Since the art critic Peter Schjeldahl has judged Henri Cartier-Bresson as being cold and without feeling—a charge I have to say I've never come across before, in years of reading about the photographer and his work—I thought I'd put in a cheer for a body of work that is undoubtedly suffused with feeling. In fact it might rank among the warmest, most affectionate, most quietly emotional picture books I've come across.
Sometimes, photography books aren't. On the surface, I Still Do: Loving and Living With Alzheimer's by Judith Fox might seem to be not a photography book, but a book about a disease, one of those specialty titles targeting a specific and defined demographic of people who are necessarily preoccupied, through no choice of their own, with a particular affliction or condition.
But it's not even that, really.
I noticed the book immediately on the "New Acquisitions" shelf at the local library because of its formally perfect and assured cover photo. (A painter would not do a better job of choosing that color palette.) And it is a photography book: Judith Fox is a committed photographer, and the foreword is a perceptive and helpful essay by Roy Flukinger, the distinguished Senior Curator of Photography and Film at the Harry Ransom Humanities Research Center at the University of Texas at Austin. Attention from Roy Flukinger is a good sign that you're dealing with something beyond the ordinary, photographically speaking.
The book is simple. It's an extended portrait of Edmund Ackell with Alzheimer's, by his wife, who has become his caregiver. It's definitely a two-way portrait: the presence of the photographer wife is every bit as vivid and well-illuminated as the sufferer husband. And the pictures are a quiet triumph, it seems to me. They make a song with no note out of place, economical, quiet, but extraordinary. Definitely in a minor key. Sad. The story is one of trouble and decline, confusion and anguish, and the tragedy that in the end belongs to us all. But it's also suffused with acceptance, affection, and real devotion.
It's kind of odd, in a way. First the book struck me as something more specific than just a book of photographs that anyone could enjoy: something narrowed down, specialized, directed at Alzheimer's families specifically. But as I looked at it, it lost that quality, and broadened out again, far past being "just" a photography book, and became a book about the human condition. Because the subject of the book, when you get down to it, is the love between a couple. A young husband and wife in the prime of life and the flush of health could look through this together and be deeply moved, I think.
If you ever doubted that plain photographs could contain love, show a feeling so deep as that, take a leisurely look through this, and see.
Mike
Note: Links in this post may be to our affiliates; sales through affiliate links may benefit this site. More...
Original contents copyright 2010 by Michael C. Johnston and/or the bylined author. All Rights Reserved.
May 12, 2010
Mike,
I was enormously touched by—and pleased by—your review of my book I Still Do: Loving and Living with Alzheimer's. I intended the work to be multi-layered...about loving, partnering, humor, mortality, illness and hope as well as Alzheimer's...and you understand that. Thank you very much for the beautiful and thoughtful review, as well as for helping to spread the word about a horrific disease that impacts individuals, families and communities.
With great appreciation,
Judith Fox
www.judithfox.com
Years ago I spent one month remodeling a nursing home dedicated to Alzheimer patients. It was heartbreaking to see these folks suffer and some at a surprisingly young age. In that month I was pulled off a step ladder by my back pockets, hit for no reason at all and called racial slurs that didn't fit my physical description.
It seems to strike females more then men. Two situations hit me hard. The first was a loud voice that echoed through the halls. It cried out in a rhythmic, never ending song. "Take away the orange juice I want milk" It would go on for an hour. At night when trying to sleep I had a hard time getting that chant out of my head.
I also remember a woman named Irene who walked up to the nurses desk when I happened to be working nearby. She slammed her shoe on the counter and in a insulted tone screamed. "I demand an explanation. You call this breakfast?" Later in a mental state closer to reality Irene with a tear in her eye told me about her condition and said it was hard. That really touched me to experience the real Irene for a short moment. The disease quickly claims them back again.
Posted by: MJFerron | Saturday, 17 April 2010 at 12:58 AM
Nice review but, please, it's "foreword", not "forward".
(This is the second time...)
Posted by: Robert Chapman | Saturday, 17 April 2010 at 05:10 AM
Mike, I'm surprised you said you never heard this kind of criticism of HCB before. I thought that at least what Robert Frank thought (and had said) about him was well known in the photography world. And I'm very, very sure this new article in the New Yorker isn't the first I saw where the author accused Cartier-Bresson of being more interested in the composition than in what he actually photographed.
Posted by: Edi Weitz | Saturday, 17 April 2010 at 08:49 AM
Mike:
On the coldness of Cartier-Bresson:
http://www.hidinginplainsight.mobi/2007/09/cartier-bresson.html
Cheers.
G
Posted by: G | Saturday, 17 April 2010 at 10:07 AM
My dear grandmother suffered from Alzheimer's. She had 16 grandchildren, and I was her favourite—we shared a special bond since I was born and she took care of me as a baby while my mother prepared entrance exams to become a teacher. Who could have predicted that 25 years later it would be me caring for her, as she became an infant herself.
It tore me inside to see her disappear, even though her body was still intact. I went away to start school in another country in the Autumn, and when I returned for Christmas a few short months later, the woman I found was no longer her; she was just a shell that once housed my dear grandmother.
I wish I had been into photography in the years prior, as now I would have tangible visual memories of her. Instead all I have are mental images, that one day may themselves be dissolved by the acid of Alzheimer's.
My father used to say that Alzheimer's was the most cruel of all diseases, because instead of affecting the diseased, it instead affected all those around them, for years.
I flipped through the pages in Ms Fox's book that Amazon lets us preview, and her love comes across. I confess I cried when I saw a portrait of her husband which to many may just be that, a portrait, but to me is the portrait of an illness—I recognised the look, it was one I saw on my grandmother's face often during those last few weeks before I left for school that fateful Autumn.
I will be ordering this book, Mike. But I don't expect it to be an entirely pleasurable experience to read through it. Cathartic, maybe; enjoyable, I doubt it.
But thank you.
Posted by: Miserere | Saturday, 17 April 2010 at 10:33 AM
Mike, your eloquent review of this book makes me want to see it; I'll search my library's catalog online. I'm sure photographing and putting the book together served a very therapeutic role for the photographer.
I'd like to point out a typo, if I may: "forward" should read "foreword." I always trip over that one myself.
Respectfully,
Rob
Posted by: Rob Atkins | Saturday, 17 April 2010 at 11:18 AM
Mike said:
"Peter Schjeldahl has judged Henri Cartier-Bresson of being cold and without feeling—a charge I have to say I've never come across before, in years of reading about the photographer and his work. . . "
I have come across this criticism before and Schjeldahl quoted it in his article: it was Robert Frank's "harsh but just" comment that “He traveled all over the goddamned world, and you never felt that he was moved by something that was happening other than the beauty of it, or just the composition.”
When I first saw this comment, it was shocking to me and surprising (I've always called Cartier-Bresson St. Henri; St Ansel?: not so much). But it shined a new light on the work and, in my opinion, it is accurate in a very telling way.
Posted by: Jeff Glass | Saturday, 17 April 2010 at 02:51 PM
Mike
Thank you for bringing this book to our attention. I plan on ordering it through your site later today or tomorrow.
My father, with whom I practiced law, who taught me how to swim as a child, and who bought me a Leica M6 a year before he died, died of metastatic prostate cancer almost 9 years ago. When the disease progressed, and before it spread to his brain, he permitted me to photograph him sparingly. As the cancer spread, he let me photograph him less and less (I understood why - a once vibrant and brilliant man could no longer remember how to use a tv remote control, could no longer swim his daily mile, or even walk the hall of his condo), though I wanted to photograph his struggles and battles even more.
My father never saw me marry and have children, but my wife and children are able to see and know him through photos that I took of him with the camera that he gave me as a present.
Watching him fight the good fight changed my life for the better as I was able to get a better understanding of the man he was, and why. It is just unfortunate that I couldn't document his life the way I wished, but it wasn't my life to document.
Yes, we had our disagreements, but he was still my father. And I miss him.
Posted by: Mikal W. Grass | Saturday, 17 April 2010 at 04:00 PM
Mike,
I like Peter Schjeldahl's work, I suppose I have read most of what he has written in the New Yorker. But he has some interesting quirks. One is that he despises any representational painting that does not include pavement, concrete, brick, steel, or the like. He seems to see no distinction between Andrew Wyeth and Thomas Kincaid.
I think HCB runs into this bias.
Doug Chadwick
Posted by: Doug Chadwick | Saturday, 17 April 2010 at 09:30 PM
For those interested in hearing about HCB from another perspective, it might also be a good idea to read John Malcolm Brinnin's book "Sextet" where he recounts a (seemingly very "interesting") tour through the US with Cartier-Bresson.
I'm with Jeff Glass in that, after having been a "fan" of HCB's work for a long time, these negative descriptions first surprised and kind of shocked me but then helped me to see his œuvre in a different light. I still think he's a towering figure and certainly one of the most important and influental photographers of all time, but he ain't a supernatural being and he had his flaws, too.
I felt more drawn towards photographers like Robert Frank or, to mention more recent ones, Paulo Nozolino and Klavdij Sluban before I heard the negative criticism of HCB's work, but with hindsight descriptions like "cold", "indifferent", or "detached" suddenly seemed fitting for a feeling I couldn't really put into words.
Posted by: Edi Weitz | Sunday, 18 April 2010 at 04:44 AM
When my mom entered a closed Alzheimer's unit, I had an opportunity to meet her companions and came to appreciate their personalities and struggles. Once when I wore a black turtleneck, an old women shuffled over and stood by my side. When my mom alerted me that she wanted to talk to me, I turned and Betty addressed me as Father and inquired why I was visiting that day. I had such fun practicing my brogue and asking her if she had made her Easter duty.
As I photographer, I had plans to try to make some strong black and white portraits of the residents, but my plans went down the tubes when I was inconveniently diagnosed with Hodgkin's Lymphoma. I recovered, Kathleen of course, didn't. A back yard snapshot does suffice quite nicely, however. http://www.flickr.com/photos/macwax/4531113150
Kathleen MacKechnie was a wonderful women. I will indeed give Judith Fox's book a look. Thank you for the reference Mike.
Posted by: John MacKechnie | Sunday, 18 April 2010 at 08:15 AM
My two cents: I am certainly not an 'expert' on this photographer but in most of the recorded interviews he comes across as a pedantic, irritable old man. Always referring to his true art, painting, of which no critic of any distinction has taken a notion. Don't underestimate the French capacity for looking at the world, and those who live in it, top down.
Posted by: peter | Sunday, 18 April 2010 at 09:08 AM
trying to bring this back to the main subject... you might be interested in hearing Judith Fox's interview on NPR's Fresh Air - link
Posted by: Michel | Monday, 19 April 2010 at 10:54 AM