We get traffic: On Sunday (it's still Sunday as I write this), TOP got 44,000+ visitors, which is our second-best traffic day in the past three months, and (I didn't actually check) almost certainly our best Sunday ever. And that's without a new post for Sunday—the excess is viral attention being paid to the "Letter for George" post, news of which appears to be wending its way through the tubes of the internets.
Unfortunately, a few people who aren't regular readers aren't grokking it. I've been called some names by people who don't come around here much. Occupational hazard, I guess. But 98% of readers seemed to understand.
We eat Himalayan: I'm happy to report that I got to eat lunch with my old friend, good friend, and very smart friend Ctein last Friday. He was in Madison for "WisCon," which sounds like Wisconsin without the sin but is actually a major feminist-themed science-fiction convention. We went out for Himalayan food at a Nepalese restaurant (a first for me—it was very good) with Ctein's friend Peggy, a mathematician and vocal artist. Believe it or not, it's been 13 years since Ctein and I have seen each other in person, so it was really a treat. Ctein is surely one of this particular galaxy's most interesting people.
We hit you up: It's that time of the month again. As I've mentioned before, hopefully not more than once a month, all this stuff doesn't write itself! If you want to help out, especially if you never have before, you can support TOP in one of three ways: make a direct donation, make a recurring donation—or just buy something for yourself from Amazon or B&H Photo using our links, which can always be found in the right-hand sidebar.
When you buy yourself something through our links, those two affiliates pay us a small commission out of their profits. You don't pay any more for your purchase, but everything you buy earns money for TOP, as long as you start from here when you actually make the purchase. (Items already in your Shopping Cart aren't counted—even if you linked from here when you put them in there.)
Of course, it would be nice if you bought yourself one of these (seriously, who buys those?), but, believe it or not, even buying something small helps out: the percentage we get for everything goes up as the item count goes up. A few notable anomalies on Amazon: we get a straight $25 for any computer purchase, no matter how large; MP3 songs do count; but Kindle books do not. Our highest commission, though—a whopping 10%—is on Kindle readers.
We find out fascinating facts about you: I have no idea how they know stuff like this, but at my friend Stephen Gandy's recommendation I went to one of those analytics sites today, and they say that, relative to the entire Universe of web users, TOP readers tend to be: 35 and older, male (that's photography in general—I believe TOP has more female readers than most photography sites), and—our strongest index—we have far more readers with post-graduate degrees than is average on the web.
We get the best comments: If you missed Jillian's poignant "Featured Comment" to the "P.S., but not to 'George'" post, be sure to go read it. I found it very touching, though tragic. What a thoughtful parting gift from her "camera hobbyist" husband, in several different ways.
Mike
Send this post to a friend
Note: Links in this post may be to our affiliates; sales through affiliate links may benefit this site. More...
Original contents copyright 2010 by Michael C. Johnston and/or the bylined author. All Rights Reserved.
Featured Comment by Tom Brenholts: "Regarding buying at B&H or Amazon through TOP; here's an easy way to do it without having to think. Enter the sites through TOP, then bookmark them. After that, any time you go to B&H or Amazon the link comes up as having entered through TOP. Here is what my browser shows: http://www.amazon.com/?tag=theonlinephot-20 Then, every time you buy anything from Amazon, the credit goes here. No fuss, no muss, no brain strain. Buy a book, credit here. Buy a gas grill, credit here. Buy the three howling wolves shirt, credit here. Buy a 7D (I did), credit here."
Mike replies: Thanks for that Tom. That does indeed work for Amazon, but I'm told it does not work for B&H Photo. With B&H, it's best to come here and click on the advertisement. That does the trick.
Some excellent news, and I echo your feeling about Jillian's comment.
Posted by: Bahi | Sunday, 30 May 2010 at 10:57 PM
A colleague of mine runs a website. He suggested the web site analytics probably use the age + gender information you provided in the your contract with the ISP (internet service provider).
Of course, if some else is using your internet account when reading TOP then the age + gender information may be incorrect.
Posted by: Sven W | Sunday, 30 May 2010 at 11:14 PM
Indeed, a very nice comment from Jillian.
Interestingly I dug out the tripod (second one I bought) for the first time in a while at the weekend, with a prime lens, and took this photo.
Posted by: Martin Doonan | Sunday, 30 May 2010 at 11:23 PM
Just to let you know that I enjoy your comments, stories and off-topic items very much and don't take any notice of those who can't appreciate a bit of tongue-in-cheek humour; (they probably don't understand it). Keep up the good work. Regards, David.
Posted by: David | Monday, 31 May 2010 at 12:04 AM
Jillian's comment hit a very tender spot in my heart, especially being a father of a 2 year old boy. My prayers go out to Jillian, her toddler, and her late husband.
Jaime
Posted by: Jim | Monday, 31 May 2010 at 12:53 AM
Presumably the 'feminist' theme to the sci-fi convention was intended by its organizers to dent the otherwise inevitable middle-aged, white, male demographic?
Posted by: James McDermott | Monday, 31 May 2010 at 01:25 AM
Dear James,
An entirely plausible hypothesis, but not correct. SF fans are predominantly middle-class (not middle-aged, as it happens), white males, but this convention was started, predominantly by women, 35 years ago to be just what it's billed as. It's probably the only SF convention where a majority of the attendees are women and there are substantial (though hugely in the minority) numbers of non-caucasians.
If any readers care, the convention URL is http://wiscon.info/
(come to think of it, that's the URL even if no reader cares).
pax / Ctein
Posted by: ctein | Monday, 31 May 2010 at 03:45 AM
Best wishes to Jillian (and her toddler).
And again, many thanks to Mike, not only for establishing such a nice site for us to share knowledge about photography, but for providing a good way to share our deep feeling. Thanks, Mike!
Posted by: Frank | Monday, 31 May 2010 at 05:52 AM
Do tell, what does a "vocal artist" do?
Posted by: Murray Lord | Monday, 31 May 2010 at 07:06 AM
Mike, TOP is the first I check every morning. Your George story is the one I keep reminding my son (he just got into photography.
Brilliant post...
Posted by: Abdul Rahman | Monday, 31 May 2010 at 08:36 AM
"I've been called some names by people"...
Mike, that's what you get for having a popular blog where you dare to write what you think, appreciate (or not), like (or not), share your perspective on life, photography and music related topics, give useful pointers, links and observations, spend thousands of hours a year doing that, and even invite guest writers, some of them going as far as offering more information from their own tests and research? How dare you offering all that for free and on your own blog?
(Ooops! I hope I don't also get some abuse for trying my poor sense of humor/humour on your blog...)
Posted by: Luc Novovitch | Monday, 31 May 2010 at 08:51 AM
Mike, thanks for pointing to Jillian's comment on the George post, I would have missed that. It is really touching, and I would love to see some of her pictures. Maybe others too.
Reminds me that I often miss a feature on TOP like "recent comments" as known from wordpress. Even better would be a box linking to "Mike's selection" or so. Because as it is now, older posts and especially their late comments suffer from digital obsolescence.
One more thing: do you really use tripods? I thought you are a handheld-kind-of-shooter.
Posted by: Andreas | Monday, 31 May 2010 at 10:29 AM
Did you go to Himal Chuli or Chautara? Himal Chuli is my favorite restraurant in Madison. Chautara's got similar food, but is fancier and more expensive.
Posted by: Chris Norris | Monday, 31 May 2010 at 10:49 AM
Hi Chris,
Himal Chuli. It was very good, and if I lived in Madison I'd go again.
One oddity--they wouldn't take a credit card; checks or cash only! I left a check on the table and we walked out. Now THAT'S unusual.
Mike
Posted by: Mike Johnston | Monday, 31 May 2010 at 11:05 AM
Chautara is or at least was run by the son of the woman who ran Himal Chuli. Himal Chuli was the first place I thought of when I read this post, and it was one of the restaurants we ate at last year when I visited Madison for the first time since moving to Toronto.
Posted by: mwg | Monday, 31 May 2010 at 11:45 AM
Dear Chris and Mike,
The next evening we went to Chautara. Only one data point for each, so it's hardly fair, but all five of us at the table thought that the kitchen at Himal Chuli was better (readers should understand that both are very good).
Based on this inadequate sampling, I'd not choose Chautara over Himal Chuli unless I needed to accomodate a larger party. Both recommended, though.
Side note: where I come from, we'd just call this a "Nepalese" restaurant. I don't know if "Himalayan" is a real gastronomic variant, or if they just call it that in case there are people who think, "Nepal? Where the hell is THAT?!"
pax / Ctein
Posted by: ctein | Monday, 31 May 2010 at 01:17 PM
Mike, it's a bit of an oddity, but there are a few places in Madison like that. The largest grocery store, Woodman's, does not take credit cards, and neither does my favorite coffee joint. I'm guessing it's because the fees are higher, but does it cost more business than it's worth? Who knows. However, the food and atmosphere is wonderful, so I'll continue to eat there. Also, there's an ATM right across the street.
Ctein - I'm not really sure. Perhaps it has more influence from non-Nepal yet Himalayan areas? I'll need a map for this.
Posted by: Chris Norris | Monday, 31 May 2010 at 03:27 PM
@ Mike
If I'm going to spend $28,999 on a lens I don't want any of that third-party junk ... only real Canon lenses for me!
(I'm kidding. I don't have $28,999, wouldn't spend it on a lens, and have nothing against Sigma or other third-party lenses.
I would prefer it to be some color other than that ugly green though....)
Oh, and for your demographic interest, I'm 22, male, and in the process of getting an undergraduate degree. I've been seriously interested in photography since I was 10.
@ Sven W.
//He suggested the web site analytics probably use the age + gender information you provided in the your contract with the ISP (internet service provider).//
Well, in that case, I'm 54, male, and do have a postgraduate degree, since the connection I'm using right now is "owned" by my dad....
(Maybe that makes advertisers think I'm a better prospect than I am, which would be OK. But while my dad has a lot more money to spend on camera equipment than I do, I'm more likely to spend money on it, so who is the better prospect, anyway?)
Posted by: Doug Newman | Monday, 31 May 2010 at 07:38 PM
Man, I miss Madison, and I miss Himal Chuli.
Smokey's, Madison's best steak house, is a cash-only establishment as well.
Posted by: Nick | Tuesday, 01 June 2010 at 08:38 AM
Nick,
Cash only doesn't surprise me as much as the fact that they take checks too. Most restaurants won't touch checks, for the simple reason that hunger will motivate even otherwise honest people to write bad checks.
Heck, credit cards were originally INVENTED for restaurants. The first modern credit card, the Diners Club card, was invented in 1950 by Frank X. McNamara after he forgot his wallet when he went out to dinner with friends.
Mike
Posted by: Mike Johnston | Tuesday, 01 June 2010 at 08:48 AM
If I've forgotten my wallet, I won't have my credit cards with me either, though; that origin story, despite being canonical, makes no sense.
Posted by: David Dyer-Bennet | Wednesday, 02 June 2010 at 12:59 PM