Sorry, I've got song titles on the brain today. What, not who.
But a serious question to throw out to the brain trust**: I'm writing an article called "Small Cameras We Love." I've got a number of the slots nailed down, but the list is looking suspiciously Mike-ish, or maybe I should say Mike-centric. Hence my query: What small camera do you love?
I'd be interested to hear, if you'd care to share.
Mike
P.S. To forestall people asking what category of cameras I'm talking about, I'm not. I'm talking about cameras that are a) small and b) loved—that's it.
*Original version: Bo Diddley, 1956. Best cover: George Thorogood and the Destroyers, 1978. Worst cover: UFO, the Morlocks (tie); Duke Robillard, Tom Rush (runners-up).
**I.e., our audience. Readers. You!
Send this post to a friend
Please help support TOP by using our links to B&H Photo and Amazon! Many thanks.
Note: Links in this post may be to our affiliates; sales through affiliate links may benefit this site. More...
Original contents copyright 2010 by Michael C. Johnston and/or the bylined author. All Rights Reserved.
Featured [partial] Comment by Simon A: "...And of course the Fuji X100—I remember it being fantastic every morning when I wake up. :) "
Featured [partial] Comment by Hugh Crawford: "...The iPhone 4 is pretty loveable—I know someone who bought it specifically to use as a camera."
Featured Comment by Bruce: "Olympus Trip. Fifteen million users can't be wrong. I repaired Olympus cameras for twenty years. Trips are sharp, and reliable, no batteries. Only thing that goes wrong is aperture blades sticky—fixable yaself. Also, screws come loose, but are tightenable yaself. Almost. Shutter blades never sticky...wonder why?? 35RD's are beautiful, but sticky shutters are slightly frustrating. Lens: 40mm ƒ/1.7...coupled rangefinder...simply sensational. 35SPn brilliant, but not small. Never saw sticky shutter blades in an SPn, but lots in 35RD—why?? XA2 brilliant. Had OM1s and all the lenses...stupidly sold when digital came in...would give my eye teeth for my 21mm ƒ/2 back to fit on my 5D Canon. Wonder what it would be like on a 5D Mark II? Whoowoo. Lovely to see such love for Oly. Am at present having fun with an EPL1 and short zoom. Lovely JPEGs straight out of camera. Great topic...wonder how many people will read this far??" [Bruce's was approximately the 150th comment. —Ed.]
Featured Comment by Martin: "I'm surprised not to see the iPhone appear more. I have an Olympus XA2—mentioned many times in the Comments—and a Canonet QL19, both wonderful small cameras. However, neither changed the way I work. With those cameras, I just transfered my usual SLR process to them, i.e. bring the camera to an event and consciously set about to photograph.
"The iPhone, on the other hand, did change the way I work. The photos I take with it are during times when 'I amn't photographing.' Since those times are play rather than work, they are precious to me and so I love having photos from them. Also, the photos I take with the iPhone look completely different (I'm not talking about image quality here) from my SLR pictures because of the different process.
"If you aren't working in a different way with your small camera compared to your big camera, I don't really see the point of using a small camera. But if you yourself change as a photographer in response to a small camera, then that's love."
Featured Comment by Hans Muus: "Back in 1994 I went on a short organized dog-sled trekking trip in the south of Lapland (mid-Sweden). To cut the costs a little I had arranged an assignment for a story plus photos for a backpacking monthly. Because of the unique occasion I took matters very seriously and carried (or rather, the sleigh carried and the dogs tugged) a Nikon F3, an FM2 with motordrive and a Minox 35. All with Kodacolor (negative) film. Five pictures were published alongside the story, two almost full page—and these were both taken with the Minox. Lovely little basterd."
Featured [partial] Comment by James: "...I also want to nominate the Hubble Space Telescope (hey, size is relative, right? 57 metres in length is small in relation to most space objects...). Some of the imagery coming off that thing is literally changing science and thus human understanding."
Featured Comment by Bob Dales: "Canon S90 'cause my sweetie's always with me."
Voigtländer "E-messer". Tiny camera for a negative the size of almost an entire parking lot (6x9). And it is really sharp if stopped down and focused properly.
Posted by: Erik P | Tuesday, 16 November 2010 at 10:23 PM
My daughter's currently got my G9 OS and I'm missing it to bits.
Posted by: Phill | Tuesday, 16 November 2010 at 10:25 PM
The Contax G2, just about everything you need in a tiny kit.
Posted by: Jonathan | Tuesday, 16 November 2010 at 10:36 PM
I've owned lots of cameras over the years, from high-end SLRs to little digicams. For a long time, I favored my Chinon Belami as a travel camera - small, quick, discrete. But I've never put as many miles on a camera as quickly as I have with my Canon G11. No, it's not the smallest of small, but it slips over my shoulder and vanishes when I'm traveling. Fabulous resolution, great color, snappy reflexes, great build quality, good high-ISO. What's not to love?
Posted by: Peter | Tuesday, 16 November 2010 at 10:38 PM
Love? No.
But, I do carry a small camera, I'm on my second Canon Elph, often on my belt. So, while not loved, it is the best camera much of the time. But, the truth is that I want a small camera with a better sensor than the little Canons currently sport.
Three decades ago, and more, I did the Pentax SV, it taught me so much, and then I added the Spotmatic. After they were stolen, Olympus entered my life. An OM-2n, and then (here we go again) an XA. The XA was so stylish and cool; I loved the style and the design. But, as a camera it was the only the OM that I loved.
Today, when I pull out the OM-2n (in need of seals on the door), it does look really small compared to my D700. But, it leaks light, and it makes me use film. I am pretty well done with film. I do love what the Nikon D700 can do, and I love my tripod very much, but that also is not small.
So, today I shoot the Canon SD700 IS pretty often, but I cannot say that I love it. No, I definitely do not love it. It is my best camera by virtue of proximity. Like a Swiss Army knife in one's pocket. Not the best tool for almost anything, except when it is the only tool one has.
I think the next small camera I might love will likely be that mythical, pocketable, camera which you, Mike, have been asking about, or its first cousin.
Posted by: David Ralph | Tuesday, 16 November 2010 at 10:43 PM
Leica F (Leica III if you prefer) with 50/2.8 Elmar collapsible.
Sigma DP1/DP2
Posted by: Peter Cameron | Tuesday, 16 November 2010 at 10:44 PM
With trepidation, I submit:
From last Sunday with my new LX5 - Stanley Park, Vancouver, BC.
Posted by: Michael Farrell | Tuesday, 16 November 2010 at 10:47 PM
This one
http://www.instructables.com/image/FN7PS3SFJ0O3Y2J/Kodak-Instamatic-X-15.jpg
Posted by: charlie | Tuesday, 16 November 2010 at 10:47 PM
My Panasonic Lumix TZ1, the first of the pocket-superzooms, from 2006. It just fits in my jeans pocket ("is that a camera or are you just happy to see me?"), it's very sturdy and makes great pictures. I also loved my very first camera, a fully manual Agfa Parat 1 halfframe I bought in 1966. And my Pentax ME Super, but I guess I didn't love it enough: I sold it...
Posted by: Frans | Tuesday, 16 November 2010 at 10:48 PM
Three that I have and use regularly. Nikon 28ti, Canon G10, and my M6 with 35mm Summicron for B+W. All superb results in their given areas of strength.
Posted by: Michael Korak | Tuesday, 16 November 2010 at 10:50 PM
Love is not too strong a word to use for my Leica CL, which I bought new in 1975 and intend to be buried with. Sherry Krauter CLA'd the body and the 40mm Summicron in 2005, so I'm expecting it to be good for another 30 years beyond that. And I can't believe I'm the first person to mention this camera (the CLE doesn't count. Not the same camera, not matter the mount.)
Posted by: Jim Simmons | Tuesday, 16 November 2010 at 10:52 PM
I love my Pen EED, but when I want to go really small, I load my Pen EE. Its size and fixed focus and programmed exposure and half-frame-extended-goodness makes me extra snap happy. Makes me feel like I'm a tourist on vacation even though I'm just walking to work. And like I've stepped back into a simpler time.
Posted by: Jeff Hohner | Tuesday, 16 November 2010 at 10:55 PM
Olympus XA
Olympus Stylus Epic mju-II
Rollei 35S
Still waiting for a digital that can stack up, particularly in terms of responsiveness.
Posted by: Jim Couch | Tuesday, 16 November 2010 at 11:00 PM
C O N T A X. T
small
Real Viewfinder
Aperture priority (+ adjustable ISO)
Shutter lag same as leica MP
quiet
Manual focus
(I'd pick the minolta tc-1 if it weren't so noisy)
Posted by: Gary S. | Tuesday, 16 November 2010 at 11:01 PM
For film, the Olympus Stylus Epic and for digital, my Canon SX100IS (it's not the smallest camera by any stretch but that 10X zoom covers a lot of ground).
I'd love to get my hands on a Canon S90/S95.
Posted by: Terry Manning | Tuesday, 16 November 2010 at 11:04 PM
Contax T-3
Still looking for the digital equivalent of it!
E-P1 with 20mm Panasonic and the LX-3 are close, but not quite.
I have owned, used and liked many of the small cameras mentioned here. There are many good ones.
Posted by: mikegj | Tuesday, 16 November 2010 at 11:05 PM
Konica Hexar AF.
Digitals like the Canon S95 and m4/3 are great, but I couldn't say I love them.
Posted by: James W. | Tuesday, 16 November 2010 at 11:13 PM
Canon S90. I use it for everything. What dslr?
Posted by: Chris | Tuesday, 16 November 2010 at 11:24 PM
Another vote for the Canon s90:
I carry it with me everywhere. I love to experiment with it.
Posted by: Ken Rahaim | Tuesday, 16 November 2010 at 11:26 PM
Ricoh GR-Dii and M9.
scott
Posted by: scott kirkpatrick | Tuesday, 16 November 2010 at 11:31 PM
Canon S90, with the Franiec Grip and the control wheel knurled ring to reduce the tendency of the control wheel to move randomly. Small, Light, decent battery life, rudimentary video, great stills, raw files and good out of camera JPG. Manual controls!
Posted by: Robert Von Mayr | Tuesday, 16 November 2010 at 11:32 PM
Well, my big camera is a Whole Plate Improved Seneca View, so that colors my idea of small.
I had an XA that I loved. I dropped it on my honeymoon and messed it up good. Ruined the negs too. It was replaced with a Stylus Epic that I never came to love like I did the XA. I dropped the Stylus Epic in the parking lot of the hospital where my first son was born. That took care of that!
My favorite small film camera is my Dad's old Pentax MX with the 40mm Pancake.
My favorite small view camera is a 4x5 Walker Titan SF.
Posted by: Dave Karp | Tuesday, 16 November 2010 at 11:32 PM
Another vote for the Olympus XA. Runner-up, probably Pentax MX.
Posted by: GKFroehlich | Tuesday, 16 November 2010 at 11:35 PM
Minox 35EL. I got one of these in the mid 70's. The camera's size and picture quality soon caused my wife to leave her AE1 at home when we traveled.
My favorite in this space though would be the Contax T3. While bigger and heavier than the Minox, the built-in flash and the better build quality and reliability gives it the nod.
Posted by: Joel Bartlett | Tuesday, 16 November 2010 at 11:49 PM
from largest to smallest:
Pentax ME super with 43mm ltd lens
Olympus XA2
Panasonic FX150
And of course the Fuji X100 - I remember it being fantastic every morning when I wake up :)
Posted by: Simon A | Tuesday, 16 November 2010 at 11:50 PM
Olympus mju/Stylus 790SW
It is small (jeans pocket) and doesn't break – it's even watertight. Image quality in low light leaves something to be desired, but this camera is about being there when it happens, not taking great images on a tripod. I took mine with me on a half-year sailing trip and while three other cameras in my crew failed, mine always worked.
You might not regard it as a "real camera", but I do…
Posted by: Ludger Heide | Tuesday, 16 November 2010 at 11:58 PM
Zorki 3M with a collapsible Summicron 50mm and good exposure guide
Chrome Bronica ETRS with 60mm lens, waist level finder and Sekonic L-208 Twin-Mate meter
Some might say small is in the eye of the beholder!
Posted by: Jonathan Taylor | Wednesday, 17 November 2010 at 12:02 AM
Here are my loved ones:
Rollei 35S - engineering marvel, great optics, quiet, weird idiosyncratic upside down back to front design.
Olympus MJU II - the ultimate tiny point and shoot, autofocus with spot focusing and great lens
Olympus XA - no quite so loved, a bit plasticky and the controls are not a joy to use, but a unique camera
Minox GL - the least loved, but still fun and good quality optics.
Haven't really loved a small digital, but the G11 comes closest - it was used to take this photo
Leica CL - maybe it's a bit big, especially with the accessory finder, (it usually has the 40mm Summicron attached). However although objectively not much smaller than an M3/4/6/7 it certainly feels a lot smaller.
Posted by: richard | Wednesday, 17 November 2010 at 12:05 AM
Film:
Olympus Stylus Epic - sadly mine has a light leak around the lens.
Kodak S100 - Don't laugh. It's like loving one of those Time-Life freebie cameras, I know. But...I really like it. 3 apertures, 1 shutter speed. Only needed batteries for the flash. Too bad I let some batteries rot inside and now the flash doesn't work...
Canonet QL17 GIII still going strong.
Digital:
Canon A80 - My first digital camera, but it's not here for nostalgic reasons. Had I not dropped it one too many times it would still be in use today.
I'm rough on cameras apparently.
Posted by: phule | Wednesday, 17 November 2010 at 12:27 AM
Film: Nikon FM2n - everything I could want in a film camera - tough, small, light, plenty of small manual focus lenses available.
Digital: I'm still looking for something I really like. I get by with Canon T2i and 5DII but really just want an FM2n with a full-frame sensor, RAW capture, manual focus lenses and a self-timer. I continue to find it weird that nobody can seem to make one.
Posted by: Lee Carruthers | Wednesday, 17 November 2010 at 12:34 AM
I second the motion for Rollei 35S.
Very original. Small, yes, but the film ran backwards. All the pictures were upside down compared with my Nikon. Nothing but scale focusing. And the meter was very simple.
But what a lens! 2,8/40 Sonnar. And sturdy.
Soon after I got it it fell out of my shirtpocket down on concrete from about 1,5 meter (that is 5 feet for you americans). Got a big dent next to the finder. Did it work anyway? Yes, it did!
Posted by: Johan Grahn | Wednesday, 17 November 2010 at 12:36 AM
For film the SWC is just about perfect, and I love my Minolta Autocord. They seem pretty small all things considered, always wanted to get a Plaubel 67. If you were wearing the right clothes the the SWC and the Plaubel were pocket sized.
For digital, I spent an hour or so at Photo Expo playing around with the Sony nex 3 with the lensbaby tilt adapter and a Nikkor 28mm and I'm seriously infatuated. The nex 5 shutter release is too awkward. The iPhone 4 is pretty loveable I know someone who bought it specifically to use as a camera.
Posted by: hugh crawford | Wednesday, 17 November 2010 at 12:39 AM
My Canon ftb. Built like a finely machined bolt action rifle, and with a 50mm lens, fairly small.
Posted by: Caleb Courteau | Wednesday, 17 November 2010 at 12:40 AM
Olympus XA (think mine was XA3)
Small enough to go anywhere
I was sick of carrying an SLR around and ended up not taking any pictures. I bought it used on a whim and suddenly enjoyed photography again
can't say that I have ever had another camera that I LOVED
Is that retro enough for TOP ?
Posted by: John | Wednesday, 17 November 2010 at 12:58 AM
Small is a relative term. My favorite camera is my Technikardan 45, it is small compared to an 8x10 or ULF camera ...
Even smaller, the Bessa III. Perfect for travel.
And for 35mm (which I rarely use anymore), my old Olympus OM 3/4, especially with the 90mm f/2 macro lens..
Posted by: Arne Croell | Wednesday, 17 November 2010 at 12:58 AM
Gotta go with my everyday- my black Nikon FG w/20mm. The body is probably smaller than a Leica M (what I really lust for)- but it does have a ratcheted, double jointed advance lever just like the M (and greater framing accuracy at less than one tenth the cost).
Posted by: Stan B. | Wednesday, 17 November 2010 at 12:58 AM
I guess the important question is:
small-er than what?
Anyways, here are the ones I've loved:
1- Zeiss ZM
2- Pana FT2
3- Nikon FM3A
and growing rapidly in my appreciation:
Oly E-PL1 - this is an amazing camera, with the VLF2 I can see myself forgetting all the others!
Posted by: Noons | Wednesday, 17 November 2010 at 12:58 AM
Love - Olympus Pen E-P1 with Lumix 20mm f/1.7. The in camera stabilisation makes it worth its weight in gold to me.
Like - Canon S90. Decent pictures and it's so tiny.
Posted by: Dave Wilson | Wednesday, 17 November 2010 at 01:02 AM
LG KU 990, aka "Viewty".
Spectacular cameraphone.
Posted by: Iñaki | Wednesday, 17 November 2010 at 01:08 AM
Digital - Sigma DP2
Film - Minox 35GT
love em both, but one is now retired!
Posted by: Jerry Lewis-Evans | Wednesday, 17 November 2010 at 01:16 AM
Fuji F30
Big detail in these 6 mp files...and ISO 100 to 400 is similar...with this compact, one can "actually" shoot at 400
Panasonic LX3
http://www.fluidr.com/photos/agnihot/
Posted by: anurag agnihotri | Wednesday, 17 November 2010 at 01:16 AM
Olympus 35S II and its sister Wide S, probably the best fixed lens rangefinders ever made. I also recently had a Leica Digilux 2, and it's a spectacular camera with a cult following despite its age and flaws.
Posted by: ludo | Wednesday, 17 November 2010 at 01:19 AM
I already love the Fujifilm X100 and is not even made yet ...
Also love that George Thorogood & the Destroyers' version.
Posted by: nacho | Wednesday, 17 November 2010 at 01:20 AM
Three small cameras that delivered the goods for me, with very little effort:
Olympus Trip (with new foam)
Canonet 1.9 G-III
and my first digital camera:
Leica Digilux 4.3
For its day, miracles went on inside that camera (lost it!).
Posted by: XK50 | Wednesday, 17 November 2010 at 01:37 AM
Olympus XA2 small effective and cheap it even uses film!
Posted by: Steve | Wednesday, 17 November 2010 at 01:39 AM
I kinda feel like a Leica M might be a bit too large for the category, but perhaps what constitutes small depends a lot on how big your large camera is. A Canon 5D might be an 8x10 toting landscape photographers small camera. Anyway, I'll put a vote in for my M6, it even fits my coat pocket beautifully with the tiny 28/2.8 asph.
As for tiny cameras, I love the Oly Trip35. It's odd in a way only Asian cameras can be odd, with the little symbols for focusing, the scale on the bottom, and god knows how it decides on a shutter speed. But the lens is sharp, it's fast because you can't reliable set anything anyway, and sometimes it just manages to put out something beautiful.
Posted by: Koen Lageveen | Wednesday, 17 November 2010 at 01:46 AM
D700 + 85G. Anything less (S90/G7/T5) and I'm left wanting, regretting, wishing. Even so, I double guess not having 70-200 on. But then again, I do prefer to isolate lately, both in DoF and selective background which teles afford, so...
iPhone is cool, but can one really love its puny (dis)abilities? Only to prove to a friend that you did see see Bill Gates on that bus stop. 'Bout it, Jarvis notwithstanding.
Posted by: Tee | Wednesday, 17 November 2010 at 01:47 AM
Olympus C-3000 Camedia. 3Mp I think. Slow as heck. But this camera began my quest to pursue photography. Lost it sometime when my kids were old enough to use it. I took it to Japan on a trip. It was limiting to use because of its short battery life and its storage capacity. But I got wonderful photos out of it as long as I was patient. Here's some photos from that distant trip: http://picturejournals.com/?p=75.
Posted by: Desi Baytan | Wednesday, 17 November 2010 at 01:48 AM
My Panasonic LX3. I have taken about 140,000 photographs with it in two years and two months.
Posted by: Juha Haataja | Wednesday, 17 November 2010 at 01:53 AM
I've enjoyed:
Olympus 35RC
Rollei 35
I loved/love:
Olympus Stylus Epic (MJUii)
Canon S90
Both of these don't just fit a pocket, they fit a jeans pocket. Means you can take them anywhere.
Currently waiting for my first new mobile phone in about 5 years (because my last one is finally falling apart) - Nokia N8 - it looks as if it has a serious camera fitted - with a sensor the same size as a compact camera.
Posted by: Hugh Alison | Wednesday, 17 November 2010 at 01:57 AM
Olympus Pen S, the full manual, 35mm half frame, non metered viewfinder camera with the 28mm f3.5 lens.
After that, the Pen F or FV.
What can I say, I'm a 18X24mm nut.
Posted by: John Robison | Wednesday, 17 November 2010 at 02:19 AM
Bessa L and the little Snapshot Skopar 25/4. Just a wonderful street machine. Lets you get in REAL close and not miss a thing with all that DOF!
Posted by: Jamie Pillers | Wednesday, 17 November 2010 at 02:29 AM
The version with the Band from The Last Waltz concert is very good.
Best small camera... most be my Holga and the GF1 whit the 20/1.7
Posted by: Jens_E | Wednesday, 17 November 2010 at 02:33 AM
Fufijilm Finepix F30. I got it after getting loads of information, and was not disappointed: great pictures, excellent for low light, small and convenient.
All I need when I can not bring my Pentax K10D with me.
Posted by: Cateto/Jose | Wednesday, 17 November 2010 at 02:34 AM
Konica AA35 (half frame)
Canon MC
Fujifilm Natura
Konica S3
danny
Posted by: Danny | Wednesday, 17 November 2010 at 02:36 AM
Olympus XA3.
Have you seen "When You're Strange"? Astounding vintage colour film footage of The Doors.
It starts with an incredibly irritating 5 minute imagined sequence, narrated by Johnny Depp, but soon settles into its stride.
Makes the late '60s look a very alarming and dangerous place.
Posted by: Guy Batey | Wednesday, 17 November 2010 at 02:37 AM
My favourite small cameras:
Olympus XA and XA4
Voigtlander Vito B
Posted by: Steve Smith | Wednesday, 17 November 2010 at 02:47 AM
I'd say that there's two categories for my submission:
1. Cameras that I've used and owned
- M6 Classic or MP (new): I'm sure you've got plenty of an opinion on this already.
- Minolta Hi-Matic AF2: An excellent compact camera with a fixed lens with a great viewfinder
- Olympus Mju-II / Stylus Epic: Small rugged camera with an excellent lens
- Ricoh GR Digital: Infuriatingly slow camera, but loved the interface.
2. Cameras that I've wanted to use but never have (and hope to still)
- Nikon 35Ti: Wonderful build, size, and quality
- Rollei 35
- Ricoh GR1 (yes the film version)
I'd say that all of these had something a little bit "eccentric" about them, but things in common: a great user experience through build quality, viewfinder, shutter release, film loading / transport, and sound.
Pak
Posted by: Pak-Ming Wan | Wednesday, 17 November 2010 at 02:47 AM
Yet another Canon S90 fan. Small, easy to use, RAW capability, takes good photos for its class. Of course, the S95 is a similar but somewhat improved model.
Posted by: R. Edelman | Wednesday, 17 November 2010 at 02:54 AM
Leica M6 w 50 'cron. What else is there? (I'm not really a Leica snob, I just HAD to say it...)
Posted by: Phil Maus | Wednesday, 17 November 2010 at 03:29 AM
Easy question:)
In size order
Ricoh GX200/100, usually with a 35mm optical finder and set in 3:2 (B&W) raw mode. These relatively cheap and practically identical cameras have given me as many pictures that I really like as any. I haven't really bonded with my wife's LX5 yet.
Zeiss Ikon, usually with 2/35 Biogon. The nicest camera to use I have. Great viewfinder and just the right size/weight with the Zeiss grip.
Leica M9, usually with 2/35 Biogon. So close to being a digital Ikon and much, much better than I expected. Needs a Thumbs Up or a grip if you've got hands like mine.
Canon 1Ds3 - nah....
Mike
Posted by: Mike | Wednesday, 17 November 2010 at 03:38 AM
"What, not who."
Though we entirely miss the point, the pedants among us might argue "whom, not who". :-)
For me, it's the Pentax MX - my first real camera, back when it was new. Recently reacquired one, with the 40mm pancake. Love is possibly not too strong a word.
The other candidate is the Voigtlander CLR from 1960. Never even saw one at the time, but something about its design and style reminds me of my childhood.
Posted by: Nigel | Wednesday, 17 November 2010 at 03:39 AM
Minox 35 EL/GL/GT - true gems.
Full frame, 35mm f2.8 lens that folds into the body and is as sharp as anything ever made by Leica or Zeiss. Manual guestimation focus or hyperfocal distance.
Aperture priority (via aperture ring on the lens barrel) with +1EV from a button on top, with fully adjustable ASA setting on bottom (also used for exposure compensation). Shutter speed in viewfinder via needle. Very fast operations once you learn how to handle the removable back while changing film.
When the Olympus XA came out, I bought one for the rangefinder, but found it was bulky compared to the Minox, and couldn't do decent night shots (limited to 30 sec). After doing half hour shots with the Minox of a starlit lake (had a CdS meter that just sat there counting photons indefinitely), I felt the XA was not for me, and sold it and continued with the Minox.
I greatly miss the ability to take razor sharp pictures in the dark with a camera that sags my shirt pocket only a little. I'd happily pay a DSLR price for a digital equivalent.
Posted by: Phil | Wednesday, 17 November 2010 at 03:43 AM
I like them all (and I have a bunch) but my favorite is the Ricoh GRDIII. I took me fours to buy it (no zoom, very high price) but to me it is the best.
Posted by: Rube Redfield | Wednesday, 17 November 2010 at 03:46 AM
My little Mamiya 35 S2 fixed lens rangefinder. It's a gem.
Posted by: Neal Thorley | Wednesday, 17 November 2010 at 03:48 AM
been through a few small one,s Minox, Ricoh Gr1, Fuji Z1, Nikon P5000 but currently Leica X1 with viewfinder, comes with me everywhere, like anything you love some aspects drive you crazy, but the results make it worthwhile
Posted by: John Frye | Wednesday, 17 November 2010 at 03:54 AM
Minox 35 and the Rollei 35 (with the marvelous Sonnar 40 mm), then the Leica M3 (M4/M6) with the Simmicron 50 mm collapsable.
BTW, does the K7/K5 (+ the DA 21 mm) fits in the small cameras league too?
Posted by: Philippe | Wednesday, 17 November 2010 at 04:02 AM
sub-reflex: Olympus XA (still carrying it 25 years on)
reflex: OM1, OM4 (but I'm not sure that's what you're asking about)
Tried to love: XA4, Canon G10 (verdict still out on the latter)
Posted by: BrianW | Wednesday, 17 November 2010 at 04:05 AM
I've got an S90 that's pretty much always with me. I like it a lot. Loving is too strong a word, for that it would maybe need a viewfinder, but most of all a hot-shoe (of course not to stick a flash ON it, that would be silly, but to attach one via TTL-cable. For me, that would make it one heck of a street-photography-camera).
I do love my Canon A1. I realize that's stretching the definition of »small« a bit, but I mostly work with a 5D MkII, and in comparison it's positively tiny.
Posted by: Judith Wallerius | Wednesday, 17 November 2010 at 04:11 AM
Posted by: Mickld | Wednesday, 17 November 2010 at 04:12 AM
Yashica Electro GX. Lightweight and small enough to fit in a coat's pocket. Okay, looks a bit bumpy. But hey, I'm too old to pose around as a fotomodel. Olympus XA is smaller, but a bit of a love-hate-relation, same as Minolta AF-C. Both very pocketable, but XA isn't really made for wide open, and AF-Cs AF is a gamble when it comes to infinity - sometimes it's way off, sometimes spot on.
The Yashica Electro 35 GX has a very, very good 40/1.7 lens, a decent rangefinder, fits leica-like in my hand and sports an aperture-priority autoexposure. Only real complaint: You can't switch that auto off. So for night and indoors photography, my most beloved small camera at moment is an older-than-me soviet Zorki 3M with a do-it-yourself-adapted Minolta 50/2. It's not exactly small. It's hefty. Exactly what I need for longer shutter speeds.
No digital so far. I need a real viewfinder. I love smaller dof.
I'm better in b&w than in color.
So much about love.
Posted by: Robert Birnbaum | Wednesday, 17 November 2010 at 04:12 AM
The oldest of my Leicas - the IIIa. It's to cameras what the Curta is to calculators, or the Nagra is to tape recorders.
And, for sentimental reasons, my father's 1930s Certo Dolly, which is still working perfectly and gets fed a roll of 127 every so often.
Posted by: Sam | Wednesday, 17 November 2010 at 04:18 AM
Film Leica M7
Digital Canon S95 a real top pocket always with me camera that shoots raw.
Posted by: Warren | Wednesday, 17 November 2010 at 04:26 AM
I have an Olympus OM-10 that I got at a yard sale for less than $10. It's remarkably compact and a joy to carry along on a trip.
Posted by: Pen Waggener | Wednesday, 17 November 2010 at 04:30 AM
Leica III's and Leica M's; Olympus OM1 to 4. All great, pity Olympus let the digital side down.
Posted by: jeremy | Wednesday, 17 November 2010 at 04:40 AM
Rollei 35. The first camera I have used.
Posted by: Fabian Becker | Wednesday, 17 November 2010 at 04:41 AM
A Canon A2000IS. It fits in a a shirt pocket, lens zooms to 200mm eq.(I like long lenses), and has good image quality for a pocketable digicam. I wish it had a viewfinder, but since I got it free as a safety award from my employer, I can't really complain. The only time it's not with me is when I'm out working with my DSLR.
Posted by: John Roberts | Wednesday, 17 November 2010 at 04:46 AM
I wrote this on another site one night after a few drinks, so forgive me reusing it here, but I don't think I can improve on it!
Frankly, I messed around with countless other smaller-than-an-SLR digital cameras over the years, the list goes something like Canon G3 / Fuji F11 / Ricoh GR-D / Canon G9 / Leica D-Lux 4 / Canon S90 - and that's quite aside from the 7 SLR bodies! I can say to you in all honesty, if I'd found & bought an Epson R-D1 in the first place, I would never have bothered with any of them. (Apart from the SLRs, that is.)
If you like control over depth of field, this is your camera. If you like vintage lenses, this is your camera. If you like feeling like you've achieved something - simply by remembering all the steps, winding / stopping down / setting the shutter speed & ISO / focussing, THEN capturing the moment you were doing all that for; this is your camera.
I liken it to why I enjoy driving a manual car: when you nail it, when the downshift is perfect and smooth halfway round a corner, or when a perfectly crisp & exposed image pops up on the LCD and you know YOU did it - not the AF / AE / AISO system in the camera...well, that's why we all got into photography, right? To capture those moments that fly past us, through a bizarre mix of skill, luck, persistence, determination, practice and timing.
Love it.
R!
Posted by: Robertcatto | Wednesday, 17 November 2010 at 04:46 AM
Ricoh GR Digital III and Rollei 35T
Posted by: Irminger | Wednesday, 17 November 2010 at 04:49 AM
Panasonic LX3. Although its zoom range is limited, shooting with a prime is limited as well. Like an earlier commenter, it's been all over the world with me, especially useful when a larger camera would draw attention. Image and video quality are great. Exceptionally durable too. While no one seems to like the clip-on lens cap, it has helped save the lens from an exceptional amount of wear and tear in my travels.
Posted by: DK | Wednesday, 17 November 2010 at 04:51 AM
I see I am not the only one to love my Olympus XA. Recently I "discontinued" it in favour of a Contax 139 with Tessar 45/2.8 (small love this, too).
I find the optics of the XA very sharp but, unfortunately, with too much vignetting at all apertures.
Posted by: Marco | Wednesday, 17 November 2010 at 04:53 AM
In order of increasing size..
Canon Demi EE17 (half frame)
Minolta Hi-Matic F
Contax 139
And I suppose I should mention my Canon G10 but that's digital so doesn't really count as a camera.
Posted by: Peter | Wednesday, 17 November 2010 at 04:59 AM
Hi.
Bessa L with 25mm Snapshot-Skopar.
Posted by: Dean Johnston | Wednesday, 17 November 2010 at 05:14 AM
Ricoh GXR 50mm, greatest compact digital, only bad thing was slow auto focus which is now corrected with latest firmware, and new modules are coming - 28mm just got released and probably m-mount next year
Posted by: ivan | Wednesday, 17 November 2010 at 05:24 AM
My Nikon 35Ti has been to hell and back with me. I think it's the nicest looking camera in the world, too.
Posted by: Peter Rees | Wednesday, 17 November 2010 at 05:29 AM
Sticking with camera/lens combinations that fit in a back pocket:
Posted by: Jean-Yves Mead | Wednesday, 17 November 2010 at 05:33 AM
wow, more than 100 comments and no mention of the Sigma DP's... (no love for Sigma apparently :)
For me it's the Sigma DP2.
Granted, it's a love/hate relationship. But it's the first digital camera I ever got emotional about :)
Posted by: Tilman Paulin | Wednesday, 17 November 2010 at 05:44 AM
I love my Voigtlander Bessa R3A (w/ the 40mm f1.4 nokton lens).
I don't love my E-P1, even though I use it a lot.
Posted by: Chris Bertram | Wednesday, 17 November 2010 at 05:47 AM
Yashica Micro Finesse. Very sharp Yashica 33mm f/3.5 lens. Simple 35mm auto-focus P&S that fits in ones pocket. Perhaps one of the last cameras Yashica produced. Bought mine new/old stock for $15, then found a second used one for $40. Accurate auto-focus and exposure. Killer lens.
Posted by: latent_image | Wednesday, 17 November 2010 at 05:48 AM
Olympus EP1 With Panasonic 20mm,a wonderful
available darkness camera.Mike,if you get
one of these or the EP2 body for your panasonic 20 your camera shake worries are over.
Posted by: Danny Chatham | Wednesday, 17 November 2010 at 05:56 AM
Panasonic GF1
Olympus RC
Nikon Coolpix S1 - the first camera I ever owned. Also, one of the first affordable "super-compact" digicams. No extending lens. Fit inside a deck of cards. Complain about the technical quality all you want, I always had this with me.
Posted by: D'11 | Wednesday, 17 November 2010 at 05:57 AM
I loved the GR1 series of film cameras. 28mm focal length, and that so slim and well-built body.
Also, a soft spot for the Optio S series cameras; primarily for sentimental reasons more than anything else.
I consider the Micro Four Thirds cameras and their ilk to be too large for small cameras. This includes the Sony NEX, since it's not quite so small with the lens.
Posted by: YS | Wednesday, 17 November 2010 at 05:57 AM
The iPhone 4.
Posted by: Geoffrey Meyer-van Voorthuijsen | Wednesday, 17 November 2010 at 06:07 AM
The Cosina SLR, in all of it's myriad variations.
I've owned the Ricoh KR-5sv, Nikon FM10, Olympus OM2000, Yashica FX-3 and Cosina CS-1 variations of this over the years (along with the closely related Voigtlander Bessa R). Sure it's a little plasticky but it combines a decent viewfinder, an excellent shutter and meter and a quite compact body into a low-cost package (sadly it's usually kitted with an awful 35-70 zoom that's not even usable as a paperweight).
My favourite version has to be the OM2000 for the added spot metering.
Posted by: Adam Maas | Wednesday, 17 November 2010 at 06:25 AM
Easily the Olympus OM-1. I've said it before, but give me this camera with a good full-frame digital sensor and maybe an LCD on the back and I'd be done forever. A beautiful example of camera design at its finest.
Posted by: Erik | Wednesday, 17 November 2010 at 06:26 AM
I'd have to say Canon Powershot G series -- which is why I'm so often writing about it/them in my blog, http://lightdescription.blogspot.com/
Current favorite is the latest: G12.
Posted by: Gordon Buck | Wednesday, 17 November 2010 at 06:32 AM
I still miss my Olympus Om2n
Posted by: Kevin Mayo | Wednesday, 17 November 2010 at 06:35 AM
Pentax MX + SMC Pentax-M 1:2.8 40mm pancake.
Posted by: savik | Wednesday, 17 November 2010 at 06:44 AM
If anyone is still reading, I love my
Contax G1. I planned to get a G2 if I liked the G1, but I liked it so much I never saw a reason to upgrade. None of that stealthy Leica stuff for me - everyone should know when you are focusing and when the film is advancing! I really liked, though did not truly love, my Canon G9 until it died. And, since I don't remember anyone mentioning the Sigma DP2s, I will say that there was at least one thing I loved about that camera in addition to its size - that Foveon image quality!
Posted by: Jeff Damron | Wednesday, 17 November 2010 at 06:46 AM
Stylus Epic turns up a lot, I see, and it's no wonder. Mine is broken, but I can't bring myself to toss it away.
I wanted to love the Rollei 35, but couldn't. Same with the Olympus 35RC, wanted to love it too, but in the end, it was just infatuation.
The Pentax MX came close to love. Very close.
I had a fling with a Fuji f31fd, but it was only physical, nothing lasting.
Posted by: Robert Roaldi | Wednesday, 17 November 2010 at 06:51 AM