The Washington Post Company announced yesterday that Newsweek magazine is for sale.
Long one of the two leading U.S. weekly news magazines (with Time, its longtime rival, and trailed by U.S. News and World Report, now a monthly), Newsweek was first published in 1933 and was acquired by the Washington Post Company in 1961.
The magazine has faced mounting operating losses and declining revenue, while circulation has fallen from 3.14 million in the first half of 2000 to 1.97 million in the second half of last year, reports the New York Times. It received a major makeover one year ago this month.
The first Newsweek cover, from 1933
Also quoted in the Times: Charles Whitaker of the Northwestern University school of Journalism, who says, "The era of mass is over." There would be good and bad in that....
Mike
Send this post to a friend
Note: Links in this post may be to our affiliates; sales through affiliate links may benefit this site. More...
Original contents copyright 2010 by Michael C. Johnston and/or the bylined author. All Rights Reserved.
Featured Comment by Poagao: "Ah, this explains why I've been able to get so many photos published in Time and The New Yorker lately. I haven't come up in the world; they've just come down."
Mike replies: I don't know about that. You're good. Have you really had pictures in Time and The New Yorker?
Interestingly (?) I just read yesterday an article in my local daily paper about how, alone among the weeklies, "The Economist" was doing quite all right, and the article itself linked to a rather good piece by The Altlantic discussing TE vs Time and Newsweek. Maybe others would enjoy it.
Posted by: Ludovic | Thursday, 06 May 2010 at 09:51 AM
Newsweek's first issue came out on my birthday! I was -44 that year.
Posted by: JonA | Thursday, 06 May 2010 at 12:55 PM
Why is 'Newsweek' in quotes? Is it not really Newsweek that is for sale?
Posted by: David | Thursday, 06 May 2010 at 01:20 PM
James Fallows of the Atlantic has, as usual, an interesting analysis of Newsweek's positioning dilemma in the magazine market:
http://www.theatlantic.com/culture/archive/2010/05/a-note-on-newsweek-long-updated/56277/
Posted by: Richard T | Thursday, 06 May 2010 at 03:14 PM
David,
It's proper format style for a headline. Here's a "fer instance":
http://www.tnr.com/article/politics/backward-runs-newsweek
Mike
Posted by: Mike Johnston | Thursday, 06 May 2010 at 04:10 PM
I'm not a wide angle shooter, but I do appreciate Poagao's photos, which opened a distinctive view of the familiar world around me that I haven't seen.
Thanks to Poagao, and thanks to Mike.
Posted by: Frank | Friday, 07 May 2010 at 12:12 AM
Thanks, Frank and Mike. Yes, I have, but as I said, this doesn't have the same meaning as it might have in the heyday of these publications.
Posted by: Poagao | Friday, 07 May 2010 at 02:57 AM
JonA - indeed, my birthday too! Except I was negative 19. Guess I have a few years on you.
Posted by: Carl Blesch | Friday, 07 May 2010 at 09:33 AM
Newsweek is failing because the owners decided to change the editorial direction from objective news reporting to liberal advocacy. After all, it worked so well for Air America.
Oh, wait....
Posted by: ObiJohn | Tuesday, 11 May 2010 at 11:12 PM