uncreative headstone in Highgate Cemetery.
• A minority of Douglasites believe that Douglas Adams actually did die at that Montecito gym, but that he wrote all of the Dilbert Blog entries in advance for gradual release in the future. Problem: the Dilbert Blog occasionally makes references to events that have occurred since May 11, 2001, when D. Adams died. This requires further explanations like the positing of a living henchperson to insert the contemporary references, which for one thing violates Occam's Razor, besides requiring a successful ongoing conspiracy of silence (and as we all know, conspiracies of silence can only be successful when they're imaginary). It is possible that Douglas Adams was psychic, and knew what was going to happen before it happened, although his record in that regard falls far below that of George Orwell. And some things just don't seem predictable, like how weird Michael Jackson was going to get.
• The "Oxfordians." Some people believe that a cartoonist who flunked out of art school could not have the high level of verbal skills evinced by "the Dilbert Blog Writer." They note that the supposed writer's IP address was briefly exposed by hackers for four hours in 2007, and that the IP address thus revealed was that of one Earl Oxford, a flamboyant* Summa Cum Laude graduate of Harvard and the multimillionaire owner of the "Duke of Oil" chain of oil-change shops. Although of course not witnessed by reporters, Earl Oxford allegedly starred in lots of Hasty Pudding shows in the Arena where he showed a dazzling gift for witty repartée. Problem: like, er, "some" other Harvard students, Oxford is known to be toweringly egocentric and a profligate braggart. If he is writing the Dilbert Blog, why would he try to pass himself off as "Scott Adams" rather that taking the credit for himself?
• Barryism: Some believe that the Dilbert Blog writer is Dave Barry. Problem: Barry has his own syndicated column, and, as a humorist himself, could be considered a competitor of Scott Adams. Why would he write mini-columns in another blog under a different name? Why not just do something other than links on his own blog? Barryism is the least popular of the Identity theories.
Undated black-and-white snapshot of Scott Adams. Photographer unknown.
Of course, there are a few people who believe that the obvious solution is also the true one, namely, that Scott Adams actually writes his own blog. They get shouted down at conventions, however. The mystery lives on.
Mike
*This word means "gay."
P.S. We really are going to have to get back on topic, before we lose every single reader we have left.
Send this post to a friend
Please help support TOP by patronizing our sponsors B&H Photo and Amazon
Note: Links in this post may be to our affiliates; sales through affiliate links may benefit this site. More...
Original contents copyright 2010 by Michael C. Johnston and/or the bylined author. All Rights Reserved.
Featured Comment by Kevin Bourque: "My money is on Charles Addams, who is 1) a cartoonist and 2) no less dead than Douglas Adams. Besides, can you prove I'm wrong?"
Featured Comment by Paul Pomeroy: "I can't seem to find the link to it now but I was just reading about this woman in San Francisco named Vivian Maloof who was either at an estate sale or dumpster diving when she discovered 16 crates containing nearly 100,000 unpublished Dilbert cartoons and a box full of pens (with a note explaining that these were actually undeveloped cartoon strips).
"She wasn't sure who the cartoonist was or if they were actually any good, the article said, but had started a conversation up on Snickr in the Street Cartoonists group to get some feedback. Seems no one there found them all that interesting, though. The conversation had quickly drifted off topic and, of all things, they'd ended up discussing which small cameras they loved most.
"It could be worse, I suppose, but probably not much weirder."
Featured Comment by Archer Sully: "Everyone in Silicon Valley was sure that Scott Adams worked at our respective companies. Although I think there was an Eddie de Vere at SGI, where I worked."
When I worked at cisco (back when they were still making up their minds about whether they were cisco or Cisco) we were pretty sure that Scott Adams worked there but it turned out he worked at the phone company. Why he kept writing about our projects was a mystery other than the fact that the phone company has no products and thus no product development teams.
Posted by: hugh crawford | Wednesday, 29 December 2010 at 06:16 PM
On a related note, who here thinks William Shatner actually wrote any of the "Tek War" books?
I'm sure Scott Adams knows who is writing the blog, but as long as it is funny I don't really care who is in fact the author.
Posted by: Al Patterson | Wednesday, 29 December 2010 at 07:08 PM
Errr, I think I'm really not getting the joke. Before the days of blogs, Scott Adams also wrote a number of books. I mean, I guess there's humor in making a big Shakespeare-mystery out of nothing, but why this target?
Posted by: Matthew Miller | Wednesday, 29 December 2010 at 07:30 PM
Mike, I'm slowly beginning to conclude that you don't have enough to do. My suggestion is that you don some winter clothing, then go out and take some photographs. For instance, take photos of drunks on new year's eve; that's always fun. Just use a telephoto lens and wear good running shoes. Happy new year, and remember, there's no need to rush your technical treatise about the range of Dick Tracy's two-way wrist TV into print.
Posted by: Bill Rogers | Wednesday, 29 December 2010 at 07:40 PM
Oh, and in my experience, graduation from art school does not correlate with a high level of verbal skills. Quite the opposite. Those with verbal skills are predestined to flunk out of art school.
Posted by: Bill Rogers | Wednesday, 29 December 2010 at 07:48 PM
Dear Mike,
It's gotta be Catbert, in my ever-humble opinion.
I don't see how this is off-topic-- you ran a "photo," right?
~~~~~~~
Dear Hugh,
If you were at c/Cisco *that* early, seems like you gotta know my very-long-time friend, Doug Faunt.
'Twas his van that we drove to Cape Canaveral to photograph the first shuttle launch... and then to Vandenberg to photograph the landing.
pax / Ctein
Posted by: ctein | Wednesday, 29 December 2010 at 07:57 PM
Clearly the Dilbert Blog is written by Christopher Marlowe.
Posted by: James | Wednesday, 29 December 2010 at 08:02 PM
The name prefaced before Adams perhaps has many variants, in this world, the world we left yesterday and in the world of our futures whatever that may be.
Dilbert's blog is a recent happening as much as the word "blog" itself.
Hence rather than question the sanity of stupidity as exhibited by Dilbert,
perhaps look at a similar strip entitled
"What The Duck!"
Now there is a daily cartoon that makes non-sense of our photographic world.
Oh and maybe if we all looked at ourselves either in the mirror or elsewhere perhaps we shall realize we are all characters in our own comic strip, entitled the Life And Daily Times of:
(insert your name here)
Posted by: Bryce Lee | Wednesday, 29 December 2010 at 10:07 PM
I really couldn't care less. [smile]
Posted by: charlie | Wednesday, 29 December 2010 at 10:09 PM
Perhaps writing the Dilbert Blog is The Stig's* side job?
* yes, another semi-obscure reference piled on the existing ones. So sue me.
Posted by: Paul Glover | Wednesday, 29 December 2010 at 11:11 PM
Matthew,
Yes, I think I see your point. I mean, the chicken has every right to cross the road; other creatures of all species cross the road. The chicken quite possibly has legitimate business on the far side of the road. It's not really fair to second-guess or ridicule his motivations. Yes, I think I'm beginning to come around.
Mike
Posted by: Mike Johnston | Wednesday, 29 December 2010 at 11:37 PM
Anyone who claims cartoonists don't have to write too many words has obviously never read Subnormality.
For the most extreme example, see here. (warning: The `F-word' is used.)
Posted by: Bernard Scharp | Thursday, 30 December 2010 at 02:41 AM
If you haven't read Jasper Fforde's 'The Eyre Affair' and are into English literature, do so now. In it, bands of Marlowists and Oxfordians roam the streets and knock on doors, desperate to convince non-believers.
Watch out for a Barryist on your street corner with a petition and a nervous twitch.
Posted by: Karin | Thursday, 30 December 2010 at 05:04 AM
Conspiracy theory folk clearly have to much time on their hands. They should be made to take up blogging.
Posted by: Jack Nelson | Thursday, 30 December 2010 at 08:12 AM
The "Majority Douglasite Position" is right. Like Hari Seldon, Adams was/is a prophet before his time. Long live psychohistory!
Posted by: Andy | Thursday, 30 December 2010 at 08:43 PM