« A Tip: Be Sure Your Gear Guru Is a Good Match for You | Main | Alec Soth Does the Hardest Thing »

Tuesday, 07 December 2010


Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Not sure about which is the better deal, maybe this?


This one has the newer graphics?

The 27" iMac at B&H is not the newest model... the one at the apple store right now has a 2.8GHz Intel Core i5 vs a 2.66Ghz, and a 5750 vs a 4850.

Dear Peter and Alan,

I've got the late 2010 model iMac that B&H is advertising. The difference in performance between it and the current (2.8 GHz) machine is insignificant for most users. If you're so much at the cutting edge that you need a few extra percent of performance (and that's all it is), you're probably more a customer for a full-blown Mac Pro.

The one reason I can see for getting the Apple refurb (which are great deals, BTW, my MacBook pro is a refurb) is that OWC can add an eSATA port to it for a modest sum. If you want really fast I/O (e.g., Photoshop scratch disk), eSATA's a big win over FW800.

Other than that, not much difference.

Canon 5600F scans a strip of six frames or 4 slides at once. OK for casual use.

Think I'll stick with my Canon 9950F's 5x6 strips = 30 frames or 12 slides at once.


Thanks for the heads up. After much humming and hawing I pulled the trigger on an E-P2 with the 17mm lens. Should be fun for family snaps over the holidays.

The comments to this entry are closed.



Blog powered by Typepad
Member since 06/2007